PDA

View Full Version : Westfield posters get your crow here!!!


HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 04:18 PM
Time for all you posters to man up and eat your crow and bow down before the Judson tradition.

Judson beat you and the refs down in the same game.

None of you gave jrock a chance and now you will be watching TV next weekend.

Let's here your feedback.

shooter
12-03-2005, 04:28 PM
That was a great game by two great teams. Region 265 lives on to another week.

implacable44
12-03-2005, 04:30 PM
what? speak up - sound off - I can't hear you guys ???? all of you folks that were shouting from the rooftops -- you know who you are -- get in this thread and cowboy up ! i want to hear you shouting just as loud now as you were before the game proclaiming westfield dominance - that included you kt -- where is my apology ??? -

hook em horns - you graduated from judson in 90 ?

lonny23
12-03-2005, 04:33 PM
Hey, guys. They know they were wrong and we don't have to rub it in. Westfield just wasn't playing like they needed to in the playoffs and it finally caught up with them. Judson was the best team they played all year.

joeman26
12-03-2005, 04:35 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.

LUFPAN
12-03-2005, 04:36 PM
Congratulations to Judson on a great win. Its hard to beat a team with Judson's tradition of post season success.

Favpack
12-03-2005, 04:37 PM
I'm not a Westfield fan -but I'll take my crow frozen with no salt - sitting by the Riverwalk waiting for Ike and Bleed.:eek:

Converse Judson
12-03-2005, 04:37 PM
You NEVER underestimate the hearts of Champions. Judson outhustled and outplayed Spring Westfield today. I guess my "modified quote" worked. On with Euless Trinity.

Converse Judson
12-03-2005, 04:44 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.


You gotta play with the cards your dealt. And injuries are a part of the game. I knew that someone would pull the injury card and blame the game on not being at full strength. But the great teams find a way to win without some of their star players. And what's with this "had to injure"?? It's like your saying the Rockets injured him on purpose????

lonny23
12-03-2005, 04:46 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.
Pierre threw an INT and they struggled to move the ball with him in there. SW might've won, but it wasn't a slam dunk win and Judson deserved to win.

shooter
12-03-2005, 04:49 PM
2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one....

You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play...
I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future...


Injuries are part of the game.

You should be careful how you word statement about a student Athletes and his future.

In 2003 a radio announcer questioned a young mans future because of an injury. He went on to sue the Radio station for that statement because the student felt that one statement on the air cost him scholarships. AND HE WON! So while you are trying to make a point about the ethics of Judson you are also opening yourself up to a nasty legal issue. By making statements like the one above you are hurting this young man more than anyone did on the football field today. You ever notice coaches don't talk about injuries? Why? Because they know it might affect a kid’s future.

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 04:51 PM
what? speak up - sound off - I can't hear you guys ???? all of you folks that were shouting from the rooftops -- you know who you are -- get in this thread and cowboy up ! i want to hear you shouting just as loud now as you were before the game proclaiming westfield dominance - that included you kt -- where is my apology ??? -

hook em horns - you graduated from judson in 90 ?
yes 90 was the year.

Big_Maar
12-03-2005, 04:52 PM
I'm not a Westfield fan -but I'll take my crow frozen with no salt - sitting by the Riverwalk waiting for Ike and Bleed.:eek:


I had Westfield to win, so I'll take my crow smoked with some Q'Suace.

Great game Judson.

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 04:52 PM
I'm not a Westfield fan -but I'll take my crow frozen with no salt - sitting by the Riverwalk waiting for Ike and Bleed.:eek:
You are classy.

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 04:55 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.

WHAh whah whah.

Don't wanna get hit take up syncronized swimming.

BandidoNB
12-03-2005, 04:58 PM
I just got on the message board right now to see the updates.. WOAH!!!!!!!!!! JUDSON WON???!?!?!? Awesome!! GO 26-5A!!! I was listening to the Smithson Valley game also and that was a blowout. Too bad Canyon didnt win tho. Oh well.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 05:07 PM
I just got on the message board right now to see the updates.. WOAH!!!!!!!!!! JUDSON WON???!?!?!? Awesome!! GO 26-5A!!! I was listening to the Smithson Valley game also and that was a blowout. Too bad Canyon didnt win tho. Oh well.
It's hard to beat Calallen, just like it's hard to beat Judson and SV in the playoffs.

RedRage00
12-03-2005, 05:14 PM
Im so glad Judson won. Those Westfield players were so cocky and just trying to start stuff with the Judson players. They were taunting and acting classless towards the Judson players. I guess they thought they were going to walk over a team with 4 loses.

Lonny, you would be proud of me. I cheered for Judson LOL

GO ROCKETS GO! Represent 265!


I loved it when the Westfield side was chanting WESTFIELD! WESTFIELD! Then Judson returns the fumble for a TD! lol I never saw a crowd get so quiet that fast lol

RR

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 05:20 PM
Man that is going to be a long drive back to Houston.

SeguinMatadors
12-03-2005, 05:24 PM
Im so glad Judson won. Those Westfield players were so cocky and just trying to start stuff with the Judson players. They were taunting and acting classless towards the Judson players. I guess they thought they were going to walk over a team with 4 loses.

Lonny, you would be proud of me. I cheered for Judson LOL

GO ROCKETS GO! Represent 265!


I loved it when the Westfield side was chanting WESTFIELD! WESTFIELD! Then Judson returns the fumble for a TD! lol I never saw a crowd get so quiet that fast lol

RR

I second that. I was pulling for Judson like I would that Matadors. For today and this game, they were my team.

