PDA

View Full Version : Longhorn Cake Walk ?


country club
09-21-2009, 12:15 AM
Is OU the only team standing between them and a date at the Rose Bowl Jan 7th ? Their performance against Tech was less than stellar, granted, but what are the odds OU fields a healthy team in October after a blood bath against Miami ? Things are getting interesting.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 12:23 AM
Oklahoma State will give us a game also... but other than those two teams... it should be clear sailing. I'm glad Texas played one of the more quality opponents on the schedule early.

tayb
09-21-2009, 12:30 AM
Please don't start this crap. Texas has three easy games left on the schedule, that's it, but if USC teaches us anything it is that there are no guaranteed wins. Outside of that we have Oklahoma, @ Oklahoma State, @ Missouri, @ Baylor, @ Texas A&M, and home against Kansas. It's not going to be easy to play Kansas at home and then turn around and play A&M at A&M five days later. The rest of the schedule definitely isn't a cake walk and we already have a target on our back. All of this is without mentioning the fact that Texas has looked like crap the past two games and I'm still waiting on the "improved" secondary to show up.

SLC
09-21-2009, 12:31 AM
No way in hell, after the way this team has played in the first 2 qtrs of all 3 games, that this Orange Blood will say we have a cake walk to anything.

We have road games with Mizzou, Okie Lite, Baylor and A&M. We have a home game with Kansas and a neutral game with OU. Ha...There is no way in hell I am going to say the only thing standing between us and an MNC game is OU. Hell, forget for a second who we have left to play and just think about what Texas needs to do to get this team where IT needs to be. We have alot of work to do between Saturdays before we should be ready to say that a win over OU gets us to the dance.

BDB
09-21-2009, 12:45 AM
NO! NO CAKE WALK!

play them like they're all florida's and oklahoma's! :mad:

svhorns
09-21-2009, 12:48 AM
No way in hell, after the way this team has played in the first 2 qtrs of all 3 games, that this Orange Blood will say we have a cake walk to anything.

We have road games with Mizzou, Okie Lite, Baylor and A&M. We have a home game with Kansas and a neutral game with OU. Ha...There is no way in hell I am going to say the only thing standing between us and an MNC game is OU. Hell, forget for a second who we have left to play and just think about what Texas needs to do to get this team where IT needs to be. We have alot of work to do between Saturdays before we should be ready to say that a win over OU gets us to the dance.

A&M - W... Baylor - W... Missouri - W(blowout).... Okie lite and OU are really the only games I'm worried about. You're a very pessimistic football fan... you act the same with Carroll too.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 12:51 AM
Please don't start this crap. Texas has three easy games left on the schedule, that's it, but if USC teaches us anything it is that there are no guaranteed wins. Outside of that we have Oklahoma, @ Oklahoma State, @ Missouri, @ Baylor, @ Texas A&M, and home against Kansas. It's not going to be easy to play Kansas at home and then turn around and play A&M at A&M five days later. The rest of the schedule definitely isn't a cake walk and we already have a target on our back. All of this is without mentioning the fact that Texas has looked like crap the past two games and I'm still waiting on the "improved" secondary to show up.

Our secondary played a hell of a game against Tech... They also played lights out against Wyoming... They had first game jitters against ULM but really... our secondary really didn't do that bad of a job against tech.... Do you understand that Tech will make every secondary look like that?

Firebird
09-21-2009, 12:55 AM
There are no cakewalks in BCS conferences...any of them. That said, I think UT has the easiest, comparatively, route of any team to the title game. But there have been lots of teams with those types of routes that trip up. UT has the hosses and schedule to do it.

SLC
09-21-2009, 12:55 AM
A&M - W... Baylor - W... Missouri - W(blowout).... Okie lite and OU are really the only games I'm worried about. You're a very pessimistic football fan... you act the same with Carroll too.



I'm a realist bro....Look no further then Notre Dame, USC, OU, tOSU, OSU, Va Tech, FSU, BYU, UGA, Nebraska..etc.

I believe the unrealistic Horn fans didn't think we would lose the last 2 of 3 to A&M either.


Texas...again..TEXAS has work to do..forget the teams we have left to play, upsets happen all the time, but TEXAS has work to do..if that is not obvious to you by watching the games, then believe what you want, I will remain a realist.

tayb
09-21-2009, 12:57 AM
Our secondary played a hell of a game against Tech... They also played lights out against Wyoming... They had first game jitters against ULM but really... our secondary really didn't do that bad of a job against tech.... Do you understand that Tech will make every secondary look like that?

