PDA

View Full Version : Top 20 important games (College football-2009)


cajun
04-02-2009, 04:48 PM
20 most important games

• 1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17)
• 2. USC at Ohio St. (9/12)
• 3a. Florida at LSU (10/10)
• 3b. 'Bama at Mississippi (10/10)
• 5. Texas at Oklahoma St. (10/31)
• 6. Tennessee at Florida (9/19)
• 7. USC at Oregon (10/31)
• 8. Oklahoma St. at OU (11/28)
• 9. LSU at Mississippi (11/21)
• 10. USC at Notre Dame (10/17)
• 11. 'Bama vs. VT at Atlanta (9/5)
• 12. USC at California (10/3)
• 13. Oklahoma at Miami (10/3)
• 14. Oregon at Boise St. (9/5)
• 15. Ohio State at Penn St. (11/7)
• 16. Va. Tech at Georgia Tech (10/17)
• 17. Georgia at Oklahoma St. (9/5)
• 18. Georgia vs. Florida at Jacksonville, Fla. (10/31)
• 19. Florida St. at BYU (9/19)
• 20. Notre Dame at Michigan (9/12)

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/29555757/?pg=21#spt_FBC2009_MostImportantGames

slorch
04-02-2009, 05:05 PM
Georgia @ Stillwater?

wonder if Farmer has his tix yet?:D:confused:


Notre Lame at Michigan? WTF cares?

cajun
04-02-2009, 05:13 PM
Notre Lame at Michigan? WTF cares?

Notre Dame got to get their name in it...:rolleyes:

I'm just glad they didn't pick Ohio St vs Michigan.....Remember when that game meant something?...(lol)

svhorns
04-02-2009, 06:28 PM
OU sucks.

yankee
04-02-2009, 06:42 PM
OU sucks.

this.

mad_fan
04-02-2009, 08:32 PM
Georgia @ Stillwater?

wonder if Farmer has his tix yet?:D:confused:


Notre Lame at Michigan? WTF cares?

Atleast they paid to get listed...:rolleyes::D

F18mustang
04-02-2009, 11:25 PM
this.

+1

BDB
04-02-2009, 11:39 PM
+1

+1

DragonBand06
04-02-2009, 11:58 PM
"Important" is such a relative word...

BDB
04-03-2009, 12:05 AM
"Important" is such a relative word...

**important outside of aggyland**

better?

DragonBand06
04-03-2009, 12:19 AM
**important outside of aggyland**

better?nope. Still pretty vague. Important to what? Important relative to determining who will be in the title game? Who will make bowl games? How the economy will do next year? Whether terrorism is going away?

lonny23
04-03-2009, 02:33 AM
20 most important games

• 1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17)
• 2. USC at Ohio St. (9/12)
• 3a. Florida at LSU (10/10)
• 3b. 'Bama at Mississippi (10/10)
• 5. Texas at Oklahoma St. (10/31)
• 6. Tennessee at Florida (9/19)
• 7. USC at Oregon (10/31)
• 8. Oklahoma St. at OU (11/28)
• 9. LSU at Mississippi (11/21)
• 10. USC at Notre Dame (10/17)
• 11. 'Bama vs. VT at Atlanta (9/5)
• 12. USC at California (10/3)
• 13. Oklahoma at Miami (10/3)
• 14. Oregon at Boise St. (9/5)
• 15. Ohio State at Penn St. (11/7)
• 16. Va. Tech at Georgia Tech (10/17)
• 17. Georgia at Oklahoma St. (9/5)
• 18. Georgia vs. Florida at Jacksonville, Fla. (10/31)
• 19. Florida St. at BYU (9/19)
• 20. Notre Dame at Michigan (9/12)

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/29555757/?pg=21#spt_FBC2009_MostImportantGames
I have 2 questions:

1. Why post a list this bad for us to read?
2. Why did you post this list and not even discuss how much it wreaks?

BDB
04-03-2009, 09:16 AM
I have 2 questions:

1. Why post a list this bad for us to read?
2. Why did you post this list and not even discuss how much it wreaks?


20 most important games

• 1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17) as last year, most important of regular season
• 2. USC at Ohio St. (9/12) is the big televen ready to beat someone outside of conference?
• 3a. Florida at LSU (10/10) sec heavyweights
• 3b. 'Bama at Mississippi (10/10) sec middleweights
• 5. Texas at Oklahoma St. (10/31) can texas walk out of stillwater with a win?
• 6. Tennessee at Florida (9/19) new head coach, same possibility of upsetting fla
• 7. USC at Oregon (10/31) pac-10 champs
• 8. Oklahoma St. at OU (11/28) can ou leave bedlam with a win?
• 9. LSU at Mississippi (11/21) nutt's other chance at turning the corner
• 10. USC at Notre Dame (10/17) media lovefest. i take it was grains of salt
• 11. 'Bama vs. VT at Atlanta (9/5) ACC looking to be taken seriously OOC
• 12. USC at California (10/3) when USC plays... it's important
• 13. Oklahoma at Miami (10/3) how far has shannon taken miami since taking over. trap game for oklahoma
• 14. Oregon at Boise St. (9/5) the mighty mighty wac..... or mwc? i forget
• 15. Ohio State at Penn St. (11/7) lethargy bowl 09...catch it
• 16. Va. Tech at Georgia Tech (10/17) ACC Champs
• 17. Georgia at Oklahoma St. (9/5) how good is the big XII. trap game for UGA
• 18. Georgia vs. Florida at Jacksonville, Fla. (10/31) worlds largest outdoor cocktail party. SEC West champs
• 19. Florida St. at BYU (9/19) mighty mighty MWC vs. a known
• 20. Notre Dame at Michigan (9/12) media lovefest


please lonny... tell me why this sucks? granted it's a bit USC/big televen heavy, but most things are.

upset that no one cares about tcehlahoma, again?

cajun
04-03-2009, 09:35 AM
I have 2 questions:

1. Why post a list this bad for us to read?
2. Why did you post this list and not even discuss how much it wreaks?

I tried to find a list that had Texas Tech playing an important game this year, but couldn't, lonny23...:cool:

cajun
04-03-2009, 09:37 AM
20 most important games

• 1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17) as last year, most important of regular season
• 2. USC at Ohio St. (9/12) is the big televen ready to beat someone outside of conference?
• 3a. Florida at LSU (10/10) sec heavyweights
• 3b. 'Bama at Mississippi (10/10) sec middleweights
• 5. Texas at Oklahoma St. (10/31) can texas walk out of stillwater with a win?
• 6. Tennessee at Florida (9/19) new head coach, same possibility of upsetting fla
• 7. USC at Oregon (10/31) pac-10 champs
• 8. Oklahoma St. at OU (11/28) can ou leave bedlam with a win?
• 9. LSU at Mississippi (11/21) nutt's other chance at turning the corner
• 10. USC at Notre Dame (10/17) media lovefest. i take it was grains of salt
• 11. 'Bama vs. VT at Atlanta (9/5) ACC looking to be taken seriously OOC
• 12. USC at California (10/3) when USC plays... it's important
• 13. Oklahoma at Miami (10/3) how far has shannon taken miami since taking over. trap game for oklahoma
• 14. Oregon at Boise St. (9/5) the mighty mighty wac..... or mwc? i forget
• 15. Ohio State at Penn St. (11/7) lethargy bowl 09...catch it
• 16. Va. Tech at Georgia Tech (10/17) ACC Champs
• 17. Georgia at Oklahoma St. (9/5) how good is the big XII. trap game for UGA
• 18. Georgia vs. Florida at Jacksonville, Fla. (10/31) worlds largest outdoor cocktail party. SEC West champs
• 19. Florida St. at BYU (9/19) mighty mighty MWC vs. a known
• 20. Notre Dame at Michigan (9/12) media lovefest


please lonny... tell me why this sucks? granted it's a bit USC/big televen heavy, but most things are.

upset that no one cares about tcehlahoma, again?

You beat me to it...

It's just a list anyways as seen by a "somebody", there are alot of important games....

Favpack
04-03-2009, 10:15 AM
Mr. Obvious:

List is made by NBC - NBC is in bed with the Irish.

I know more about chess than NBC does about college football.

Firebird
04-03-2009, 10:16 AM
Ole' Miss might be, but 'Bama is no SEC middleweight. Let's not forget that they beat everyone on their SEC schedule last year save the eventual national champion. They bring a lot back and Saban's had top 5 recruiting since arriving in Tuscaloosa. They will be in the very thick of the SEC and probably national race next year.

cajun
04-03-2009, 10:21 AM
Ole' Miss might be, but 'Bama is no SEC middleweight. Let's not forget that they beat everyone on their SEC schedule last year save the eventual national champion. They bring a lot back and Saban's had top 5 recruiting since arriving in Tuscaloosa. They will be in the very thick of the SEC and probably national race next year.

Ole Miss could be better this year than they were last year....

You heard it here....:cool:

BDB
04-03-2009, 10:22 AM
Ole' Miss might be, but 'Bama is no SEC middleweight. Let's not forget that they beat everyone on their SEC schedule last year save the eventual national champion. They bring a lot back and Saban's had top 5 recruiting since arriving in Tuscaloosa. They will be in the very thick of the SEC and probably national race next year.

fla and lsu have won the sec in the past few years. until bama and ole miss win it, their middlewieghts.

cajun
04-03-2009, 10:28 AM
fla and lsu have won the sec in the past few years. until bama and ole miss win it, their middlewieghts.

Ole Miss beat us and Florida last year....Almost beat Alabama losing 24-20....That's not a chump game by any means...

tayb
04-03-2009, 11:23 AM
I have 2 questions:

1. Why post a list this bad for us to read?
2. Why did you post this list and not even discuss how much it wreaks?

Tech being absent from the list is a testament to how much it doesn't wreak. ;)

BDB
04-03-2009, 11:45 AM
Ole Miss beat us and Florida last year....Almost beat Alabama losing 24-20....That's not a chump game by any means...

tcehlahoma beat texas and okie st. last year, but still isn't a big XII heavyweight, because they don't have the hardware.

that being said, they're no lightweights.

Dawg Fan
04-03-2009, 12:48 PM
I tried to find a list that had Texas Tech playing an important game this year, but couldn't, lonny23...:cool:

I'm just glad you were able to get the Oregon vs Boise St. game in there:rolleyes:

what a travesty this would have been if it were not on that list

tayb
04-03-2009, 12:55 PM
I'm just glad you were able to get the Oregon vs Boise St. game in there:rolleyes:

what a travesty this would have been if it were not on that list

Those two teams finished 10 and 11 in the final AP polls and aren't losing much coming into this season.

cajun
04-03-2009, 01:18 PM
I'm just glad you were able to get the Oregon vs Boise St. game in there:rolleyes:

what a travesty this would have been if it were not on that list

I probably wouldn't have included that game on "my" list, but like tayb said, it could be big...

BDB
04-03-2009, 01:36 PM
I probably wouldn't have included that game on "my" list, but like tayb said, it could be big...

i think what dawg is forgetting is that now there are 4- 5 non-bcs teams on the bubble, and whenever they face a BCS school, it increases their chances of making it in the at-large bid.

lonny23
04-03-2009, 04:00 PM
i think what dawg is forgetting is that now there are 4- 5 non-bcs teams on the bubble, and whenever they face a BCS school, it increases their chances of making it in the at-large bid.
I won't deny that, but it still doesn't get around the fact that if it weren't for ACC vs. Big East, the token non-BCS school that crashes the party will always be in the worst, least talked about BCS bowl. That really doesn't make them relavent in the sense of this list which is SUPPOSED to THEORETICALLY really mean something; i.e. impact the BCS National Title Game. I mean I agreed that Utah should've won the title since they ran the table and nobody else did, but if they can't win a title last year, that makes any non-BCS team's big games less relavent.

