Climate Bill passed.

[JOH]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090626/ap_on_go_co/us_climate_bill

By 7 votes. Oh, joy.

[85Roughneck]

I feel like I'm in a vortex spiraling down down down ... :(

[JOH]

I feel like I'm in a vortex spiraling down down down ... :(

Its called the taxation express...

http://mexicoinstitute.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/nancy_pelosi_official_portrait.jpg


||


http://ppcsydney.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ppc-campign-flush-money.jpg

[85Roughneck]

Its called the taxation express...

http://ppcsydney.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ppc-campign-flush-money.jpg

you should be fined for posting up her pic ... hideous ... she and the rest of the libtards are going to bring this country to it's proverbial knees. 2012 cannot get here soon enough.

[JOH]

you should be fined for posting up her pic ... hideous ... she and the rest of the libtards are going to bring this country to it's proverbial knees. 2012 cannot get here soon enough.

2010 is the one we need to worry about.

[chhspantherfan]

you should be fined for posting up her pic ... hideous ... she and the rest of the libtards are going to bring this country to it's proverbial knees. 2012 cannot get here soon enough.

Can't stop thinking about the Mayan calendar, huh roughneck?:D

[smw358]

Its called the taxation express...

http://mexicoinstitute.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/nancy_pelosi_official_portrait.jpg


||


http://ppcsydney.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ppc-campign-flush-money.jpg

THANKS........my old dart board picture was pretty "holy." I needed another Pelosi dart board cover.......:D

[smw358]

Can't stop thinking about the Mayan calendar, huh roughneck?:D

I wonder what the "Global Warming" forecast will be for that day.....:eek:

[ktCarl]

So now the Dems even control the weather? Any time they want to pass legislation to control something that is beyond their control you can bet it's intended to be people control and power consolidation that is the prime directive.

[Favpack]

Wonderin' what freaking jobs this creates?

At least one Miss Favpack will be out of college and off my payroll by then.

[rwilleby]

Another bill passed... WITHOUT READING THE FRIGGIN' BILL...

AAAhhhhgggggggggghhhhhhhhh!!!!

2010, the end of the world or the end of America...

[CCCSportsFan]

Can anyone remember so much legistlation being passed by a new President? This guy figures he has to scorch the earth as fast as possible :mad:

[DrEdward]

As a summary of the effects on the global average temperature from the United States fully implementing Waxman-Markey:


http://masterresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/waxman-markey_fig11.jpg

"The solid lines are the projections of the change in global average temperature across the 21st century from the original IPCC A1FI (red) and A1B (blue) high and mid-range emissions scenarios, respectively (assuming a climate sensitivity of 3ºC). The dotted lines (of the same color) indicate the projected change in global average surface temperature when the emissions reductions prescribed by Waxman-Markey are factored in.

By the year 2050, the Waxman-Markey Climate Bill would result in a global temperature “savings” of about 0.05ºC regardless of the IPCC scenario used—this is equivalent to about 2 years’ worth of warming. By the year 2100, the emissions pathways become clearly distinguishable, and so to do the impacts of Waxman-Markey. Assuming the IPCC mid-range scenario (A1B) Waxman-Markey would result in a projected temperature rise of 2.847ºC, instead of 2.959ºC rise— a mere 0.112ºC temperature “savings.” Under the IPCC’s high-emissions scenario, instead of a projected rise of 4.414ºC, Waxman-Markey limits the rise to 4.219ºC—a “savings” of 0.195ºC. In either case, this works out to about 5 years’ worth of warming. In other words, a full implementation and adherence to the emissions restrictions provisions described by the Waxman-Markey Climate Bill would result only in setting back the projected rise in global temperatures by a few years—a scientifically meaningless prospect."

Chip Knappenberger, "Climate Impacts of Waxman-Markey (the IPCC-based arithmetic of no gain)," MasterResource, May 6, 2009

[yankee]

:notworthy

[chhspantherfan]

so where is the Phoenix rising from the ashes?:rolleyes:

I was sure he was going to show up with a graph, but Doc Ed beat him to it. :notworthy

[stevefoxsc]

the only green thats ever important http://www.marijuanaseedbanks.com/images/marijuana_leaf_pics/images/weed_plant.jpg