Texas passing defense... 105th in the nation. I guess that is a slight improvement over last season... 105th in the nation.

WestPlano006
09-21-2009, 12:57 AM
I'm a realist bro....Look no further then Notre Dame, USC, OU, tOSU, OSU, Va Tech, FSU, BYU, UGA, Nebraska..etc.

I believe the unrealistic Horn fans didn't think we would lose the last 2 of 3 to A&M either.


Texas...again..TEXAS has work to do..forget the teams we have left to play, upsets happen all the time, but TEXAS has work to do..if that is not obvious to you by watching the games, then believe what you want, I will remain a realist.

Good way to look at things. Remember when all Texas had to do was beat A&M at home to go to play for the Big 12 title? When USC only had to beat Stanford, and another year UCLA, two below average teams? Anything can happen in college football.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 12:58 AM
I'm a realist bro....Look no further then Notre Dame, USC, OU, tOSU, OSU, Va Tech, FSU, BYU, UGA, Nebraska..etc.

I believe the unrealistic Horn fans didn't think we would lose the last 2 of 3 to A&M either.


Texas...again..TEXAS has work to do..forget the teams we have left to play, upsets happen all the time, but TEXAS has work to do..if that is not obvious to you by watching the games, then believe what you want, I will remain a realist.

You can be half empty... Ill be half full... whatever floats your boat I guess. I do agree we need to get better as does every other FBS team trying to make it to the national championship... Florida didn't look all that great against Tennessee either...

svhorns
09-21-2009, 01:03 AM
Texas passing defense... 105th in the nation. I guess that is a slight improvement over last season... 105th in the nation.

God what happened to the good UT fans. We win a 10 pt game at home and the sky is falling. Want to make a wager that we end up at least top 30 in pass defense?

tayb
09-21-2009, 01:12 AM
God what happened to the good UT fans. We win a 10 pt game at home and the sky is falling. Want to make a wager that we end up at least top 30 in pass defense?

What happened to the realistic Longhorn fans? We win a 10 point game at home and suddenly we have a "cupcake walk to the BCS title." How many teams the past three years have gone undefeated? We literally play all of our remaining tough games except for Kansas on the road.

SLC
09-21-2009, 01:15 AM
God what happened to the good UT fans. We win a 10 pt game at home and the sky is falling. Want to make a wager that we end up at least top 30 in pass defense?

I am and always will be a "good" Texas fan and I am and always will be a realistic Texas fan as well.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 01:16 AM
What happened to the realistic Longhorn fans? We win a 10 point game at home and suddenly we have a "cupcake walk to the BCS title." How many teams the past three years have gone undefeated? We literally play all of our remaining tough games except for Kansas on the road.

If realistic means negative than by all means your one realistic fan. I didn't say anything about our games being cupcakes I said we should win the rest of our games and that OU and Okie State games should be good games. If you're looking for an argument you will find one.... but by all means please cover up before the sky knocks you out.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 01:18 AM
I am and always will be a "good" Texas fan and I am and always will be a realistic Texas fan as well.

Ok what the hell happened to all the optimistic Texas fans?

BDB
09-21-2009, 01:26 AM
Ok what the hell happened to all the optimistic Texas fans?

tceh last year.
aggy k-state last 2 years.
zerou.
nc state a long time ago.

the list can go on forever.

SLC
09-21-2009, 01:27 AM
Ok what the hell happened to all the optimistic Texas fans?


I'm actually very optimistic, but I want Texas to get better and show it for a few games. I'd also like the offense to quit trying to win Colt McCoy a Heisman..why? because I feel like this offense is pressing to much and it's almost become obvious they are trying to win Colt the Heisman..the O line is pressing and over thinking their assignments, the offensive coordinator is pressing and Colt is pressing. I wish Mack would get the offense in a room by themselves, with the offensive coaches and tell them all that we are no longer going to try to win Colt the Heisman..That we are going to just settle down and play for team goals..like winning games, winning the Big 12 South, winning the Big 12 and trying for a title.


To hell with the Heisman trophy, this is a team game first and I want Texas to try for a team goal, the rest of the team deserves their glory as well. If we keep pressing like we are on offense, this team will not be in the national title game...You can mark that one down right now!

svhorns
09-21-2009, 01:30 AM
tceh last year.
aggy k-state last 2 years.
zerou.
nc state a long time ago.

the list can go on forever.

Jesus Christ you too?

I'm shoving all these posts down ya'lls damn throats when we win the national championship... hell even if we get there... I will make you deep throat em until you can't stand me anymore. You all can eabod.

tayb
09-21-2009, 01:32 AM
If realistic means negative than by all means your one realistic fan. I didn't say anything about our games being cupcakes I said we should win the rest of our games and that OU and Okie State games should be good games. If you're looking for an argument you will find one.... but by all means please cover up before the sky knocks you out.

Not being negative at all, just not unrealistically optimistic. This team has not looked like at all like a team destined for an undefeated season. The personnel is there, the schedule is relatively easy, but we just flat out are not playing that great right now. I thought we would go undefeated last season. I thought we would go undefeated in 2005. Those teams were clicking, this team is not... right now. Coming out sluggish, having to come out in the second half and win the game, and McCoy mimicking his 2007 self more than his 2008 self don't leave me ridiculously confident about all of our road games. Pardon me if I don't place W's in the win column before they actually happen.

svhorns
09-21-2009, 01:36 AM
I'm actually very optimistic, but I want Texas to get better and show it for a few games. I'd also like the offense to quit trying to win Colt McCoy a Heisman..why? because I feel like this offense is pressing to much and it's almost become obvious they are trying to win Colt the Heisman..the O line is pressing and over thinking their assignments, the offensive coordinator is pressing and Colt is pressing. I wish Mack would get the offense in a room by themselves, with the offensive coaches and tell them all that we are no longer going to try to win Colt the Heisman..That we are going to just settle down and play for team goals..like winning games, winning the Big 12 South, winning the Big 12 and trying for a title.


To hell with the Heisman trophy, this is a team game first and I want Texas to try for a team goal, the rest of the team deserves their glory as well. If we keep pressing like we are on offense, this team will not be in the national title game...You can mark that one down right now!

I agree... I could care less if Colt wins the heisman... I want a NC. I'm still trying figure out why not one single UT fan other me noticed the positives in that Tech game. We caused turnovers... the emergence of a running game... the acho's are very football savy and always seem to be in the right place at the right time... Kindle is a monster... Aaron Williams is one hell of a lock down corner. Once we established the running game with Newton our O-line was playing just fine... and colt didn't over throw a receiver in the second half.

country club
09-21-2009, 01:44 AM
At ease, Longhorn Nation ! I 'm just trying to light a fire with our neighbors to the North. No contest is a cake walk, that can be confirmed with countless examples. Between Mac and Muschamp the Horns will be focused on each game individually. Maybe the boys from Stillwater will prove their coach wrong and stand up and be men this year, who knows. I for one am looking for a good old fashioned Longhorn Romp and Stomp at the State Fair this year ! Cake Walk.........c'mon, get real! ;)

yankee
09-21-2009, 01:51 AM
At ease, Longhorn Nation ! I 'm just trying to light a fire with our neighbors to the North. No contest is a cake walk, that can be confirmed with countless examples. Between Mac and Muschamp the Horns will be focused on each game individually. Maybe the boys from Stillwater will prove their coach wrong and stand up and be men this year, who knows. I for one am looking for a good old fashioned Longhorn Romp and Stomp at the State Fair this year ! Cake Walk.........c'mon, get real! ;)

then you and sv are the only ones....

SLC
09-21-2009, 02:00 AM
I agree... I could care less if Colt wins the heisman... I want a NC. I'm still trying figure out why not one single UT fan other me noticed the positives in that Tech game. We caused turnovers... the emergence of a running game... the acho's are very football savy and always seem to be in the right place at the right time... Kindle is a monster... Aaron Williams is one hell of a lock down corner. Once we established the running game with Newton our O-line was playing just fine... and colt didn't over throw a receiver in the second half.



Great..So you notice were running the ball pretty well to then...Then Greg Davis needs to be pimp slapped by Mack and told to run the rock until they stop it...That takes pressure off of Colt and allows the O line to beat and bang on the defense for awile. That means they wont be over thinking their assignments, that means Colt wont be pressing as well either.


The rest of your post is pointing out the side of the ball that I dont have any real issues with...For me its all about this offense and what we returned from a year ago is not performing to expectations to this point and its obvious to me why that is.


