View Full Version : WOODLANDS.... check this out
oldmanwoodlandsfan
10-12-2005, 11:10 AM
http://highlanderfootball.net/
If you go to the coaches corner there is a really go video of some highlights from the KF game. This video shows how aggresive the defense is, they hit that poor qb so many times.
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 11:28 AM
I like the opening kickoff for six! Looks like the people who who were talking smack about me talking about #1 sure got quiet!
dawgdude86
10-12-2005, 11:46 AM
The D looks like they came to play. Why did they only end up with 21 points? You would think that the O would have feed off of that type of outing and been able to score.
stevefoxsc
10-12-2005, 11:47 AM
to bad they wont look that good agaisnt lufkin
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 11:48 AM
The D looks like they came to play. Why did they only end up with 21 points? You would think that the O would have feed off of that type of outing and been able to score.
Here is the funny thing:
We scored on the opening kickoff = 7
Run up the middle = 7
INT return for = 7
That is the 21 points, only ONE TD of offense!! NOT GOOD!!
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 11:49 AM
to bad they wont look that good agaisnt lufkin
That is what everybody said last year!
stevefoxsc
10-12-2005, 11:56 AM
but last year team was better than this one weren't they
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 12:09 PM
On offense, but not Defense
TWHPA
10-12-2005, 01:15 PM
Last year our secondary was weak. Everyone scored over the top. The only team that had real success on the ground was Lufkin I think.
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 01:29 PM
Last year our secondary was weak. Everyone scored over the top. The only team that had real success on the ground was Lufkin I think.
RR Mcneil did also didn't they?
oldmanwoodlandsfan
10-12-2005, 01:31 PM
Although younger, this team is much better all around than last years team. Especially with Drabek and Smalls in the line up.
stevefoxsc
10-12-2005, 01:33 PM
i see alot of speed on the team
unbiasedobserver
10-12-2005, 01:36 PM
I think this years team is more consistent than last years. However, I don't think it compares with last years team that showed up for the Lufkin and KCollins game.
Having said that, the defensive front seven are very very good. I don't think the skill players everyone talks about are much help. The Oline is not capable of giving the Qb time to throw or the backs holes to hit. I can't see the Woodz winning many games with 97 yards of total offense.
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 02:03 PM
I think this years team is more consistent than last years. However, I don't think it compares with last years team that showed up for the Lufkin and KCollins game.
Having said that, the defensive front seven are very very good. I don't think the skill players everyone talks about are much help. The Oline is not capable of giving the Qb time to throw or the backs holes to hit. I can't see the Woodz winning many games with 97 yards of total offense.
I have to agree with you, we need someone on Offense to step it up and make plays, but you can't make plays without blocking.
Mean Green Machine
10-12-2005, 02:40 PM
The Highlanders are for real on Defense.
Smith, B. Hinton and Van Mark Romero are the only seniors starters, they're very active.
An all junior secondary that is aggressive and love to lay the "Wood". They rotate 5 junior LB's and DL that are fast and strong with better than average size. They don't make too many mistakes and they cause turn overs 4 Int, 9 fumbles with 5 recovered.
They are a bend but don't break defense, that has 7 Red Zone stops so far this year. No running back has broken for a long one yet. Katy, NS, Humble, KL and Klein all have very good running attacks and they all averaged 3.4 per rush. They put a lot of pressure on the QB and that helps the secondary. Other then the Katy 4th Quater the Defense has carried this Team.
If the Offense can improve the Highlanders will go far this season!
TWHPA
10-12-2005, 02:59 PM
Looks like B. Hinton and Schouffel are out tonight and Monday.......
LongviewLobo209
10-12-2005, 03:22 PM
Wow, I'm looking at the stats, and ya'll are lucky ya'll won that game. Statistically speaking anyways....
Horrible offensive performance in that game...ya'll are going to need to get some offense going if you wanna beat Lufkin...
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 03:23 PM
Wow, I'm looking at the stats, and ya'll are lucky ya'll won that game. Statistically speaking anyways....
Horrible offensive performance in that game...ya'll are going to need to get some offense going if you wanna beat Lufkin...
Why don't you send over McGee for the Lufkin game!
:D
coesmiff07
10-12-2005, 03:58 PM
look dukie,
i have a life. i can't be on here all day like you. #1 had one good play. count it...ONE good play. he ran the opening kickoff back. his other carries were for negative yards.
now, between me and you...suck my duke
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 04:11 PM
look dukie,
i have a life. i can't be on here all day like you. #1 had one good play. count it...ONE good play. he ran the opening kickoff back. his other carries were for negative yards.
now, between me and you...suck my duke
Classy Kid! REAL CLASSY!! :D
Also, sounds like you have a great handle on your life kiddo, talk with your parents, I think they need to start over with a bar of soap in your mouth!
Texasfrog
10-12-2005, 05:13 PM
Why don't you send over McGee for the Lufkin game!
:D
Hey Duke.. do you know if the Woodlands Booster Club or anyone at the school sells DVD game copies of Woodland games?
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 06:55 PM
Hey Duke.. do you know if the Woodlands Booster Club or anyone at the school sells DVD game copies of Woodland games?
I will check on that for you Frog!
x-choice
10-12-2005, 10:27 PM
I like the opening kickoff for six! Looks like the people who who were talking smack about me talking about #1 sure got quiet!
No one ever doubted that #1 was the real deal, I believe what was in question was whether or not you had a man crush on him or not. I'm going with yes.
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 10:40 PM
No one ever doubted that #1 was the real deal, I believe what was in question was whether or not you had a man crush on him or not. I'm going with yes.
Just can't keep your mouth shut huh kid!
Texasfrog
10-12-2005, 10:41 PM
I will check on that for you Frog!
Thanks..
WoodlandsHigh
10-12-2005, 11:02 PM
The Highlanders are for real on Defense.
Smith, B. Hinton and Van Mark Romero are the only seniors starters, they're very active.
Hey Mean Green.... you might wish to buy a game program & watch who starts. I think your missing Alan Weimar DL & Kirby Smith LB.
They sub in many players & it's amazing that the level of play is the same. All of these kids are good & contribute. Next year's defense will not skip a beat.
TheDuke
10-12-2005, 11:02 PM
Anyone know the final?
heckyesforfootball
10-13-2005, 12:10 AM
38-7
TWHS72
10-13-2005, 12:10 AM
38 - 7 the woodlands dominated
Highlandballer
10-13-2005, 12:12 AM
I think it was 38-7 (the good guys).
oldmanwoodlandsfan
10-13-2005, 12:35 AM
Hey calm down everybody, I think number 1 is a very good athlete and is capable of making some huge plays, but i still think the Woodlands should rely on there other players as well and not jsut focus on him. For example he can use his break away speed to stretch the field, but in a key situation you want the ball going to one of your sure hands. I think that this Highlander offense has so many weapons if they can just integrate all of them in in some way (like Southlake does) this offense could be explosive. Also remember there can never be too many stars on one team. the more stars the better jsut look at USC!!
TheDuke
10-13-2005, 08:41 AM
Hey calm down everybody, I think number 1 is a very good athlete and is capable of making some huge plays, but i still think the Woodlands should rely on there other players as well and not jsut focus on him. For example he can use his break away speed to stretch the field, but in a key situation you want the ball going to one of your sure hands. I think that this Highlander offense has so many weapons if they can just integrate all of them in in some way (like Southlake does) this offense could be explosive. Also remember there can never be too many stars on one team. the more stars the better jsut look at USC!!
Better watch out what you say about #1, kids around here will think your in love with him or something because they are stupid and immature!
Highlandballer
10-13-2005, 07:17 PM
Were not stupid and immature Duke. Count how many threads you post mentioning #1. Yeah he's good, but get over him. The first game he played he didnt do so hot. Against KF he showed some sign of life, but still didn't impress me (except on kick return). Now Duke, if you went to the Huntsville game you would have been proud of your boy #1, he kicked some serious *ss.
ktCarl
10-13-2005, 07:30 PM
...and now for something completely different....
How's Drabek doing?
PackAttack2005
10-13-2005, 07:31 PM
It was Huntsville, they are pitiful, like OakRidge. They are headed back to 4A next year.
TheDuke
10-13-2005, 10:25 PM
Were not stupid and immature Duke. Count how many threads you post mentioning #1. Yeah he's good, but get over him. The first game he played he didnt do so hot. Against KF he showed some sign of life, but still didn't impress me (except on kick return). Now Duke, if you went to the Huntsville game you would have been proud of your boy #1, he kicked some serious *ss.
Ok Then, by the way, all I said is that he LOOKED like a good athlete!! NOTHING ELSE!!!! & Why do you think I was talking about you????
Highlandballer
10-13-2005, 10:53 PM
I'm not trying to get in an argument Duke, I'm just trying to defend all of the "stupid immature teenagers." Anyways... give me a break I was agreeing with you that #1 looks like he can help ous out a lot this year at RB.
TheDuke
10-14-2005, 09:03 AM
I'm not trying to get in an argument Duke, I'm just trying to defend all of the "stupid immature teenagers." Anyways... give me a break I was agreeing with you that #1 looks like he can help ous out a lot this year at RB.
I here ya, I am over it, I was just defending myself that all I said is he looked like a good athlete that could eventually help this team, especially without Smalls and Drabek! Then I have all these Woodz kids and a few Conroe idiots (not ALL OF THEM) using there smart mouths for no reason talking smack that I love the kid! I mean give me a break! It is all good, let's just forget it!
coesmiff07
10-14-2005, 09:46 AM
Dukie,
For some reason, I think you are talking about me. Why am I an idiot? Do you think you know more than me? Cause guess what...YOU DON'T!! Too bad you weren't there at the game on Wednesday. Cause if you were, #1 would of given you a mushroom tattoo.
Suck my Duke!!!
TheDuke
10-14-2005, 10:01 AM
Dukie,
For some reason, I think you are talking about me. Why am I an idiot? Do you think you know more than me? Cause guess what...YOU DON'T!! Too bad you weren't there at the game on Wednesday. Cause if you were, #1 would of given you a mushroom tattoo.
Suck my Duke!!!
LOL!!! This kid cracks me up!!! I wish you had any idea how stupid you sound!! Since your only a Sophmore in HS I realize you have alot of growing up to do but I didn't think you were this far behind!
GET A LIFE MOUTHY!!!
Git R Done
10-14-2005, 10:23 AM
#1 Ryan Montague is the real deal.....he has a waterbug type of running style like a Barry Sanders......he is definitely going to help at RB and receiver.....the best RB for TWHS unfortunately is stuck on JV due to transfer rules....Tracy Milo......he is very good! Burns seems to be running tippy toe and has been a big disappointment....he may be better served as areceiver in the slot. Drabek came back with little impact....they tried to throw to him twice, both overthrows and he punted twice.....he looked out of shape and his punts were marginal. It was good for the "O" to FINALLY get some points....even though it was against Huntsville......TWHS needs to get some serious Mo going, especially with next week's schedule vs KCHS and CHS. The chemistry is still not there on the "O" and they definitely need to find the right mix and stay with it.......looks like they are trying to placate all the players (Mommy and Daddy's) with mass rotations every play or two.....no consistency = no district championship, no playoffs. I want to believe but the jury is still out on this team!
TWHPA
10-14-2005, 10:30 AM
Duke,
It's to bad that Conroe has someone like coesmiff speaking for them on this thread. Conroe has made some major changes in the past three years and supported The Woodlands in 2003 for the title. The words and attitude from this student (I assume) almost remove any respect I hold for their team. I can only hope he is a bench warmer or band member because our players read this site and look forward to the Conroe game. I don't really see where or when you made comments to deserve the fowl responses he/she makes.
I will start a thread before that game next week to spike some interest.
coesmiff07
10-14-2005, 10:45 AM
If it wasn't for Conroe, The Woodlands wouldn't be here. You should respect your elders (Conroe). The Woodlands will be in for a suprise when they come and visit us. #14, Maxi, will run all over The Woodlands D. Too bad my boy Macarthur is out though. Wood Hood would have a hard time stoping him. But without him, Conroe is still tough. I expect the Conroe game and the Woodlands game to be for 3rd place in district. Woodlands is on a downhill slide while Conroe has been playing better. All you gotta do is stop #1, right Duke and The Woodlands loses. I expect Wood Hood to lose to KC and then be depressed and lose to The Mighty Conroe Tigers. Expect our passing game to be back on track and we are throwing on The Woodlands young secondary.
TheDuke
10-14-2005, 10:47 AM
Duke,
It's to bad that Conroe has someone like coesmiff speaking for them on this thread. Conroe has made some major changes in the past three years and supported The Woodlands in 2003 for the title. The words and attitude from this student (I assume) almost remove any respect I hold for their team. I can only hope he is a bench warmer or band member because our players read this site and look forward to the Conroe game. I don't really see where or when you made comments to deserve the fowl responses he/she makes.
I will start a thread before that game next week to spike some interest.
I here ya! I have no worries about it! Just a kid with alot of growing up to do!!
TheDuke
10-14-2005, 11:02 AM
If it wasn't for Conroe, The Woodlands wouldn't be here. You should respect your elders (Conroe). The Woodlands will be in for a suprise when they come and visit us. #14, Maxi, will run all over The Woodlands D. Too bad my boy Macarthur is out though. Wood Hood would have a hard time stoping him. But without him, Conroe is still tough. I expect the Conroe game and the Woodlands game to be for 3rd place in district. Woodlands is on a downhill slide while Conroe has been playing better. All you gotta do is stop #1, right Duke and The Woodlands loses. I expect Wood Hood to lose to KC and then be depressed and lose to The Mighty Conroe Tigers. Expect our passing game to be back on track and we are throwing on The Woodlands young secondary.
Your dreaming kid! We have won the last 4 games!! How is that a down hill slide? #14 won't have a chance against our defense! We have always, and always will dominate Conroe!
Woodlands wouldn't be here with out Conroe? THAT IS THE FUNNIEST AND DUMBEST THING YOU HAVE EVER SAID!! What would have been hear then?
I would love to hear that story! Drabek is back and will run all over you, along with #1, Smalls, and everyone else! You guys don't stand a chance in that game!
oldmanwoodlandsfan
10-14-2005, 11:13 AM
Come on now Conroe, don't you think you've crossed the lign into WISHFULL thinking. The Woodlands is by no means on a downhill slide. They played three of the top teams in TX in their non-district games, and next year they will be ridiculously good. Conroe is going to get smashed by the Woodlands Defense, no way you're boy is going to run all over them. It is true that the Woodlands would not be here if it were not for Conroe, but it is also true that Conroe would be long gone by now if it were not for the Woodlands.
Git er Done- In no way has burns been a dissapointment. He averages almost 5 yards a carry and has been one of the only positives about this offense. He has not gotten the carries most feture backs get because of some good depth at the RB position, but has done well when he's gottne the ball. He doesn't tip toe by any means he is just so fast and smooth he doesn't even really look like he's trying. Burns is a very good back and athlete who plays much bigger than his size.
Mean Green Machine
10-14-2005, 12:46 PM
Our friends from Conroe must be watching the wrong game films. The HighlanderNation Defense will destory anything you come up with period.
The Conroe program has improved the last couple seasons, but let's face it The Woodz has Conroe's number.
Burns is a great competitor and a good player. He has done everything the coaches wanted. I just think we get caught up in the hype of new players. Their big, run 4.37 etc...It's heart and desire that win championships.
Burns is a leader and a champion period and outstanding citizen! Like Harvard or Stanford good... He has and will make something good happen this season he already has for the past 3 years....
Focus on Collins Tigers shut down Goodson! And then the Tiggers and onward to Old Abe for the "War of the Woods"
coesmiff07
10-14-2005, 02:30 PM
Your dreaming kid! We have won the last 4 games!! How is that a down hill slide? #14 won't have a chance against our defense! We have always, and always will dominate Conroe!
Woodlands wouldn't be here with out Conroe? THAT IS THE FUNNIEST AND DUMBEST THING YOU HAVE EVER SAID!! What would have been hear then?
I would love to hear that story! Drabek is back and will run all over you, along with #1, Smalls, and everyone else! You guys don't stand a chance in that game!
hear or here?? where did you get your education? hopefully not the woodlands...sounds like you are the one from conroe.
suck my duke
TWHS72
10-14-2005, 04:49 PM
If it wasn't for Conroe, The Woodlands wouldn't be here. You should respect your elders (Conroe). The Woodlands will be in for a suprise when they come and visit us. #14, Maxi, will run all over The Woodlands D. Too bad my boy Macarthur is out though. Wood Hood would have a hard time stoping him. But without him, Conroe is still tough. I expect the Conroe game and the Woodlands game to be for 3rd place in district. Woodlands is on a downhill slide while Conroe has been playing better. All you gotta do is stop #1, right Duke and The Woodlands loses. I expect Wood Hood to lose to KC and then be depressed and lose to The Mighty Conroe Tigers. Expect our passing game to be back on track and we are throwing on The Woodlands young secondary.
You people from conroe were so excited when yall won your first 3 games in non district playing sucky *** teams and now that we have started playing district yall have gone 0 - 3 i think doesnt that tell you something. yall lost to a good KF team that we beat 21 - 7 and you still think that yall can beat us. you will not be able to run over any defense ever this year. yall might go 2-5 in distrcit and you will definetly not go to the playoffs. yall have no chance agianst us, and no chance of getting into the playoffs. give it up, yall suck we are better and we will always be better. you are ignorant to make a comment like that.
Highlandballer
10-15-2005, 05:04 PM
If it wasn't for Conroe, The Woodlands wouldn't be here. You should respect your elders (Conroe). The Woodlands will be in for a suprise when they come and visit us. #14, Maxi, will run all over The Woodlands D. Too bad my boy Macarthur is out though. Wood Hood would have a hard time stoping him. But without him, Conroe is still tough. I expect the Conroe game and the Woodlands game to be for 3rd place in district. Woodlands is on a downhill slide while Conroe has been playing better. All you gotta do is stop #1, right Duke and The Woodlands loses. I expect Wood Hood to lose to KC and then be depressed and lose to The Mighty Conroe Tigers. Expect our passing game to be back on track and we are throwing on The Woodlands young secondary.
Coesmiff07, are you delerious? Hold on one sec, let me check Conroe's stats... oh ya that right, ya'll are 0-3 in district. Ya'll aren't competing for 3rd in district, more like competing for last in district. I cant wait until the Woodlands vs. Conroe game too, say hi to our 4th string for me!
coesmiff07
10-15-2005, 09:22 PM
If you say The Woodlands will win by that much then, I guess we will see you and Dukie on the field. Cause I know both of yall are 4th string...
Suck My Duke!!!
Highlandballer
10-16-2005, 12:37 PM
Thanks for agreeing with me coesmiff07 about The Woodlands killing the Conroe *******, I mean tigers. But the Duke and I are the waterboys, we wont be playing... well actually, they might throw us in when we run the score up on ya'll.
coesmiff07
10-16-2005, 09:24 PM
I never said The Woodlands would win. I said If. Now, one likely scenario could be the Conroe would be up by about 30 and then all the 4th strings could play. I look forward to seeing you step onto the field. What number are you?
Total domination by Conroe on Saturday. LOOK OUT!!
Suck my Duke!!
ilovefootball
10-16-2005, 10:20 PM
Conroe may deceive you with it's beautiful lake and high dollar homes, but its core is really just a trash dirty town similar to Cleveland, New Caney, and Splendora. This thread is proving that.
TheDuke
10-17-2005, 02:36 PM
Suck my Duke!!
He is using my line? He needs to be kicked off ASAP!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.