Some of the other games are obivously flawed. What Miami, ND, and Free Shoes used to do has nothing to do with them being important games in 2009.

I would also argue that Okie Lite has done far too little to have so many important games this year and I think time will show they finish 4th in the South.

There were other games that were just a joke, too.

It's good to see the mental midgets around here want to make it a Tech thing.

Dawg Fan
04-03-2009, 04:06 PM
i think what dawg is forgetting is that now there are 4- 5 non-bcs teams on the bubble, and whenever they face a BCS school, it increases their chances of making it in the at-large bid.

I wasn't really forgetting, I could just hardly give a sh*t less about those two teams;)

stevefoxsc
04-03-2009, 04:16 PM
tcehlahoma beat texas and okie st. last year, but still isn't a big XII heavyweight, because they don't have the hardware.

that being said, they're no lightweights.

the real question was were they relevant, the end of year came and proved other wise.

cajun
04-03-2009, 04:23 PM
It's good to see the mental midgets around here want to make it a Tech thing.

No one really made a big deal about it like a certain Texas Tech Fan did...Most took it for it what it was...:rolleyes:

I personally think LSU going to Georgia is an important game, but I ain't crying about someone else's list...

oldmojo94
04-03-2009, 05:21 PM
OU sucks.
tu sucks .............but hey, 45-35, right??

tayb
04-03-2009, 05:28 PM
tu sucks .............but hey, 45-35, right??

http://tulane.edu/news/style/images/shield_large.jpg

F18mustang
04-03-2009, 06:30 PM
tu sucks .............but hey, 45-35, right??

And I guess you are gonna tell the rest of us that A&M is better than Texas right? :rolleyes:

slorch
04-03-2009, 06:32 PM
the real question was were they relevant, the end of year came and proved other wise.

ask Texas if Tech mattered last year.

Only the idiots will say no.

stevefoxsc
04-03-2009, 07:17 PM
ask Texas if Tech mattered last year.

Only the idiots will say no.

being realistic, do you honestly think they had a chance vs florida... Yeah we knew the beat Texas, but come on you don't play that bad at the end of the season and get slaughtered in your bowl game and think you're relevant.

They beat the horns and i acknowledge, but c'mon everyone snags that 1 victory against the big dogg every now and then. And in reality you know 9/10 you'd lose.

slorch
04-03-2009, 07:24 PM
being realistic, do you honestly think they had a chance vs florida... Yeah we knew the beat Texas, but come on you don't play that bad at the end of the season and get slaughtered in your bowl game and think you're relevant.

They beat the horns and i acknowledge, but c'mon everyone snags that 1 victory against the big dogg every now and then. And in reality you know 9/10 you'd lose.

the only reality is that they beat UT last season and they were as relevant as anyone else in the title picture.

tayb
04-03-2009, 07:30 PM
You can't claim Tech wasn't relevant last year or their game against Texas and Oklahoma weren't absolutely HUGE (at least in the first five minutes against ou :D). In retrospect the BIGGEST game of the year last season was the Texas vs Texas Tech game. Had that game never been played there wouldn't have been a three way tie, Texas would have played in the Big XII championship, and oklahoma could have averted losing another big BCS game. I can't think of a single game that had more national title implications than that single game.

Just look at the polls. Tech started the season 12th and made their way up to #2 in the country (and stayed there for several weeks) before getting taken out back by ou, losing their bowl game (probably because they just didn't give a damn), and finished the season at #12. Hardly irrelevant.

I don't think Tech is going to be near as good of a team this year which is probably why they weren't included in the list but to claim they weren't relevant last year is nonsense.

F18mustang
04-03-2009, 07:34 PM
You can't claim Tech wasn't relevant last year or their game against Texas and Oklahoma weren't absolutely HUGE (at least in the first five minutes against ou :D). In retrospect the BIGGEST game of the year last season was the Texas vs Texas Tech game. Had that game never been played there wouldn't have been a three way tie, Texas would have played in the Big XII championship, and oklahoma could have averted losing another big BCS game. I can't think of a single game that had more national title implications than that single game.

