PDA

View Full Version : New San Antonio Top Ten 10-17-05


bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 06:54 AM
Here is the updated S.A. top ten. Last weeks top ten got a good run, let's see what happens this week.
1. Clemens- Tied atop 25-5A. Facing their toughest test of the season this week, when #3 San Marcos comes a visiting. Should be a low scoring affair with Clemens defense and San Marcos's ability to control the clock. Same as last week, if you don't like them being number 1 then beat them. Will make a deep play-off run.
2. Smithson Valley- Sitting in Second behind unbeaten Madison in 26-5A. Smithson Valley has been questioned on not blowing opponents out, that is not their style. They control the game with the run and limit mistakes. A win is a win.
3. San Marcos- Tied atop 25-5A. Showdown this week at Clemens. Should be a good game. Two new coaches taking over established programs facing off. San Marcos must have thought they were in the BCS last week against Jefferson.
4. Madison- Sits atop 26-5A. Can pretty much ensure a play-off spot with a victory over Judson this week, will be a tough test, because Judson should be playing for their play-off lives. Cannot be looking forward to showdown with Smithson Valley next week.
5. O'Connor- Sits atop 27-5A. A young bunch of guys playing some great football. Coming up with a huge victory over Clark this past week the Panthers look to cruise the rest of the way through district and prepare for the play-offs. Moved up two spots.
6. Clark- Coming off a tough loss to a scrappy O'Connor team, the Cougars look to rebound this week and rebuild their momentum going into the play-offs.
7. Jay- Good defense will keep Jay in any game. The Mustang defense is as fast as any in the San Antonio area. They must stay focused for four quarters to win tight games.
8. Churchill- Churchill coming off shutting out the Rockets are playing good defense. They have Mac, Reagan, and Lee left, need to run the table to get in the play-offs. Will also, need help from others in district to get in.
9. MacArthur- Gotta give them some love. In a four way tie for third place in 26-5A. Still will face Churchill, Judson, and Madison probably the toughest schedule of the four teams tied for third. Will need to win out and get some help to lock up the third spot.
10. Judson- Is it time for us to bow our heads and say goodbye to the Rockets as we once knew them. Rockets must rebound in a hurry if they post season aspirations. Tied for third place in 26-5A is not where they wanted to be at this time. They have Madison, MacArthur, and Reagan left on their schedule. They must win all three to have a chance to get in. Also, relying on help from other teams to get in.

Once again this is for fun. If you, agree or disagree, let me know? Should be a great battle to the finish in 26-5A. 25-5A is pretty much decided on who the top three will be, now they must decide in what order. 27-5A still has some questions, but would be a shocker if it is not O'Connor, Clark, and Jay. :D

Game of the Week: Clemens vs. San Marcos

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 09:52 AM
Where is everyone from the San Antonio Area. I know you all have an opinion. Let me hear it.

Bucky
10-17-2005, 10:32 AM
You are the man bubba. No one will disagree with the Man!!!! :cool:

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 10:35 AM
I know!!! I must have hit the nail on the head. It is just pure genius on my part. It is hard always being right.:D

Gridiron Gopher
10-17-2005, 10:41 AM
Here is the updated S.A. top ten. Last weeks top ten got a good run, let's see what happens this week.
1. Clemens- Tied atop 25-5A. Facing their toughest test of the season this week, when #3 San Marcos comes a visiting. Should be a low scoring affair with Clemens defense and San Marcos's ability to control the clock. Same as last week, if you don't like them being number 1 then beat them. Will make a deep play-off run.
2. Smithson Valley- Sitting in Second behind unbeaten Madison in 26-5A. Smithson Valley has been questioned on not blowing opponents out, that is not their style. They control the game with the run and limit mistakes. A win is a win.
3. San Marcos- Tied atop 25-5A. Showdown this week at Clemens. Should be a good game. Two new coaches taking over established programs facing off. San Marcos must have thought they were in the BCS last week against Jefferson.
4. Madison- Sits atop 26-5A. Can pretty much ensure a play-off spot with a victory over Judson this week, will be a tough test, because Judson should be playing for their play-off lives. Cannot be looking forward to showdown with Smithson Valley next week.
5. O'Connor- Sits atop 27-5A. A young bunch of guys playing some great football. Coming up with a huge victory over Clark this past week the Panthers look to cruise the rest of the way through district and prepare for the play-offs. Moved up two spots.
6. Clark- Coming off a tough loss to a scrappy O'Connor team, the Cougars look to rebound this week and rebuild their momentum going into the play-offs.
7. Jay- Good defense will keep Jay in any game. The Mustang defense is as fast as any in the San Antonio area. They must stay focused for four quarters to win tight games.
8. Churchill- Churchill coming off shutting out the Rockets are playing good defense. They have Mac, Reagan, and Lee left, need to run the table to get in the play-offs. Will also, need help from others in district to get in.
9. MacArthur- Gotta give them some love. In a four way tie for third place in 26-5A. Still will face Churchill, Judson, and Madison probably the toughest schedule of the four teams tied for third. Will need to win out and get some help to lock up the third spot.
10. Judson- Is it time for us to bow our heads and say goodbye to the Rockets as we once knew them. Rockets must rebound in a hurry if they post season aspirations. Tied for third place in 26-5A is not where they wanted to be at this time. They have Madison, MacArthur, and Reagan left on their schedule. They must win all three to have a chance to get in. Also, relying on help from other teams to get in.

Once again this is for fun. If you, agree or disagree, let me know? Should be a great battle to the finish in 26-5A. 25-5A is pretty much decided on who the top three will be, now they must decide in what order. 27-5A still has some questions, but would be a shocker if it is not O'Connor, Clark, and Jay. :D

Game of the Week: Clemens vs. San Marcos


Not a bad list. I would agree with list this week. First through fourth are solid and 5th through 10th could be shuffled around and it probably wouldn't be bad. Those teams would go back and forth beating up on each other.

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 10:44 AM
At least two of the teams listed from 26-5A will not even make the play-offs. Maybe I should have put Seguin in one of their places.

Gridiron Gopher
10-17-2005, 10:45 AM
That would mean the list would have to be called "The 10 teams to make the playoffs" would'nt it? :)

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 10:48 AM
Yes, and I think that although not play-off bound they would still put a whippin on Seguin.

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 10:50 AM
Holy bad teams Batman. Can you imagine if nothing changes a fourth team out of 25-5A in the play-offs next year. You might as well give the team from 26-5A a bye. The top two teams are salty in 25-5A, but then you are talking about a major drop off after that. :eek:

Gridiron Gopher
10-17-2005, 10:54 AM
I also agree with you on MacArthur having a tough schedule left. Churchill, Judson and Madison will not be easy. Another team with just as tough if not tougher is Madison. Judson, SV and then Mac. The Mac game could still mean something, maybe even a playoff spot between the two. I think that's how tough this district is right now. We have a team that is 4-0 with 3 games to go in district and they could be on the outside looking in when it's all over. I like their postition but you never know.

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 10:58 AM
GOPHER LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION. I HAVE STATED AND BELIEVE THAT THE QUALITY OF FOOTBALL IS DOWN IN 26-5A THIS YEAR, AND IN SAN ANTONIO IN GENERAL. tHE TYPICAL GOOD TEAMS ARE PLAYING SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERAGE AT BEST AND THE AVERAGE TEAMS ARE STILL AVERAGE AND THE BAD TEAMS HAVE GOTTEN TO SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE, CREATING THE PARITY. DO YOU THINK IT IS THIS ARE IS EVERYONE PLAYING AT A HIGHER LEVEL?

KT2000
10-17-2005, 11:10 AM
Good post, bubba, I think you nailed it. Clemens-San Marcos is obviously our game of the week this week.

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 11:12 AM
Good post, bubba, I think you nailed it. Clemens-San Marcos is obviously our game of the week this week.
The way I see it, It should be a dogfight. With the running games that both teams have, and the defense that both teams play. It should be low scoring, smash mouth football. The clock might not ever stop. It might be over in a hour and a half.

Gridiron Gopher
10-17-2005, 11:28 AM
GOPHER LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION. I HAVE STATED AND BELIEVE THAT THE QUALITY OF FOOTBALL IS DOWN IN 26-5A THIS YEAR, AND IN SAN ANTONIO IN GENERAL. tHE TYPICAL GOOD TEAMS ARE PLAYING SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERAGE AT BEST AND THE AVERAGE TEAMS ARE STILL AVERAGE AND THE BAD TEAMS HAVE GOTTEN TO SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE, CREATING THE PARITY. DO YOU THINK IT IS THIS ARE IS EVERYONE PLAYING AT A HIGHER LEVEL?

I think we would all have to say that Judson is not where they were last year. Other teams have seen their programs move up to the next level such as Reagan, MacArthur, Churchill. These programs are seeing the athletes(sophmores, juniors that have come from winning programs in Jr High) join the seniors to produce some of their best teams in the last 3 or 4 years. Madison has once again shown that they have a very solid team and will run their system as good as any other year. SV is a young team that is getting better each week. Yes their games are close but that's because of the district.
I think that 265a has always been one of the toughfest districts in the state and the 2nd tier teams are better then average. You could take Judson, Mac, Reagan, Churchill(all 2-2 teams) and they would compete for the district title in 275a
Bottom line is that yes Judson is down but SV and Madison are not. Churchill, Mac and Reagan have raised their level to above average teams and I would consider them 2nd tier teams. Theirs no longer a top dog in district 265a but there is also less bye weeks for an easy win when you play Mac, Reagan and Churchill.

sendero
10-17-2005, 11:46 AM
I think we would all have to say that Judson is not where they were last year. Other teams have seen their programs move up to the next level such as Reagan, MacArthur, Churchill. These programs are seeing the athletes(sophmores, juniors that have come from winning programs in Jr High) join the seniors to produce some of their best teams in the last 3 or 4 years. Madison has once again shown that they have a very solid team and will run their system as good as any other year. SV is a young team that is getting better each week. Yes their games are close but that's because of the district.
I think that 265a has always been one of the toughfest districts in the state and the 2nd tier teams are better then average. You could take Judson, Mac, Reagan, Churchill(all 2-2 teams) and they would compete for the district title in 275a
Bottom line is that yes Judson is down but SV and Madison are not. Churchill, Mac and Reagan have raised their level to above average teams and I would consider them 2nd tier teams. Theirs no longer a top dog in district 265a but there is also less bye weeks for an easy win when you play Mac, Reagan and Churchill.

Another comment I would add about this year versus last year is the amount of injuries, where maybe a starter is not playing. I know it has happened to almost all teams this year which I don't remember it being that way last year with the exception of Fanuzzi's injury. Anyone else seem to notice this? I guess it could be attributed to the physical play in this district.

Gridiron Gopher
10-17-2005, 12:06 PM
It's still hard to tell how good Madison or SV are. Madison is on a roll and beat a solid O'Conner team on the way. SV is SV and maybe the lose to Churchill wasn't as bad as we first thought. Is Judson really that bad??? They did take a Cove team to the final minutesa and beat a very good Pflugerfield team. I guess Cove is way overated? Probably not. MacArthur beat a very solid team in Clark and then beat a Boerne team at Boerne. That same Boerne team treated O'Conner like a Freshman team the week before. Now O'Conner is considered one of the top teams in SA.

What I've seen so far is we have 5 very good teams in 265a. They all have their stengths and weaknesses.

SV is a running team that plays solid defense. They want to shorten the games by controlling the clock. The defense has shown it's true grit in the red zone.

Madison is another running team that plays solid defense. Their running game is better then SV's but the defense is not. Still solid but will give up points

Judson has a very solid defense but is struggling on offense. Seems to be taking it's toll on the defense. They have struggled against good run defenses (Churchill, SV). If their offense can show any life, they will make the playoffs.

Churchill has a very good front D-line and that's what beat SV and Judson. Both those teams rely on the run. Their offense is a mess and will rely on field possession to win low scoring close games. This team "could" have won district with Fanuzzi at the helm but not convienced he had the WR's to take advantage that he brought with that offensive scheme.

MacArthur is the lone passing offense in the district. It's a new offense that was put in the first day of practice this year. They can score on anybody. Their defense is the question mark and their defense is not at the level of SV, Judson or Reagan. This is their weakness that teams have to attack. Most of MacArthurs games will be higher scoring because of this.

Still to many senerios that could play out.

RedRage00
10-17-2005, 12:48 PM
I have become a new Mac fan since last Friday night when I realized their fight song is my old Victoria HS fight song :p I miss my STINGS!

I hadn't heard that fight song in years! I walked up to the stadium and I got flash backs HAHAHAH

RR

bubbacoach
10-17-2005, 02:54 PM
Glad to see Mac finally getting back up to par, but still not a Mac fan. Not a Mac hater, just not a Mac fan.

clemensbuff
10-17-2005, 06:43 PM
I have become a new Mac fan since last Friday night when I realized their fight song is my old Victoria HS fight song :p I miss my STINGS!

I hadn't heard that fight song in years! I walked up to the stadium and I got flash backs HAHAHAH

RR

What is up with Victoria Memorial? I remember when the combined the high schools there was a whole lot of talk about them becoming a real dominant region 4 team and even possibly competing for the title. They really have not done much that I can remember since they merged. I can't understand how a school with this many kids to choose from can't be more competitive than they have been!

TexasRed6x
10-17-2005, 06:47 PM
Here is the updated S.A. top ten. Last weeks top ten got a good run, let's see what happens this week.
1. Clemens- Tied atop 25-5A. Facing their toughest test of the season this week, when #3 San Marcos comes a visiting. Should be a low scoring affair with Clemens defense and San Marcos's ability to control the clock. Same as last week, if you don't like them being number 1 then beat them. Will make a deep play-off run.
2. Smithson Valley- Sitting in Second behind unbeaten Madison in 26-5A. Smithson Valley has been questioned on not blowing opponents out, that is not their style. They control the game with the run and limit mistakes. A win is a win.
3. San Marcos- Tied atop 25-5A. Showdown this week at Clemens. Should be a good game. Two new coaches taking over established programs facing off. San Marcos must have thought they were in the BCS last week against Jefferson.
4. Madison- Sits atop 26-5A. Can pretty much ensure a play-off spot with a victory over Judson this week, will be a tough test, because Judson should be playing for their play-off lives. Cannot be looking forward to showdown with Smithson Valley next week.
5. O'Connor- Sits atop 27-5A. A young bunch of guys playing some great football. Coming up with a huge victory over Clark this past week the Panthers look to cruise the rest of the way through district and prepare for the play-offs. Moved up two spots.
6. Clark- Coming off a tough loss to a scrappy O'Connor team, the Cougars look to rebound this week and rebuild their momentum going into the play-offs.
7. Jay- Good defense will keep Jay in any game. The Mustang defense is as fast as any in the San Antonio area. They must stay focused for four quarters to win tight games.
8. Churchill- Churchill coming off shutting out the Rockets are playing good defense. They have Mac, Reagan, and Lee left, need to run the table to get in the play-offs. Will also, need help from others in district to get in.
9. MacArthur- Gotta give them some love. In a four way tie for third place in 26-5A. Still will face Churchill, Judson, and Madison probably the toughest schedule of the four teams tied for third. Will need to win out and get some help to lock up the third spot.
10. Judson- Is it time for us to bow our heads and say goodbye to the Rockets as we once knew them. Rockets must rebound in a hurry if they post season aspirations. Tied for third place in 26-5A is not where they wanted to be at this time. They have Madison, MacArthur, and Reagan left on their schedule. They must win all three to have a chance to get in. Also, relying on help from other teams to get in.

Once again this is for fun. If you, agree or disagree, let me know? Should be a great battle to the finish in 26-5A. 25-5A is pretty much decided on who the top three will be, now they must decide in what order. 27-5A still has some questions, but would be a shocker if it is not O'Connor, Clark, and Jay. :D

Game of the Week: Clemens vs. San Marcos



Judson is to high on the list, should be around 15.

Its In The Bag
10-17-2005, 08:37 PM
wow please give madison some love for god sakes....There top 3 games are left, and this should be the deciding factor
with the way Judson is playing, Madison might have a good night with them
with Smithson Valley, Madison could stop them, if their Defense is up to par
and with Mac, Madison has bad blood to even the score against them...
Babies...Madison is going to be good this year MARK MY WORDS!!!

Mac Is Back
10-17-2005, 09:07 PM
[QUOTE=Its In The Bag]wow please give madison some love for god sakes....There top 3 games are left, and this should be the deciding factor
with the way Judson is playing, Madison might have a good night with them
with Smithson Valley, Madison could stop them, if their Defense is up to par
and with Mac, Madison has bad blood to even the score against them...
Babies...Madison is going to be good this year MARK MY WORDS!!!

Well Mac no longer has the advantage because Madison is NOT the full blown favorite in the matchup. Last year came as a surprise, yes.

I'm not sure if I'd give Churchill so much credit just yet. I will admit it takes a lot to beat both SV and Judson in one season, but along with that comes the obvious losses. I won't doubt Churchill, but for me it seems just a little too early to see. I think their shutout of Judson has people a little excited.

DiamondJ2
10-17-2005, 11:14 PM
SV is winning by narrow margins. A sign of a great team or a sign of not playing to their potential or playing down to their opponents level.



Do they still have football in the largest school in Region 4?

Go Buffs
10-18-2005, 03:38 AM
Do they still have football in the largest school in Region 4?
Would that be Eagle Pass now? :D

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 07:35 AM
It will iron itself out when all the games are played. D

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 09:14 AM
Express News has it all screwed up. I think my top ten is closer than theirs. But they have to sell paper.
1. Clemens
2. Smithson Valley
3. San Marcos
4. Madison
5. Jay
6. O'Connor
7. Judson ?
8. Clark
9. Seguin
10. Churchill

Although we agreed on our top four, they sure did screw it up after that.

Bucky
10-18-2005, 09:20 AM
Judson is to high on the list, should be around 15.

Come on if Judson can get it together..and WE all hope that they can. They fine where they are.

Bucky
10-18-2005, 09:21 AM
wow please give madison some love for god sakes....There top 3 games are left, and this should be the deciding factor
with the way Judson is playing, Madison might have a good night with them
with Smithson Valley, Madison could stop them, if their Defense is up to par
and with Mac, Madison has bad blood to even the score against them...
Babies...Madison is going to be good this year MARK MY WORDS!!!
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a190/scarface6590/fatruben.gif


You're a heck of a dancer Baggie :) :)

JC73
10-18-2005, 09:22 AM
You're a heck of a dancer Baggie :) :)
I have to admit that is pretty damn funny.

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 09:28 AM
I think Its in the Bag has been bagged. At least he will have more time to work on his dance moves.

In The Bag Is Mad
10-18-2005, 09:29 AM
I think Its in the Bag has been bagged. At least he will have more time to work on his dance moves.

I was bagged....
Unfairly too....
I seriously did not break the Terms of Services!!!! oh yea wat was that pic i posted in this thread?? why are yall talking about dancing lol

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 09:30 AM
Bagged and now back. What were you put in the sack for? Running it to much. You gotta show a little tact every now and then. Like me. :D

In The Bag Is Mad
10-18-2005, 09:32 AM
Bagged and now back. What were you put in the sack for? Running it to much. You gotta show a little tact every now and then. Like me. :D


I HAVE NO IDEA why i was banned...I'm not lying I have no idea...
I don't think "running it" is against the TOS. lol, I didn' take any shots at anybody! I was posting my opinions and i was bagged because of that??
*face confused* I don't know I just hope they don't banned me I like posting on 5A

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 10:13 AM
Express News has it all screwed up. I think my top ten is closer than theirs. But they have to sell paper.
1. Clemens
2. Smithson Valley
3. San Marcos
4. Madison
5. Jay
6. O'Connor
7. Judson ?
8. Clark
9. Seguin
10. Churchill

Although we agreed on our top four, they sure did screw it up after that.

The E-N Express News is the biggest crock of.....to ever plague the earth. Whichever teams win that week somehow get posted. A few weeks ago, I was making a joke that just cause you beat Lee, you get put into the top 10....that was right with both Reagan and Mac.

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 10:15 AM
I think my poll is more unbiased.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 10:15 AM
I think my poll is more unbiased.

True....the Reagan-Churchill game next week should be good....

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 10:20 AM
It will definetly play a roll in who goes to that third spot. I think Churchill has the inside track on the third spot with their remaining schedule.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 10:28 AM
It will definetly play a roll in who goes to that third spot. I think Churchill has the inside track on the third spot with their remaining schedule.

But Reagan can make the playoffs....I have a lot of faith in them and really believe they can do it.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 10:30 AM
Right teams, wrong order. The parity post makes you sound like a parrot. :)

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 10:32 AM
What order do you think they should be in? Should Madison be number one??? LOL

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 10:34 AM
What order do you think they should be in? Should Madison be number one??? LOL


7 :)

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 10:42 AM
Well lets see your order.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 10:51 AM
1. Sv
2. Clemens
3. Jay
4. SM
5. Churchill
6. OConnor
7. Madison
8. Clark
9. Judson
10. Mac

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 10:58 AM
1. Sv
2. Clemens
3. Jay
4. SM
5. Churchill
6. OConnor
7. Madison
8. Clark
9. Judson
10. Mac
Why do you have S.V. first they lost to Churchill?
Why is Clemens secong they are undefeated?
Jay lost to Clark, why are they third?
San Marcos would slaughter jay!
Churchill lost to Clark and Marshall, didn't they?
O'Connor is all alone in first place in 27-5A, Why are they lower than Jay?
Madison is undefeated in 26-5A, why are they so low?
Clark beat Jay and Churchill, Why are they behind them?
Judson is on their last breath
Mac is Mac and is better than last year.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 11:08 AM
Why do you have S.V. first they lost to Churchill?
Why is Clemens secong they are undefeated?
Jay lost to Clark, why are they third?
San Marcos would slaughter jay!
Churchill lost to Clark and Marshall, didn't they?
O'Connor is all alone in first place in 27-5A, Why are they lower than Jay?
Madison is undefeated in 26-5A, why are they so low?
Clark beat Jay and Churchill, Why are they behind them?
Judson is on their last breath
Mac is Mac and is better than last year.


In a heads out game I'll take SV over Clemens
Jay will run the remainder of their games; including O'Connor
SM will contiue to do well (in the SA area)
I like Churchill to get a playoff spot (and do well beyond SA)
Madison; that's what they were saying last year
Judson can win their last 3 games
Mac is Mac

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 11:10 AM
Have you seen Jay play. I do not think they have the discipline to beat a very disciplined O'Connor team.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 11:15 AM
Have you seen Jay play. I do not think they have the discipline to beat a very disciplined O'Connor team.

On what side of the ball do you speak? Jay's D will shut down the O'Connor O. I see a larger MOV than Madsion v O'Connor (21-17); probably 21-10 Jay.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 11:18 AM
Have you seen Jay play. I do not think they have the discipline to beat a very disciplined O'Connor team.

On what side of the ball do you speak? Jay's D will shut down the O'Connor O. I see a larger MOV than Madsion v O'Connor (21-17); probably 21-10 Jay. Jay will win simplyby have more chances to get into the endzone.

PantherFan70
10-18-2005, 11:44 AM
On what side of the ball do you speak? Jay's D will shut down the O'Connor O. I see a larger MOV than Madsion v O'Connor (21-17); probably 21-10 Jay. Jay will win simplyby have more chances to get into the endzone.

Thats what people kept saying Clark was going to do to O'Connor, but I think Padron has been playing very strategic ball to keep the other offense off of the field. He plays like the smithson valley team, he's not interested in blowouts just the W, I say OC wins by 3. I say that because OC has a knack for creating turnovers. It will be a good game though, but neither team will win by more that a TD.

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 12:23 PM
I did not say Jay had a bad defense. If you look back I said their defense is as good as anybody. I just do not thing they are disciplined enough on either side of the ball to beat O'Connor. I did not say athletic enough.

Hunting82
10-18-2005, 01:09 PM
I think SV should be third I have seen SV, SC, and SM and SV is not better than those two teams

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 01:22 PM
Why do you think San Marcos would beat Smithson Valley?

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 01:23 PM
Coach, I think you underrate the Jay D. As far a records go...the difference between Jay and O'Connor is that one of Jay's loses was in district. If they get to the final week, OConnor 6-0 and Jay 5-1, I will put my $$$ on the strongest D. IMO Jay. :)

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 01:25 PM
Coach, I think you underrate the Jay D. As far a records go...the difference between Jay and O'Connor is that one of Jay's loses was in district. If they get to the final week, OConnor 6-0 and Jay 5-1, I will put my $$$ on the strongest D. IMO Jay. :)
Do you not know how to read? I said"their defense is as good as anybody". This is not saying they are underrated. I said they do not have the discipline O'Connor has.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 01:26 PM
I think SV should be third I have seen SV, SC, and SM and SV is not better than those two teams


SV gets a automatic gimme (just like SLC) in my list. The 25, 26 or 27 team that puts them out of the playoffs get higher on the list.Of course a loss to Lee or Roosevelt would move them down the list, but that would be the doning of anybody on my list.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 01:30 PM
Do you not know how to read? I said"their defense is as good as anybody". This is not saying they are underrated. I said they do not have the discipline O'Connor has.


Yes I read and I will still go with the better, albeit undiscipline defense

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 04:41 PM
Your choice, you have been supporting Madison all these years and look at how many titles its got you. Discipline will always prevail in the long run.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 04:55 PM
Your choice, you have been supporting Madison all these years and look at how many titles its got you. Discipline will always prevail in the long run.


no, I'm probably more like you...I supported Judson every year they won a title! :D :p

bubbacoach
10-18-2005, 04:57 PM
no, I'm probably more like you...I supported Judson every year they won a title! :D :p
Do I need to remind you,I've got my ring, so I more than supported them in the title years. I still support them.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 06:31 PM
How is Mac still ahead of Reagan? :confused:

zippy
10-18-2005, 06:35 PM
Have you seen these three teams play the exact same three teams?


I think SV should be third I have seen SV, SC, and SM and SV is not better than those two teams

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 07:21 PM
Do I need to remind you,I've got my ring, so I more than supported them in the title years. I still support them.

The pin on your head is showing again. :p

purple_thunder
10-18-2005, 08:11 PM
Why do you think San Marcos would beat Smithson Valley?
Because mAdison Beat Churchill & SV lost to Churchill which I think madison is going to beat sv thats why you should think SAN MARCOS is going to beat Clemens & SV & end up #1 in region 4

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 08:13 PM
Because mAdison Beat Churchill & SV lost to Churchill which I think madison is going to beat sv thats why you should think SAN MARCOS is going to beat Clemens & SV & end up #1 in region 4

...There's a lot of ands in that statement...maybe too many.

mad_fan
10-18-2005, 08:15 PM
Because mAdison Beat Churchill & SV lost to Churchill which I think madison is going to beat sv thats why you should think SAN MARCOS is going to beat Clemens & SV & end up #1 in region 4

E=mc^2

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 08:27 PM
E=mc^2

After seeing that...got a new sn name for you....Mad Scientist!

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 08:49 PM
How is Mac still ahead of Reagan? :confused:

MAC IS BETTER THAN REAGAN.

Clearly. Everyone agrees. Except you.


Now CONFORM!!!

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 08:50 PM
MAC IS BETTER THAN REAGAN.

Clearly. Everyone agrees. Except you.


Now CONFORM!!!

How are they better when we beat you?

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 08:54 PM
How are they better when we beat you?

That's a silly question. Would you say that Lee was better than Judson if they beat them? One game doesn't decide everything, unless you are in the state championship game.

Now I could make a statement concerning records, but that wouldn't be fair because Mac hasn't played Madison yet.

HOWEVER. Should Mac and Reagan meet again, do you honestly believe they could do better than a two point victory a second straight time? Don't sell your soul to the devil over it.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 08:59 PM
That's a silly question. Would you say that Lee was better than Judson if they beat them? One game doesn't decide everything, unless you are in the state championship game.

Now I could make a statement concerning records, but that wouldn't be fair because Mac hasn't played Madison yet.

HOWEVER. Should Mac and Reagan meet again, do you honestly believe they could do better than a two point victory a second straight time? Don't sell your soul to the devil over it.

The chances of us meeting again are very very very very rare. In fact, I don't think it can statistically happen. But no, we'd beat you more than 2 points. To shut y'all up. :D

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:07 PM
The chances of us meeting again are very very very very rare. In fact, I don't think it can statistically happen. But no, we'd beat you more than 2 points. To shut y'all up. :D

Of course you would.

In all honesty it's too hard to tell. 26-5A has been riddled with upsets this season. It's almost shocking. My concern isn't Reagan anymore...

Am I the only one who thinks Madison has quite a task ahead of them? First Judson, then SV, and finally Mac? I mean, whoa. If they pull it off, they've earned their berth.

Gridiron Gopher
10-18-2005, 09:11 PM
Redskins, is Churchill better the SV? If they are, does that make Churchill better then Reagan. If so, then you guys are going to lose to many games to get into the playoffs. One game does not mean you are better then another team unless you totally dominate the team. Also, I would think that the sites that give the state rankings probably know a little more then us and I haven't seen one yet that says Reagan is rated higher then Mac. Yes I know, Reagan beat Mac. That just tells me that on that night Reagan was better. Good job. Now go out and win enough games to make the playoffs and Reagan will get the credit that they deserve. The same is for Mac. When you lose as much as they have, it's hard for other schools to take them serious. Now both Mac and Reagan have a chance to prove it.

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:13 PM
Redskins, is Churchill better the SV? If they are, does that make Churchill better then Reagan. If so, then you guys are going to lose to many games to get into the playoffs. One game does not mean you are better then another team unless you totally dominate the team. Also, I would think that the sites that give the state rankings probably know a little more then us and I haven't seen one yet that says Reagan is rated higher then Mac. Yes I know, Reagan beat Mac. That just tells me that on that night Reagan was better. Good job. Now go out and win enough games to make the playoffs and Reagan will get the credit that they deserve. The same is for Mac. When you lose as much as they have, it's hard for other schools to take them serious. Now both Mac and Reagan have a chance to prove it.

Thank you. Can this disagreement be considered finished now?

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:18 PM
Thank you. Can this disagreement be considered finished now?

Ah, I tried to make peace with some of you all....guess I just can't.

I won't argue on this further...y'all will need a miracle to make the playoffs.

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:19 PM
Ah, I tried to make peace with some of you all....guess I just can't.

I won't argue on this further...y'all will need a miracle to make the playoffs.

Likewise. :D

Gridiron Gopher
10-18-2005, 09:23 PM
Of course you would.

In all honesty it's too hard to tell. 26-5A has been riddled with upsets this season. It's almost shocking. My concern isn't Reagan anymore...

Am I the only one who thinks Madison has quite a task ahead of them? First Judson, then SV, and finally Mac? I mean, whoa. If they pull it off, they've earned their berth.


Yes they do (have a task in front of them) if all the teams remaining were the same as last year. Their not. Madison looks pretty solid. SV is giving up yds on the ground but against Mac they weren't trying to defend the run and got caught off guard. Reagan (Greg Jones) runs their run zone to perfection. Madison's running game might not be the same as Reagan and I have to believe SV will decide to shut down the run first and make Madison beat then through the air. Judson's offense is not the same as last year but their defense is suppose to be pretty good. Who knows, Judson could still win but maybe it's closer.
Against Mac, everyone says that Madison wants revenge but revenge doesn't stop a team from scoring. Madison has to be able to stop Mac's passing attack.
Can Madison run the table. Heck yeah they can. They have a better chance this year. Could they lose all 3 again. Heck yeah they can but I don't think they will. If they do lose to SV and then Judson imagine what will be going through those kids and coaches minds. NOT AGAIN. :(
Like I said, I like Madison's chance this year but we don't really know until they play the games.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:24 PM
Likewise. :D

I don't recall you making any gesture.....even at this moment I'm refraining from a lot of things.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:25 PM
I think Madison has quite a few things in store for the Brahmas....if I go to this one I may sit with the Mavs....heck, I may even don an orange shirt if I can find one.

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:26 PM
Yes they do (have a task in front of them) if all the teams remaining were the same as last year. Their not. Madison looks pretty solid. SV is giving up yds on the ground but against Mac they weren't trying to defend the run and got caught off guard. Reagan (Greg Jones) runs their run zone to perfection. Madison's running game might not be the same as Reagan and I have to believe SV will decide to shut down the run first and make Madison beat then through the air. Judson's offense is not the same as last year but their defense is suppose to be pretty good. Who knows, Judson could still win but maybe it's closer.
Against Mac, everyone says that Madison wants revenge but revenge doesn't stop a team from scoring. Madison has to be able to stop Mac's passing attack.
Can Madison run the table. Heck yeah they can. They have a much better chance this year. Could they lose all 3 again. Heck yeah they can but I don't think they will. If they do lose to SV and then Judson imagine what will be going through those kids and coaches minds. NOT AGAIN. :(
Like I said, I like Madison's chance this year but we don't really know until they play the games.

Agreed. Well put.

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:26 PM
I think Madison has quite a few things in store for the Brahmas....if I go to this one I may sit with the Mavs....heck, I may even don an orange shirt if I can find one.

You WANT them to have something in store for us. Gopher makes a valid point.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:29 PM
You WANT them to have something in store for us. Gopher makes a valid point.

I'm sure they have some things in store....ah, the many reasons why I hate and like Mac.

So glad I chose not to go there....and such a shame my sister had to go there so many years ago.

Gridiron Gopher
10-18-2005, 09:30 PM
I think Madison has quite a few things in store for the Brahmas....if I go to this one I may sit with the Mavs....heck, I may even don an orange shirt if I can find one.

You have that right. I just hope you enjoy yourself at the game because you like to watch H.S. football. If it's only because you want to see Mac lose, then you have a 50/50 chance to have a horible evening after the game. Why would you go then? Go do something you can enjoy and catch the score later.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:46 PM
You have that right. I just hope you enjoy yourself at the game because you like to watch H.S. football. If it's only because you want to see Mac lose, then you have a 50/50 chance to have a horible evening after the game. Why would you go then? Go do something you can enjoy and catch the score later.

We still don't know what effect that game will have. And the way some of the Mac fans have been lately they've practically been yelling for me to go to each of their games and sit on the opposite side.

Ah, I can enjoy the game nonetheless.

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:51 PM
And the way some of the Mac fans have been lately they've practically been yelling for me to go to each of their games and sit on the opposite side.



LOL, you just sounded like an adult threatening the misbehaving child with punishment from over their shoulder.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 09:53 PM
LOL, you just sounded like an adult threatening the misbehaving child with punishment from over their shoulder.

....uh, ok

Mac Is Back
10-18-2005, 09:54 PM
....uh, ok

I see how it is. nevermind...

Bucky
10-18-2005, 10:01 PM
wow please give madison some love for god sakes....There top 3 games are left, and this should be the deciding factor
with the way Judson is playing, Madison might have a good night with them
with Smithson Valley, Madison could stop them, if their Defense is up to par
and with Mac, Madison has bad blood to even the score against them...
Babies...Madison is going to be good this year MARK MY WORDS!!!
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a190/scarface6590/fatruben.gif

Cant we all get along..Just look at In the bag dance here and it will make you forget all the bad things you were gonna say about someone else's team..no get after it baggie!! :cool:

bullrock
10-18-2005, 10:15 PM
At least Madison has control of thier own destiny. all they have to do is do it. Maybe this is the year the last of the original 265 finally makes it to the state game. If they do, I will be rooting for them. I just can't make myself wear burnt orange though.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 10:18 PM
At least Madison has control of thier own destiny. all they have to do is do it. Maybe this is the year the last of the original 265 finally makes it to the state game. If they do, I will be rooting for them. I just can't make myself wear burnt orange though.

The 'original' 26-5A? What teams would that be?

bullrock
10-18-2005, 10:24 PM
Lee
Mac
Churchill
Roosevelt
Judson
Madison
All of the others have been in a state game. Madison needs to get 'er done.

Reaganrattler07
10-18-2005, 10:30 PM
Lee
Mac
Churchill
Roosevelt
Judson
Madison
All of the others have been in a state game. Madison needs to get 'er done.

Oh yeah, I remember Mac went to State......ah, I remember how they got there, too....Mac lost to Katy 14-7 in the Semis....and with 26 hour notice, Katy alerted the UIL that they had played with an ineligible player, allowing Mac to play....they lost like 52-0....

Each one has a State Championship with the exception of Mac and Madison I believe.

bullrock
10-18-2005, 10:34 PM
What you say is true, but they put themselves in a position to get there.

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 06:43 AM
At least Madison has control of thier own destiny. all they have to do is do it. Maybe this is the year the last of the original 265 finally makes it to the state game. If they do, I will be rooting for them. I just can't make myself wear burnt orange though.
Don't all the teams control their own destiny. If any of the four wins out they should grab that third spot. If two of them win out then it will go to head to head and whoever won that game is still playing.

Gridiron Gopher
10-19-2005, 10:00 AM
Yes and no on the control their own destiny thing. Mac would have to when the tie-breaker if Reagan runs the tabel too. Churchill, Judson would be out. SV and Madison would have to lose another game. There's all kinds of outcomes that could happen. Even this weeks game don't decide that 3rd spot. It's going to come down to the last week. To many what if's that could happen.

Bucky
10-19-2005, 10:16 AM
Don't all the teams control their own destiny. If any of the four wins out they should grab that third spot. If two of them win out then it will go to head to head and whoever won that game is still playing.

I think Madison and SV are the only teams that can win out and dont need any help. But both cant win out since they play each other next week. Very interesting.

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 11:13 AM
but if all the teams tie for 3rd win out it would come to head to head and by beating the team they are tied with they would ultimately control their own destiny by having beaten the teams thay are tied with.

Gridiron Gopher
10-19-2005, 11:16 AM
Reagan is the only 2-2-0 team that controls their destiny. They have beat Mac and still have Churchill, Roosevelt and Judson.

Mac can run the table but then would have to wait on how the other teams finish. The matchups work for Mac as Madison still has to play SV, Judson and Mac. If Madison loses to eithe Judson or SV, then Mac would have to beat Madison by a certain amount of points to get the tie-breaker over Reagan and Madison. This is all base on Mac and Reagan running the table.
It's still too early to have any idea what might happen.

Gridiron Gopher
10-19-2005, 11:21 AM
but if all the teams tie for 3rd win out it would come to head to head and by beating the team they are tied with they would ultimately control their own destiny by having beaten the teams thay are tied with.

They all can't win out. Reagan plays Judson and Churchill. Mac plays Judson and Churchill. If Mac and Reagan run the table, Mac has to hope Madison loses to either SV or Judson. If they don't then Madison would end up 6-1 even with the lose to Mac. Mac and Reagan would tie for the spot and Reagan wins the tie breaker.

Mac's best chance is for Reagan or Madison to lose a game. Right now Mac has to worry about Churchill first.
In reality, Mac's playoffs started last week against Roosevelt.

Hunting82
10-19-2005, 12:08 PM
I hope some how some way judson does make it in to a playoff position that pairs them up with clemens because I would love nothing more than to see clemens open a can!!!!

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 12:38 PM
They all can't win out. Reagan plays Judson and Churchill. Mac plays Judson and Churchill. If Mac and Reagan run the table, Mac has to hope Madison loses to either SV or Judson. If they don't then Madison would end up 6-1 even with the lose to Mac. Mac and Reagan would tie for the spot and Reagan wins the tie breaker.

Mac's best chance is for Reagan or Madison to lose a game. Right now Mac has to worry about Churchill first.
In reality, Mac's playoffs started last week against Roosevelt.
Exactly not all of them can win out. So if you win out you control your own destiny.Reagan still has Judson and Churchill. Mac has Judson and Churchill.
Churchill has Reagan and Mac. Judson has Reagan and Mac. Which would mean at best, only two of them could win out. And then head to head would come into play. And whoever won that game would be in the playoffs. So you do control your own destiny.

Gridiron Gopher
10-19-2005, 01:10 PM
Exactly not all of them can win out. So if you win out you control your own destiny.Reagan still has Judson and Churchill. Mac has Judson and Churchill.
Churchill has Reagan and Mac. Judson has Reagan and Mac. Which would mean at best, only two of them could win out. And then head to head would come into play. And whoever won that game would be in the playoffs. So you do control your own destiny.

No, Reagan has already beat Mac. Mac could run the table and finish 5-2-0 in district and still not get in due to their lose to Reagan. If Reagan runs the table too, then they finish 5-2-0 and hold the head to head tie-breaker. Mac would have to hope that Madison would have lost to Judson or SV.

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 01:18 PM
No, Reagan has already beat Mac. Mac could run the table and finish 5-2-0 in district and still not get in due to their lose to Reagan. If Reagan runs the table too, then they finish 5-2-0 and hold the head to head tie-breaker. Mac would have to hope that Madison would have lost to Judson or SV.
My bad , i forgot about Reagan whipping Mac. But Mac lost to Reagan. They did that to themselves, just like Reagan beating Mac. Reagan did that for themselves. So in the end each team controls their own destiny.

Bucky
10-19-2005, 02:41 PM
just checking

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 02:45 PM
just checking
What are checking? Checking if you're computer will work or if you get credit for a post for saying nothing at all? :D

Hunting82
10-19-2005, 02:46 PM
In jerrys texas football rankings he has churchill over san marcos......I know they beat SV and CJ but for some reason I don't think they can beat San Marcos

bubbacoach
10-19-2005, 02:48 PM
In jerrys texas football rankings he has churchill over san marcos......I know they beat SV and CJ but for some reason I don't think they can beat San Marcos
I agree, Churchill could not beat San Marcos.

Reaganrattler07
10-19-2005, 06:26 PM
My bad , i forgot about Reagan whipping Mac. But Mac lost to Reagan. They did that to themselves, just like Reagan beating Mac. Reagan did that for themselves. So in the end each team controls their own destiny.

I agree, no matter what....each team controls their destiny...if they want to live or die...if they want to live, they win, they want to die, they lose. (Figuratively speaking of course).

Provided Reagan wins the Roosevelt game, it should make an intersting final two weeks.

Bucky
10-19-2005, 06:44 PM
What are checking? Checking if you're computer will work or if you get credit for a post for saying nothing at all? :D


No..I was trying to make that dancin baggie guy part of a signature.. it didnt work..

Reaganrattler07
10-19-2005, 06:46 PM
Haha, bubbacoach has a nice sig....

bubbacoach
10-20-2005, 07:09 AM
I just speak the truth in my signature!!! :D

Reaganrattler07
10-20-2005, 10:00 AM
I just speak the truth in my signature!!! :D

Hey bubbacoach, if you wanna improve your standing with the Rattlers...put us in your Top 10 and say good things!

bubbacoach
10-20-2005, 10:11 AM
I do have the rattlers in my top ten at number three. The other rattlers fell out of my top ten with a loss last week. Although they fought hard against a good team, a loss is a loss. :D

Reaganrattler07
10-20-2005, 10:16 AM
I do have the rattlers in my top ten at number three. The other rattlers fell out of my top ten with a loss last week. Although they fought hard against a good team, a loss is a loss. :D

Ah ha ha, not. Your lucky this is all anonymous! I'm actually surprised people from Reagan (other than me) read this...

Gridiron Gopher
10-20-2005, 10:22 AM
I do have the rattlers in my top ten at number three. The other rattlers fell out of my top ten with a loss last week. Although they fought hard against a good team, a loss is a loss. :D

Bubbacoach, don't be like those Yahoo's at KSAT. Give a team credit when they hold their own and lose to a solid team. :) I'd hate to start seeing Fox Tech and Lanier in your Top Ten next week. :p

Reaganrattler07
10-20-2005, 10:28 AM
Bubbacoach, don't be like those Yahoo's at KSAT. Give a team credit when they hold their own and lose to a solid team. :) I'd hate to start seeing Fox Tech and Lanier in your Top Ten next week. :p

I agree....course at least the Express news isn't as bad as KSAT....

bubbacoach
10-20-2005, 10:29 AM
I did say they played hard against a good team,but I think bummping them down and putting Churchill and Mac in the fold for beating Roosevelt and Judson is justified and yes I do know Reagan beat Mac, but that was like four weeks ago and the chemistry and overall makeup of both teams have changed.

Gridiron Gopher
10-20-2005, 10:31 AM
I'm just giving you crap and making fun of the guys at KSAT. They put all that time into H.S. Football (which I think is great) and then put 30 seconds into figuring out who the best teams are.

Reaganrattler07
10-20-2005, 05:59 PM
I did say they played hard against a good team,but I think bummping them down and putting Churchill and Mac in the fold for beating Roosevelt and Judson is justified and yes I do know Reagan beat Mac, but that was like four weeks ago and the chemistry and overall makeup of both teams have changed.

How is it Mac somehow gets better and Reagan doesn't? The sheer logic of this is mind boggling....either way, I hate rankings...they're always inaccurate.

bubbacoach
10-21-2005, 10:32 AM
What about them Chargers! Everyone please bow your heads and say a few nice words for the departed MAC!!

clemensbuff
10-21-2005, 10:49 AM
What about them Chargers! Everyone please bow your heads and say a few nice words for the departed MAC!!

They sure as hell took it to Mac last night! Churchill's D is the real McCoy I beleive. Congrats to the Chargers.

Reaganrattler07
10-21-2005, 06:47 PM
Churchill's D seems to be very dangerous....should make for a good game next week.

mad_fan
10-21-2005, 11:42 PM
I wonder how much this weekend will bring us down in the Expense-News Poll...

PS budda, you mybe is more smarter than eye, but I am correct more often than you! :p

mad_fan
10-21-2005, 11:46 PM
Sorry, budda, just noticed you changed your sig...hope the sexy thing works out better than the smarter thing did. :p PEACE!

RedRage00
10-21-2005, 11:55 PM
I think Churchill will beat Reagan. Sorry Redskins lol

RR

Reaganrattler07
10-22-2005, 11:12 PM
I think Churchill will beat Reagan. Sorry Redskins lol

RR

It'll be a good game - I will, naturally, be in full battle gear :D (face paint, the works)

lonny23
10-23-2005, 06:00 AM
I think Churchill will beat Reagan. Sorry Redskins lol

RR
Yep, they beat SV and Judson already.

mad_fan
10-23-2005, 07:47 AM
Yep, they beat SV and Judson already.


and lost to Roosevelt, Churchill should be a lock, but it's been a weird year...

lonny23
10-23-2005, 07:57 AM
and lost to Roosevelt, Churchill should be a lock, but it's been a weird year...
I'm feeling a little better about them, but the district is hard and they could still get beat out.

Mac Is Back
10-23-2005, 09:10 AM
They sure as hell took it to Mac last night! Churchill's D is the real McCoy I beleive. Congrats to the Chargers.

Man. Was it not obvious to Fuschak that Churchill has a phenomenal ground defense? And that Mac has a strong passing offense? And yet we tried to run against them. Wow, I fail to comprehend that.

lonny23
10-23-2005, 09:36 AM
Man. Was it not obvious to Fuschak that Churchill has a phenomenal ground defense? And that Mac has a strong passing offense? And yet we tried to run against them. Wow, I fail to comprehend that.
Maybe they should get a new coach. Coaches get prideful at times to the detriment of their team's play.

Reaganrattler07
10-23-2005, 06:33 PM
Fuschak's a good coach....one of the parts I like about Mac. The same reason why Mac didn't pass against Churchill may be the same reason why they didn't pass against Reagan. Maybe the DB's were on the recievers too well or maybe he didn't think Udell could pass it out. Mac's main passing attack are screen passes, but Mac relies more on short passes and letting the recievers go the distance....

SVite
10-23-2005, 07:08 PM
It really doesnt matter who beat who,it`s about match ups,head to head.Every team matches up differently,thats why we play the game.It`s fun sizing up games,but really thats all it is.Not to mention the injury factor.May the 2 best teams from the SA area represent region 4,and take the gold rings this year.

RedRage00
10-23-2005, 11:11 PM
Redskins,

When are you gonna get rid of your "MADISON wont last long" signature. They beat Reagan. You didn't think they'd beat Judson...they did! I think you should show them a little respect by now LOL...stop being jealous :D

RR

Reaganrattler07
10-24-2005, 09:58 AM
Redskins,

When are you gonna get rid of your "MADISON wont last long" signature. They beat Reagan. You didn't think they'd beat Judson...they did! I think you should show them a little respect by now LOL...stop being jealous :D

RR

Yeah I know, it's more of a joke between mad fan and me....I'm actually looking for them to take SV to the woodshed. I'd rather have them than SV.

JC73
10-24-2005, 10:14 AM
Yeah I know, it's more of a joke between mad fan and me....I'm actually looking for them to take SV to the woodshed. I'd rather have them than SV.
Why do you hate SV so bad?

Reaganrattler07
10-24-2005, 07:04 PM
Why do you hate SV so bad?

Because of the racial slurs that were exhibited to my friends and some of their friends. There are other reasons as well, but I like this site and I don't want bad stuff circulating....and trust me, you all may think a lot of SA likes you all, but your very wrong.

mad_fan
10-24-2005, 07:21 PM
That's what I like about starting a thread with 'New.....'; no matter how old it is, it aways says it's 'New.....' ;)