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 05:25 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.

If you read my post closely I never said WHS poster. If you look at the game thread earlier in the week you will see who all those posting for westfield were. Those are the ones I am looking for.
I at least give you credit for coming on here with an excuse.
That is bigger than most.

implacable44
12-03-2005, 05:26 PM
Man that is going to be a long drive back to Houston.

oh yeah - i graduated in 90 - didnt play football though -- just basketball

ruffshod
12-03-2005, 05:26 PM
Man that is going to be a long drive back to Houston.

Yes it will be. Congrats Rockets! Good luck next week.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 05:27 PM
Im so glad Judson won. Those Westfield players were so cocky and just trying to start stuff with the Judson players. They were taunting and acting classless towards the Judson players. I guess they thought they were going to walk over a team with 4 loses.

Lonny, you would be proud of me. I cheered for Judson LOL

GO ROCKETS GO! Represent 265!


I loved it when the Westfield side was chanting WESTFIELD! WESTFIELD! Then Judson returns the fumble for a TD! lol I never saw a crowd get so quiet that fast lol

RR
Good job. I was VERY confident that Westfield was going to be too cocky. I didn't buy for one minute that they were going to take Judson seriously because they didn't do it ALL year!

ruffshod
12-03-2005, 05:28 PM
It appears Judson made the plays they had to make. I'm a little surprised by the low score. But that's what you gotta do to beat Westfield. Congrats to the Mustangs. It was a good run.

zzz
12-03-2005, 05:29 PM
I’ve got to hand it to Judson, those kids really came out to play. Congratulations!

P.S. Crow isn't that bad, it tastes like chicken.

zzz
12-03-2005, 05:29 PM
Congratulations to Westfield for having a great season as well!

implacable44
12-03-2005, 05:31 PM
still waiting for kt the admin to apologize -- still waiting -

hey hookem - did you play football or basketball at judson ?

lonny23
12-03-2005, 05:33 PM
Congratulations to Westfield for having a great season as well!
I agree with that. Westfield did have a good year.

Hey, most of the Houston contingent isn't online right now, so I won't call them out.

I think today's game should raise my contention that Judson might've been better last year and just didn't do what they needed to do. I know Westfield was playing a lot better for the first 4 weeks of the playoffs last year.

HOOKEM
12-03-2005, 05:34 PM
I played a little b ball until my junior year. Then I majored in fermentology for the remainder of my school and college years.

implacable44
12-03-2005, 05:41 PM
I played a little b ball until my junior year. Then I majored in fermentology for the remainder of my school and college years.

fermentology - ha ha -

yeah too bad our team sucked - terrible point guard play. We had some good players on that team - Judson from 89-91 and maybe on should have gone to state -

jrp83
12-03-2005, 05:44 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.

I was at the game, and yes, the refs were terrible. Missed calls are part of the game, but these guys were bad. There were quite a few blatant bad calls or non calls both ways, but in my opinion, Judson got the worse of it. Anyway, Judson showed all the nay sayers, that they are worthy. Judson's D shut WF down, they only had 129 yds and 6 first downs. I tried telling all the non-believers that Judsons defense this year is better than last years. U. Trinity better not take the Rockets lightly or they'll get handled the same way. Westfield, great season, you guys are super tough, good luck next year. Judson's back in the title game. Go Rockets!!

TrojanHorse03
12-03-2005, 05:49 PM
I was at the game, and yes, the refs were terrible. Missed calls are part of the game, but these guys were bad. There were quite a few blatant bad calls or non calls both ways, but in my opinion, Judson got the worse of it. Anyway, Judson showed all the nay sayers, that they are worthy. Judson's D shut WF down, they only had 129 yds and 6 first downs. I tried telling all the non-believers that Judsons defense this year is better than last years. U. Trinity better not take the Rockets lightly or they'll get handled the same way. Judson back in the title game. Go Rockets!!

Please! HEB has been waiting for this game for over a decade, the Trinity program has grown up a lot since y'all manhandled us. If u listened to our players after the game, it was nothing but humility, a DIRECT reflection of Coach Lineweaver. I told the Consol fans, we can be beat, but it won't be by benefit of overlooking ANYONE in the playoffs. Congrats on the resilency of this Judson Rockets team.

joeman26
12-03-2005, 05:56 PM
Good job. I was VERY confident that Westfield was going to be too cocky. I didn't buy for one minute that they were going to take Judson seriously because they didn't do it ALL year!

I don't think this is true. And I don't think it's the reason WHS lost. If there was taunting, it was because these teams know each other and have a history. Westfield is a very disciplined team, and has benched starters (including Sweeney one week) for disciplinary reasons. Judson is a similar team; they lost 13 starters at one point in the season to injuries and disciplinary infractions. WHS knew this, and they knew their 6-4 record reflected that.

Which is why I'm fairly postive they took Judson VERY seriously. These teams are practically in the same division; they've played each other for the last four years. They know each other, and neither is going to underestimate the other. Do you think Judson underestimated the Mustangs last year, after the Mustangs trounced them the year before?

Besides, the Houston Chronicle has released three or four articles, all of which had Coach Corby Meekins, RB Terrance Sweeney, and QB Pierre Beasley saying they know Judson will show up to play, and that they had to be on their A game, ESPECIALLY coming off a close call against Cy Fair.

I will be curious to see how the Judson defense stacks up against the Trinity offense, although I must say I think Trinity is a heavy favorite. I still think it could go either way, though.

