View Full Version : 26-5A football, the most competitive District in the GAME
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 07:37 PM
Well...maybe not, maybe yes lol. That is for you to decide.
Now, back to what I want to say...
5A has posted alot of players from Macarthur on their "06 players to watch list"
Mac also after this year proves they can have some contention now in the district....but will the they actually make noise this upcoming year?
Personally, I know their coaching and their program (I have lots of football friends who go there) I don't think they have a well equipped coaching staff or good program for that matter....
Now Judson, Madison, and Smithson Valley. 3 teams that have very consistent programs with Madison being the least prestigeous out of them.
How do you think they will look for next year? From MY inside view of Madison. (I play JV) I was told that the upcoming JV to Varisity squad is the most talented they've seen in years. Madison's JV also won district and whooped Judsons and SV's *** doing so. So this begs the question...will Madisons new Varisty squadron do some damage in the district?
Feel free to post your thoughts on this district.
P.S- Judson looks like a team that is falling, but I believe that they will rebound for next year.
SeguinMatadors
03-09-2006, 07:52 PM
Well...maybe not, maybe yes lol. That is for you to decide.
Now, back to what I want to say...
5A has posted alot of players from Macarthur on their "06 players to watch list"
Mac also after this year proves they can have some contention now in the district....but will the they actually make noise this upcoming year?
Personally, I know their coaching and their program (I have lots of football friends who go there) I don't think they have a well equipped coaching staff or good program for that matter....
Now Judson, Madison, and Smithson Valley. 3 teams that have very consistent programs with Madison being the least prestigeous out of them.
How do you think they will look for next year? From MY inside view of Madison. (I play JV) I was told that the upcoming JV to Varisity squad is the most talented they've seen in years. Madison's JV also won district and whooped Judsons and SV's *** doing so. So this begs the question...will Madisons new Varisty squadron do some damage in the district?
Feel free to post your thoughts on this district.
P.S- Judson looks like a team that is falling, but I believe that they will rebound for next year.
I think SV is already in. I think Churchill will get in for sure if Fanuzzi stays healthy. I think Reagan, Mac, Judson, and Madison are going to have to fight it out for the final two playoff spots. If I had to guess now... I would go with Judson and Reagan. I see a down year this year for Madison... they won't be a bad team and would make the playoffs in almost any district in the state... just not this one.... not this year.
I
clemensbuff
03-09-2006, 08:04 PM
Well...maybe not, maybe yes lol. That is for you to decide.
Now, back to what I want to say...
5A has posted alot of players from Macarthur on their "06 players to watch list"
Mac also after this year proves they can have some contention now in the district....but will the they actually make noise this upcoming year?
Personally, I know their coaching and their program (I have lots of football friends who go there) I don't think they have a well equipped coaching staff or good program for that matter....
Now Judson, Madison, and Smithson Valley. 3 teams that have very consistent programs with Madison being the least prestigeous out of them.
How do you think they will look for next year? From MY inside view of Madison. (I play JV) I was told that the upcoming JV to Varisity squad is the most talented they've seen in years. Madison's JV also won district and whooped Judsons and SV's *** doing so. So this begs the question...will Madisons new Varisty squadron do some damage in the district?
Feel free to post your thoughts on this district.
P.S- Judson looks like a team that is falling, but I believe that they will rebound for next year.
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a190/scarface6590/madison.jpg
Rebound and do what, win another state title? All they did this year is play in the Championship game!
I've said that I believe that Judson will never be the Judson of old (dominating everyone in the region for 20+ years) but I do believe that year in and year out they will still be a top team in the SA area. I have nothing but praise for Rackley, his staff, and those kids for what the accomplished last year. When I watched Churhill man-handle them that night at Judson Stadium, I gave them up for dead.
As for Madison next year, they have some big holes to fill on both sides of the ball. If those holes get filled by kids that can get it done then I'd say Madison is in for a good year. Good luck next year.
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 08:12 PM
Rebound and do what, win another state title? All they did this year is play in the Championship game!
I've said that I believe that Judson will never be the Judson of old (dominating everyone in the region for 20+ years) but I do believe that year in and year out they will still be a top team in the SA area. I have nothing but praise for Rackley, his staff, and those kids for what the accomplished last year. When I watched Churhill man-handle them that night at Judson Stadium, I gave them up for dead.
As for Madison next year, they have some big holes to fill on both sides of the ball. If those holes get filled by kids that can get it done then I'd say Madison is in for a good year. Good luck next year.
Well, true, Judson did make a comback at the end of the year. But if they have another fall out like last time, I can't see them doing that same comeback. But no doubt, Rackley and Judson have a great program. Madison though will fill the holes. Not sure about QB yet...but our RB is a beast. Very strong,very fast, and very young.
TexasRed6x
03-09-2006, 08:15 PM
Madison year in and year out will be solid, but they will never win a state championship with Streety as a head coach. I have nothing bad to say about him, it is just an opinion. I also think that Churchill is being overlooked and will return some on the top players in the city next year. SV will be SV to good of a coach not to make the playoffs. As for Judson, I don't have a true feel, they have some good skill players coming back, but I think the jV had a down year so it could be a problem. I do not think they will stay in a funk to long in 3 years they will have around 4,200 kids again and raising hell in the city. So I would say to most enjoy this season, because double trouble will be happening in a stadium near you in the future.
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 08:23 PM
Madison year in and year out will be solid, but they will never win a state championship with Streety as a head coach. I have nothing bad to say about him, it is just an opinion. I also think that Churchill is being overlooked and will return some on the top players in the city next year. SV will be SV to good of a coach not to make the playoffs. As for Judson, I don't have a true feel, they have some good skill players coming back, but I think the jV had a down year so it could be a problem. I do not think they will stay in a funk to long in 3 years they will have around 4,200 kids again and raising hell in the city. So I would say to most enjoy this season, because double trouble will be happening in a stadium near you in the future.
lol, I can see Madison winning a state championship one year with Streety. They have always just been there, just never could really clinch the game though. I forgot which year it was, but it was SV vs Madison, and Madison if they won had a good chance of making it to State. Poor Madison though gave up a field goal in the last seconds....
That was when we had that amzing RB though, and we did a bunch of trick plays on offense.
TexasRed6x
03-09-2006, 09:04 PM
lol, I can see Madison winning a state championship one year with Streety. They have always just been there, just never could really clinch the game though. I forgot which year it was, but it was SV vs Madison, and Madison if they won had a good chance of making it to State. Poor Madison though gave up a field goal in the last seconds....
That was when we had that amzing RB though, and we did a bunch of trick plays on offense.
Like I said I think your team will be solid as always, but will not make to the finals and that what it is all about. Some teams talk about getting into the playoffs, while a few talk about the finals.
