View Full Version : San Antonio's Top Ten
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 10:35 AM
Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
1. Clemens- If you don't like them being number #1 then beat them. Playing with a stout defense that has allowed the offense to sputter at times. Could reach semi-finals in DIV 1 if they can get past the Rockets in Round 1.
2. Smithson Valley- One of the premier programs in the State of Texas. Stumbled against Churchill, do not see it happening again. You can expect them to get better each week under Larry Hill. Will make a strong push in in DIV 2. Probably will not get past semi-finals.
3. San Marcos- Tied for first in district 25-5A. Will probably finish second to Clemens. With the ground game that San Marcos has and their ability to control the clock, they will be in any game. Could match up with Smithson Valley early in the play-offs and have an early exit.
4. Madison- Sitting all alone the top of 26-5A. This is due to the fact that they have not played Smithson Valley or Judson. Madison could beat one of the two but not both. Should finish in top three and make playoffs. If they can get past San Marcos or Seguin they might have a rematch with Smithson Valley late in playoffs.
5. Judson- The name speaks for itself. Although struggling offensively, you can never count the Rockets out with their stifling defense. If the Rockets can get their offense on a roll, look out. Will be a great match-up week one in DVI 1 against Clemens.
6. Clark- Clark is tied at the top of 27-5A. Clark although undersized on the line seems to get it done offensively. Underrated defense that works exceptionally hard keeps them in ball games. Have improved each week.
7. O'Connor- Tied with Clark atop of 27-5A. Should be a good game between two good friends when Clark and O'Connor match up. Any team that is coached by Danny Padron will be well prepared, disciplined, and give you total effort.
8. Jay- Good defensive team that seemed to struggle late in the game against Clark. Defense as fast as any defense I have seen in San Antonio this year. Will be a playoff representative for 27-5A in the playoffs and will do fine as long as the games are not tight.
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
10. Marshall- Injuries have slowed down the Rams. An early injury to their tight end has hampered the Rams offense. Marshall will have to have a little help and a lot of luck to make a push for the play-offs.
Take what you want from this. Laugh at this. Cry because of this. Disagree with this. It is just one man's opinion. Give me your opinion, San Antonio Football fans!!! :)
lonny23
10-12-2005, 11:03 AM
Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
1. Clemens- If you don't like them being number #1 then beat them. Playing with a stout defense that has allowed the offense to sputter at times. Could reach semi-finals in DIV 1 if they can get past the Rockets in Round 1.
2. Smithson Valley- One of the premier programs in the State of Texas. Stumbled against Churchill, do not see it happening again. You can expect them to get better each week under Larry Hill. Will make a strong push in in DIV 2. Probably will not get past semi-finals.
3. San Marcos- Tied for first in district 25-5A. Will probably finish second to Clemens. With the ground game that San Marcos has and their ability to control the clock, they will be in any game. Could match up with Smithson Valley early in the play-offs and have an early exit.
4. Madison- Sitting all alone the top of 26-5A. This is due to the fact that they have not played Smithson Valley or Judson. Madison could beat one of the two but not both. Should finish in top three and make playoffs. If they can get past San Marcos or Seguin they might have a rematch with Smithson Valley late in playoffs.
5. Judson- The name speaks for itself. Although struggling offensively, you can never count the Rockets out with their stifling defense. If the Rockets can get their offense on a roll, look out. Will be a great match-up week one in DVI 1 against Clemens.
6. Clark- Clark is tied at the top of 27-5A. Clark although undersized on the line seems to get it done offensively. Underrated defense that works exceptionally hard keeps them in ball games. Have improved each week.
7. O'Connor- Tied with Clark atop of 27-5A. Should be a good game between two good friends when Clark and O'Connor match up. Any team that is coached by Danny Padron will be well prepared, disciplined, and give you total effort.
8. Jay- Good defensive team that seemed to struggle late in the game against Clark. Defense as fast as any defense I have seen in San Antonio this year. Will be a playoff representative for 27-5A in the playoffs and will do fine as long as the games are not tight.
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
10. Marshall- Injuries have slowed down the Rams. An early injury to their tight end has hampered the Rams offense. Marshall will have to have a little help and a lot of luck to make a push for the play-offs.
Take what you want from this. Laugh at this. Cry because of this. Disagree with this. It is just one man's opinion. Give me your opinion, San Antonio Football fans!!! :)
I'm going to say:
1. SV
2. Judson
3. Clemens
4. MacArthur
5. Madison
6. O'Connor
7. San Marcos
8. Clark
9. Jay
10. Roosevelt
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 11:06 AM
Didn't Reagan beat Mac and you still have them at number four?
lonny23
10-12-2005, 11:25 AM
Didn't Reagan beat Mac and you still have them at number four?
That was a fluke. I still think Mac beats out Madison for that last playoff spot.