Just look at the polls. Tech started the season 12th and made their way up to #2 in the country (and stayed there for several weeks) before getting taken out back by ou, losing their bowl game (probably because they just didn't give a damn), and finished the season at #12. Hardly irrelevant.

I don't think Tech is going to be near as good of a team this year which is probably why they weren't included in the list but to claim they weren't relevant last year is nonsense.

I tend to agree.

I also think next years team will turn out to be pretty solid. Alot of guys are in a position to step up. We have replaced star wide receivers with young guys that turn out to be stars year after year. That will be no different in '09.

lonny23
04-03-2009, 07:35 PM
No one really made a big deal about it like a certain Texas Tech Fan did...Most took it for it what it was...:rolleyes:

I personally think LSU going to Georgia is an important game, but I ain't crying about someone else's list...
No, you didn't take it for what it was. You posted it and initially said nothing about it. That's called a silent endorsement of said product. It would've been far better to post it, and discuss the merits of it vs. the standard, "I'm going to throw this out there for everybody to see" like normal for many people. There is no logical reason to post something that you don't agree with, but also won't castigate. When you post it, you're endorsing the validity of it and that's why I came out and said it blows and I still say it blows. I'm not talking about likes, dislikes, or any number of things. I'm just talking about simple human emotions and thought processes. The message you sent me was "cajun thinks this is a cool list." If you don't want to send that message, say something the next time.

Some of those who followed you took it for what it's worth and some disagreed. I'm sure many read it, but we don't know who they are, and it's insignificant enough for them that they didn't even comment.

cajun
04-03-2009, 07:53 PM
No, you didn't take it for what it was. You posted it and initially said nothing about it. That's called a silent endorsement of said product. It would've been far better to post it, and discuss the merits of it vs. the standard, "I'm going to throw this out there for everybody to see" like normal for many people. There is no logical reason to post something that you don't agree with, but also won't castigate. When you post it, you're endorsing the validity of it and that's why I came out and said it blows and I still say it blows. I'm not talking about likes, dislikes, or any number of things. I'm just talking about simple human emotions and thought processes. The message you sent me was "cajun thinks this is a cool list." If you don't want to send that message, say something the next time.

Some of those who followed you took it for what it's worth and some disagreed. I'm sure many read it, but we don't know who they are, and it's insignificant enough for them that they didn't even comment.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3253/2899735580_3a540e3f7e.jpg

stevefoxsc
04-03-2009, 08:24 PM
the only reality is that they beat UT last season and they were as relevant as anyone else in the title picture.

no i'm sorry you beat a texas team who deserved to lose for playing like crap thought you were relevant and got brought down to reality.

tayb
04-03-2009, 08:29 PM
Face palm is the best reaction whenever the VI speaks.

Dawg Fan
04-03-2009, 09:16 PM
no i'm sorry you beat a texas team who deserved to lose for playing like crap thought you were relevant and got brought down to reality.


ROTFLMAO!!!!! It never ceases to amaze me how the sips will spin any loss. Tech deserved to lose at OU and Ole Miss because they played like crap. Yea that excuse makes everything all better.:rolleyes:

BDB
04-03-2009, 09:28 PM
ROTFLMAO!!!!! It never ceases to amaze me how the sips will spin any loss. Tech deserved to lose at OU and Ole Miss because they played like crap. Yea that excuse makes everything all better.:rolleyes:

looking at the overall record of ou texas and tceh, which one is the most shoking?

the 1 loss texas team beating a 2 loss ou
the 2 loss ou beating the 2 loss tceh
or
the 2 loss tceh beating the 1 loss texas.

???

please answer.

The Wet Mustard
04-05-2009, 02:45 PM
1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17)
Without a doubt the Red River Shootout is the game of the year. Factor in the return of both Sam Bradford and Colt McCoy — who finished first and second in the 2008 Heisman race, respectively — whose teams, the Sooners and Longhorns, respectively, finished second and third in the final BCS standings.