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 09:10 PM
Like I said I think your team will be solid as always, but will not make to the finals and that what it is all about. Some teams talk about getting into the playoffs, while a few talk about the finals.
k chill out....lol
Madison always makes the playoffs and its not like the coaches goals are just to make the playoffs....
if that were the case, then any coach who had that mindset would be fired.
TexasRed6x
03-09-2006, 09:17 PM
k chill out....lol
Madison always makes the playoffs and its not like the coaches goals are just to make the playoffs....
if that were the case, then any coach who had that mindset would be fired.
Maverick you talked about your coaching staff telling you that this was the best group he as seen, or something like that. Did you really think he would of told you that you guys stink and that he thought the season would be terrible. You did come on here and ask how the race would shape up, did you not. Since you are new you should expect to get some answers you like and some you won't, so be prepared for it and the best thing is to have thick skin or at times this board will tear you up. I have no hate toward the Mavericks, they are year in and year out a solid team, I see no difference this year.
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 09:28 PM
Maverick you talked about your coaching staff telling you that this was the best group he as seen, or something like that. Did you really think he would of told you that you guys stink and that he thought the season would be terrible. You did come on here and ask how the race would shape up, did you not. Since you are new you should expect to get some answers you like and some you won't, so be prepared for it and the best thing is to have thick skin or at times this board will tear you up. I have no hate toward the Mavericks, they are year in and year out a solid team, I see no difference this year.
Damn, stop, I'm not saying I'm mad at your opinion or anything! I was just saying that it's obvious that any coach/staff who have that mindset would be fired by now. Also, If we sucked, I don't think they would have said we were the best JV team they've seen in a while. They won district champions, and have very talented players from what I have seen with my own eyes. They are a very disciplined team, so yes I think I can believe my coaches when they say that this could be the best JV team they've seen.
lol and stop acting like these boards are hard or something.....it's just football
TexasRed6x
03-09-2006, 09:47 PM
Damn, stop, I'm not saying I'm mad at your opinion or anything! I was just saying that it's obvious that any coach/staff who have that mindset would be fired by now. Also, If we sucked, I don't think they would have said we were the best JV team they've seen in a while. They won district champions, and have very talented players from what I have seen with my own eyes. They are a very disciplined team, so yes I think I can believe my coaches when they say that this could be the best JV team they've seen.
lol and stop acting like these boards are hard or something.....it's just football
Then you answered your own question, Madison will be a very disciplined awesome team, after all the JV was 10-0 so good luck to you.
BIGrNtx12
03-09-2006, 09:58 PM
Madison will look strong in the beginning of they year like always, but come crunch time they will crumble like the teams before them. Oh by the way, it's JV, who cares?
SeguinMatadors
03-09-2006, 10:00 PM
Madison will look strong in the beginning of they year like always, but come crunch time they will crumble like the teams before them. Oh by the way, it's JV, who cares?
No, this year they will open up with a loss.:D
MaverickDefense
03-09-2006, 10:03 PM
Madison will look strong in the beginning of they year like always, but come crunch time they will crumble like the teams before them. Oh by the way, it's JV, who cares?
who cares...? ummm just maybe the fact that JV is the guys who fill the Varsity's holes......
and all Varisty players have to start from somewhere....
DEE DEE DEE
Primetime536
03-09-2006, 11:38 PM
most competitive,,,,what a joke
SeguinMatadors
03-09-2006, 11:47 PM
most competitive,,,,what a joke
I am pretty sure you are the joke... hands down the best district in the state.
most competitive,,,,what a joke
lol i cant get enough of this guy he makes me laugh me and prime get into it but the above post is the reason why and the cussing at me :(
Well...maybe not, maybe yes lol. That is for you to decide.
Now, back to what I want to say...
5A has posted alot of players from Macarthur on their "06 players to watch list"
Mac also after this year proves they can have some contention now in the district....but will the they actually make noise this upcoming year?
Personally, I know their coaching and their program (I have lots of football friends who go there) I don't think they have a well equipped coaching staff or good program for that matter....
Now Judson, Madison, and Smithson Valley. 3 teams that have very consistent programs with Madison being the least prestigeous out of them.
How do you think they will look for next year? From MY inside view of Madison. (I play JV) I was told that the upcoming JV to Varisity squad is the most talented they've seen in years. Madison's JV also won district and whooped Judsons and SV's *** doing so. So this begs the question...will Madisons new Varisty squadron do some damage in the district?
Feel free to post your thoughts on this district.
P.S- Judson looks like a team that is falling, but I believe that they will rebound for next year.
the whole jv thing is weird. the 08 team for SV had never lost a game until that one. but then again rios was playing on the varsity and the game proly would have been the other way if he was on jv
SeguinMatadors
03-09-2006, 11:56 PM
the whole jv thing is weird. the 08 team for SV had never lost a game until that one. but then again rios was playing on the varsity and the game proly would have been the other way if he was on jv
Rios= nothing!
Rios= nothing!
lol im going to tell him you said that you better hope he doesnt play seguin now he will have it out for them
SeguinMatadors
03-10-2006, 12:01 AM
lol im going to tell him you said that you better hope he doesnt play seguin now he will have it out for them
lol... if Trent meets the Matadors I will make sure he meets Desmond Jackson and Marcus Richardson.... and that should be the last we hear of him.:D
lol... if Trent meets the Matadors I will make sure he meets Desmond Jackson and Marcus Richardson.... and that should be the last we hear of him.:D
lol ok tell them to meet him in the end zone or after the game if they want an autograph i dont think he would have time during the game you know :D
SeguinMatadors
03-10-2006, 12:06 AM
lol ok tell them to meet him in the end zone or after the game if they want an autograph i dont think he would have time during the game you know :D
lol... by the end of the game... he will just be injured and washed up like his older brother... lmao... nah jk dude... low blow.
lol... by the end of the game... he will just be injured and washed up like his older brother... lmao... nah jk dude... low blow.
LMAO ouch real low that was just wrong dude
clemensbuff
03-10-2006, 07:58 AM
most competitive,,,,what a joke
WAKE UP GUY! There is not another district in the state that has this many quality teams in it. There are at least 3 teams every year at home come playoff time that in almost any other district in the state would be playing in week 11.
clemensbuff
03-10-2006, 08:03 AM
Madison year in and year out will be solid, but they will never win a state championship with Streety as a head coach. I have nothing bad to say about him, it is just an opinion. I also think that Churchill is being overlooked and will return some on the top players in the city next year. SV will be SV to good of a coach not to make the playoffs. As for Judson, I don't have a true feel, they have some good skill players coming back, but I think the jV had a down year so it could be a problem. I do not think they will stay in a funk to long in 3 years they will have around 4,200 kids again and raising hell in the city. So I would say to most enjoy this season, because double trouble will be happening in a stadium near you in the future.
