View Full Version : Since the Federal Government is SOLELY responsible for illegal immigrants...
mad_fan
07-29-2010, 09:19 PM
I'd favor ALL local, city, county, and state agencies billing the responsible party for ALL costs of their people...
cyfallsbooster2
07-29-2010, 09:24 PM
If they want to take the lead.....let them?
dragonsdaddy
07-29-2010, 09:26 PM
I'd favor ALL local, city, county, and state agencies billing the responsible party for ALL costs of their people...
no, they are better at delineating the responsibility and the obligations of other entities to carry out their mandates and fiats, than they are in funding them.
Mong Hu
07-30-2010, 01:09 AM
I'd favor ALL local, city, county, and state agencies billing the responsible party for ALL costs of their people...
My question is it ok to be a sanctuary city then? I mean isn't that kind of like having their own immigration policy?
mojotrain
07-30-2010, 11:15 AM
My question is it ok to be a sanctuary city then? I mean isn't that kind of like having their own immigration policy?
The answer to your question is a question. Is the defination of "sanctuary city" covered in the federal laws of immigration? No? Then you see where we are?
Fact is, a nation that was once set apart because of laws, is no longer. A nation that was once set apart by those laws and enforced by those we commission to protect and enforce, are now meaningless and stymied by a new modern definition of the word FREEDOM. The word FREEDOM only works for those with conscience. A trait totally lacking in near half of the USA population and 99 percent of todays elected body and subsequently those who have elected them. Furthermore those without conscience have elected those without conscience therefore freedon now means your are free to do whatever you wish to do and laws be dammed.
In todays America, coruption has begat coruption. Greed has begat greed. Lawyers begat judges and finally lawyers and judges interpret and rule on laws to propogate more wealth for those in the business of law.
I've never voted for a lawyer for any office reguardless of the party. They have the same level of esteem in my view of "conscience level" as that of 99 percent of car dealers, and 99 percent of auto repair shops.
Is that a answer you might be seeking?
dragonsdaddy
07-30-2010, 11:21 AM
The answer to your question is a question. Is the defination of "sanctuary city" covered in the federal laws of immigration? No? Then you see where we are?
Fact is, a nation that was once set apart because of laws, is no longer. A nation that was once set apart by those laws and enforced by those we commission to protect and enforce, are now meaningless and stymied by a new modern definition of the word FREEDOM. The word FREEDOM only works for those with conscience. A trait totally lacking in near half of the USA population and 99 percent of todays elected body and subsequently those who have elected them. Furthermore those without conscience have elected those without conscience therefore freedon now means your are free to do whatever you wish to do and laws be dammed.
In todays America, coruption has begat coruption. Greed has begat greed. Lawyers begat judges and finally lawyers and judges interpret and rule on laws to propogate more wealth for those in the business of law.
I've never voted for a lawyer for any office reguardless of the party. They have the same level of esteem in my view of "conscience level" as that of 99 percent of car dealers, and 99 percent of auto repair shops.
Is that a answer you might be seeking?unless your desires run counter to the ruling party" beliefs/agendas. then you don't even need to be breaking a law before the bureaucratic mafia shuts you down. and if that isn't enough, the irs has even better agents.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.