After this week, with pretty much every team I was pulling for falling in tight games, pretty much the only football I have to look forward to is the Rose Bowl. Go longhorns!

Edit: An observation. Today's game was a great defensive effort, with each team scoring on defense and special teams. The WHS defense held an anemic Judson offense scoreless for three quarters after the Rockets dominated the first quarter, and the solid Judson defense rocked a WHS offense without one of its two star players. Good defensive play, and thus, good football.

Biggems
12-03-2005, 06:00 PM
since i listened on the radio i didnt see the play where the QB got injured. Ill have to ask my bro. However, I doubt Judson injured him intentionally, we dont play that way.

However, when we playes Smithson Valley, they did intentionally take out #1 Williams, our best WR, after he scored a TD on them. the play was over and all the refs were looking in the backfield after our QB was sacked, and the DB dropped down and hit Williams in the knee area. He was useless the rest of the game.

Still, Judson was just dominant defensively. Westfield only had 1 scoring drive the entire game. ONE.......from a nationally ranked team.

ROCKET PRIDE
class of 93

theloneranger
12-03-2005, 06:19 PM
since i listened on the radio i didnt see the play where the QB got injured. Ill have to ask my bro. However, I doubt Judson injured him intentionally, we dont play that way.

However, when we playes Smithson Valley, they did intentionally take out #1 Williams, our best WR, after he scored a TD on them. the play was over and all the refs were looking in the backfield after our QB was sacked, and the DB dropped down and hit Williams in the knee area. He was useless the rest of the game.

Still, Judson was just dominant defensively. Westfield only had 1 scoring drive the entire game. ONE.......from a nationally ranked team.

ROCKET PRIDE
class of 93
Sorry to tell you...but Williams got injured earlier in the game and it was a question if he would come back. I got it saved on my DVR..... The play that he got injured on was a catch he made then got tripped up out of bounds from there on he was limping....On the play you are talking about he got bumped at the line then got his feet tangled with the SV CB. Its all on my DVR and there was no intentional hit on Williams.

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 06:28 PM
OK..Im in the house now and lets end the drama..To the dumb a$$ who said we had to injury Beasley, what the hell are u talking about. Beasley got hurt from a regular play and not intentional.. I just got back from the game. Our defense is the best in the state and tried to warn you. But u never took that warning as credible..I feel bad for Beasley but thats a part of the game and he will go on to play D1 College ball..The reason Im not showing any love in regards to the injury is because all you haters always talked about our 4 losses and when I stated we had 13 starters gone due to injurys and other thigs youll werent trying to hear me..So one starter is out and thats the reason for the loss..Come On...SW didnt get a first down untill the second Quarter when Beasley left, so what happened the first half..Some one needs to give credit were credit is due..All along I said this is a team game..Not we have a great QB or RB..We have the best DEFENSE in the state..And once again Offense wins Games but DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS...Oh one more thing all this stats have been thrown in my face all week..I forgot your name maybe TEXRED, why dont u tell me the stats now...Had to Vent a little..Lonny were up in Round Rock Next Week..Only me, you and a few thought this could happen...HOLLA BACK

bullrock
12-03-2005, 06:31 PM
I don't think it was intentional. TYhese guys are selling out everthing they have on the field. When two objects collide there is going to be consequences. Good luck next week against Katy. They are starting to be so much like Judson it's almost scary. Maybe when Permian had it going it was hard to understand, but I thing Katy and Judson have a better feeling now of what "MOJO" is all about. What is the saying" Luck is when preparation meets opportunity? That is a true statement.

SeguinMatadors
12-03-2005, 06:34 PM
Jrock, might want to cut the name calling... could lead to your banishment.

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 06:36 PM
I know about the name calling..But Im tired of the excuses..This guy cant even come on this forum and say Judson took it to the Best team around..Now we hurt someone intentional..CMON...Any given day or game someone can get hurt..Could u imagine the posts around here if Judson Lost

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 06:39 PM
SW is a very good team but they got beat by a very good under estimated team..No one gave them a chance in hell to win..I took flack all week from people and now its time to give credit were credit is due..And Im not trying to hear the whole ref thing either..

MisterJ
12-03-2005, 06:56 PM
WOW!

Those Judson Boys (Men) just won't go away. 29 years with a winning season! The best in Texas High School Football history and 3rd best in the nation. Riddle me this....We're not riding on our name...we've been riding on the backs of our opponents for 29 years:)

Hey, the Westfield game was a great game for both teams. I'm very proud of Judson and Westfield. I'm very disappointed in the Westfield fans that didn't show up. There was an entire section on their side that was empty. Were's the support moms and pops. You did a grave dis-service to your boys. The fans that didn't show should eat the crow!!!!!

MisterJ

Slim-Rob
12-03-2005, 07:03 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.

Give It Up. WE WERE STUFFING BEASLEY BEFORE HE GOT HURT SO DON'T EVEN FALL BACK ON THAT.

And the refs were not pro Westfield? How about the not called block in the back on that Punt Return for a Touchdown? How about that "Pass Interference," where the WR got hit after he missed the ball? And they got moved back 20 yards because they messed up. You have to throw the flag when a linemen backs up a step before the snap

Westfield played a Great game and had a great season, I look forward to the Semis next year!

chieftom
12-03-2005, 07:10 PM
I was there. Thanks to Northside ISD for use of there first class facility.
The game was not as close as the score! The best team on the field today won. I was not impressed with there QB or RB. Are you sure both are ligit D1 players. Madison had much quicker players at both positions. See you Sat in Round Rock when the Rockets go for #7.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:21 PM
I second that. I was pulling for Judson like I would that Matadors. For today and this game, they were my team.
I told you that I would've put my money on Judson!:D

DiamondJ2
12-03-2005, 07:23 PM
The SW QB was hurt on a normal tackle, not on purpose as stated by joe. It wasn't even that hard of a tackle, the kid just rolled his ankle. Westfield WAS averaging 420 yds and 41 ppg, but today they played a team who could control their offensive line. Rockets corraled the Mustangs holding them to six 1st downs and 170 yds. total offense. If Beasley had played, would it have made a difference? We'll never know. But with all of that talent, they should have overcome the situation. When you have that many Div. I prospects on the team compared to your opponents 1 or 2, you would believe that much talent would step it up and overcome an adverse situation.
Instead, they underacheived.

Rockets offense had about 240 yards total offense, and its ball control offense kept SW's offense off the field which was contributed big time in the Judson win. Outstanding offensive job by Taylor for the Rockets, excellent job for Rocket defense, and great job coaching staff, especially defensive coaches.

And for all of you Region III fans, Judson is now 10-4 against the so called athletically superior Region III (who has the least state titles of any Region in 5A Texas since 1990). Old tradition beat the so called new tradition.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:24 PM
I was at the game, and yes, the refs were terrible. Missed calls are part of the game, but these guys were bad. There were quite a few blatant bad calls or non calls both ways, but in my opinion, Judson got the worse of it. Anyway, Judson showed all the nay sayers, that they are worthy. Judson's D shut WF down, they only had 129 yds and 6 first downs. I tried telling all the non-believers that Judsons defense this year is better than last years. U. Trinity better not take the Rockets lightly or they'll get handled the same way. Westfield, great season, you guys are super tough, good luck next year. Judson's back in the title game. Go Rockets!!
I doubt Trinity takes them lightly after the anointed D1 champs got beat. I just lit up when I read what the Chronicle was saying about Westfield!:D It was a setup in the first degree.

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 07:25 PM
Missed the game but i was there in spirit i was in houston watching Texas clobber some 2nd graders lol.

Game kina sounds like the North shore game from the 90's little judson wasnt supposed to stand a chance and now were going to the title game lol.....its just so funny i cant stop laughing. All those teams that had better records then us we beat em all.

CNV J-Rock
12-03-2005, 07:29 PM
I told those kids in another post that we're right on schedule.

Westfield had a great team and great season, but Houston football is WAY OVERRATED!

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:29 PM
I don't think this is true. And I don't think it's the reason WHS lost. If there was taunting, it was because these teams know each other and have a history. Westfield is a very disciplined team, and has benched starters (including Sweeney one week) for disciplinary reasons. Judson is a similar team; they lost 13 starters at one point in the season to injuries and disciplinary infractions. WHS knew this, and they knew their 6-4 record reflected that.

Which is why I'm fairly postive they took Judson VERY seriously. These teams are practically in the same division; they've played each other for the last four years. They know each other, and neither is going to underestimate the other. Do you think Judson underestimated the Mustangs last year, after the Mustangs trounced them the year before?

Besides, the Houston Chronicle has released three or four articles, all of which had Coach Corby Meekins, RB Terrance Sweeney, and QB Pierre Beasley saying they know Judson will show up to play, and that they had to be on their A game, ESPECIALLY coming off a close call against Cy Fair.

I will be curious to see how the Judson defense stacks up against the Trinity offense, although I must say I think Trinity is a heavy favorite. I still think it could go either way, though.

After this week, with pretty much every team I was pulling for falling in tight games, pretty much the only football I have to look forward to is the Rose Bowl. Go longhorns!

Edit: An observation. Today's game was a great defensive effort, with each team scoring on defense and special teams. The WHS defense held an anemic Judson offense scoreless for three quarters after the Rockets dominated the first quarter, and the solid Judson defense rocked a WHS offense without one of its two star players. Good defensive play, and thus, good football.
Good post. I hear a lot about Westfield being disciplined and the whole 9 yards, but I also hear about how great the talent is and Meekins guaranteed a title before the Lee game last year. I just don't know how it all fits. In some ways, it seems like they take some opponents lightly, but if what you say is true, that tells me one thing. Houston teams aren't as good as they are made out to be most of the time.

TrojanHorse03
12-03-2005, 07:31 PM
I doubt Trinity takes them lightly after the anointed D1 champs got beat. I just lit up when I read what the Chronicle was saying about Westfield!:D It was a setup in the first degree.

Yeah we would of had plenty of bulletin board material if Westfield had one. I guess no one was paying attention to when the won state vs. Northshore :D :rolleyes: .

Dragonuncle
12-03-2005, 07:34 PM
I didn't read all the previous posts But if Judson won like I think they did. Great job. I picked Westfield to win it all. The crow is not that bad. I'm impressed!!!:)

bullrock
12-03-2005, 07:37 PM
You have to feel for Meekins and his staff. It is a very long road, beginning in January, to get as far as they have the last two years and come up empty. It takes a lot out of you and kind of makes you wonder why they would subject themselves to this beginning next month. I know the fans don't realize it yet, but after it's over you'll be glad. It's been equally hard on fans too.

Slim-Rob
12-03-2005, 07:43 PM
You have to feel for Meekins and his staff. It is a very long road, beginning in January, to get as far as they have the last two years and come up empty. It takes a lot out of you and kind of makes you wonder why they would subject themselves to this beginning next month. I know the fans don't realize it yet, but after it's over you'll be glad. It's been equally hard on fans too.

I think it would be great for Westfield to win state, but not if it means they have to go through Judson to do it. I think it is still a big accomplishment, 04 Finalists, 05 Semi-Finalists.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:48 PM
OK..Im in the house now and lets end the drama..To the dumb a$$ who said we had to injury Beasley, what the hell are u talking about. Beasley got hurt from a regular play and not intentional.. I just got back from the game. Our defense is the best in the state and tried to warn you. But u never took that warning as credible..I feel bad for Beasley but thats a part of the game and he will go on to play D1 College ball..The reason Im not showing any love in regards to the injury is because all you haters always talked about our 4 losses and when I stated we had 13 starters gone due to injurys and other thigs youll werent trying to hear me..So one starter is out and thats the reason for the loss..Come On...SW didnt get a first down untill the second Quarter when Beasley left, so what happened the first half..Some one needs to give credit were credit is due..All along I said this is a team game..Not we have a great QB or RB..We have the best DEFENSE in the state..And once again Offense wins Games but DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS...Oh one more thing all this stats have been thrown in my face all week..I forgot your name maybe TEXRED, why dont u tell me the stats now...Had to Vent a little..Lonny were up in Round Rock Next Week..Only me, you and a few thought this could happen...HOLLA BACK
HOLLA!:D

The stats:

10 Judson title games since 1983!

CNV J-Rock
12-03-2005, 07:49 PM
It's pretty safe to say we'll be getting another "Team of the Week" helmet.

implacable44
12-03-2005, 07:50 PM
Jrock, might want to cut the name calling... could lead to your banishment.

hey did you play ball at seguin with pitts?

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:51 PM
I don't think it was intentional. TYhese guys are selling out everthing they have on the field. When two objects collide there is going to be consequences. Good luck next week against Katy. They are starting to be so much like Judson it's almost scary. Maybe when Permian had it going it was hard to understand, but I thing Katy and Judson have a better feeling now of what "MOJO" is all about. What is the saying" Luck is when preparation meets opportunity? That is a true statement.
I agree, except SV may be catching what Katy had a few years ago.

We talk a lot about the SuperBracket, but it's almost a shame that Judson and SV would have knock each other out every year if we did have one.

joeman26
12-03-2005, 07:52 PM
A few too many posts are misinterpreting what I meant by Judson injuring Beasley. If you read my post, I didn't say it was intentional at all. That's putting words in my mouth. What I said was, "You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one," meaning it was the difference maker in the game. That statement does not imply intentional harm. Had you not injured Beasley, it still could've gone either way. I realize Judson did a great job stopping him in the first quarter, but it takes very little for the Mustang offense to get going, and once they've started, no one can stop them. I would've liked to see Sweeney step up a bit more to try to turn the game, but he didn't have his best stuff.

As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurrence where one of the division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?

Slim-Rob
12-03-2005, 07:52 PM
I've been hangin in there JRocketMan. I never give up on Judson, even with 4 losses. 10-4 sounds so good.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:53 PM
Jrock, might want to cut the name calling... could lead to your banishment.
That's true. I don't want to make personal attacks even though there's a LOT of people from Houston who've said stuff to Me in the last 2 years.

Slim-Rob
12-03-2005, 07:54 PM
A few too many posts are misinterpreting what I meant by Judson injuring Beasley. If you read my post, I didn't say it was intentional at all. That's putting words in my mouth. What I said was, "You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one," meaning it was the difference maker in the game. That statement does not imply intentional harm. Had you not injured Beasley, it still could've gone either way. I realize Judson did a great job stopping him in the first quarter, but it takes very little for the Mustang offense to get going, and once they've started, no one can stop them. I would've liked to see Sweeney step up a bit more to try to turn the game, but he didn't have his best game.

As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurence where one of the Division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?

1995 Judson's Rival Roosevelt Beat them. Judson went 14-1 that season. Roosevelt went 16-0.

Judson won D1
Roosevelt won D2
Both are in District 26-5A

lonny23
12-03-2005, 07:56 PM
I know about the name calling..But Im tired of the excuses..This guy cant even come on this forum and say Judson took it to the Best team around..Now we hurt someone intentional..CMON...Any given day or game someone can get hurt..Could u imagine the posts around here if Judson Lost
It was bad taste to say that after Judson beat them fairly. Of course, there would be posts galore. When you have me as a fan, you're going to get a LOT of feedback when Judson loses. If Judson had lost, all the Rocket fans were going to be mad at the refs. I've heard Tony Franklin complain before, but never like today.

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 08:02 PM
Yeha houston is crying there eyes out tonight.....

lonny23
12-03-2005, 08:02 PM
It's pretty safe to say we'll be getting another "Team of the Week" helmet.
I called for #4 yesterday. Can we get #5 next week?:D

lonny23
12-03-2005, 08:04 PM
A few too many posts are misinterpreting what I meant by Judson injuring Beasley. If you read my post, I didn't say it was intentional at all. That's putting words in my mouth. What I said was, "You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one," meaning it was the difference maker in the game. That statement does not imply intentional harm. Had you not injured Beasley, it still could've gone either way. I realize Judson did a great job stopping him in the first quarter, but it takes very little for the Mustang offense to get going, and once they've started, no one can stop them. I would've liked to see Sweeney step up a bit more to try to turn the game, but he didn't have his best stuff.

As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurence where one of the division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?
Yes.

1992 Temple over Judson
1995 SA Roosevelt over Judson (Same District)

I don't know about others.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 08:07 PM
I've been hangin in there JRocketMan. I never give up on Judson, even with 4 losses. 10-4 sounds so good.
They've never gone to a title game with more than 1 loss until this year. They never had even made the playoffs with 4 losses before this year.

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 08:08 PM
A few too many posts are misinterpreting what I meant by Judson injuring Beasley. If you read my post, I didn't say it was intentional at all. That's putting words in my mouth. What I said was, "You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one," meaning it was the difference maker in the game. That statement does not imply intentional harm. Had you not injured Beasley, it still could've gone either way. I realize Judson did a great job stopping him in the first quarter, but it takes very little for the Mustang offense to get going, and once they've started, no one can stop them. I would've liked to see Sweeney step up a bit more to try to turn the game, but he didn't have his best stuff.

As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurence where one of the division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?

Joe why cant u just give credit where credit is due..Once again it took Beasley to get injured for us to take this one..Doesnt make sense..If the offense was so so great. Points would have been put on the board in the first quarter. Just say SW hasnt seen a defense like Judson..Next..U Would have liked it if Sweeney step upped, but He didnt have his best stuff..So what does it take for him to have his best stuff..As I remember this was the State Semi Final Game, so what was he waiting for..Not saying is a bad player, he is extremely talented, but thats why Judson won, players show up to play when somethings on the line something called a State Championship..My Man..Just give credit to a well coached, hard working team, as other people did..This SW team I think like most, looked at the record and stats and thought this was an easy win..WHEN I GAVE U FAIR WARNING..To all that was at the game..This was the best HS Footbal Game I saw in a long time..

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 08:10 PM
probably made a stupid bet and hes trying to fine a way to justify it so he wont lose his home or some crap :eek:

lonny23
12-03-2005, 08:13 PM
probably made a stupid bet and hes trying to fine a way to justify it so he wont lose his home or some crap :eek:
You mean something like I'll run on the Riverwalk naked if Judson beats Westfield!:p

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 08:14 PM
Exactly !!! well said lonny.

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 08:14 PM
probably made a stupid bet and hes trying to fine a way to justify it so he wont lose his home or some crap :eek:

LOL:)

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 08:15 PM
But not to take anything away from a very talented SW team and that run back they had was amazing, but I think Meekins wasted is timeouts way to quick..

joeman26
12-03-2005, 08:29 PM
You misunderstand what I mean yet again. Last week Spring Westfield trailed at the half. Had they gone on first half statistics, the game would've been a huge upset. In the second half, Beasley stepped up and engineered a great comeback. His offense marched down the field for 70+ yards on nearly every possession, unchallenged. Like I said, once they get started, it's nearly impossible to stop them. A similar event happened vs North Shore. Both North Shore and Cy Fair have defenses just as good as Converse Judson. Props for Judson on keeping him at bay for the first quarter, but a football game has four of those.

And by "Sweeney had a bad game," I mean, "he's a key player to WHS's offense, and good job Judson on holding him to little yardage." You just twisted my words a little to make them sound like I was saying Judson had no part in making him play bad.

Furthermore, I already mentioned how Judson fans are just generalizing when they said that WHS would underestimate them. Go back to page two for more on that. I also gave the Judson defense credit for taking this game, but that just glazed right over you. You want me to say that Judson won this game on all levels, but I don't think they did. Had they defeated them 100-0, I wouldn't be so skeptical. They came out and won today, and vs a Beasleyless Spring Westfield, they are certainly the better team. That one stipulation is not just excuse fodder, because as lonny pointed out, all 700 Judson posters would crow about the bad officiating had WHS pulled this one out.

Judson's defense won the game, but the WHS offense wasn't at full strength. End of story. A lot of the reasons Judson posters gave for why they'd win this game just weren't true. Some examples include Westfield being disadvantaged for having to drive to San Antonio when they normally drive out to the Lousiana border under Houston traffic to play Beaumont teams during the regular season, and WHS simply underestimating Judson, when all of the top players and coaches on their team have been stressing that they are taking everything one game at a time and certainly didn't think Judson was a free pass to state. Nobody really predicted the game would be decided like it did, with Beasley on the sidelines.

lonny23
12-03-2005, 08:33 PM
You misunderstand what I mean yet again. Last week Spring Westfield trailed at the half. Had they gone on first half statistics, the game would've been a huge upset. In the second half, Beasley stepped up and engineered a great comeback. His offense marched down the field for 70+ yards on nearly every possession, unchallenged. Like I said, once they get started, it's nearly impossible to stop them. A similar event happened vs North Shore. Both North Shore and Cy Fair have defenses just as good as Converse Judson. Props for Judson on keeping him at bay for the first quarter, but a football game has four of those.

And by "Sweeney had a bad game," I mean, "he's a key player to WHS's offense, and good job Judson on holding him to little yardage." You just twisted my words a little to make them sound like I was saying Judson had no part in making him play bad.

Furthermore, I already mentioned how Judson fans are just generalizing when they said that WHS would underestimate them. Go back to page two for more on that. I also gave the Judson defense credit for taking this game, but that just glazed right over you. You want me to say that Judson won this game on all levels, but I don't think they did. Had they defeated them 100-0, I wouldn't be so skeptical. They came out and won today, and vs a Beasleyless Spring Westfield, they are certainly the better team. That one stipulation is not just excuse fodder, because as lonny pointed out, all 700 Judson posters would crow about the bad officiating had WHS pulled this one out.

Judson's defense won the game, but the WHS offense wasn't at full strength. End of story. A lot of the reasons Judson posters gave for why they'd win this game just weren't true. Some examples include Westfield being disadvantaged for having to drive to San Antonio when they normally drive out to the Lousiana border under Houston traffic to play Beaumont teams during the regular season, and WHS simply underestimating Judson, when all of the top players and coaches on their team have been stressing that they are taking everything one game at a time and certainly didn't think Judson was a free pass to state.
Hey, I'll cut you some slack.

You sure get your money's worth out of a post!:D

JRocketMan
12-03-2005, 08:35 PM
OK..anyway..good game..very good season..My job is done here..I mean Judson's.

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 09:05 PM
hey at least wesfield people get to save some money on gas now :eek:

IGot2Rings
12-03-2005, 09:13 PM
A few too many posts are misinterpreting what I meant by Judson injuring Beasley. If you read my post, I didn't say it was intentional at all. That's putting words in my mouth. What I said was, "You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one," meaning it was the difference maker in the game. That statement does not imply intentional harm. Had you not injured Beasley, it still could've gone either way. I realize Judson did a great job stopping him in the first quarter, but it takes very little for the Mustang offense to get going, and once they've started, no one can stop them. I would've liked to see Sweeney step up a bit more to try to turn the game, but he didn't have his best stuff.

As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurrence where one of the division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?


Yes In 1992 #1 Temple beat #2 JUDSON in a pre-district battle. Temple went on to win the DII title and JUDSON won the DI title.

Also, in 1995 San Antonio Roosevelt beat JUDSON in a 26-5A district game. Roosevelt went on to win the DII title, and JUDSON won the DI title. This was the 1st and only time two teams in the same district won titles. This year could be the 2nd time if SV and JUDSON take care of business.

Judson coaches have known for years how to prepare their teams for a championship run. They always play a tough pre-district season, the alwyas take a long road trip during the season, and more times than not, they lose early in the season. For this reason, Judson is ALWAYS prepared for a successful playoff run.

See you in Round Rock!

LoneRocket
12-03-2005, 09:19 PM
On our way home we noticed that one of the Westfield team buses on the side of 1604, it was smoking like it was going to catch on fire. Does anybody if they are okay?

IGot2Rings
12-03-2005, 09:23 PM
When it rains it pours!

eingedikid
12-03-2005, 09:25 PM
As a theoretical situation, if Judson wins Div. I, and Smithson wins Div. II, does that make SV the unofficial complete Texas champions? Has their even been an occurrence where one of the division state champions had defeated the other in the regular season?
The answer is basically yes. That's why Temple can make this claim in 1992 after beating Judson 37-21 in week 4, and of course TR in 1995 as a result of a 35-21 verdict over Judson in week 6. Intersetingly, Temple got better after getting beat 14-7 by Killeen(?) later in the season, as did Judson, but I've always suspected that if they matched those two up again that season Temple would come out on top again. Ditto for the TR/Judson 1995 scenario. Judson was in a minor funk for about two games after the loos to TR, but then they really cranked things up thereafter. So did TR as they took it to another level in the playoffs in beating Westlake and of course in doing the number on FM Marcus. Nevertheless, we will never know for sure, which makes it kind of fun whenever things like this happen.

If there had been a Judson/TR rematch I suspect it would have been one of those classic defensive fights to the death similar to the 1982 Judson-Churchill rematch.

LoneRocket
12-03-2005, 09:26 PM
The answer is basically yes. That's why Temple can make this claim in 1992 after beating Judson 37-21 in week 4, and of course TR in 1995 as a result of a 35-21 verdict over Judson in week 6. Intersetingly, Temple got better after getting beat 14-7 by Killeen(?) later in the season, as did Judson, but I've always suspected that if they matched those two up again that season Temple would come out on top again. Ditto for the TR/Judson 1995 scenario. Judson was in a minor funk for about two games after the loos to TR, but then they really cranked things up thereafter. So did TR as they took it to another level in the playoffs in beating Westlake and of course in doing the number on FM Marcus. Nevertheless, we will never know for sure, which makes it kind of fun whenever things like this happen.

If there had been a Judson/TR rematch I suspect it would have been one of those classic defensive fights to the death similar to the 1982 Judson-Churchill rematch.
I thought the rematch was going to be in the parking lot at Windsor Park mall.

fbjones
12-03-2005, 10:41 PM
I'd like my crow without the feathers.

DiamondJ2
12-03-2005, 11:03 PM
So not having the QB (he was in the game 80% of the plays in the 1st half and did nothing) was the reason Westfield's offensive line was unable to block and open up the running game the whole 4 quarters? SW was averaging 284 yards rushing per game, but only got a little over 120 against Judson. With all of the talent and 10-12 Div. I suspects, they couldn't bring it together against a 4 loss team with maybe 1-3 Div. I prospects? No, the Judson defensive line just outplayed SW o-line. You can count the number of Judson sacks of the QB on one hand. The Rockets just played superior ball defensively. The back-up QB had some good passes, but the receivers dropped 4 passes that should have been caught.

Anyway, thanks for a great game. See you next year. Enjoy the championship games on TV.

gldneagles
12-03-2005, 11:09 PM
I had Westfield to win, so I'll take my crow smoked with some Q'Suace.