Could this possibly be because of the many sophomores that were sucked up by Wagner this past year??? That's what I've been trying to say for the last 7 months! Wagner will impact Judson for a good while to come, if not forever, and anybody who says different is just not real bright! No different than Steel effecting Clemens.
bubbacoach
03-10-2006, 10:12 AM
They are the strongest district in the State in almost every sport.
TexasRed6x
03-10-2006, 07:18 PM
Could this possibly be because of the many sophomores that were sucked up by Wagner this past year??? That's what I've been trying to say for the last 7 months! Wagner will impact Judson for a good while to come, if not forever, and anybody who says different is just not real bright! No different than Steel effecting Clemens.
Always have and will be a huge fan, but for some reason this season, will be much different for Judson. Yes Wagner will and has had an impact, but after the year we should know just how much.
lonny23
03-11-2006, 01:42 AM
Well, true, Judson did make a comback at the end of the year. But if they have another fall out like last time, I can't see them doing that same comeback. But no doubt, Rackley and Judson have a great program. Madison though will fill the holes. Not sure about QB yet...but our RB is a beast. Very strong,very fast, and very young.
Judson will still be a good team next year. I have no complaints about last year.
lonny23
03-11-2006, 01:43 AM
Madison year in and year out will be solid, but they will never win a state championship with Streety as a head coach. I have nothing bad to say about him, it is just an opinion. I also think that Churchill is being overlooked and will return some on the top players in the city next year. SV will be SV to good of a coach not to make the playoffs. As for Judson, I don't have a true feel, they have some good skill players coming back, but I think the jV had a down year so it could be a problem. I do not think they will stay in a funk to long in 3 years they will have around 4,200 kids again and raising hell in the city. So I would say to most enjoy this season, because double trouble will be happening in a stadium near you in the future.
I don't see Streety winning a title, either.
lonny23
03-11-2006, 01:46 AM
most competitive,,,,what a joke
It's the best district.
SVite
03-11-2006, 10:08 PM
WAKE UP GUY! There is not another district in the state that has this many quality teams in it. There are at least 3 teams every year at home come playoff time that in almost any other district in the state would be playing in week 11.
Also there is 9 teams this year!It`s gonna be a district grind.....
SVite
03-11-2006, 10:15 PM
Rios= nothing!
Exactly....There are teams that need their sophmores on Varsity,that wouls have been playing on the JV.Yes,it`s a good sign to have a dominate JV team,but it does`nt mean it will translate into victories on the Varsity level.
SVite
03-11-2006, 10:23 PM
lol im going to tell him you said that you better hope he doesnt play seguin now he will have it out for them
Hows Trents leg doing?Is he hittin the weights?Is he getting faster?;) I sure hope Coach Hill can get him the football out in the flats next year!Can you ask your brother what he thinks the offensive line will look like? (Typical or huge SV line)
I know,i sound like a reporter,but you got inside info,!:p
Hows Trents leg doing?Is he hittin the weights?Is he getting faster?;) I sure hope Coach Hill can get him the football out in the flats next year!Can you ask your brother what he thinks the offensive line will look like? (Typical or huge SV line)
I know,i sound like a reporter,but you got inside info,!:p
yeah his leg has been good since last week of football season. he will be fine hes in track right now and doing very well. and the o line will be one of the biggest ever in SV. i dont thinkk they will be as good as the 2002 line that corey clarck was a part of but next year they have a chance to be the best in the state.
SVite
03-12-2006, 06:57 PM
yeah his leg has been good since last week of football season. he will be fine hes in track right now and doing very well. and the o line will be one of the biggest ever in SV. i dont thinkk they will be as good as the 2002 line that corey clarck was a part of but next year they have a chance to be the best in the state.
Wow!Good news.....That means young and strong!Good combination....Is trent running 100m in track?
svcenter53
03-15-2006, 10:44 AM
Well...maybe not, maybe yes lol. That is for you to decide.
Now, back to what I want to say...
5A has posted alot of players from Macarthur on their "06 players to watch list"
Mac also after this year proves they can have some contention now in the district....but will the they actually make noise this upcoming year?
Personally, I know their coaching and their program (I have lots of football friends who go there) I don't think they have a well equipped coaching staff or good program for that matter....
Now Judson, Madison, and Smithson Valley. 3 teams that have very consistent programs with Madison being the least prestigeous out of them.
How do you think they will look for next year? From MY inside view of Madison. (I play JV) I was told that the upcoming JV to Varisity squad is the most talented they've seen in years. Madison's JV also won district and whooped Judsons and SV's *** doing so. So this begs the question...will Madisons new Varisty squadron do some damage in the district?
Feel free to post your thoughts on this district.
P.S- Judson looks like a team that is falling, but I believe that they will rebound for next year.
I dont care what anyone says last year SV, Judson, and madison made it to the playoffs and the only reason madison lost was becuase they faced another 26-5a opponent if anyone else besides lee from 25-5a makes it to the playoffs (Regan, Mac, Churchill, or Rossevelt) They definitly would do better than most teams anywhere else....26-5A is the toughest district in the toughest state in the world for high school football....But if the best of the best have to some out im going to go with Smithson Valley to prvail once again!
Slim-Rob
03-15-2006, 11:33 AM
I see it like this:
1st: SV-7-1
2nd: Judson-7-1
3rd: Churchill-5-3
4th (t): Reagan-3-5
4th (t): Wagner-3-5
4th (t): Madison-3-5
4th (t): Macarthur-3-5
8th: Roosevelt-1-7
9th: Lee-0-8
LP_FAN_in_Plano
03-15-2006, 12:54 PM
26-5A is the most competitive district............ in region 4. But how well do you think any 26-5A team would do in another distrct outside of region 4?
SeguinMatadors
03-15-2006, 01:18 PM
26-5A is the most competitive district............ in region 4. But how well do you think any 26-5A team would do in another distrct outside of region 4?
There are 5-6 teams in 26-5a that could make the playoffs in any district in the state.
bubbacoach
03-15-2006, 01:47 PM
Most district's champs would have a hard time making the playoffs in 26-5A.
Slim-Rob
03-15-2006, 02:14 PM
26-5A is the most competitive district............ in region 4. But how well do you think any 26-5A team would do in another distrct outside of region 4?
All but Lee would win 80% of district games or more. SV, Madison, Judson, Reagan= District champs in most other districts.
Gridiron Gopher
03-15-2006, 02:20 PM
26-5A is the most competitive district............ in region 4. But how well do you think any 26-5A team would do in another distrct outside of region 4?
I think they would do just fine. 265a is the toughest district out there. If you put SV, Madison and Judson from last years team in region 1,2 or 3 I have no doubt all three would have made the playoffs.
I would tell you if Reagan, Churchill or MacArthur would have been in 255a or 275a they would have been in the playoffs as well. Head to head matchups favored 265a in those districts. All six of these teams would have made the playoffs in the other regions but the bottom 3 might have had trouble in some of the top districts in the other regions. There are some very good districts in the other regions as well.
