PDA

View Full Version : How about those giants


Dawg Fan
11-01-2009, 02:43 PM
30-7 philly at the half:eek: ROTFLMAO!!!!:notworthy

this could be one of the all time great football weekends....regular season of course

15Adragon
11-01-2009, 03:06 PM
30-7 philly at the half:eek: ROTFLMAO!!!!:notworthy

this could be one of the all time great football weekends....regular season of course

Good news (Giants) / Bad news (Eagles)

Dawg Fan
11-01-2009, 03:48 PM
Good news (Giants) / Bad news (Eagles)

when we beat the Eagles next week all will be right in the world.;)

15Adragon
11-01-2009, 05:45 PM
when we beat the Eagles next week all will be right in the world.;)

Yes. Here is a thought provoking question... Would you trade the Cowboys receivers for the Eagles?

smw358
11-01-2009, 09:38 PM
30-7 philly at the half:eek: ROTFLMAO!!!!:notworthy

this could be one of the all time great football weekends....regular season of course

I don't know what the Giants are up to.....but I hope they keep it up...:rolleyes:

Mr. Rod
11-02-2009, 01:49 AM
Man it's tough being a Giants fan right now. Luckily the Texans are doing good right now.

SLC
11-02-2009, 01:49 AM
Yes. Here is a thought provoking question... Would you trade the Cowboys receivers for the Eagles?



Not MA, the rest....blah.

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 08:58 AM
It's just time for the bandwagon guys to jump ship and the haters to build up their goat herds. The Giants never stay down......and if you're going to mess up, now's the time.
What me worry? Division play isn't even half way over.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 10:11 AM
It's just time for the bandwagon guys to jump ship and the haters to build up their goat herds. The Giants never stay down......and if you're going to mess up, now's the time.
What me worry? Division play isn't even half way over.

I'd be far more concerned about Eli reverting to mid 2007 form, or the defensive injuries or the loss of Spagnola .... Giants won't stay down. They are too talented to not right the ship a bit but I do not see them as anywhere near the elite some want to paint them as.

Maroondog
11-02-2009, 10:35 AM
Very glad to see the Giants backing up some. The way they handled the Boyz was concerning. I agree though, they usually bounce back at the right time.

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 10:57 AM
Spagnola was a big loss and the injury bug has been around.
Eli's arm isn't the answer.......the Giants know that.
Nobody is elite......so the door is open.
I'd be far more concerned about Eli reverting to mid 2007 form, or the defensive injuries or the loss of Spagnola .... Giants won't stay down. They are too talented to not right the ship a bit but I do not see them as anywhere near the elite some want to paint them as.

15Adragon
11-02-2009, 11:14 AM
Eagles could be a bigger concern than the Giants...

SLC93
11-02-2009, 12:07 PM
Very glad to see the Giants backing up some. The way they handled the Boyz was concerning. I agree though, they usually bounce back at the right time.

Didn't Dallas lose at the buzzer after putting up 30 points while their qb experienced a meltdown? Handled is not the word you were looking for.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 12:09 PM
Eagles could be a bigger concern than the Giants...

Agreed. They're far more explosive on offense and not nearly as decimated and reaching on defense.

Maroondog
11-02-2009, 12:13 PM
Didn't Dallas lose at the buzzer after putting up 30 points while their qb experienced a meltdown? Handled is not the word you were looking for.

Yeah, you are right. However, 30 wasn't enough in the big debut of the new house on national TV. It was DALLAS who had the meltdown. :D

In any event, best not to let the Giants get too far in front.

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 12:36 PM
The Giants won.......they didn't back into victory against the Cowboys.
Didn't Dallas lose at the buzzer after putting up 30 points while their qb experienced a meltdown? Handled is not the word you were looking for.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 01:05 PM
The Giants won.......they didn't back into victory against the Cowboys.

Didn't say they didn't win the game. What I said is that there is no possibility to apply the term handled to how they won and be accurate.

15Adragon
11-02-2009, 01:17 PM
Didn't say they didn't win the game. What I said is that there is no possibility to apply the term handled to how they won and be accurate.

I'm wondering if Coughlin is starting to lose some of his players. In todays NFL how long can a coach like that keep his players. I think Parcells was starting to lose his imact with the 'boys when he left. Just a thought... I could be way off base here but maybe not....

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 01:38 PM
Handled simply means to come out successful which was the case, as opposed to "manhandling".
Handled is a very appropriate term.Didn't say they didn't win the game. What I said is that there is no possibility to apply the term handled to how they won and be accurate.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 03:12 PM
Handled simply means to come out successful which was the case, as opposed to "manhandling".
Handled is a very appropriate term.

Guess my standards are a tad higher. I've never associated handling somebody or being handles with meaning we did just enough to win.

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 03:15 PM
Check the definition..........that's the true meaning.Guess my standards are a tad higher. I've never associated handling somebody or being handles with meaning we did just enough to win.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 03:18 PM
I'm wondering if Coughlin is starting to lose some of his players. In todays NFL how long can a coach like that keep his players. I think Parcells was starting to lose his imact with the 'boys when he left. Just a thought... I could be way off base here but maybe not....

The biggest issue with Coughlin is going to be can he or should he keep his cool if they continue to slide. This kinder Coughlin has only been around for about 20 months now. His history dictates he should be boiling over any second now. If he's not careful with his approach to this it could be a lose our team type of deal but I don't think he's there right now.

The Giants are going to struggle this season until late, if not for the entire thing. The db's are too banged up. Their front seven has injury and cohesion issues. The biggest obstacle they face, though, is the plantar fasciatus Eli has. He's simply no mechanically sound enough to overcome an injury that effects your mechanics and it's showing.

SLC93
11-02-2009, 03:26 PM
Check the definition..........that's the true meaning.

Actually .....



han·dle (hndl)
v. han·dled, han·dling, han·dles
v.tr.
1. To touch, lift, or hold with the hands.
2. To operate with the hands; manipulate.
3. To deal with or have responsibility for; conduct: handles matters of corporate law.
4. To cope with or dispose of: handles problems efficiently.
5.
a. To direct, execute, or dispose of: handle an investment.
b. To manage, administer to, or represent: handle a boxer.
6. To deal or trade in the purchase or sale of: a branch office that handles grain exports.
v.intr.
To act or function in a given way while in operation: a car that handles well in the snow.
n.


Not much in there as it applies to sports analogy and nothing mentioning doing just enough to win, unless you want to say the Gints coped with the Cows well. Think of how this term is used on the radio, in commetary, on tv, from the booth or by coaches. It carries more weight. Gints did enough to win, nothing more, and given the nature of the performance by the Boys how impressive is that win, really?

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 03:39 PM
Here you go........The Giants handled the Cowboys.
http://www.yourdictionary.com/handled

noun
that part of a utensil, tool, etc. which is to be held, turned, lifted, pulled, etc. with the hand
a thing like a handle in appearance or use
the total amount of money bet over a specified period of time, as at a racetrack
☆ Informal a person's name, nickname, or title
Etymology: ME handil < OE handle (akin to Du handel) < hand, hand (http://www.yourdictionary.com/hand)


transitive verb handled (http://www.yourdictionary.com/handled) -·dled, handling (http://www.yourdictionary.com/handling) -·dling
to touch, lift, etc. with the hand or hands
to manage, operate, or use with the hand or hands; manipulate
to manage, control, direct, train, etc.

to deal with or treat in a particular way to handle a problem tactfully
to deal with successfully or appropriately
Informal to come to terms with psychologically he can't handle it

☆ to sell or deal in (a certain commodity)
to behave toward; treat



Actually .....



han·dle (hndl)
v. han·dled, han·dling, han·dles
v.tr.
1. To touch, lift, or hold with the hands.
2. To operate with the hands; manipulate.
3. To deal with or have responsibility for; conduct: handles matters of corporate law.
4. To cope with or dispose of: handles problems efficiently.
5.
a. To direct, execute, or dispose of: handle an investment.
b. To manage, administer to, or represent: handle a boxer.
6. To deal or trade in the purchase or sale of: a branch office that handles grain exports.
v.intr.
To act or function in a given way while in operation: a car that handles well in the snow.
n.


Not much in there as it applies to sports analogy and nothing mentioning doing just enough to win, unless you want to say the Gints coped with the Cows well. Think of how this term is used on the radio, in commetary, on tv, from the booth or by coaches. It carries more weight. Gints did enough to win, nothing more, and given the nature of the performance by the Boys how impressive is that win, really?

Maroondog
11-02-2009, 04:01 PM
I think E-Vol and SLC are handling this discussion well. :p

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 04:12 PM
Basically term usage and perception.........no biggie.I think E-Vol and SLC are handling this distcussion well. :p

Dawg Fan
11-02-2009, 07:04 PM
The giants were lucky to get out of Dallas with the win and everyone knows it. The boys played like sh*t and it still took a last secon fg for the Giants to win.

The word is Lucky, not handled

15Adragon
11-02-2009, 07:56 PM
The giants were lucky to get out of Dallas with the win and everyone knows it. The boys played like sh*t and it still took a last secon fg for the Giants to win.

The word is Lucky, not handled

;)

yankee
11-02-2009, 08:02 PM
a win is a win, as far as i'm concerned....and remind me again who won that game between the giants and cowboys earlier this year, in jerryworld.

DragonBand06
11-02-2009, 08:28 PM
The Giants are overrated. Not saying they aren't decent, but they certainly aren't one of the best teams in the league. Neither are the Cowboys. Neither are the Eagles. Look at the teams that make up the schedules of most of these records. The Giants beat every softie on their schedule, then got pwned by NO, then lost to Arizona, then got routed by Philly. Other than the 'Boys, those 3 teams are the only above-.500 teams they've played. So in their 4 games vs. above-par clubs, they are 3-1 with 2 blowouts and a last-second win after Romo melted down. I say whoever wins the 2-game Philly/Dallas matchup wins the East.

E-Vol-ution
11-02-2009, 11:58 PM
Maybe the Cowboys were lucky they didn't lose worse the way they played pass defense. These are professional athletes.......they win or lose.
Stop making excuses........lol
Luck is winning lotto. Dallas bet on winning by stopping the run game.

The giants were lucky to get out of Dallas with the win and everyone knows it. The boys played like sh*t and it still took a last secon fg for the Giants to win.

The word is Lucky, not handled

SLC93
11-03-2009, 07:52 AM
a win is a win, as far as i'm concerned....and remind me again who won that game between the giants and cowboys earlier this year, in jerryworld.

BYU
Miami
Texas

:ninja: