PDA

View Full Version : Espn top 25 for 2006


stevefoxsc
01-23-2006, 01:40 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=forde_pat&id=2299436

1. West Virginia Mountaineers
Why: One of the surprise teams of 2005 should be better in '06. Quarterback Pat White and running back Steve Slaton were amazingly productive as freshmen, and they have plenty of other offensive weapons to rely on.


Why not: The secondary must be rebuilt, and we all remember how the Mountaineers underachieved in 2004 with top 10 expectations.


2. Ohio State Buckeyes
Why: Did you see Troy Smith, Ted Ginn and Antonio Pittman carve up Notre Dame in the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl?


Why not: Can the Buckeyes really be No. 2 after losing all three members of a great linebacking crew, plus two key offensive linemen? And with a trip to Austin next fall?


3. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Why: Brady Quinn, Jeff Samardzija, Anthony Fasano and Darius Walker all return along with another strong line, so the offense will torch scoreboards again. The defense will be improved. And there's a strong recruiting class coming in. Charlie Weis is just getting started.


Why not: The Irish will be breaking in some new linebackers against a schedule that includes six 2005 bowl squads.


4. LSU Tigers
Why: Tons of talent at the skill positions and the defensive backfield, and tons of momentum from that flattening of Miami in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl.


Why not: Some key losses on both lines. Settling on a quarterback could be troublesome -- and Les Miles can ask Phil Fulmer about what a quarterback controversy can do to a team's chemistry.


5. Florida Gators
Why: Chris Leak should continue to progress in Urban Meyer's offense, and Meyer should have a better handle on what will work in the SEC. Lots of other talent to be found on both sides of the ball, and another very good recruiting class is on the way.


Why not: If Leak looked skittish behind a veteran offensive line, what will he look like behind a rebuilt one in '06?


6. Oklahoma Sooners
Why: Adrian Peterson should return to Heisman contender form, Rhett Bomar should take a major step forward at quarterback, and the defense should be up to usual Bob Stoops standards.


Why not: A shaky offensive line in 2005 only gets younger in 2006. And although Bomar impressed with his toughness in the Pacific Life Holiday Bowl, he's still got a long way to go before mastering his position.


7. USC Trojans
Why: If you've been paying attention the past three years, you know why. Regardless of the NFL exodus, there is plenty of talent ready to step forward at Troy.


Why not: All good things come to an end -- especially when the best and most experienced players in recent school history are gone. Darnell Bing and Fred Matua joining them a year early doesn't help, either.


8. Michigan Wolverines
Why: If Mike Hart stays healthy and Chad Henne continues to progress, the Wolverines will still score a lot of points. And the defense will have a lot of experience at linebacker and in the secondary.


Why not: When was the last time this program lived up to expectations?


9. Miami Hurricanes
Why: Kyle Wright will be better, and in Greg Olsen and Ryan Moore, he'll have a couple of quality targets to throw to. The Hurricanes' secondary should be excellent again.


Why not: Concerns exist regarding the leadership of the program, from the head coach to the upperclassmen, after the disaster in the Peach Bowl.


10. Oregon Ducks
Why: Start with a sensational offensive line and add plenty of skill talent and very good coaching.


Why not: Defense will miss Haloti Ngata up front, and quarterbacks Dennis Dixon and Brady Leaf will have to prove they're big-time leaders and playmakers.


11. Texas Longhorns
Why: The monkey is off their back and lies dead at the Longhorns' feet. They know how to win championships -- and they have a deep cast of skill-position talent to work with, even if the quarterback has changed.


Why not: That's not just any change at quarterback. Vince Young was the heart, soul and singular talent on that Texas title team. There have been no bigger shoes to fill in college football in many years.


12. Louisville Cardinals
Why: If Brian Brohm returns healthy from knee surgery, he and running back Michael Bush will both be strong All-America candidates. There is speed and talent on defense and at wide receiver that should only improve by next year.


Why not: There are some key offensive line losses, and star rush end Elvis Dumervil has left the building.


13. Penn State Nittany Lions
Why: The skill-position speed that helped turn around the program will be back. If linebacker Paul Posluszny returns healthy and quarterback Anthony Morelli can even approximate Michael Robinson's leadership skills, the Nittany Lions will not regress very far from their 2005 form.


Why not: Take Tamba Hali, Alan Zemaitis and Robinson out of the equation and you've lost a lot. And Morelli doesn't have Robinson's mobility, which will change the scope of the offense.


14. Auburn Tigers
Why: QB Brandon Cox and RB Kenny Irons are two great places to start on offense, and the secondary should be among the best units in the country.


Why not: The Tigers have considerable turnover at receiver, plus a few holes on the defensive line and at linebacker.


15. Cal Bears
Why: Fantastic running backs and receivers and an experienced defense team up with Jeff Tedford's coaching.


Why not: Still not sure the Bears have a big-time quarterback, and they lose a couple of very good offensive linemen.


16. Georgia Bulldogs
Why: Mark Richt has elevated his program to autopilot contender status. The Bulldogs will have one of the best linebacking corps in the nation.


Why not: This team could struggle offensively. Quarterback will be a question, as will the line.


17. Alabama Crimson Tide
Why: The Crimson Tide is just about all the way back from probation. Mike Shula has answered all questions about his readiness for this job.


Why not: No Brodie Croyle, no DeMeco Ryans. There go the two solid-gold leaders on each side of the ball.


18. Nebraska Cornhuskers
Why: Another kingpin program proving that its rebound is well underway. The Cornhuskers ended 2005 with tremendous momentum and seem to have a firm grasp on Bill Callahan's passing offense.


Why not: Some holes to fill on the offensive line, and still some credibility issues for anyone from the Big 12 North.


19. TCU Horned Frogs
Why: Running back Aaron Brown could be a breakout star as a sophomore, and there is very good young talent at linebacker as well. Gary Patterson has done a remarkable job adding to the program foundation laid by Dennis Franchione.


Why not: Hard to replicate 11-1 for a second straight season, especially given some of the close calls the Horned Frogs had.


20. Arizona State Sun Devils
Why: Pick a quarterback, Rudy Carpenter or Sam Keller, and the Sun Devils will again be powerful offensively. Some D-I transfers will help immediately on defense.


Why not: ASU has had a problem getting over the hump and becoming a legitimate national title contender, in part because of chronic defensive shortcomings. Will it be much better in '06?


21. Iowa Hawkeyes
Why: Drew Tate could be the best quarterback in the Big Ten, and he'll have 1,300-yard running back Albert Young alongside.


Why not: Linebackers Chad Greenway and Abdul Hodge are finally gone, leaving a major void in the middle of the Hawkeyes' defense.


22. Clemson Tigers
Why: Tigers ride momentum into '06, having won six of their last seven games in '05. Running back James Davis leads a strong returning cast.


Why not: Replacing forever quarterback Charlie Whitehurst might not be as easy as everyone in orange thinks. (See: Brandon Cox replacing Jason Campbell.)


23. Virginia Tech Hokies
Why: The defense should again be very fast and very good, and perhaps there will be some addition-by-subtraction without Marcus Vick around for the administration to overprotect.


Why not: Until the Hokies prove they can properly finish off a season, there is reason to doubt this team. Quarterback is now a big question, too.


24. Iowa State Cyclones
Why: Pass-and-catch combo of Bret Meyer and Todd Blythe return for another productive season.


Why not: Chronic crunch-time failure with the Big 12 North title on the line is no way to convince anyone that the program has arrived.


25. Florida State Seminoles
Why: Gritty showings in the ACC title game and Orange Bowl show that pride and talent remain in Tallahassee.


Why not: Early entries hurt at several key positions, and questions remain about FSU's offensive direction.

yup.....

wide-e-wide
01-23-2006, 01:45 AM
Is this the same ESPN that said USC was the greatest team of all time?

Yeah....that's a reliable source for solid predictions...:rolleyes:

bowiedawgs01
01-23-2006, 01:54 AM
#11? I laughed.

Our Defense is going to be absolutely SICK. Imagine that DE rotation of Robison, Crowder and Orakpo. Okam, Lokey and Miller up the gut. Only losing Harris in the linebacking corp. Our secondary will downgrade slightly, but M. Griffin is ready to take Huff's place as Thorpe winner. The D alone will carry Texas to 9-10 wins.

The Offense, save QB, will be better. The Line will have to gel quickly, but they're only "breaking" in 2 new guys who aren't really new. They played all year and in key situations. All receivers but Carter return. Every back returns except Hall.

USCPN is ********.

wide-e-wide
01-23-2006, 02:04 AM
USCPN is ********.

A bit redundant don't you think?

Saw Omaha Sweepstakes winner next to your name over on Hornfans.com....what does that mean?

Are you going to Omaha?
If so............I officially hate you.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y294/bogthekid/screamingtiger-com-bushfark.jpg

bowiedawgs01
01-23-2006, 02:11 AM
haha I'm not that lucky. I won last year's bracket for the college baseball playoffs. We had to pick the winners of the regionals, supers and World Series, just like March Madness pools.

wide-e-wide
01-23-2006, 02:14 AM
haha I'm not that lucky. I won last year's bracket for the college baseball playoffs. We had to pick the winners of the regionals, supers and World Series, just like March Madness pools.


Oh...okay...I almost thought I had to hate you for a second there.

Are you going to the alumni game next weekend?

bowiedawgs01
01-23-2006, 02:48 AM
I've never been to one. But if I'm free, I will try to make it.

dragonfootballfan
01-23-2006, 10:02 AM
THE SEARCH BUTTON IS YOUR FRIEND (http://www.5atexasfootball.com/forum/vB/showthread.php?t=5661)

slorch
01-23-2006, 07:00 PM
I was dissappointed not to see Tech on there, but there are a few big names to replace like Taurean Henderson and Brandon Slay. 2 top20 finishes in a row, and i realize for UT maybe thta would be a bad season. I am pleased to see the improvement at TTU for the past 4-5 years.

I would like to see Tech keep improving, heck another CottonBowl wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

ktchamp97
01-23-2006, 07:05 PM
Ohio State has 7 returning starters...not on offense, not on defense, but total. Meanwhile, Texas has 15. No matter. It will be fun to see how it all plays out.

dragonfootballfan
01-23-2006, 07:08 PM
Ohio State has 7 returning starters...not on offense, not on defense, but total. Meanwhile, Texas has 15. No matter. It will be fun to see how it all plays out.
Texas returns over 60 total touchdowns. Only 5 teams in the NCAA even scored that many

AZTiger
01-23-2006, 07:12 PM
Texas returns over 60 total touchdowns. Only 5 teams in the NCAA even scored that many

you can't be serious, talkin about returning stats now?

is selvin young done?

dragonfootballfan
01-23-2006, 07:13 PM
you can't be serious, talkin about returning stats now?

is selvin young done?
nope. Selvin was a junior this year

AZTiger
01-23-2006, 07:16 PM
do most texas fans wish he was gone so charles could get the carries? neither one seems to be able to stay healthy. what about taylor's long term prospects as a RB?

dragonfootballfan
01-23-2006, 07:21 PM
do most texas fans wish he was gone so charles could get the carries? neither one seems to be able to stay healthy. what about taylor's long term prospects as a RB?
I don't think that Taylor is a runningback. I think that Taylor is what I call a speed back, which is becoming a new position in college football. He is a guy that must get the ball in different situations atleast 10-15 times whether it is a handoff, pitch, reverse, screen pass or regular pass. I am happy that Young is back to tutor Charles and because he is good in pass protection. In college football you never know what will happen to your runningbacks. 2 seasons ago Iowa lost their first 5 runningbacks to injury. I also like Young and Charles different styles, because Charles can stay fresh throughout the season, which is one reason why Reggie Bush was so successful for USC this year.

Texasfrog
01-23-2006, 07:23 PM
Ohio State has 7 returning starters...not on offense, not on defense, but total. Meanwhile, Texas has 15. No matter. It will be fun to see how it all plays out.
It amazes me that Ohio St is getting that much "love" with all those huge losses. Especially on defense where they pretty much have to replace everyone.

I dont see how Ohio St will have enough "experience" on defense to stop Texas in that early game in Austin.

I mean if McCoy or Snead can just not make any "killer" mistakes and just manage the game. I dont see Ohio St stopping them.

Plus.. if Shipley can get 100% healthy. He's going to be a killer WR.:D

Notre Dame on the other hand probably deserves to be a top #3.

Texasfrog
01-23-2006, 07:25 PM
I don't think that Taylor is a runningback. I think that Taylor is what I call a speed back, which is becoming a new position in college football. He is a guy that must get the ball in different situations atleast 10-15 times whether it is a handoff, pitch, reverse, screen pass or regular pass. I am happy that Young is back to tutor Charles and because he is good in pass protection. In college football you never know what will happen to your runningbacks. 2 seasons ago Iowa lost their first 5 runningbacks to injury. I also like Young and Charles different styles, because Charles can stay fresh throughout the season, which is one reason why Reggie Bush was so successful for USC this year.

It's great to have 2 or 3 very solid RB's on the team. Ie. USC & Auburn.

ktchamp97
01-23-2006, 08:34 PM
I don't care where Ramonce plays, but that kid needs to get the ball 15-20 times a game next year. He's a TD waiting to happen.

Most smart UT fans are glad to have Selvin to go along with Jamaal. Charles is going to be an absolute ******, but as you pointed out, he has had some injury issues...all the more reason to have a capable running-mate like Selvin. People forget just how good Selvin was before he ran into his own injury problems. There was a time when he was seriously pushing Ced Benson for playing time. The problem is, he hasn't been fully healthy since he was a sophomore at Jersey Village.

As an aside, Jamaal Charles, in the first track event of the season, ran a 6.68 in the 60m dash, earning an automatic berth in the NCAA meet. That is smoking.

Frog, I can't wait to see Shipley on the field. Let's just hope he fully recovers.

slorch
01-23-2006, 08:39 PM
How'd Charles run with no hurdles in the way?

cove_2001
01-23-2006, 11:59 PM
I want to see Shipley as well KT. Hopefully he is ready to play. There was alot of buzz in Burnet about him. I can't wait.

cove_2001

wide-e-wide
01-24-2006, 12:29 AM
Shipley = BigFoot,Easter Bunny,Tooth Fairy,Santa Claus,etc.....

I keep hearing it.......but I have yet to see it.

AZTiger
01-24-2006, 12:33 AM
Shipley = BigFoot,Easter Bunny,Tooth Fairy,Santa Claus,etc.....

I keep hearing it.......but I have yet to see it.

ha ha, i agree, but it sucks for the kid. you never like to see someone like that, especially a young college kid, never even get ONE shot

wide-e-wide
01-24-2006, 01:00 AM
ha ha, i agree, but it sucks for the kid. you never like to see someone like that, especially a young college kid, never even get ONE shot


It's a running joke over on Hornfans.com...
When anybody mentions Shipley...everyone pretends they don't
know who the hell he is...
And post pics of BigFoot and other mythical creatures.
He will emerge soon...just had a stretch of bad luck...and horrible timing.

ktchamp97
01-24-2006, 01:12 AM
There are alot of folks too, who have no idea how good Shipley was in high school. They think that the reason people are excited about him is based on the fact that he's a "Great White Hope" of sorts at the WR position. Maybe that is part of it, but he's easily one of the most polished high school receivers I've seen, not to mention having great speed and quicks. In fact, Robert Ferguson is the only other guy I've seen that Shipley reminds me of. Ferguson was such a graceful receiver and such a fluid athlete, that he just made things look way easier than they were. I do think Shipley has that kind of talent...that's why I want to see him.

dragonfootballfan
01-24-2006, 01:19 AM
There are alot of folks too, who have no idea how good Shipley was in high school. They think that the reason people are excited about him is based on the fact that he's a "Great White Hope" of sorts at the WR position. Maybe that is part of it, but he's easily one of the most polished high school receivers I've seen, not to mention having great speed and quicks. In fact, Robert Ferguson is the only other guy I've seen that Shipley reminds me of. Ferguson was such a graceful receiver and such a fluid athlete, that he just made things look way easier than they were. I do think Shipley has that kind of talent...that's why I want to see him.
When I saw Shipley in high school it was a non-stop how did he do that? My friends and I could not believe it

wide-e-wide
01-24-2006, 01:23 AM
Oh yeah...he's good.
And I (like most Horns fans) am anxious to see him actually get to play.

dragonfootballfan
01-24-2006, 01:25 AM
Oh yeah...he's good.
And I (like most Horns fans) am anxious to see him actually get to play.
the problem is with all of the wide receiver depth even if he can come back, he will not get a lot of playing time. I mean which horn receiver would you like to take out for him. I know I want Sweed, Quan, Pittman, and Taylor to get the ball as much as possible.

wide-e-wide
01-24-2006, 01:30 AM
the problem is with all of the wide receiver depth even if he can come back, he will not get a lot of playing time. I mean which horn receiver would you like to take out for him. I know I want Sweed, Quan, Pittman, and Taylor to get the ball as much as possible.


This is very true.
I don't want to take any of those guys out.
It is a problem...that a lot of D1 coaches wish they had.
Too many solid RB's...too many solid WR's...
Vince is gone...but if anybody thinks Texas is just gonna disappear...they are quite dumb.

dragonfootballfan
01-24-2006, 01:40 AM
This is very true.
I don't want to take any of those guys out.
It is a problem...that a lot of D1 coaches wish they had.
Too many solid RB's...too many solid WR's...
Vince is gone...but if anybody thinks Texas is just gonna disappear...they are quite dumb.
The quarterback will not even have to be good. He just has to not be stupid. He will have atleast 6 seconds to throw the ball against most teams that Texas plays save Ohio State and Oklahoma. He has receivers that will get open and two that he can just lob it up to. He will have an excellent running game. The quarterback does not have to be as good as Vince to be successful. He does not have to be as good as Reggie McNeal to be successful. He has to have average quarterback skills, with a great mind. I think that Colt, Snead and Harris have one big thing in common and that is all are extremely intelligent kids.

cove_2001
01-24-2006, 05:34 PM
It's a running joke over on Hornfans.com...
When anybody mentions Shipley...everyone pretends they don't
know who the hell he is...
And post pics of BigFoot and other mythical creatures.
He will emerge soon...just had a stretch of bad luck...and horrible timing.

Yeah I have seen that Wide. Even on other forum boards they do the same thing. ...Jordan...who? It is funny.

cove_2001