As I said, :Censor: the Heisman trophy..This is a team game and the rest of the team deserves their glory as well.

the_phoenix612
09-21-2009, 02:03 AM
A&M has shown flashes of brilliance, if they can get it together for more than a quarter, Texas had better be on their game come Thanksgiving.

tayb
09-21-2009, 02:16 AM
A&M has shown flashes of brilliance, if they can get it together for more than a quarter, Texas had better be on their game come Thanksgiving.

I applaud the optimism, but A&M didn't exactly look great against that powerhouse Utah State.

the_phoenix612
09-21-2009, 10:52 AM
I applaud the optimism, but A&M didn't exactly look great against that powerhouse Utah State.

overall, no, but they showed the tools to get it done.

Most of football is keeping it together for the whole game, and that's where they fail right now, but with a team full of freshman and sophomores, I'm not exactly surprised.

lonny23
09-21-2009, 11:00 AM
Is OU the only team standing between them and a date at the Rose Bowl Jan 7th ? Their performance against Tech was less than stellar, granted, but what are the odds OU fields a healthy team in October after a blood bath against Miami ? Things are getting interesting.
1. OU is the only team you'll play that isn't worse than Tech.
2. My guess is Texas loses a game to a team they have no business losing to or they'll lose to OU.
3. I have more faith in Tech running the table than Texas actually doing it. Last year was very odd in the fact that Texas didn't lose to a subpar team.

lonny23
09-21-2009, 11:05 AM
God what happened to the good UT fans. We win a 10 pt game at home and the sky is falling. Want to make a wager that we end up at least top 30 in pass defense?
That's very hard to do in the Big 12 the way people throw the ball.

33Blood
09-21-2009, 12:37 PM
Aggies may be an almost guarantee win for anyone other than Texas but that game is their season. Mizzou is still an unknown but looks like they may be good. OSU and OU will both be ready already having 1 unexpected loss. Texas can win out if they play to their capabilities but if they come out like they have lately and get behind any and all of those could be losses.

tayb
09-21-2009, 12:52 PM
1. OU is the only team you'll play that isn't worse than Tech.
2. My guess is Texas loses a game to a team they have no business losing to or they'll lose to OU.
3. I have more faith in Tech running the table than Texas actually doing it. Last year was very odd in the fact that Texas didn't lose to a subpar team.

Yes, because Tech has shown the ability to go undefeated.

lonny23
09-21-2009, 01:18 PM
Yes, because Tech has shown the ability to go undefeated.
1. That will come with time.
2. History suggests Texas stands a decent chance to lose a game they shouldn't lose.
3. If they win out, more power to them for doing so.

tayb
09-21-2009, 01:30 PM
1. That will come with time.
2. History suggests Texas stands a decent chance to lose a game they shouldn't lose.
3. If they win out, more power to them for doing so.

1. Yeah. That's what we've been told for the past three seasons.
2. History suggests Tech stands a decent chance of losing several games a year.

pied
09-21-2009, 01:31 PM
1. That will come with time.
2. History suggests Texas stands a decent chance to lose a game they shouldn't lose.
3. If they win out, more power to them for doing so.

History suggests that is common against top ranked teams, no unique to Texas/USC/ou/LSU/FL/whoever.

BDB
09-21-2009, 02:25 PM
1. OU is the only team you'll play that isn't worse than Tech.
2. My guess is Texas loses a game to a team they have no business losing to or they'll lose to OU.
3. I have more faith in Tech running the table than Texas actually doing it. Last year was very odd in the fact that Texas didn't lose to a subpar team.

they lost to tceh.... they did lose to a subpar team....

toonman
09-21-2009, 03:09 PM
Yes, because Tech has shown the ability to go undefeated.

…...but with a history of not being able to win Championships. Let's examine Tech's claim to fame :-

1976 - Shared SW Conference Winners
1994 - Shared SW Conference Winners
2008 - Shared Big 12 Title.

WOW that’s impressive. We will probably have to wait another 10 or 20 years to see Tech win a football championship.

History shows that Tech does not have the ability to go undefeated; never having achieved this feat.

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 03:16 PM
they lost to tceh.... they did lose to a subpar team....

Where the hell did that come from?

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 03:17 PM
…...but with a history of not being able to win Championships. Let's examine Tech's claim to fame :-

1976 - Shared SW Conference Winners
1994 - Shared SW Conference Winners
2008 - Shared Big 12 Title.

WOW that’s impressive. We will probably have to wait another 10 or 20 years to see Tech win a football championship.

History shows that Tech does not have the ability to go undefeated; never having achieved this feat.

We get it dude, you hate Tech. Quit your act.

