View Full Version : Bledsoe?
Dawg Fan
09-10-2006, 06:32 PM
He had more int's than Td's and is slower than molasses on a cold day. I know its just one game but I say let Romo get a shot next week. He can't be any worse than Bledsoe. Bad reads all day. :mad:
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 06:35 PM
He had more int's than Td's and is slower than molasses on a cold day. I know its just one game but I say let Romo get a shot next week. He can't be any worse than Bledsoe. Bad reads all day. :mad:
He threw a TD to Witten but it got called back due to a pass interference penaly.(Dammit, I needed that TD for my fantasy team. :mad: )
Dawg Fan
09-10-2006, 06:37 PM
He threw a TD to Witten but it got called back due to a pass interference penaly.(Dammit, I needed that TD for my fantasy team. :mad: )
Me too:mad: I have Witten and Glen on mine:mad:
Miss Kitty
09-10-2006, 06:42 PM
Well the guy I was playing had him too. But I would have rather the Boys gotten the points and me loose FF than the Boys lose. :(
Reaganrattler07
09-10-2006, 06:48 PM
He had more int's than Td's and is slower than molasses on a cold day. I know its just one game but I say let Romo get a shot next week. He can't be any worse than Bledsoe. Bad reads all day. :mad:
Yes, yes, throw Romo in against us!!!!:D
Dawg Fan
09-10-2006, 06:56 PM
Yes, yes, throw Romo in against us!!!!:D
might as well, Bledsoe couldn't beat the redskins last year anyway. Romo would give us a better chance IMO
Miss Kitty
09-10-2006, 07:02 PM
I actually have Drew for FF. I didn't play him but he acutally scored more points that the QB I did play. :(
Reaganrattler07
09-10-2006, 07:02 PM
might as well, Bledsoe couldn't beat the redskins last year anyway. Romo would give us a better chance IMO
Lol, maybe....course if Bledsoe hears Phillip Daniels is starting at DE, he may sit out....after what happened last year. (Daniels had a career night sacking Bledsoe)
Reaganrattler07
09-10-2006, 07:03 PM
I actually have Drew for FF. I didn't play him but he acutally scored more points that the QB I did play. :(
You play Favre?
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 07:15 PM
I actually have Drew for FF. I didn't play him but he acutally scored more points that the QB I did play. :(
Who did you play?
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 07:17 PM
Me too:mad: I have Witten and Glen on mine:mad:
Hey Glenn got 81 yards but not having a TD from him and Witten hurt you.
Miss Kitty
09-10-2006, 07:18 PM
You play Favre?
Who did you play?
Nope but I do have him. I played Hasselbeck.
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 07:22 PM
Nope but I do have him. I played Hasselbeck.
Yeah I have Hasselbeck too. He will bounce back next week. I also have Leftwich who I should of played because he scored 16.4 compaired to Hasselbeck's 6.3
drgnXman
09-10-2006, 07:29 PM
Me too:mad: I have Witten and Glen on mine:mad:
not to smart of a fantasy player gettin to WR threats that are on the same team... its like gettin walter and mcmahon, only one can breakout each week...
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 07:31 PM
not to smart of a fantasy player gettin to WR threats that are on the same team... its like gettin walter and mcmahon, only one can breakout each week...
I have Leftwich and Jones but I probably won't play them together.
drgnXman
09-10-2006, 07:35 PM
I have Leftwich and Jones but I probably won't play them together.
gotta love em both, matt will always get hot late in the game, but with wilford and williams all being tall also his redzone TD goes down from last year with jimmy his accomplice.
lefty is solid, doesnt get sacked much bc he is huge and is a great developing QB.
how about alex smith today? along with vernon davis and frank gore...wow
Reaganrattler07
09-10-2006, 08:24 PM
Nope but I do have him. I played Hasselbeck.
Ah, bad choice, bad choice
Dawg Fan
09-10-2006, 08:46 PM
not to smart of a fantasy player gettin to WR threats that are on the same team... its like gettin walter and mcmahon, only one can breakout each week...
It was an auto draft, I had no choice. I ranked all the players but there is 16 teams in my league. I did get Riggie Bush who I think will get me tons of points before all is said and done.
Matthew 2000 Eagle
09-10-2006, 09:21 PM
Bledsoe had horrible reads. I've NEVER seen Bledsoe play that horrible. Oh, and I also think that the Cowboys played one hell of a team also. Jacksonville is a VERY good team and they're one of the best at disguising their defense. Another thing, what took so freakin' long to open up the offense and throw down field?
backthepack
09-10-2006, 09:23 PM
When is Bledsoe going to retire for god's sake...to me, he is just a burden on the team and I think with some exp., Romo would be a hell of a ball player.