SeguinMatadors
10-12-2005, 11:37 AM
I'm going to say:
1. SV
2. Judson
3. Clemens
4. MacArthur
5. Madison
6. O'Connor
7. San Marcos
8. Clark
9. Jay
10. Roosevelt
San Marcos beat Madison. That should count for something.
stevefoxsc
10-12-2005, 11:40 AM
my top 3
1.Schertz
2.SV
3.Judson
Gridiron Gopher
10-12-2005, 11:59 AM
I'm going to say:
1. SV
2. Judson
3. Clemens
4. MacArthur
5. Madison
6. O'Connor
7. San Marcos
8. Clark
9. Jay
10. Roosevelt
I see it this way:
1. SV
2. Judson
3. Clemens
4. San Marcos
5. Madison
6. MacArthur
7. Clark
8. Jay
9. Roosevelt
10. O'Conner
PantherFan70
10-12-2005, 12:12 PM
My top 10:
1. Smithson Valley
2. Judson
3. Madison - Green (which is the team) seems to be in GOOD form lately
4. Clemens - Good D, but I still have doubts
5. Macarthur
6. O'Connor :D - If you can still be as strong as they are with all their injuries and player losses watch out when they are healthy not too sure how far they will go in the playoffs if they make it, because they do eventually run into either SV or Judson. Should be interesting since they are so young of a team
7. San Marcos
8. Roosevelt
9. Jay - haven't seen them play but I know they have a lot returning
10. Clark - I can't wait till Friday! Will be a good game!
RedRage00
10-12-2005, 12:23 PM
I don't think San Marcos should be that high. I don't think they should be ranked above Judson either.
Good analysis though.
RR
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 12:44 PM
Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
1. Clemens- If you don't like them being number #1 then beat them. Playing with a stout defense that has allowed the offense to sputter at times. Could reach semi-finals in DIV 1 if they can get past the Rockets in Round 1.
2. Smithson Valley- One of the premier programs in the State of Texas. Stumbled against Churchill, do not see it happening again. You can expect them to get better each week under Larry Hill. Will make a strong push in in DIV 2. Probably will not get past semi-finals.
3. San Marcos- Tied for first in district 25-5A. Will probably finish second to Clemens. With the ground game that San Marcos has and their ability to control the clock, they will be in any game. Could match up with Smithson Valley early in the play-offs and have an early exit.
4. Madison- Sitting all alone the top of 26-5A. This is due to the fact that they have not played Smithson Valley or Judson. Madison could beat one of the two but not both. Should finish in top three and make playoffs. If they can get past San Marcos or Seguin they might have a rematch with Smithson Valley late in playoffs.
5. Judson- The name speaks for itself. Although struggling offensively, you can never count the Rockets out with their stifling defense. If the Rockets can get their offense on a roll, look out. Will be a great match-up week one in DVI 1 against Clemens.
6. Clark- Clark is tied at the top of 27-5A. Clark although undersized on the line seems to get it done offensively. Underrated defense that works exceptionally hard keeps them in ball games. Have improved each week.
7. O'Connor- Tied with Clark atop of 27-5A. Should be a good game between two good friends when Clark and O'Connor match up. Any team that is coached by Danny Padron will be well prepared, disciplined, and give you total effort.
8. Jay- Good defensive team that seemed to struggle late in the game against Clark. Defense as fast as any defense I have seen in San Antonio this year. Will be a playoff representative for 27-5A in the playoffs and will do fine as long as the games are not tight.
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
10. Marshall- Injuries have slowed down the Rams. An early injury to their tight end has hampered the Rams offense. Marshall will have to have a little help and a lot of luck to make a push for the play-offs.
Take what you want from this. Laugh at this. Cry because of this. Disagree with this. It is just one man's opinion. Give me your opinion, San Antonio Football fans!!! :)
This is probably the best thing bubbacoach has had to say! :D
Mac had a reason to beat Reagan.....after watching Mac play two times, I wouldn't say the Reagan game was a fluke. But I may try and make the Roosevelt-Mac game to see how they are.
lonny23
10-12-2005, 01:06 PM
This is probably the best thing bubbacoach has had to say! :D
Mac had a reason to beat Reagan.....after watching Mac play two times, I wouldn't say the Reagan game was a fluke. But I may try and make the Roosevelt-Mac game to see how they are.
I shouldn't say it was a fluke because Reagan is a good team, but they shouldn't have beaten MacArthur.
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 01:07 PM
This is probably the best thing bubbacoach has had to say! :D
Mac had a reason to beat Reagan.....after watching Mac play two times, I wouldn't say the Reagan game was a fluke. But I may try and make the Roosevelt-Mac game to see how they are.
I have good thought and opinions, I just like firing you guys up.
P.S. If you guys disagree with my top ten, tell me why.
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 01:08 PM
I shouldn't say it was a fluke because Reagan is a good team, but they shouldn't have beaten MacArthur.
I forgot to read about the law that said they shouldn't have won.....
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 01:09 PM
I have good thought and opinions, I just like firing you guys up.
Yeah I know....and you do fire people up. But I've noticed you put some good stuff in.
lonny23
10-12-2005, 01:11 PM
Yeah I know....and you do fire people up. But I've noticed you put some good stuff in.
Bubba does say some good stuff. I get a kick out of all the name calling people do because I'm never in the middle of it like I used to be.
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 01:13 PM
You gotta sometimes force people to be passionate about something.
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 01:14 PM
You gotta sometimes force people to be passionate about something.
True.....and Lonny, didn't you and Texas Headliner used to be like me and Dragons?
lonny23
10-12-2005, 01:19 PM
True.....and Lonny, didn't you and Texas Headliner used to be like me and Dragons?
The way it would go would be for me to make fun of Clemens and Headliner act like he was mad. We were always cool. He'd call me names and all kinds of good stuff, but I never took it personally. He'd get warned and I'd always tell the KT's that he didn't mean it.
The guys who got mad at me were bleedgreen, Pack0808, JTate, the SLC crew, and the North Shore crew.
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 01:20 PM
I think we should all Love each other and get along. All this fighting is giving me ulcers. I have turned over a new leaf and will promote peace and harmony from now on. Well, we will see how long this last, but I am trying. LOL :D
PantherFan70
10-12-2005, 01:21 PM
I used to get on the message boards all last season beacuse lonny and all of the people that were against him were sooooooooo entertaining! Thanks for all the laughs guys! :D
Bucky
10-12-2005, 01:21 PM
I think we should all Love each other and get along. All this fighting is giving me ulcers. I have turned over a new leaf and will promote peace and harmony from now on. Well we see how long this last, but I am trying. LOL :D
It will last about 5 minutes!!!!
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 01:23 PM
It will last about 5 minutes!!!!
You must believe. Peace and Love. Everyone's football team is the greatest. Your opinions are all right. Peace and Love.
PantherFan70
10-12-2005, 01:24 PM
Well if ALL of our opinions are right O'Connor will beat SLC!!! :D :) :eek: :p
lonny23
10-12-2005, 01:26 PM
I used to get on the message boards all last season beacuse lonny and all of the people that were against him were sooooooooo entertaining! Thanks for all the laughs guys! :D
Almost all the active Hall of Famers were against me and then I got accepted to their hallowed Hall! :D
KT sent me a couple warnings saying that people wanted to leave because the board wasn't fun anymore. I always said they liked it too much to leave!
lonny23
10-12-2005, 01:27 PM
I think we should all Love each other and get along. All this fighting is giving me ulcers. I have turned over a new leaf and will promote peace and harmony from now on. Well we see how long this last, but I am trying. LOL :D
You won't last the rest of the week! :p
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 01:29 PM
Well if ALL of our opinions are right O'Connor will beat SLC!!! :D :) :eek: :p
I am hoping that ya'll play and end up in a tie. I would hate to see a team disappointed with a loss. Peace and Love :D
PantherFan70
10-12-2005, 01:35 PM
YEAH RIGHT! Losing and winning is what makes football such a fun game! Especially when it is a good matchup!
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 01:40 PM
I used to get on the message boards all last season beacuse lonny and all of the people that were against him were sooooooooo entertaining! Thanks for all the laughs guys! :D
When I was scouting the board deciding to join or not three users always stuck out: Lonny, Texas Headliner, and Wide.
But everything Lonny was involved in was always humerous
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 01:42 PM
You must believe. Peace and Love. Everyone's football team is the greatest. Your opinions are all right. Peace and Love.
Someone leave an anonymous tip for the police to check out bubbacoach's office and house for marijuana :D
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 02:37 PM
Someone leave an anonymous tip for the police to check out bubbacoach's office and house for marijuana :D
No need, I have been hanging out with Bucky and he has shown me the light. Peace and Love to all my Hippie Brothers
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 02:45 PM
YEAH RIGHT! Losing and winning is what makes football such a fun game! Especially when it is a good matchup!
But we don't want someone leaving the field upset. We want them to feel good about themselves. If you guys don't mind can we please get back to San Antonio Football. Only if ya'll don't mind.
PantherFan70
10-12-2005, 02:58 PM
O'Connor -V- Clark?
I think this game could decide the District. I think with O'Connor being a young team, and Clark being almost the same team as last year this game will be a good one. Clark is Wilkersonless, but this is the same team that was up on O'Connor last year at halftime. O'Connor's O-line can move the D-line, so Clarks D will have to really step it up to push around the O-linemen. At the same time though clark has a runner, and we all know how well O'Connor is at stopping the run. BUT O'Connor does cause turnovers! Its happened, they even popped one out of Green's hands during the madison game. I think this will be a good game but O'Connor squeeks out the win 27-24. :D
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 03:02 PM
That is a very good thought on the O'Connor vs. Clark game. I, also, think the game will be a classic. I have seen Clark play several times this year and they seem to improve each week. There Defense is definitely their strength. Then they seem to make plays offensively when they need to. I have not seen O'Connor play, but I know Padron will have his boys ready. It should be the game of the week.
Bucky
10-12-2005, 03:02 PM
No need, I have been hanging out with Bucky and he has shown me the light. Peace and Love to all my Hippie Brothers
Hey Brother...dont let anyone in on my secret. And there is nothing that I have that would lead you to put CLEMENS at #1...LOL Easy clemensbuff...that is a joke..i dont need a 6'4'' fat ugly girl looking for me!! lol :cool:
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 03:05 PM
Hey Brother...dont let anyone in on my secret. And there is nothing that I have that would lead you to put CLEMENS at #1...LOL Easy clemensbuff...that is a joke..i dont need a 6'4'' fat ugly girl looking for me!! lol :cool:
Bucky, will you please be nice. There is no need to be mean. Everyone has the right to their intelligent, insightful, entertaining opinion. All opinions are right, because they are just opinions. Let everyone share in their football knowledge in peace and harmony. :)
mad_fan
10-12-2005, 06:20 PM
I take one day off, to WORK on an old pos nt4 server on a ranch 85 miles away, and I miss the love fest. :D
Here's mine. Why? been waitin' 24 years...what's another...
1. SV
2. Clemens
3. Judson
4. San Marcos
5. Clark
6. MacArthur
7. O'Conner
8. Jay
9. Reagan
10. Seguin
Note the cross-section of districts, fitting with the new peace and love theme. :)
Bucky
10-12-2005, 06:37 PM
Bucky, will you please be nice. There is no need to be mean. Everyone has the right to their intelligent, insightful, entertaining opinion. All opinions are right, because they are just opinions. Let everyone share in their football knowledge in peace and harmony. :)
That was nice. and would you take off the rainbow shirt you are wearing and bring bubba back!! :cool:
SeguinMatadors
10-12-2005, 07:23 PM
I take one day off, to WORK on an old pos nt4 server on a ranch 85 miles away, and I miss the love fest. :D
Here's mine. Why? been waitin' 24 years...what's another...
1. SV
2. Clemens
3. Judson
4. San Marcos
5. Clark
6. MacArthur
7. O'Conner
8. Jay
9. Reagan
10. Seguin
Note the cross-section of districts, fitting with the new peace and love theme. :)
Good Man.
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:34 PM
I'm going to say:
1. SV
2. Judson
3. Clemens
4. MacArthur
5. Madison
6. O'Connor
7. San Marcos
8. Clark
9. Jay
10. Roosevelt
How can you justify having Madison two spots above SM when they lost to SM? I also don't think O'Conner is better than SM. SV could be better than Clemens and deserve the #1 ranking except for the fact that they lost to a decent Churchill team. That fact alone disqualifies them from deserving the #1 ranking at this time. Judson with two losses ranked above Clemens (even to two good teams), NO WAY! LOL However, I do respect your opinion and your dedicated support to your team.
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:38 PM
My top 10:
1. Smithson Valley
2. Judson
3. Madison - Green (which is the team) seems to be in GOOD form lately
4. Clemens - Good D, but I still have doubts
5. Macarthur
6. O'Connor :D - If you can still be as strong as they are with all their injuries and player losses watch out when they are healthy not too sure how far they will go in the playoffs if they make it, because they do eventually run into either SV or Judson. Should be interesting since they are so young of a team
7. San Marcos
8. Roosevelt
9. Jay - haven't seen them play but I know they have a lot returning
10. Clark - I can't wait till Friday! Will be a good game!
Or Clemens! LOL Madison above Clemens??? That makes no sense at this point in the season!
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:41 PM
I think we should all Love each other and get along. All this fighting is giving me ulcers. I have turned over a new leaf and will promote peace and harmony from now on. Well, we will see how long this last, but I am trying. LOL :D
LOL You are full of it! You'll be instigating it again soon enough! LOL
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:45 PM
Hey Brother...dont let anyone in on my secret. And there is nothing that I have that would lead you to put CLEMENS at #1...LOL Easy clemensbuff...that is a joke..i dont need a 6'4'' fat ugly girl looking for me!! lol :cool:
Watch it, I'm not in a good mood this evening after putting in 12 hours at the job today! LOL
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:49 PM
Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
1. Clemens- If you don't like them being number #1 then beat them. Playing with a stout defense that has allowed the offense to sputter at times. Could reach semi-finals in DIV 1 if they can get past the Rockets in Round 1.
2. Smithson Valley- One of the premier programs in the State of Texas. Stumbled against Churchill, do not see it happening again. You can expect them to get better each week under Larry Hill. Will make a strong push in in DIV 2. Probably will not get past semi-finals.
3. San Marcos- Tied for first in district 25-5A. Will probably finish second to Clemens. With the ground game that San Marcos has and their ability to control the clock, they will be in any game. Could match up with Smithson Valley early in the play-offs and have an early exit.
4. Madison- Sitting all alone the top of 26-5A. This is due to the fact that they have not played Smithson Valley or Judson. Madison could beat one of the two but not both. Should finish in top three and make playoffs. If they can get past San Marcos or Seguin they might have a rematch with Smithson Valley late in playoffs.
5. Judson- The name speaks for itself. Although struggling offensively, you can never count the Rockets out with their stifling defense. If the Rockets can get their offense on a roll, look out. Will be a great match-up week one in DVI 1 against Clemens.
6. Clark- Clark is tied at the top of 27-5A. Clark although undersized on the line seems to get it done offensively. Underrated defense that works exceptionally hard keeps them in ball games. Have improved each week.
7. O'Connor- Tied with Clark atop of 27-5A. Should be a good game between two good friends when Clark and O'Connor match up. Any team that is coached by Danny Padron will be well prepared, disciplined, and give you total effort.
8. Jay- Good defensive team that seemed to struggle late in the game against Clark. Defense as fast as any defense I have seen in San Antonio this year. Will be a playoff representative for 27-5A in the playoffs and will do fine as long as the games are not tight.
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
10. Marshall- Injuries have slowed down the Rams. An early injury to their tight end has hampered the Rams offense. Marshall will have to have a little help and a lot of luck to make a push for the play-offs.
Take what you want from this. Laugh at this. Cry because of this. Disagree with this. It is just one man's opinion. Give me your opinion, San Antonio Football fans!!! :)
I think you are pretty darn close. I would bet that the top 5 teams could play one another and either team in any game could win or lose on any given night. It would all come down to who makes the plays and who makes the mistakes!
lonny23
10-12-2005, 08:51 PM
How can you justify having Madison two spots above SM when they lost to SM? I also don't think O'Conner is better than SM. SV could be better than Clemens and deserve the #1 ranking except for the fact that they lost to a decent Churchill team. That fact alone disqualifies them from deserving the #1 ranking at this time. Judson with two losses ranked above Clemens (even to two good teams), NO WAY! LOL However, I do respect your opinion and your dedicated support to your team.
Right now, Madison is better than San Marcos and SV and Judson are better than Clemens. It has nothing to do with wins and losses.
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 08:53 PM
LOL You are full of it! You'll be instigating it again soon enough! LOL
Who me? I am just trying to promote a more peaceful football conversation that we can all enjoy.
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 08:58 PM
Right now, Madison is better than San Marcos and SV and Judson are better than Clemens. It has nothing to do with wins and losses.
How do you know that Madison is better than SM right now? And how can you say that SV and Judson are both better than Clemens when just the other day, unless I'm mixing you up with someone else, you said that SV was 2 TDs better than Clemens. Wouldn't that make Clemens and Judson pretty darn close to even odds??? Also, Judson really was not very impressive (except the defense on a couple of goal line stands) last week against a struggling Roosevelt team. On top of that, Madison didn't exactly put it on Roosevelt either! In fact, they flat out had their hands completely full!
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 09:00 PM
Who me? I am just trying to promote a more peaceful football conversation that we can all enjoy.
There is not, and should not ever be anything peaceful about football!!! LOL :p
Alamo_Mojo
10-12-2005, 09:05 PM
There is not, and should not ever be anything peaceful about football!!! LOL :p
Except before the start of the game when each schools student council meets at the middle of the field to exchange fruit baskets and carnations :D
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 09:10 PM
Except before the start of the game when each schools student council meets at the middle of the field to exchange fruit baskets and carnations :D
I think we should throw down the pads and break out the flags.
:eek:
Alamo_Mojo
10-12-2005, 09:13 PM
I think we should throw down the pads and break out the flags.
:eek:
..........and I'm with you on that also Bro......
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 09:19 PM
In my opinion there is no sport like football that brings a pure adrenaline rush. The problem with football is the rules are softening it to the point where it might as well be flag football. It is a contact sport. That if taught and played correctly there are few injuries. If you look back at tape of most injuries they are caused by bad technique and or lack of effort. Most injuries occur when someone is not going full speed and gets rolled up by someone going full speed.
Mac Is Back
10-12-2005, 09:31 PM
Clemens has more firepower, in my opinion.
1. Clemens
2. Smithson Valley
3. San Marcos
4. Judson
5. Madison
6. MacArthur
7. O'Connor
8. Jay
9. Marshall
10. Reagan
Clemens and SV are given, San Marcos is just flat out good, Judson, although a powerhouse, is sturggling a little this season. Madison is in contention for a playoff berth for another consecutive season, Mac (although they're not the favorite to go far at all) could very easily surprise Roosevelt, Churchill, and Madison in the final 3 out of 4 games to secure a berth. O'Connor has some strength going for them, and Jay, Marshall and Reagan are surprising in both good and bad ways.
bubbacoach
10-12-2005, 09:34 PM
Clemens has more firepower, in my opinion.
1. Clemens
2. Smithson Valley
3. San Marcos
4. Judson
5. Madison
6. MacArthur
7. O'Connor
8. Jay
9. Marshall
10. Reagan
Clemens and SV are given, San Marcos is just flat out good, Judson, although a powerhouse, is sturggling a little this season. Madison is in contention for a playoff berth for another consecutive season, Mac (although they're not the favorite to go far at all) could very easily surprise Roosevelt, Churchill, and Madison in the final 3 out of 4 games to secure a berth. O'Connor has some strength going for them, and Jay, Marshall and Reagan are surprising in both good and bad ways.
Please do not get angry, but did you put Mac before Reagan because you are biased or do you truly believe this? If so, Why do you think MAC is better than Reagan, after Reagan beat them?
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 09:35 PM
In my opinion there is no sport like football that brings a pure adrenaline rush. The problem with football is the rules are softening it to the point where it might as well be flag football. It is a contact sport. That if taught and played correctly there are few injuries. If you look back at tape of most injuries they are caused by bad technique and or lack of effort. Most injuries occur when someone is not going full speed and gets rolled up by someone going full speed.
I gotta agree with that.......people who odn't know how to tackle well end up hurting themselves more than the guy their tackling. Now, provided, twisted ankles and knee injuries are gonna happen regardless of tackling the guy right or not cause it depends of the way you fall down.
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 09:36 PM
Please do not get angry, but did you put Mac before Reagan because you are biased or do you truly believe this? If so, Why do you think MAC is better than Reagan, after Reagan beat them?
Apparently so.....I just saw that gatorade commercial "A win is a win, a loss is a loss, but no matter what....you better come with it". In other words - no such things as "flukes"....you either play or you don't. And Mac is at 1-2....Reagan at 2-1. And I was right! Beating Lee gets you into the top 10!
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 09:37 PM
In my opinion there is no sport like football that brings a pure adrenaline rush. The problem with football is the rules are softening it to the point where it might as well be flag football. It is a contact sport. That if taught and played correctly there are few injuries. If you look back at tape of most injuries they are caused by bad technique and or lack of effort. Most injuries occur when someone is not going full speed and gets rolled up by someone going full speed.
Totally agree with your take! The worst hit I ever took was when I was lolly gagging down the field on a kickoff return in practice one day and was probably thinking of going deer hunting, or maybe a cute babe, and a guy coming down field to cover the kick, well no better way to put it, kicked my A$$! He hit me so hard that I was looking out my right ear hole and could not see a thing (except some exceptionally bright stars flashing) for about 30 seconds! You are exactly right about all of the new rules that keep being added! Lets just play a little touch football like they do in PE class! LOL
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 09:41 PM
Totally agree with your take! The worst hit I ever took was when I was lolly gagging down the field on a kickoff return in practice one day and was probably thinking of going deer hunting, or maybe a cute babe, and a guy coming down field to cover the kick, well no better way to put it, kicked my A$$! He hit me so hard that I was looking out my right ear hole and could not see a thing (except some exceptionally bright stars flashing) for about 30 seconds! You are exactly right about all of the new rules that keep being added! Lets just play a little touch football like they do in PE class! LOL
Haha, that was actually pretty funny....but that's a shame about that hit but like they say....get your head outta your %(^ and in the game! But yeah....too many rules now. Can hardly touch the quarterback and if he sees you comming he can just throw it away...
Mac Is Back
10-12-2005, 09:43 PM
Please do not get angry, but did you put Mac before Reagan because you are biased or do you truly believe this? If so, Why do you think MAC is better than Reagan, after Reagan beat them?
Do you take me for an angry person?
I understand that Reagan defeated Mac in an upset. Stupendous. Does that mean that Reagan is overall better than MacArthur? Not necessarily. Any high school team can win on any night against any team.
When it comes to district records, Mac is, yes, 1-2. Reagan is, yes, 2-1.
Reagan upset MacArthur for a 1-0 district record. That handed Mac a 0-1 record. Reagan then went and lost to Madison, evening their record at 1-1. MacArthur went and beat Lee, evening their record. Then Reagan defeated Lee, improving to 2-1. Mac then lost to SV, falling to 1-2.
Case in point, Mac has faced SV already. Reagan still has to play Judson and SV. MacArthur plays Roosevelt, Churchill, Judson, and finally Madison. Clearly, they are not the favorites in the Judson game. However, they will challenge in the other three. I don't see Reagan coming close to beating SV or Judson, truthfully. Now, they are indeed a surprising team, but let's not jump the gun here. One upset doesn't tell the whole story.
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 09:52 PM
Haha, that was actually pretty funny....but that's a shame about that hit but like they say....get your head outta your %(^ and in the game! But yeah....too many rules now. Can hardly touch the quarterback and if he sees you comming he can just throw it away...
After a couple of more practice runs on kickoff (you know how the coaches love to do it about 677 times in a row) I found out who layed it on me. When I found out I really got hot because he was a year younger and about 1/2 my size. Needless to say, everybody on the team thought it was pretty funny, except me. So, on the next return I kind of strayed out of my blocking lane and paid him back with a slobber knocker! Looking back some twenty years later, I guess I really shouldn't have done it. Well, on second thought, I'm still happy I lit him up and I'm not going to lose any sleep tonight! LOL
clemensbuff
10-12-2005, 09:57 PM
Do you take me for an angry person?
I understand that Reagan defeated Mac in an upset. Stupendous. Does that mean that Reagan is overall better than MacArthur? Not necessarily. Any high school team can win on any night against any team.
Not any team on any night. I don't think that Lee would beat Judson or SV if they played them 100 times each this year. Or if Jefferson or Highlands played Clemens 100 times each this year. LOL But I do get your point. If a good team plays a great game against a great team that plays an average or even bad game, then it surely can happen.
Mac Is Back
10-12-2005, 09:59 PM
Not any team on any night. I don't think that Lee would beat Judson or SV if they played them 100 times each this year. Or if Jefferson or Highlands played Clemens 100 times each this year. LOL But I do get your point. If a good team plays a great game against a great team that plays an average or even bad game, then it surely can happen.
Well. You got me on the Lee-Judson matchup. Unless of course Lee has a holy vision...and then Judson loses three starters. Then perhaps....LOL
mad_fan
10-12-2005, 10:09 PM
Among the TOP TEN teams around SA this year there is more parity than at any point I can recall...say, 25 years. Yes you have your Lee, Del Rio and all those misfits in the 25, but amongst the top teams there is no team that stands out as THE team. I don't think you can even say, at this point, these are the two or three or four teams. :)
SeguinMatadors
10-12-2005, 10:12 PM
Among the TOP TEN teams around SA this year there is more parity than at any point I can recall...say, 25 years. Yes you have your Lee, Del Rio and all those misfits in the 25, but amongst the top teams there is no team that stands out as THE team. I don't think you can even say, at this point, these are the two or three or four teams. :)
I think Clemens will take it to SM so good that they will become that team in a lot of your eyes.
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 10:13 PM
Okay, Mac Is Back....could you make your sig about 10 times smaller? It takes up quite a bit of room.....
mad_fan
10-12-2005, 10:18 PM
I think Clemens will take it to SM so good that they will become that team in a lot of your eyes.
OK. :D
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 10:19 PM
OK. :D
Hey mad fan...I got something we can add to our sigs:
"Mac won't last long either...wait, when did they last?"
mad_fan
10-12-2005, 10:29 PM
Hey mad fan...I got something we can add to our sigs:
"Mac won't last long either...wait, when did they last?"
Cant use that...most recently, 2000 Quarterfinals come to mind...close games with Marshall...
Reaganrattler07
10-12-2005, 10:33 PM
Cant use that...most recently, 2000 Quarterfinals come to mind...close games with Marshall...
But nothing after that....5 year drought. And as they say, it's a new year, new team.
mad_fan
10-12-2005, 10:43 PM
But nothing after that....5 year drought. And as they say, it's a new year, new team.
Careful now...I believe Reagan's going on five... :p
DiamondJ2
10-12-2005, 11:38 PM
Good chance the final week of the season will determine the 3rd playoff spot between Madison, Mac, & Reagan. Could end up in a 3 way tie if Mac beats Madison in the final game assuming Madison loses to SV & Judson if SV & Judson win out and then it would go to positive points. That's just one scenario; there are only a half a dozen more.
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 01:04 AM
Or Clemens! LOL Madison above Clemens??? That makes no sense at this point in the season!
OR Clemens thats right. Why doesn't Madison Over Clemens make sense? I have my doubts about them, but who doesn't after they stormed through district last year and then "stumbled" in the first round of the Playoffs. So ARE they for REAL or are they just cruising? We will see.No doubt they win district though! Funny I just realized I posted almost ALL 265A on the top of my top ten, Then I guess I'm just going to have to put OC at #2 just to mix things up! :p
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 06:50 AM
OR Clemens thats right. Why doesn't Madison Over Clemens make sense? I have my doubts about them, but who doesn't after they stormed through district last year and then "stumbled" in the first round of the Playoffs. So ARE they for REAL or are they just cruising? We will see.No doubt they win district though! Funny I just realized I posted almost ALL 265A on the top of my top ten, Then I guess I'm just going to have to put OC at #2 just to mix things up! :p
after they stormed through district last year????? :confused:
They lost the last three district games and finished 4-3. Won tie break over Churchill...more like a breeze than a storm...
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 06:52 AM
I have to agree with mad fan the parity amongst the top teams in San Antonio is probably the greatest it has been in a number of years. This is due, to the top teams being down a bit. Injuries, youth, missing that one key cog, court dates, etc. has kept many of these teams from truly shining.
Right now if there is one team that shines just a little bit, it would be Clemens. They beat Waco and Roosevelt, both team are down, but both teams have athletes on their teams that most teams only dream of having. Hopefully next year everyone will be able to get their respective programs on line again and we can start talking about truly exceptional teams. Peace and Love. Can't we all get along.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 07:37 AM
Do you take me for an angry person?
I understand that Reagan defeated Mac in an upset. Stupendous. Does that mean that Reagan is overall better than MacArthur? Not necessarily. Any high school team can win on any night against any team.
When it comes to district records, Mac is, yes, 1-2. Reagan is, yes, 2-1.
Reagan upset MacArthur for a 1-0 district record. That handed Mac a 0-1 record. Reagan then went and lost to Madison, evening their record at 1-1. MacArthur went and beat Lee, evening their record. Then Reagan defeated Lee, improving to 2-1. Mac then lost to SV, falling to 1-2.
Case in point, Mac has faced SV already. Reagan still has to play Judson and SV. MacArthur plays Roosevelt, Churchill, Judson, and finally Madison. Clearly, they are not the favorites in the Judson game. However, they will challenge in the other three. I don't see Reagan coming close to beating SV or Judson, truthfully. Now, they are indeed a surprising team, but let's not jump the gun here. One upset doesn't tell the whole story.
I'm with you on the Mac thing. I don't put Reagan up there because I say Mac is better.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 07:40 AM
I have to agree with mad fan the parity amongst the top teams in San Antonio is probably the greatest it has been in a number of years. This is due, to the top teams being down a bit. Injuries, youth, missing that one key cog, court dates, etc. has kept many of these teams from truly shining.