That’s a lot of respect. Just like in 2008, it will be a surprise if one participant in this game (notice, we didn’t say “winner”) is not playing for the national championship in Pasadena.

So the secret is you actually mnust lose the game to get a chance at the national champioship.

Dawg Fan
04-05-2009, 02:54 PM
looking at the overall record of ou texas and tceh, which one is the most shoking?

the 1 loss texas team beating a 2 loss ou
the 2 loss ou beating the 2 loss tceh
or
the 2 loss tceh beating the 1 loss texas.

???

please answer.''

shoking? not sure if that is tex-mex or what

Ut did some shoking at Lubbock this year

You sips are the spin masters of all college sports. You find a way to justify any loss and make it a fluke or we just played bad. The arrogance is what causes people to hate UT.

BDB
04-05-2009, 03:04 PM
''


You sips are the spin masters of all college sports. You find a way to justify any loss and make it a fluke or we just played bad. The arrogance is what causes people to hate UT.

sooooooooooo. what you're saying is that texas lost to a better tceh team, who lost to a better zerou AND ole miss team who lost to a better texas AND florida team?

and i'll try not to mindfuck you next time by accidentally dropping a c that is followed by a k resulting in the same "k" sound, regardless.... sorry about that dawg.

agmc27
04-05-2009, 03:10 PM
20 most important games

• 1. Texas vs. OU at Dallas (10/17)
• 2. USC at Ohio St. (9/12)
• 3a. Florida at LSU (10/10)
• 3b. 'Bama at Mississippi (10/10)


1. Texas
2. Ohio St.
3a. Florida
3b. Bama

BDB
04-05-2009, 03:19 PM
1. Texas
2. Ohio St.
3a. Florida
3b. Bama

idk about those. ohio st. finally got their offense at the end of the season when wells was almost %100 and pryor started to hit those senior WR's but they lose most of their threats BESIDES pryor. i trust USuC in rebuilding more then tOSU.

texas and ou...... toss up every year.

Dawg Fan
04-05-2009, 04:51 PM
sooooooooooo. what you're saying is that texas lost to a better tceh team, who lost to a better zerou AND ole miss team who lost to a better texas AND florida team?

and i'll try not to mindfuck you next time by accidentally dropping a c that is followed by a k resulting in the same "k" sound, regardless.... sorry about that dawg.

nope, I am saying sips can't handle a loss without an excuse and you proved it. I can even say that without the juvenile attempt at humor by using vulgarity. Of course your superior intellect won't let you understand that...sorry

BDB
04-05-2009, 11:32 PM
nope, I am saying sips can't handle a loss without an excuse and you proved it. I can even say that without the juvenile attempt at humor by using vulgarity. Of course your superior intellect won't let you understand that...sorry

i thought the arguement was that texas choked away a game that the experts said they should have won? how is that not "handling a loss"? if they were saying "naw, it wasn't a loss...we really won". THAT would be not handling a loss.

but let's be real, texas should have beaten aggy in 06 & 07, they probably should have beaten tceh in 08, but both times came up short.

spin? i don't see it. i guess i'm "spinning" that texas was a worse team then aggy? :laugh

Dawg Fan
04-06-2009, 10:16 AM
i thought the arguement was that texas choked away a game that the experts said they should have won? how is that not "handling a loss"? if they were saying "naw, it wasn't a loss...we really won". THAT would be not handling a loss.

but let's be real, texas should have beaten aggy in 06 & 07, they probably should have beaten tceh in 08, but both times came up short.

spin? i don't see it. i guess i'm "spinning" that texas was a worse team then aggy? :laugh

The sad thing is you really don't get it but that makes you a great kool aid drinker. I see we have really made a lot of progress as always;)

BDB
04-06-2009, 11:28 AM
The sad thing is you really don't get it but that makes you a great kool aid drinker. I see we have really made a lot of progress as always;)

being called a kool-aid drinker by dawg = pure irony.

can you please tell me why i'm not "getting it", without stating nothing like you usually do?

and try to leave out a :rolleyes: or :confused: