LeanderLions3033
11-28-2008, 10:34 PM
I've had this broken down to me by die hard UT fans and die hard OU fans who i feel both have a good football IQ, and both made extremely valid points that completely shred the other persons argument....
UT's side....
We always hear the espn talking heads that dont agree with the playoff system say, "we dont need a playoff because the entire season is a playoff." Well in this case, if OU and Mizzou go to the big 12 championship, we would have beaten the two representatives by a combined 35 points. BOTH TEAMS!!! so much for the regular season being the playoff, because with this argument it just seems like more of a beauty contest. And i know it obviously wasnt the only thing that happened in that game for us to lose, but we really were a dropped int away from being the undisputed #1, and i dont think this can be overlooked in terms of how the 3 way tie is looked at.
OUs side....
All UT fans say that Tech has been effectively eliminated from this argument because of how bad Tech lost in Norman. So are you trying to say that if OU had beaten tech by say....10 points, would they still be relevant in the argument then? Cause a team shouldnt be eliminated from the disscusion of a 3 way tie just because they got blown out on the road. I mean in the end, an L is an L no matter how many points its by, it still doesnt change the fact that OU, UT, and Tech still have identical records in conference and overall play. They're saying that a team shouldnt be eliminate just because of the name in front of their jersey compared to teh other two teams (considering tech doesnt have the same national respect that OU and UT have). If for some reason OU loses to OSU and Tech goes on to the big 12 championship and blows out Mizzou, they just as good of an argument as anybody to go to the national championship.
Both very valid points IMO and is a reason to why the system is flawed. Nobody is right in this situation, and nobody is wrong. Obama needs to just go ahead and make his 8 team playoff. Imagine how epic that would be this year with so many teams that claim they have a right to be in the hunt.
UT's side....
We always hear the espn talking heads that dont agree with the playoff system say, "we dont need a playoff because the entire season is a playoff." Well in this case, if OU and Mizzou go to the big 12 championship, we would have beaten the two representatives by a combined 35 points. BOTH TEAMS!!! so much for the regular season being the playoff, because with this argument it just seems like more of a beauty contest. And i know it obviously wasnt the only thing that happened in that game for us to lose, but we really were a dropped int away from being the undisputed #1, and i dont think this can be overlooked in terms of how the 3 way tie is looked at.
OUs side....
All UT fans say that Tech has been effectively eliminated from this argument because of how bad Tech lost in Norman. So are you trying to say that if OU had beaten tech by say....10 points, would they still be relevant in the argument then? Cause a team shouldnt be eliminated from the disscusion of a 3 way tie just because they got blown out on the road. I mean in the end, an L is an L no matter how many points its by, it still doesnt change the fact that OU, UT, and Tech still have identical records in conference and overall play. They're saying that a team shouldnt be eliminate just because of the name in front of their jersey compared to teh other two teams (considering tech doesnt have the same national respect that OU and UT have). If for some reason OU loses to OSU and Tech goes on to the big 12 championship and blows out Mizzou, they just as good of an argument as anybody to go to the national championship.
Both very valid points IMO and is a reason to why the system is flawed. Nobody is right in this situation, and nobody is wrong. Obama needs to just go ahead and make his 8 team playoff. Imagine how epic that would be this year with so many teams that claim they have a right to be in the hunt.