SLC
09-21-2009, 03:18 PM
History suggests that is common against top ranked teams, no unique to Texas/USC/ou/LSU/FL/whoever.


Well done Pied...You jumped right on what I noticed too. I was just about to reply and kept reading.


Opponents get up for a big game against a highly ranked team...Tech wont have to deal with that because they aren't highly ranked.

BDB
09-21-2009, 04:31 PM
Where the hell did that come from?

lonny said that texas didn't lose to a subpar (i'm counting that as anyteam that isn't a conference champion), so i said that they lost to tceh.

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 04:40 PM
lonny said that texas didn't lose to a subpar (i'm counting that as anyteam that isn't a conference champion), so i said that they lost to tceh.

Subpar teams would kill for 11 win seasons...

pied
09-21-2009, 04:48 PM
Subpar teams would kill for 11 win seasons...

Most teams would. The number of undefeated teams pales in comparison to the number of teams that lose to teams they shouldn't lose to.

Favpack
09-21-2009, 04:50 PM
OU, at Stillwater, a possible conf. title game with a tough Husker squad - three very tough games right there.

BDB
09-21-2009, 04:51 PM
Subpar teams would kill for 11 win seasons...

above-par teams streak double digit seasons.

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 04:55 PM
above-par teams streak double digit seasons.

And who's program is the only one to have a winning season since the Big 12's conception?

BDB
09-21-2009, 04:59 PM
And who's program is the only one to have a winning season since the Big 12's conception?

how long is a streak to you? i was talking 3-4 seasons in a row....

but, ok ok...tceh is a national power...all fear tceh, the 2010 big xii champs.

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 05:02 PM
how long is a streak to you? i was talking 3-4 seasons in a row....

but, ok ok...tceh is a national power...all fear tceh, the 2010 big xii champs.

I'm not saying that, but we certainly aren't supbar. Baylor is subpar, not Tech.

BDB
09-21-2009, 05:04 PM
I'm not saying that, but we certainly aren't supbar. Baylor is subpar, not Tech.

tceh hasn't won a conference championship under the Big XII...that's subpar....

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 05:06 PM
tceh hasn't won a conference championship under the Big XII...that's subpar....

I guess subpar=eye of the beholder.

yankee
09-21-2009, 05:09 PM
I guess subpar=eye of the beholder.

since i don't wear orange glasses...IMO tech is in no way a subpar football program.

yankee
09-21-2009, 05:12 PM
tceh hasn't won a conference championship under the Big XII...that's subpar....

would you classify nebraska as a subpar team?

stevefoxsc
09-21-2009, 05:29 PM
any team can lose on anygive day, and we're no exception.
any team can beat any team on anygiven day, and we're still no exception.


Come and play every team with all you have all 4 downs.

pied
09-21-2009, 05:35 PM
would you classify nebraska as a subpar team?

I wouldn't classify either as sub-par, but Nebraska has won the Big XII.

BDB
09-21-2009, 07:34 PM
would you classify nebraska as a subpar team?

way to ruin my fishing trip.....

F18mustang
09-21-2009, 07:48 PM
way to ruin my fishing trip.....

Anything to heighten your self-esteem, I'm there.

BDB
09-21-2009, 07:49 PM
Anything to heighten your self-esteem, I'm there.

the world is my barrel...

HUM398
09-21-2009, 11:49 PM
This thread is dumb.

Dawg Fan
09-22-2009, 08:43 AM
This thread is dumb.

you are waaaaaaay to kind

yallerjacket2
09-22-2009, 10:26 AM
This thread is dumb.

There's no such thing as a dumb thread. Only dumb posters.

HUM398
09-22-2009, 11:49 AM
There's no such thing as a dumb thread. Only dumb posters.

trust me. You are very very wrong on this point.

Their are dumb posters, Dumb threads...****** posters....****** Threads....ghey threads, ghey posters....etc.

Dawg Fan
09-22-2009, 12:34 PM
trust me. You are very very wrong on this point.

Their are dumb posters, Dumb threads...****** posters....****** Threads....ghey threads, ghey posters....etc.


can I get an Amen!;)

toonman
09-23-2009, 03:18 PM
We get it dude, you hate Tech. Quit your act.

There is no hate. I have stated a fact. I just want bring Tech fans back to earth and remind you that 'you what you are' - a school whose only claim to football fame is a shared Big 12 Title last year; while trying to convince everyone that you have a chance of winning a national championship, which is as likely as me winning the lottery.

F18mustang
09-23-2009, 03:25 PM
There is no hate. I have stated a fact. I just want bring Tech fans back to earth and remind you that 'you what you are' - a school whose only claim to football fame is a shared Big 12 Title last year; while trying to convince everyone that you have a chance of winning a national championship, which is as likely as me winning the lottery.

Or you could come out of your little routinal, stickler attitude and wake up and realize that THINGS CHANGE. The athletes that Tech had 5 years ago couldn't hold the ones we have here now and its a noticeable change. We are getting better recruits, that attitude has changed around campus and Leach finally has a D coordinator worth a damn.

You should really get used to the face that Tech is force to be reckoned with now and the days of "Typical Tech" are over. If you say there is no hate than there is something wrong, its almost too obvious. Wake up and admit that things change and that change is what make college football great.

Dawg Fan
09-23-2009, 04:09 PM
Or you could come out of your little routinal, stickler attitude and wake up and realize that THINGS CHANGE. The athletes that Tech had 5 years ago couldn't hold the ones we have here now and its a noticeable change. We are getting better recruits, that attitude has changed around campus and Leach finally has a D coordinator worth a damn.

You should really get used to the face that Tech is force to be reckoned with now and the days of "Typical Tech" are over. If you say there is no hate than there is something wrong, its almost too obvious. Wake up and admit that things change and that change is what make college football great.

really...why waste your time...he is a hater no matter how hard he tries to spin it and it really doesn't matter what he guarantees or predicts for Tech.;)

HUM398
09-23-2009, 04:19 PM
Or you could come out of your little routinal, stickler attitude and wake up and realize that THINGS CHANGE. The athletes that Tech had 5 years ago couldn't hold the ones we have here now and its a noticeable change. We are getting better recruits, that attitude has changed around campus and Leach finally has a D coordinator worth a damn.

You should really get used to the face that Tech is force to be reckoned with now and the days of "Typical Tech" are over. If you say there is no hate than there is something wrong, its almost too obvious. Wake up and admit that things change and that change is what make college football great.

I wouldn't say too much has change. Certainly Tech is receiving better recruits because of the decline of A&M during the franny era, but the distance in athletic ability is not substantial. Tech still gets out recruited by OU, Texas, and some years even okie lite.

That being said, Tech certainly will improve more over time as they get more national recognition....and this will help them land those key play makers ever great team seems to have.

Tech while not being an unstoppable force, will most certainly be a worthy opponents for any team that faces them.

farmerfan
09-23-2009, 04:52 PM
would you classify nebraska as a subpar team?

I could have sworn that SOME of the die hard Whiny Orange fans on here tried to tell us just a week or so ago that Conference Championships don't mean anything are in no way a measure of a program. I could have sworn the same thing was said by others last spring too.
Funny how that all the sudden has become a point when it involves a program the Whiny's do own in that department ;)

farmerfan
09-23-2009, 05:09 PM
History suggests that is common against top ranked teams, no unique to Texas/USC/ou/LSU/FL/whoever.

Well said and very true.

yankee
09-23-2009, 11:16 PM
trust me. You are very very wrong on this point.

Their are dumb posters, Dumb threads...****** posters....****** Threads....ghey threads, ghey posters....etc.

...

HUM398
09-23-2009, 11:45 PM
...

Case and point....

stevefoxsc
09-25-2009, 12:14 PM
Case and point....

pot meet kettle.

HUM398
09-25-2009, 01:59 PM
pot meet kettle.

you are so racist.

bleedblue
09-25-2009, 08:16 PM
Whoever listed Texas A&M and Baylor as hard games is an idiot. Also Missouri and Oklahoma State have proven to be vulnerable this year. Bowling Green had Missouri beat in Columbia and Oklahoma State lost at home to Houston who is probably worse than Texas.

SLC
09-25-2009, 08:25 PM
Whoever listed Texas A&M and Baylor as hard games is an idiot. Also Missouri and Oklahoma State have proven to be vulnerable this year. Bowling Green had Missouri beat in Columbia and Oklahoma State lost at home to Houston who is probably worse than Texas.


Uh huh...And if I had said 4 years ago we would be 1-2 against them over the next 3, including one at our house, you would have said "oh man, your an idiot"...of course I would have been right twice and you once, so, I have to wonder who the idiot would be...


It's also not always about what those teams are doing..sometimes it's about what my team is or isn't doing...past that, upsets happen all the time, I'll choose to not take anyone for granted.