Slim-Rob
03-15-2006, 02:46 PM
I think they would do just fine. 265a is the toughest district out there. If you put SV, Madison and Judson from last years team in region 1,2 or 3 I have no doubt all three would have made the playoffs.
I would tell you if Reagan, Churchill or MacArthur would have been in 255a or 275a they would have been in the playoffs as well. Head to head matchups favored 265a in those districts. All six of these teams would have made the playoffs in the other regions but the bottom 3 might have had trouble in some of the top districts in the other regions. There are some very good districts in the other regions as well.
Good post.
Some people just have no clue...
LP_FAN_in_Plano
03-16-2006, 08:17 AM
All but Lee would win 80% of district games or more. SV, Madison, Judson, Reagan= District champs in most other districts.
I really doubt Madison, Judson or SV would have been district champs in the following districts from last year. 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 22, and 23, that is roughly 46% of the districts in regions 1, 2, and 3. So your statement about winning districts in most other districts still rings true. 80% wont cut it in the districts were the top teams in the other regions play. In districts 6 or 12 from last year any one of the four you listed more than likely would have been fighting for the last playoff spot. 26-5A made a great run in the playoffs this last year and beat some good teamsf rom the other regions, but last year I do not believe they would make it out of regionals in regions 1 and 2, especially in Division 2. SV may be the exception, but it is doubtful they beat Lufkin or SLC.
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 08:48 AM
It's pretty easy to stick a team in the semi-finals every year when you are the ONLY district with competitive teams in the whole region. Hell, if your district DOESN'T put a team in the semi's in both divisions each year, it's an upset. Geeze, it sure would be nice to get cake walk games to the semis each year, but no, we and every other district in Region 2 get the opportunity to beat up on each other all the way to the semis. Arguably, your guys are in much better condition to win late playoff games due to the lack of competition outside your district in your region. However, what happens more often than not, someone from Region 2 wins state anyway. Why, they've already seen the best teams in the state, week in and week out, and nothing that comes from Region 4 scares anybody any more. Sorry to break up this "San Antonio area love fest", but why don't you win something, recently, before you start proclaiming yourself the best?
You guys are starting to sound like some Longview boosters.:D
SVite
03-16-2006, 08:59 AM
It's pretty easy to stick a team in the semi-finals every year when you are the ONLY district with competitive teams in the whole region. Hell, if your district DOESN'T put a team in the semi's in both divisions each year, it's an upset. Geeze, it sure would be nice to get cake walk games to the semis each year, but no, we and every other district in Region 2 get the opportunity to beat up on each other all the way to the semis. Arguably, your guys are in much better condition to win late playoff games due to the lack of competition outside your district in your region. However, what happens more often than not, someone from Region 2 wins state anyway. Why, they've already seen the best teams in the state, week in and week out, and nothing that comes from Region 4 scares anybody any more. Sorry to break up this "San Antonio area love fest", but why don't you win something, recently, before you start proclaiming yourself the best?
You guys are starting to sound like some Longview boosters.:D
I thought this was about district!The playoffs are after district!Just thought you might be on the wrong thread!:confused:
LoneRocket
03-16-2006, 09:07 AM
It's pretty easy to stick a team in the semi-finals every year when you are the ONLY district with competitive teams in the whole region. Hell, if your district DOESN'T put a team in the semi's in both divisions each year, it's an upset. Geeze, it sure would be nice to get cake walk games to the semis each year, but no, we and every other district in Region 2 get the opportunity to beat up on each other all the way to the semis. Arguably, your guys are in much better condition to win late playoff games due to the lack of competition outside your district in your region. However, what happens more often than not, someone from Region 2 wins state anyway. Why, they've already seen the best teams in the state, week in and week out, and nothing that comes from Region 4 scares anybody any more. Sorry to break up this "San Antonio area love fest", but why don't you win something, recently, before you start proclaiming yourself the best?
You guys are starting to sound like some Longview boosters.:D
District 26 is the most competitive week in and week out because of the multiple number of power programs in the district. We (Judson) also play top teams across the state in non-district, our play-off reps are already battle tested going into the playoffs. Some districts have maybe two or three “programs” in their districts. It would be nice if WE had a cake walk thru district and then WE could be well rested for the playoffs.
It's pretty easy to stick a team in the semi-finals every year when you are the ONLY district with competitive teams in the whole region. Hell, if your district DOESN'T put a team in the semi's in both divisions each year, it's an upset. Geeze, it sure would be nice to get cake walk games to the semis each year, but no, we and every other district in Region 2 get the opportunity to beat up on each other all the way to the semis. Arguably, your guys are in much better condition to win late playoff games due to the lack of competition outside your district in your region. However, what happens more often than not, someone from Region 2 wins state anyway. Why, they've already seen the best teams in the state, week in and week out, and nothing that comes from Region 4 scares anybody any more. Sorry to break up this "San Antonio area love fest", but why don't you win something, recently, before you start proclaiming yourself the best?
You guys are starting to sound like some Longview boosters.:D
same story diff. person. region 4 is a cake walk :rolleyes:. everyone else plays tuff people so so they have people hurt but not region 4 teams :( (sniff sniff).
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:12 AM
I thought this was about district!The playoffs are after district!Just thought you might be on the wrong thread!:confused:
Reading comprehension should be a class you take. The title of the thread is "26 5A football, the most competitive District in the state"......correct? The only way to judge that is playoff results against the other 3 regions.........right? How about we do just that?
Over the last 10 years, Region 4 has 8 state finals appearances in either Division I or Division II, and has come away with 1 (one) state title. Region 2 has 14 state title appearances over the same 10 year span, and has 11 state titles. Our region has 3 more state titles than your region has title game appearances over the same span of time.
Now let's talk rings. 11 to 1 isn't a pretty ratio over the last ten years....is it?
Let's see, to sumate, in 20 games over the last 10 years, Region 2 has played in 14 of them and won 11.
OK........you guys got a really tough district......I guess not tough enough though......huh?
Reading comprehension should be a class you take. The title of the thread is "26 5A football, the most competitive District in the state"......correct? The only way to judge that is playoff results against the other 3 regions.........right? How about we do just that?
Over the last 10 years, Region 4 has 8 state finals appearances in either Division I or Division II, and has come away with 1 (one) state title. Region 2 has 14 state title appearances over the same 10 year span, and has 11 state titles. Our region has 3 more state titles than your region has title game appearances over the same span of time.
Now let's talk rings. 11 to 1 isn't a pretty ratio over the last ten years....is it?
Let's see, to sumate, in 20 games over the last 10 years, Region 2 has played in 14 of them and won 11.
OK........you guys got a really tough district......I guess not tough enough though......huh?
here we are back to the rings again. This is a never ending cycle.............
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:19 AM
here we are back to the rings again. This is a never ending cycle.............
Win some meaningful games and it won't be.....or just shut up till you do.
Win some meaningful games and it won't be.....or just shut up till you do.
lol so because we have won games that you dont think is meaningful we have to shut up.......................i dont think so. im sorry that im not going to listen to a fan of another school and stop talking just because he this his crap doesnt stink.
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:27 AM
lol so because we have won games that you dont think is meaningful we have to shut up.......................i dont think so. im sorry that im not going to listen to a fan of another school and stop talking just because he this his crap doesnt stink.
YOU and your cronies are the ones with all the hollow chatter. If you don't like people sticking facts that contradict your spoutings in your face, don't make the unsubstantiated claims. Using recent history, you have a very competitive district, but no state powers. There are a lot of districts, including mine, that can claim that. Yours in the only one on this board, at the present time, that had fans proclaiming greatness that has no recent substantiation.
Ususally all chest pounding does is give you a sore chest.
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 09:28 AM
here we are back to the rings again. This is a never ending cycle.............
It is My opinion, that they have playoff games to see who wins rings>LMAO:confused:
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:32 AM
It is My opinion, that they have playoff games to see who wins rings>LMAO:confused:
Kids......:D ..........huh, Grayowl?
YOU and your cronies are the ones with all the hollow chatter. If you don't like people sticking facts that contradict your spoutings in your face, don't make the unsubstantiated claims. Using recent history, you have a very competitive district, but no state powers. There are a lot of districts, including mine, that can claim that. Yours in the only one on this board, at the present time, that had fans proclaiming greatness that has no recent substantiation.
Ususally all chest pounding does is give you a sore chest.
lol i dont care what facts you think back you up really. im not going to say that we are not the tuffest on the state because well.............. we are the tuffest in the state. i mean really if you dont think we are so good why do come into this thread worrying about it. the great garland owls won state 7 years ago and that is impressive but do you know how long 7 years is. but really tell me of one team that can beat judson or Sv from district 10-5a.
and no our chest are not soe because we dont play anyone tuff so we are healthy enough to take it :rolleyes:
Kids......:D ..........huh, Grayowl?
lol yeah im the kid and im not the one using words as cronies and telling people to shut up. man i hate being at the bottom of the ladder in this world :rolleyes:
It is My opinion, that they have playoff games to see who wins rings>LMAO:confused:
and in my opinion teams from 26-5 go deep in the playoff every year to try to get those rings. but that is becasue we have it easy that is why we get so far year in and year out :rolleyes: . but i know the one judson won a couple years back doesnt count.
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:40 AM
lol yeah im the kid and im not the one using words as cronies and telling people to shut up. man i hate being at the bottom of the ladder in this world :rolleyes:
Listen to some older folks and learn something and you won't be anymore.:D
Listen to some older folks and learn something and you won't be anymore.:D
ok ill listen to you and tell people to shut up.something i havent done it since 8th grade and name calling................. man i cant wait to grow up and be mature like that
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:47 AM
lol i dont care what facts you think back you up really. im not going to say that we are not the tuffest on the state because well.............. we are the tuffest in the state. i mean really if you dont think we are so good why do come into this thread worrying about it. the great garland owls won state 7 years ago and that is impressive but do you know how long 7 years is. but really tell me of one team that can beat judson or Sv from district 10-5a.
and no our chest are not soe because we dont play anyone tuff so we are healthy enough to take it :rolleyes:
I wasn't the bragging about our title in 1999. It's ancient history, we need to do it again. I also didn't start and perpetuate a thread about 10-5A's dominance with no facts to support it. It's because I didn't want to get laughed off this board. You guys, however, are looking pretty hollow right now with all the bragging and no facts (rings) to support it.
Would 26-5A blow out my Garland schools? Who knows, we will never know. I do know this, the Garland district champions would be in the 3rd or 4th round every year too, if we had your competion in our region.
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 09:51 AM
ok ill listen to you and tell people to shut up.something i havent done it since 8th grade and name calling................. man i cant wait to grow up and be mature like that
The shut up comment was for a specific point. If you don't like getting these facts blown up in your face, then "shut up" and I won't have any reason to pound you with them. It's just plan common sense.......something very lacking around here.
BTW, I can tell you are yearning for maturity. It comes with time, not desire.
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 09:54 AM
Listen to some older folks and learn something and you won't be anymore.:D
Opinions, as they say are, are like axx holes, ALMOST everybody has one, except some can back up those opinions with, duh....RINGS. If some of these powerhouse wannabes ever do get a ring, OMG we will never hear the end of it.
I wasn't the bragging about our title in 1999. It's ancient history, we need to do it again. I also didn't start and perpetuate a thread about 10-5A's dominance with no facts to support it. It's because I didn't want to get laughed off this board. You guys, however, are looking pretty hollow right now with all the bragging and no facts (rings) to support it.
Would 26-5A blow out my Garland schools? Who knows, we will never know. I do know this, the Garland district champions would be in the 3rd or 4th round every year too, if we had your competion in our region.
if you think so that is the wonders of this board to have your own opinion but dont be imature and call people names and tell the to shut up for theres. and the only point the shut up comment got across was that i am agruing with a older man the is not very mature for his age.
Opinions, as they say are, are like axx holes, ALMOST everybody has one, except some can back up those opinions with, duh....RINGS. If some of these powerhouse wannabes ever do get a ring, OMG we will never hear the end of it.
glad to here your opinion my mature elder adult
The shut up comment was for a specific point. If you don't like getting these facts blown up in your face, then "shut up" and I won't have any reason to pound you with them. It's just plan common sense.......something very lacking around here.
BTW, I can tell you are yearning for maturity. It comes with time, not desire.
yes and im so glad a man of your status is teaching me what a good example you give in this world
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 10:22 AM
yes and im so glad a man of your status is teaching me what a good example you give in this world
How convenient of you to turn this on me. Again, I wasn't making the the baseless claims, you guys were. I was just pointing out your errors.
You're welcome, by the way, you should have to pay for this knowledge.:D
BTW, thanks for the give up. Send the trophy for the victory to my WORK address.
How convenient of you to turn this on me. Again, I wasn't making the the baseless claims, you guys were. I was just pointing out your errors.
You're welcome, by the way, you should have to pay for this knowledge.:D
I havent turned anything you did with your childish comments and your sarcasum is not helping you look any better by the way.
BTW, thanks for the give up. Send the trophy for the victory to my WORK address.
lol the give up wow i hope people see this one. my point has been made thank you for that. :D man that was eaiser than i thought it would be i didnt even have to try to prove my point you did it yourself with that comment
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 10:27 AM
How convenient of you to turn this on me. Again, I wasn't making the the baseless claims, you guys were. I was just pointing out your errors.
