View Full Version : Mansfield Timberview
grayowl60
12-21-2005, 05:00 PM
Timberview reports 2000+ and will be 5a. District 4 will still needs one more to make 8 teams. Who will it be?
dragonsdaddy
12-21-2005, 05:10 PM
if they send abilene east, they'll probably reconfigure 4-5a. the western members will go with abilene. weatherford, granbury, nwest, the crowleys, and burleson would be 8. mansfield could be with the arlingtons.
toonman
12-21-2005, 05:34 PM
I do not know how the UIL will manage to have 8 team districts in 1 through 4. What is the point of a 6 team district; if 4 teams are going to the play-offs.
As at today :-
District 1 has the 8 El Paso teams, so looks set
Districts 2 and 3 have 6 teams each and are therefore looking for another 4 teams to balance the districts, if an 8 team district is the target. If this is indeed the need then I see Weatherford, Granbury, Burleson and North Crowley being in a district with Abilene and Midland.
Mansfield Summit, Mansfield, Fort Worth Boswell, Fort Worth Paschal and the new Mansfield Timberview would need to be in a new district or a revised District 4 with; some teams from the existing Districts 5 and 6.
dragonsdaddy
12-21-2005, 05:55 PM
I do not know how the UIL will manage to have 8 team districts in 1 through 4. What is the point of a 6 team district; if 4 teams are going to the play-offs.
As at today :-
District 1 has the 8 El Paso teams, so looks set
Districts 2 and 3 have 6 teams each and are therefore looking for another 4 teams to balance the districts, if an 8 team district is the target. If this is indeed the need then I see Weatherford, Granbury, Burleson and North Crowley being in a district with Abilene and Midland.
Mansfield Summit, Mansfield, Fort Worth Boswell, Fort Worth Paschal and the new Mansfield Timberview would need to be in a new district or a revised District 4 with; some teams from the existing Districts 5 and 6.if the ptb are going to have 245 teams in 5a, then there will be several 6 team districts. i suspect 3-5a will be one of them, as will the corpus district, and maybe an east texas district. at least a 6 team et district will probably have 4 relatively strong teams in the po's, whereas the corpus district will likely send zero.
WildcatFan
12-21-2005, 06:11 PM
Mansfield Timberview...Welcome to 1-9 LOL
toonman
12-21-2005, 06:35 PM
I read somewhere that the Little Southwest Conference (District 3) was going to be disbanded, so there will be some realignment in the west. In addition, would it not make sense to have 8 x 8-Team Districts in each Region. If a 6 team district is sending 4 teams to play-offs, there will be quite a few blow-outs in the first round.
jtk1519
12-21-2005, 07:21 PM
There is a way to perfectly balance West Texas with 8 team districts, but I guarantee you that it will not be popular at all. If the 5A cutoff is raised to 1949 (or less), El Paso will have 4 schools that will move up to 5A. The districts would look like this...
1-5A
El Paso Americas
El Paso Bel Air
El Paso Coronado
El Paso Eastwood
El Paso Franklin
El Paso Hanks
El Paso Montwood
El Paso Socorro
2-5A*
El Paso Andress
El Paso Del Valle
El Paso El Dorado
El Paso Ysleta
Midland
Midland Lee
Odessa
Odessa Permian
3-5A
Abilene
Abilene Cooper
Amarillo
Amarillo Palo Duro
Amarillo Tascosa
Lubbock
Lubbock Coronado
Lubbock Monterey
I weep just typing that.
*- The 4 El Paso schools in district 2 are just the 4 that will move up. The real district could look different based on geography.
rancher52
12-21-2005, 09:58 PM
if they send abilene east, they'll probably reconfigure 4-5a. the western members will go with abilene. weatherford, granbury, nwest, the crowleys, and burleson would be 8. mansfield could be with the arlingtons.
I really think Northwest may end up in 5-5a with Keller, Keller Central, Richland, Colleyville Heritage, Grapevine, Haltom, and SLC. This could not come at a better time for SLC... they will be able to fine tune things on a weaker district. With this district I think SLC ends up going D1 - CH & Grapevine would probably be 2 playoff teams (& both will be smaller than SLC next year)... flip a coin for the remaining team.
dragonsdaddy
12-21-2005, 10:01 PM
I really think Northwest may end up in 5-5a with Keller, Keller Central, Richland, Colleyville Heritage, Grapevine, Haltom, and SLC. This could not come at a better time for SLC... they will be able to fine tune things on a weaker district. With this district I think SLC ends up going D1 - CH & Grapevine would probably be 2 playoff teams (& both will be smaller than SLC next year)... flip a coin for the remaining team.
i think richland is going back to 4a. seems like i read that.
rancher52
12-21-2005, 10:36 PM
i think richland is going back to 4a. seems like i read that.
I read that a while back too, but one of the other threads indicates they turned in 2103 so that would keep them in 5A. Maybe there was a boundary change with Birdville that accomplished this.
grayowl60
12-21-2005, 10:50 PM
if they send abilene east, they'll probably reconfigure 4-5a. the western members will go with abilene. weatherford, granbury, nwest, the crowleys, and burleson would be 8. mansfield could be with the arlingtons.
If they wanted to be geographically correct, three Mansfield schools, two Grand Prarie, Duncanville, De Soto, And Ceder Hill, Would make no more than a 30 min. drive to distict games.:rolleyes:
dragonsdaddy
12-22-2005, 10:23 AM
If they wanted to be geographically correct, three Mansfield schools, two Grand Prarie, Duncanville, De Soto, And Ceder Hill, Would make no more than a 30 min. drive to distict games.:rolleyes:
don't arlington and mansfield abut for quite a few miles? the west and east texas 5as cause problems with logistics, regardless of who gets included with them.
JagDad07
12-22-2005, 11:36 AM
don't arlington and mansfield abut for quite a few miles? the west and east texas 5as cause problems with logistics, regardless of who gets included with them.
Much of south Arlington is in the MISD. MISD and AISD have petitioned to be in a district together - whether it happens or not is still to be seen.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.