PDA

View Full Version : Slc Vs. Et



go_hawgs_04
11-05-2005, 02:03 AM
so looks like the dream match up is going to happen. can ET secondary hold the SLC offense? well see... can the SLC defense stop trinitys running game? highly doubt it... guess well find out the first round ladies and gents... i see ET pulling an upset if SLC cant maintain the two horses, Nance and Handy, lethal combo. If Mcelroy and the speedsters play there best they might manhandle the secondary of ET.

ktchamp97
11-05-2005, 02:06 AM
Carroll is D2 and will be playing Irving MacArthur next Saturday...it's official.

go_hawgs_04
11-05-2005, 02:08 AM
i thought if grapevine wins slc will go d1... guess i was wrong... crap, really wanted to see that matchup.

go_hawgs_04
11-05-2005, 02:10 AM
Mac will defeat Slc...i really predict that

farmerfan
11-05-2005, 03:13 AM
Mac will defeat Slc...i really predict that


i posted wrong information, guess it is better to look before I post.
I thought with Mac's win over SGP they would be the 1 seed in D2, I guess they are not which does not make much sense to me.

cougardude
11-05-2005, 07:44 AM
i posted wrong information, guess it is better to look before I post.
I thought with Mac's win over SGP they would be the 1 seed in D2, I guess they are not which does not make much sense to me.


That is strange! If they finished with the same district mark wouldn't the tie breaker be head-to-head competition? :confused:

Answer: Check this thread - http://www.5atexasfootball.com/forum/vB/showthread.php?t=3145

farmerfan
11-05-2005, 07:52 AM
That is strange! If they finished with the same district mark wouldn't the tie breaker be head-to-head competition? :confused:

Answer: Check this thread - http://www.5atexasfootball.com/forum/vB/showthread.php?t=3145


that is what I would think. It makes sense with Trinity going D1 to decide the seeding in d2 on head to head, but I guess not. I was looking forward to seeing Carroll/SGP if we did not get the Trinity/Carroll game.

luckyfighter05
11-05-2005, 06:51 PM
I think you will see a sgp carroll match up in the regional finals. I dont think irv mac has what it takes 2 beat carroll, but sgp might. Trinity should have beaten irv mac by a significantly larger amount. Trinity's Defense is moving very sluggish as of late causing their offense 2 stay on the sidelines. Sgp had a good game plan, hopefully trinity's d can pressure the qb's in the playoffs if they want a state title. D1 is looking very stacked, I see a lot of teams that could really make it hard for carroll to repeat.

KTHoC
11-05-2005, 07:14 PM
Don't you mean DII is stacked and SLC will have a tough time repeating there? It had appeared a couple of weeks back that DI would have most of the big dogs. How quickly things change in Texas HS Football!!

dragons08
11-06-2005, 12:17 AM
so looks like the dream match up is going to happen. can ET secondary hold the SLC offense? well see... can the SLC defense stop trinitys running game? highly doubt it... guess well find out the first round ladies and gents... i see ET pulling an upset if SLC cant maintain the two horses, Nance and Handy, lethal combo. If Mcelroy and the speedsters play there best they might manhandle the secondary of ET.
you must feel stupid now huh?? :p

dragons08
11-06-2005, 12:17 AM
Mac will defeat Slc...i really predict that
for some reason im going with SLC defeats Mac

toonman
11-06-2005, 08:51 AM
for some reason im going with SLC defeats Mac

I agree. I know history does not count for this game, but we all like to refer to what has happened in the past. I believe that SLC has owned I-Mac in the play-offs in recent years.

DragonNation
11-06-2005, 08:57 AM
hawg:

I guess since you made this prediction the Dragons should just not show up for the Mac contest...............naw, I think we will play the game anyway.

Phoenixrising05
11-06-2005, 09:16 AM
I agree. I know history does not count for this game, but we all like to refer to what has happened in the past. I believe that SLC has owned I-Mac in the play-offs in recent years.

Actually I believe 3 years ago (SLC's 1st year in 5A) they were the 1st team to really give us a run for our money. I remember many mistakes on our side and a good I-Mac Defense taking the game down to the last few in the 4th. BUT we've played a lot of ball between now and way back then so I could be mistaken ;)

dragonfootballfan
11-06-2005, 09:37 AM
Actually I believe 3 years ago (SLC's 1st year in 5A) they were the 1st team to really give us a run for our money. I remember many mistakes on our side and a good I-Mac Defense taking the game down to the last few in the 4th. BUT we've played a lot of ball between now and way back then so I could be mistaken ;)
actually that 14 point win should have been a 21 point win as the second team went in to take a knee on the 3 yard line and a fumbled snap let macarthur scored a defensive touchdown right before time expired

BigFanSLC
11-06-2005, 11:48 AM
yah IMAC won't be able to hold SLC under 35 this game. it will be a good game until 3rd quarter.

toonman
11-06-2005, 12:03 PM
Actually I believe 3 years ago (SLC's 1st year in 5A) they were the 1st team to really give us a run for our money. I remember many mistakes on our side and a good I-Mac Defense taking the game down to the last few in the 4th. BUT we've played a lot of ball between now and way back then so I could be mistaken ;)

I got my facts from your website :-

2002 SLC 31 IM 21
2003 SLC 55 IM 14

I think you must been thinking about the 2002 SLC vs Arlington Sam Houston game - that was only SLC 19 ASH 16.

dragonsdaddy
11-06-2005, 01:59 PM
no we let imac back in the game with a fumble/td on a wasson scramble on the last play of the half, and never put them away, despite almost nothing out of imac, except some decent d. i wouldn't say they tested us much.

Phoenixrising05
11-06-2005, 05:22 PM
I got my facts from your website :-

2002 SLC 31 IM 21
2003 SLC 55 IM 14

I think you must been thinking out the 2002 SLC vs Arlington Sam Houston game - that was only SLC 19 ASH 16.

Toonman you're 100% correct that is exactly who I was thinking of. The I-Mac game was never in question it was Sam Houston that gave us the trouble. Dang the public humiliation in being proven wrong! :)

BigFoot
11-07-2005, 12:52 PM
I think you will see a sgp carroll match up in the regional finals. I dont think irv mac has what it takes 2 beat carroll, but sgp might. Trinity should have beaten irv mac by a significantly larger amount. Trinity's Defense is moving very sluggish as of late causing their offense 2 stay on the sidelines. Sgp had a good game plan, hopefully trinity's d can pressure the qb's in the playoffs if they want a state title. D1 is looking very stacked, I see a lot of teams that could really make it hard for carroll to repeat.

Trinity's d has looked slow....I heard from a good source that 6 of our players
had the stomach flu the week of the SGP game and didn't practice. I am sure they were exhausted after that game and then had to face another tought match up with IMAC. No excuses ...I didn't know this until recently when an insider told me...ALSO notice not even mentioned by Lineweaver and crew.

toonman
11-07-2005, 01:25 PM
Toonman you're 100% correct that is exactly who I was thinking of. The I-Mac game was never in question it was Sam Houston that gave us the trouble. Dang the public humiliation in being proven wrong! :)

No public humiliation was intended - I just wanted to make I was on the right page.

gritty52
11-07-2005, 02:37 PM
:D :D Bigfoot I know for a fact that 12-15 of the players had the flu. That's not an excuse and didn't dare say anything here on the thread about it. They are about over it now and everyone is healthy for the PO'S. HAKA :D

BigFoot
11-07-2005, 02:53 PM
Actually I felt very relieved about that flu bug. I had never seen our defense look so out of it. Not just the pass defense but the tackling..the misses were such a shock to me. Thanks for verifying that issue. It made me feel much better about the playoffs. GO Trojans....keep doing the HAKA!

gritty52
11-07-2005, 03:39 PM
I know 6 starters on defense had the flu. You could tell they were just a wee bit slower than SGP. Like I said earlier they'll be healthy Saturday. HAKA :D :D :D