You're welcome, by the way, you should have to pay for this knowledge.:D
BTW, thanks for the give up. Send the trophy for the victory to my WORK address.
LOL! Let him rave Go, your dealing with a scurge on the earth these days; a child with a keyboard:D
LOL! Let him rave Go, your dealing with a scurge on the earth these days; a child with a keyboard:D
lol a child now. man i just wish i am as sucessful as you when i am older. us college kids are just the downfall of this world lol
come on guys think you can do it make yourself look worse than you already do
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 10:45 AM
come on guys think you can do it make yourself look worse than you already do
"Rave on" (Buddy Holly):rolleyes:
"Rave on" (Buddy Holly):rolleyes:
lol i knew you could do it............good boy
LP_FAN_in_Plano
03-16-2006, 10:52 AM
Most district's champs would have a hard time making the playoffs in 26-5A.
Last season if any one of the following SLC, Lufkin, Euless Trinty, and Katy had been in 26-5A they would not only make the playoffs but would have ran the table in district. Now Longview, North Shore, Plano, Abilene, Copperas Cove, and John Tyler would have made the playoffs and may or may not have ran the table indistrict but would have probably been district champs.Garland, I-Mac, Spring Westfield and South Grand Prairie would make the playoffs. 26-5A plays some good ball, the best in region 4. Just not the best in the state. Put any two of teams I listed in 26-5A last year and Judson and Madison are setting home for the playoffs.
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 10:56 AM
lol i knew you could do it............good boy'
Getting the last word is very important to you, evidently> ok....go.
Last season if any one of the following SLC, Lufkin, Euless Trinty, and Katy had been in 26-5A they would not only make the playoffs but would have ran the table in district. Now Longview, North Shore, Plano, Abilene, Copperas Cove, and John Tyler would have made the playoffs and may or may not have ran the table indistrict but would have probably been district champs.Garland, I-Mac, Spring Westfield and South Grand Prairie would make the playoffs. 26-5A plays some good ball, the best in region 4. Just not the best in the state. Put any two of teams I listed in 26-5A last year and Judson and Madison are setting home for the playoffs.
I agree but he said most districts not all SLC,lufkin,trinity, and katy are only three districts out of 32. but the other teams you listed i dont think would would have won the district the past 2 years who knows what could have happened though
Eagle81
03-16-2006, 03:11 PM
I agree but he said most districts not all SLC,lufkin,trinity, and katy are only three districts out of 32. but the other teams you listed i dont think would would have won the district the past 2 years who knows what could have happened though
Abilene may not have won that district last year but the year before they not only win it they dominate it.
Slim-Rob
03-16-2006, 04:45 PM
Since we are talking most competitive DISTRICT in the state:
Strength of Schedule (opponent record)
#1 Judson District 26-5A
#4 Madison District 26-5A
#5 Smithson Valley 26-5A
#39 SA Reagan
#48 SA MacArthur
#56 SA Roosevelt
#62 SA Lee
#63 SA Churchill
Strength of Schedule (opponent rating)
#1 Converse Judson
#5 SA Reagan
#11 Smithson Valley
#13 SA Madison
#18 SA MacArthur
#21 SA Churchill
#32 SA Lee
#34 SA Roosevelt
Strength of District by Rating
#1 12-5A
#2 26-5A
#3 3-5A
#4 6-5A
#5 5-5A
Strength of District by Record
#1 3-5A
#2 26-5A
#3 23-5A
#4 32-5A
#5 6-5A
2006 Realignment(districts according to 06 realignment, average rating per team)
The average rating for a team in 26-5A is 181.01 without SA Lee and 177.51 with Lee included. Wagner does not have a rating because they have not played varsity football yet...
The average rating for a team in 5-5A is 164.9 (thats with SLC's 208.62 rating)
The average rating for a team in 12-5A is 177.87
The average rating for a team in 3-5A is 174.37
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 04:58 PM
I havent turned anything you did with your childish comments and your sarcasum is not helping you look any better by the way.
Child, I don't give a rats' patoot how I appear on this board. You can pose and posture all you want. I just called a spade a spade. If you don't like a mouthful of toes for dinner, don't open up your yap with baseless claims and allow someone to shove your foot in your mouth for you. I told the truth and gave facts to support my position, something I would hope a college student would have learned by now. A hypothesis is just excess gas until you can back it up with factual evidence. I'm sorry you were unable to successfully attack my positions with fact and instead used your whining and personal attacks about my maturity and board integrity. The poeple on here who like me and respect my opinions know who they are and enjoy my mutual respect. You are not in that group, but I'm leaving the door open in hopes you will mature.
As for my sarcasm, as you get older you will learn to appreciate well placed, intelligent sarcasm. It's a form of release after having raised 6 kids with a mouth just like yours. I wish I was around when you get the pleasure of being condescended to by a wet-eared kid.
Enjoy your youth.:eek:
LP_FAN_in_Plano
03-16-2006, 05:02 PM
Since we are talking most competitive DISTRICT in the state:
Strength of Schedule (opponent record)
#1 Judson District 26-5A
#4 Madison District 26-5A
#5 Smithson Valley 26-5A
#39 SA Reagan
#48 SA MacArthur
#56 SA Roosevelt
#62 SA Lee
#63 SA Churchill
Strength of Schedule (opponent rating)
#1 Converse Judson
#5 SA Reagan
#11 Smithson Valley
#13 SA Madison
#18 SA MacArthur
#21 SA Churchill
#32 SA Lee
#34 SA Roosevelt
Strength of District by Rating
#1 12-5A
#2 26-5A
#3 3-5A
#4 6-5A
#5 5-5A
Strength of District by Record
#1 3-5A
#2 26-5A
#3 23-5A
#4 32-5A
#5 6-5A
2006 Realignment(districts according to 06 realignment, average rating per team)
The average rating for a team in 26-5A is 181.01 without SA Lee and 177.51 with Lee included. Wagner does not have a rating because they have not played varsity football yet...
The average rating for a team in 5-5A is 164.9 (thats with SLC's 208.62 rating)
The average rating for a team in 12-5A is 177.87
The average rating for a team in 3-5A is 174.37
Good research but where did you get your numbers from?
grayowl60
03-16-2006, 05:19 PM
Child, I don't give a rats' patoot how I appear on this board. You can pose and posture all you want. I just called a spade a spade. If you don't like a mouthful of toes for dinner, don't open up your yap with baseless claims and allow someone to shove your foot in your mouth for you. I told the truth and gave facts to support my position, something I would hope a college student would have learned by now. A hypothesis is just excess gas until you can back it up with factual evidence. I'm sorry you were unable to successfully attack my positions with fact and instead used your whining and personal attacks about my maturity and board integrity. The poeple on here who like me and respect my opinions know who they are and enjoy my mutual respect. You are not in that group, but I'm leaving the door open in hopes you will mature.
As for my sarcasm, as you get older you will learn to appreciate well placed, intelligent sarcasm. It's a form of release after having raised 6 kids with a mouth just like yours. I wish I was around when you get the pleasure of being condescended to by a wet-eared kid.
Enjoy your youth.:eek:
LMAO!...GO OWLS!;)
Slim-Rob
03-16-2006, 05:23 PM
Good research but where did you get your numbers from?
texasfootballratings.com
dragonsdaddy
03-16-2006, 05:27 PM
i have wrestled with the ignorance past any semblance of pleasure. he's an almost decent excuse for returning to corporal punishment. he makes me appreciate the good kids i raised and their polite, intelligent friends. he is also the perfect reason to use the ignore function on this site. "never argue with idiots. they'll bring you down to their level and they've had a lot more practice."
Slim-Rob
03-16-2006, 05:28 PM
i have wrestled with the ignorance past any semblance of pleasure. he's an almost decent excuse for returning to corporal punishment. he makes me appreciate the good kids i raised and their polite, intelligent friends. he is also the perfect reason to use the ignore function on this site. "never argue with idiots. they'll bring you down to their level and they've had a lot more practice."
...who? me? or coolestkidever?
dragonsdaddy
03-16-2006, 05:30 PM
...who? me? or coolestkidever?
definitely not you. sorry for the mixup.
Slim-Rob
03-16-2006, 05:31 PM
definely not you. sorry for the mixup.
'Tis cool. I have used the ignore function before. It just puts their name to say they posted, but doesn't show their post. The only time you see their post is when someone quotes them.
HAHA. I quoted you before you could fix your spelling mistake :D
Firebird
03-16-2006, 10:11 PM
Reading comprehension should be a class you take. The title of the thread is "26 5A football, the most competitive District in the state"......correct? The only way to judge that is playoff results against the other 3 regions.........right? How about we do just that?
Over the last 10 years, Region 4 has 8 state finals appearances in either Division I or Division II, and has come away with 1 (one) state title. Region 2 has 14 state title appearances over the same 10 year span, and has 11 state titles. Our region has 3 more state titles than your region has title game appearances over the same span of time.
Now let's talk rings. 11 to 1 isn't a pretty ratio over the last ten years....is it?
Let's see, to sumate, in 20 games over the last 10 years, Region 2 has played in 14 of them and won 11.
OK........you guys got a really tough district......I guess not tough enough though......huh?
Wrong, bucko. Region 4 has won 3 state titles in 10 years:
1995 Converse Judson (D1)- We just came off the 2005 season.
1996 Austin Westlake (D2) -- Westlake was moved to Region II in the last realingment, was in Region IV. They couldn't have been in Region II in 1996, because they beat Abilene Cooper for the title, if they were in II they would have met in the semis.
2002 Converse Judson (D1)
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 11:05 PM
Wrong, bucko. Region 4 has won 3 state titles in 10 years:
1995 Converse Judson (D1)- We just came off the 2005 season.
1996 Austin Westlake (D2) -- Westlake was moved to Region II in the last realingment, was in Region IV. They couldn't have been in Region II in 1996, because they beat Abilene Cooper for the title, if they were in II they would have met in the semis.
2002 Converse Judson (D1)
Double wrong bucko, back to ya'. I went back 10 years as was stated in my example. The 1995 season is 11 years......doesn't count. Please use your fingers and do the math. Austin Westlake was in Region 2 when we clobbered them on our state champioship run in 1999, and had been for a while. I don't have the time or inclination to do the research, but I bet Westlake was Region 2 most of those 10 years.
But so what, 11 to 2 is STILL a horrible ratio and certainly nothing to brag about, much less start some sort of superiority thread over.
Next!
Firebird
03-16-2006, 11:11 PM
I know that Westlake was just realigned into Region II in the last alignment. My Cardinals lost to them in the quarterfinals. In any case, it is another championship for Region IV.
You also have to take into condsideration that in the other Regions, the best teams are not all concentrated into one district. Often, a 26-5a team would be the class of another region, but they already lost in the quarters.
In the pas ELEVEN years Judson, Roosevelt, and Smithson Valley have all played in a state title game, and two of those teams have won the title. Plus, if the region IV is so weak, why does our champ so often beat the Region III champ, with teams out of Houston and the surrounding area, the hottest D-1 recruiting ground in the state.
GoOwls
03-16-2006, 11:35 PM
I know that Westlake was just realigned into Region II in the last alignment. My Cardinals lost to them in the quarterfinals. In any case, it is another championship for Region IV.
You also have to take into condsideration that in the other Regions, the best teams are not all concentrated into one district. Often, a 26-5a team would be the class of another region, but they already lost in the quarters.
In the pas ELEVEN years Judson, Roosevelt, and Smithson Valley have all played in a state title game, and two of those teams have won the title. Plus, if the region IV is so weak, why does our champ so often beat the Region IV champ, with teams out of Houston and the surrounding area, the hottest D-1 recruiting ground in the state.
Well, I wasn't the one who started or propogated a thread about how superior 26-5A is, all I was doing is showing that they are the only district in that region that has done anything.....period....and that the lower level of competition in that region has aided them in getting to the semi-final rounds as much as they have. I would lave to play the competition that 26-5A gets on the way to the Region championship. Like I said much earlier, there are any number of teams that go out in round 1 or 2 in Regions 1 and 2 that would be state semi-finalists, like the teams from 26-5A, if they were in that region. A good portion of 26-5A's success has to be attributed to the 3 or 4 rounds of "byes" that they draw in the playoffs every year. You are well rested and ready to outperform teams that have had to battle top to bottom talent each week for 4 weeks prior to that and are tired.
To ignore the competitive imbalance that 26-5A enjoys on the way through the playoffs each year is rediculous. The fact that Region 2 holds an 11 to 2 edge in titles over the last 10 years is further proof that Region 2 is vastly superior to Region 4, considering the imbalance and the advantage for Region 4 that they must face.
Firebird
03-16-2006, 11:50 PM
Come to think of it, after reviewing the region II state championship listing, I'll be deviled if I can find 11 state championships for Region II in the past 10 years. There must have been some crazy realigment, because I count 4 Region II teams that have won state over the last 10 years:
2004 Tyler Lee
2001 Lufkin
2001 Mesquite
1999 Garland
You owe me 7 state titles. I'm not saying that there wasn't that drastic of realignment, but you are going to have to show me.
Firebird
03-16-2006, 11:59 PM
Now I am quite sure that your 11 state titles for region II are BS.
There have been 20 state title games (one for each division) played over the past 10 years:
Midland Lee (Region I) has won 3
Southlake Carroll (Region I) has won 3
Katy (Region 3) has won 3
There are 9 non-region II titles right there.
Throw in :
Converse Judson's (Region 4) 1 title
North Shore (Region 3) 1 title
Euless Trinity (Region 1) 1 title.
I am already at 12 titles right there. There are not 11 left for Region II to win.
Child, I don't give a rats' patoot how I appear on this board. You can pose and posture all you want. I just called a spade a spade. If you don't like a mouthful of toes for dinner, don't open up your yap with baseless claims and allow someone to shove your foot in your mouth for you. I told the truth and gave facts to support my position, something I would hope a college student would have learned by now. A hypothesis is just excess gas until you can back it up with factual evidence. I'm sorry you were unable to successfully attack my positions with fact and instead used your whining and personal attacks about my maturity and board integrity. The poeple on here who like me and respect my opinions know who they are and enjoy my mutual respect. You are not in that group, but I'm leaving the door open in hopes you will mature.
As for my sarcasm, as you get older you will learn to appreciate well placed, intelligent sarcasm. It's a form of release after having raised 6 kids with a mouth just like yours. I wish I was around when you get the pleasure of being condescended to by a wet-eared kid.
Enjoy your youth.:eek:
lol you are arguing with an 18 year old and you think you have acomplished something in life....... well whatever makes you happy i guess and why didnt you reply to the facts the rocket posted i see he shoves a foot in your mouth and you have nothing to say
i have wrestled with the ignorance past any semblance of pleasure. he's an almost decent excuse for returning to corporal punishment. he makes me appreciate the good kids i raised and their polite, intelligent friends. he is also the perfect reason to use the ignore function on this site. "never argue with idiots. they'll bring you down to their level and they've had a lot more practice."
aaaa hahaha you disagree with someone and they get all but hurt. if you cant take a shot its ok ill try to be a little nicer in later discussions just to not hurt you feelings. and what is with the drying im going to press the ignore button on anyone that makes me mad :(. and its good you raised these kids i hope they didnt get picked on to much in highschool lol
GoOwls
03-17-2006, 12:20 AM
lol you are arguing with an 18 year old and you think you have acomplished something in life....... well whatever makes you happy i guess and why didnt you reply to the facts the rocket posted i see he shoves a foot in your mouth and you have nothing to say
Nope, I have plenty to say, just getting my facts together.
First, to Firebird, thanks for pointing out my advanced case of old age. In my haste to shut up the kid I made a critical error. I accidentally grouped the Metroplex schools into Region 2 without thinking about the fact that some on the west side of the Metroplex are actually in Region 1. My mistake and I, unlike somebody who is the coolest kid ever, will freely admit my error. In my mind the Metroplex is one Region, that's just how I think. I still think that I have proved my preponderance of evidence and my point about 26-5A's competitive advantage is still a factually inarguable point.
Actually, I didn't have Lufkin in my group since I had forgotten that they were in Region 2 at the time they won. Mesquite in 2001 is the Region 2 team you missed. The others I included were E. Trinity in 05, Southlake in 05, 04, 02, Duncanville in 98, Lewisville in 96, and Flower Mound Marcus in 97.
Yes, most of those are or were Region 1 teams, but my point is still intact since Region 1 and 2 have to play what comes up out of 3 and 4 for the state title. I just apologize for the fact that I let my regional myopic view allow me to make the mistake I made. However, I think my point still rings true, in spite of my error. 26-5A is on an island in region 4.
Firebird
03-17-2006, 12:26 AM
I am not disputing that 26-5a is an island in a sea of Region 4 mediocrity. I still maintain that top to bottom, you will not find more quality teams in a single district in the rest of the state. Not since the glory days of the Little SWC.
Nope, I have plenty to say, just getting my facts together.
First, to Firebird, thanks for pointing out my advanced case of old age. In my haste to shut up the kid I made a critical error. I accidentally grouped the Metroplex schools into Region 2 without thinking about the fact that some on the west side of the Metroplex are actually in Region 1. My mistake and I, unlike somebody who is the coolest kid ever, will freely admit my error. In my mind the Metroplex is one Region, that's just how I think. I still think that I have proved my preponderance of evidence and my point about 26-5A's competitive advantage is still a factually inarguable point.
Actually, I didn't have Lufkin in my group since I had forgotten that they were in Region 2 at the time they won. Mesquite in 2001 is the Region 2 team you missed. The others I included were E. Trinity in 05, Southlake in 05, 04, 02, Duncanville in 98, Lewisville in 96, and Flower Mound Marcus in 97.
Yes, most of those are or were Region 1 teams, but my point is still intact since Region 1 and 2 have to play what comes up out of 3 and 4 for the state title. I just apologize for the fact that I let my regional myopic view allow me to make the mistake I made. However, I think my point still rings true, in spite of my error. 26-5A is on an island in region 4.
point out what error i have made in this thread please
GoOwls
03-17-2006, 12:41 AM
I am not disputing that 26-5a is an island in a sea of Region 4 mediocrity. I still maintain that top to bottom, you will not find more quality teams in a single district in the rest of the state. Not since the glory days of the Little SWC.
Now there, you may have a point. I could go there with you. I had a problem with the kids last night and today boasting how they were so superior to the other regions, I just had to jump in.
GoOwls
03-17-2006, 12:44 AM
point out what error i have made in this thread please
Your inability to face reality and you can't spell "sarcasm". :D
Your inability to face reality and you can't spell "sarcasm". :D
so i dont agree with your opinion and and dont check my spelling all the time...........sorry but that was weak you can do better
GoOwls
03-17-2006, 12:50 AM
so i dont agree with your opinion and and dont check my spelling all the time...........sorry but that was weak you can do better
So can you, and that WAS my original point.
So can you, and that WAS my original point.
lol what was that we have a diff. opinion ok good point but then you start taking shots at people and cant take them back
SeguinMatadors
03-17-2006, 12:59 AM
Come on now guys... this is getting petty.
Come on now guys... this is getting petty.
sure is
GoOwls
03-17-2006, 02:01 AM
I can't take a shot.......get real. I believe you were the one who got bent when someone challenged the 26-5A kingdom....known as Region 4. I've taken shots from some of the best on here......no offense.....but you have a way to go yet to get in their league.
You're really an OK kid, I just like to point out irregularities in peoples' arguments....and you have many. But you will get better.
I can't take a shot.......get real. I believe you were the one who got bent when someone challenged the 26-5A kingdom....known as Region 4. I've taken shots from some of the best on here......no offense.....but you have a way to go yet to get in their league.
You're really an OK kid, I just like to point out irregularities in peoples' arguments....and you have many. But you will get better.
this coming from the guy that got all bent out of shape when someone made fun of the numbers in his name............ and i didnt care about you saying region 4 was not good its the way you said it i found it to be rude but i might have been wrong i guess
Slim-Rob
03-17-2006, 01:18 PM
I love stats....
I love stats....
he didnt reply to them did he? and not to start anything i just really want to know what you think about it since we are past the whole name calling i hope
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.