Matthew 2000 Eagle
09-10-2006, 09:27 PM
When is Bledsoe going to retire for god's sake...to me, he is just a burden on the team and I think with some exp., Romo would be a hell of a ball player.
Romo will be a hell of a ball player, but the year isn't over yet.
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 09:34 PM
Ah, bad choice, bad choice
Hasselbeck is better than Bledsoe.
DragonBand06
09-10-2006, 09:39 PM
Sssss H H Aaa Nn N K K !!!
S H H A A N N N K K !!!
Sssss Hhhhh Aaaaa N N N Kk !!!
S H H A A N N N K K
Sssss H H A A N Nn K K !!!
DragonBand06
09-10-2006, 09:39 PM
Sssss H H Aaa Nn N K K !!!
S H H A A N N N K K !!!
Sssss Hhhhh Aaaaa N N N Kk !!!
S H H A A N N N K K
Sssss H H A A N Nn K K !!!
Well that looked really cool until I posted it...:rolleyes:
Matthew 2000 Eagle
09-10-2006, 10:26 PM
I wonder if the folks in Carolina and Seattle are screaming for Hasselbeck and Delhomme's heads.
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 10:27 PM
I wonder if the folks in Carolina and Seattle are screaming for Hasselbeck and Delhomme's heads.
Well Delhomme struggled because he didn't have Steve Smith to throw to.
drgnXman
09-10-2006, 10:32 PM
Well Delhomme struggled because he didn't have Steve Smith to throw to.
bledsoe struggled because bledsoe sucks:mad:
TexasRed6x
09-10-2006, 10:34 PM
bledsoe struggled because bledsoe sucks:mad:
I hear you on that one.
gtown04
09-11-2006, 02:33 AM
bledsoe struggled because bledsoe sucks:mad:
I dont think he sucks, because he wouldnt be the starting QB for the Dallas Cowboys if he sucked. He had a bad game, actually a very bad 3 quarters. Does anyone know if he is injured? The sideline reporter kept saying that he was stretching out, and throwing some warm-up passes in the 3rd and 4th quarters.
And its not like he's playing against a chump defense. The Jacksonville Jaguars were 12-4 last season for a reason.
GoOwls
09-11-2006, 02:39 AM
I dont think he sucks, because he wouldnt be the starting QB for the Dallas Cowboys if he sucked. He had a bad game, actually a very bad 3 quarters. Does anyone know if he is injured? The sideline reporter kept saying that he was stretching out, and throwing some warm-up passes in the 3rd and 4th quarters.
And its not like he's playing against a chump defense. The Jacksonville Jaguars were 12-4 last season for a reason.
BINGO, again!!!!!
No, really, Bledsoe did appear to be in discomfort since that play he dove for the first down and got popped in the back. We may see Romo earlier than expected.
Matthew 2000 Eagle
09-11-2006, 09:33 AM
Like I stated in another thread, the Cowboys played a darn good football team that can contend for the AFC South title and possibly a Super Bowl title. Looking at the Jaguars across the board as a full team, and we're looking at a team that's not getting the props they deserve for being a good team. This was the main reason I didn't want the 'Boys going undefeated in preseason.
SVite
09-11-2006, 12:13 PM
Well the guy I was playing had him too. But I would have rather the Boys gotten the points and me loose FF than the Boys lose. :(]
:p Amen SISTA......
SVite
09-11-2006, 12:18 PM
Like I stated in another thread, the Cowboys played a darn good football team that can contend for the AFC South title and possibly a Super Bowl title. Looking at the Jaguars across the board as a full team, and we're looking at a team that's not getting the props they deserve for being a good team. This was the main reason I didn't want the 'Boys going undefeated in preseason.
That, and theirs not much film on the revamped jags reciever core, until now.
It used to be Jimmy Smith , left, and Jimmy smith right. The NFL coaches will have a new book on them now.
Matthew 2000 Eagle
09-11-2006, 05:25 PM
That, and theirs not much film on the revamped jags reciever core, until now.
It used to be Jimmy Smith , left, and Jimmy smith right. The NFL coaches will have a new book on them now.
Correct, and their number 1, 2, and 3 recievers are 6-5 and up.:eek:
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.