Great game Judson.
that sounds very tasty. mind if i join you? does red wine go with that? i like red wine.

gldneagles
12-03-2005, 11:19 PM
The SW QB was hurt on a normal tackle, not on purpose as stated by joe. It wasn't even that hard of a tackle, the kid just rolled his ankle. Westfield WAS averaging 420 yds and 41 ppg, but today they played a team who could control their offensive line. Rockets corraled the Mustangs holding them to six 1st downs and 170 yds. total offense. If Beasley had played, would it have made a difference? We'll never know. But with all of that talent, they should have overcome the situation. When you have that many Div. I prospects on the team compared to your opponents 1 or 2, you would believe that much talent would step it up and overcome an adverse situation.
Instead, they underacheived.

Rockets offense had about 240 yards total offense, and its ball control offense kept SW's offense off the field which was contributed big time in the Judson win. Outstanding offensive job by Taylor for the Rockets, excellent job for Rocket defense, and great job coaching staff, especially defensive coaches.

And for all of you Region III fans, Judson is now 10-4 against the so called athletically superior Region III (who has the least state titles of any Region in 5A Texas since 1990). Old tradition beat the so called new tradition.
region 3 is superior and always will be!

B2BStateChamps92_93
12-03-2005, 11:46 PM
First of all, there are no WHS posters on this forum. It is extremely biased towards Judson. Extremely. The so called "Westfield posters" you intend to taunt are actually just non-Judson posters that were being realistic.

Congratulations on the game, but two things.

1. The referees were not pro-Westfield. The announcers were pro-Judson. Of course they're going to lament every bad call. If the referees were pro-Westfield, then they wouldn't have backed them up 20 yards with the game on the line in the two minute drill. Westfield may have even won the game if not for that.

2. You guys had to injure Pierre Beasley to take this one. Trust me, WHS would rather have had a healthy Beasley than lucky calls. I doubt ya'll could've pulled it off had he stayed in the game. He's such an efficient player, it's hard to stop his offense. Austin Shaw's a good player, but he's not anywhere on his level. The turnovers attributed to Shaw that eventually won ya'll the game would not have occurred with Beasley on the field. But that's not the worst of it. You guys not only injured WHS's star quarterback, but their star forward on the same play. He's a starter on their nationally ranked basketball team, and now they might have to go the entire season without him. I realize you guys are excited and all, but the Judson football team and fans should know not to start celebrating wildly when they potentially ruin a future NCAA division I star's future, especially considering they were penalized in this game for distasteful celebrations.


Lets not forget that Pierre did not get a single first down the entire time that he was in the game. If this poster (poser) was acctually at the game he would know that Pierre was injured on a QB keeper around the right side and he got rolled up on by numerous players from both teams. Not to mention that it was SWF that was penalized for unsportsmanlike conduct in the first series. Anyone who was at the game would probably agree that the announcer could hardly be considered favoring Judson since you could not hear him for 90% of the game.

This is what I posted earlier this week.

This is all simple enough to explain, Judson started off the year with a new offensive coordinator (previously from SA Madison). Against Judson tradition they ran a spread offense thru the Churchill game I think. They then switched back to the pound and ground of the DW Rutledge days and have looked much more like the Judson that is constantly referred to in this forum. With a homefield advantage and a defense that seems to come through in the final minutes of the most important games (interception with >3:00 against Reagan to hold them off and make the playoffs and interception with >2:00 against O'Connor to seal the game)Judson defense recovers fumble and runs it back 65+ yards then intercepts pass w/ >2:00 left to seal up the win and move ON TO STATE against SWFI pick Judson in a 28-24 UPSET!!! This reminds me of the 1993 state semi-finals against a very strong Aldine Eisenhauer team that Judson managed to beat in a tie on penatrations 5-4.

We Believe in Rocket Pride!!

Judson Class of 94

Mad Hatter
12-03-2005, 11:55 PM
region 3 is superior and always will be!

u need to lay off that houston weed kid.

lonny23
12-04-2005, 12:02 AM
Lets not forget that Pierre did not get a single first down the entire time that he was in the game. If this poster (poser) was acctually at the game he would know that Pierre was injured on a QB keeper around the right side and he got rolled up on by numerous players from both teams. Not to mention that it was SWF that was penalized for unsportsmanlike conduct in the first series. Anyone who was at the game would probably agree that the announcer could hardly be considered favoring Judson since you could not hear him for 90% of the game.

This is what I posted earlier this week.

This is all simple enough to explain, Judson started off the year with a new offensive coordinator (previously from SA Madison). Against Judson tradition they ran a spread offense thru the Churchill game I think. They then switched back to the pound and ground of the DW Rutledge days and have looked much more like the Judson that is constantly referred to in this forum. With a homefield advantage and a defense that seems to come through in the final minutes of the most important games (interception with >3:00 against Reagan to hold them off and make the playoffs and interception with >2:00 against O'Connor to seal the game)Judson defense recovers fumble and runs it back 65+ yards then intercepts pass w/ >2:00 left to seal up the win and move ON TO STATE against SWFI pick Judson in a 28-24 UPSET!!! This reminds me of the 1993 state semi-finals against a very strong Aldine Eisenhauer team that Judson managed to beat in a tie on penatrations 5-4.

We Believe in Rocket Pride!!

Judson Class of 94
Good job on the predictions. I was thinking low scoring and that we might get some non-traditional scores to push us over the top.

ruffshod
12-04-2005, 01:02 AM
Hey Lonny! Don't let Ike off the hook. And Congrats to you and the Rockets. Y'all beat one hell of a team.

lonny23
12-04-2005, 06:00 AM
Hey Lonny! Don't let Ike off the hook. And Congrats to you and the Rockets. Y'all beat one hell of a team.
The signature remains. We have Shooter on the case with camera in hand!:p