Right now if there is one team that shines just a little bit, it would be Clemens. They beat Waco and Roosevelt, both team are down, but both teams have athletes on their teams that most teams only dream of having. Hopefully next year everyone will be able to get their respective programs on line again and we can start talking about truly exceptional teams. Peace and Love. Can't we all get along.
The mid-level teams in SA are on par with the mid-level teams in Dallas that get run as being good teams. I don't think things are as down as some of us advertise.
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 08:34 AM
after they stormed through district last year????? :confused:
They lost the last three district games and finished 4-3. Won tie break over Churchill...more like a breeze than a storm...
Clemens lost there first 2 non-district games last year, and then didn't lose again until they met judson, I think you were referring to the year before last when they gave O'Connor that nice whipping in the playoffs.
2004 clemens schedule and scores (http://www.texasfootballratings.com/2004SchedWkly5ADist25.html)
lonny23
10-13-2005, 08:37 AM
Clemens lost there first 2 non-district games last year, and then didn't lose again until they met judson, I think you were referring to the year before last when they gave O'Connor that nice whipping in the playoffs.
2004 clemens schedule and scores (http://www.texasfootballratings.com/2004SchedWkly5ADist25.html)
After the last 2 years, I thought O'Connor was on the upswing. They haven't gone to another level this year like I expected.
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:16 AM
After the last 2 years, I thought O'Connor was on the upswing. They haven't gone to another level this year like I expected.
O'Connor is on a steady climb. Now will they have the athletes to take the next step every year? No. I can speak from personal knowledge that O'Connor has a strong coach, that has taken them to another level. If you will look at O'Connor before Coach Padron, you will see they had never even come close to the playoffs, after we are talking about them being one of the better programs in San Antonio. Last year O'Connor graduated alot of important players from a very good football team. This year they are young and have had some injuries. They are taking the next step, it will just not be a giant stride every time.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:16 AM
The mid-level teams in SA are on par with the mid-level teams in Dallas that get run as being good teams. I don't think things are as down as some of us advertise.
I'm going to have to agree with you on this Lonny. I think that the level of play is just coming up from a whole lot more teams. I have never thought that CJ has lost a step from their total domination of the area for about 10 to 15 years, it is simply that several schools around the area have tried to mold their programs to what CJ had been doing already for several years. I think that there will always be three or four different teams that will stand out every year, and a couple that will always be at or near the top of the food chain, but the competition between many of them will improve yearly! What else can you ask for?
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 10:22 AM
I agree Lonny, but you have to remember they only have 7 starting seniors. Which is their QB, RB,RT, RG, DE, S, and one LB. So I would watch out for them the next 2 to 3 years. The majority of the OC team this year is soph.'s
when you have a 63 man Roster and only 20 are seniors, thats kind of scary. They have'nt dominated this year but, they are learning. So it will be interesting.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 10:27 AM
I'm going to have to agree with you on this Lonny. I think that the level of play is just coming up from a whole lot more teams. I have never thought that CJ has lost a step from their total domination of the area for about 10 to 15 years, it is simply that several schools around the area have tried to mold their programs to what CJ had been doing already for several years. I think that there will always be three or four different teams that will stand out every year, and a couple that will always be at or near the top of the food chain, but the competition between many of them will improve yearly! What else can you ask for?
Is that legal for you? :p
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:28 AM
Clemens lost there first 2 non-district games last year, and then didn't lose again until they met judson, I think you were referring to the year before last when they gave O'Connor that nice whipping in the playoffs.
2004 clemens schedule and scores (http://www.texasfootballratings.com/2004SchedWkly5ADist25.html)
How does the Panther's team this year compare to the 03 team that we played in the regional final? I've heard that they are very young and getting better!
I can tell you this about Clemens; Our defense is better than 03' and the offense is as good and improving every week.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:32 AM
Is that legal for you? :p
I'm making an exception just this once! LOL ;) :cool: Really, I do agree with a whole bunch of your posts. I can also see that you do a whole bunch of research to put together a lot of the stuff you write here.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 10:33 AM
O'Connor is on a steady climb. Now will they have the athletes to take the next step every year? No. I can speak from personal knowledge that O'Connor has a strong coach, that has taken them to another level. If you will look at O'Connor before Coach Padron, you will see they had never even come close to the playoffs, after we are talking about them being one of the better programs in San Antonio. Last year O'Connor graduated alot of important players from a very good football team. This year they are young and have had some injuries. They are taking the next step, it will just not be a giant stride every time.
Coach Padron is a good coach and they'll stay pretty good.
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:33 AM
I am just glad we are all getting along. It sure is a great thing. I am so happy that my new pleasant personality has had an effect on you guys. :)
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:34 AM
Coach Padron is a good coach and they'll stay pretty good.
Coach Padron is a good coach as well as a great person. If you ever have a chance to meet the man and talk to him, you will be impressed.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 10:34 AM
I'm making an exception just this once! LOL ;) :cool: Really, I do agree with a whole bunch of your posts. I can also see that you do a whole bunch of research to put together a lot of the stuff you write here.
It's no wonder I like sports because numbers have always been a part of my life. I probably have more fun studying and predicting than I do watching.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:36 AM
I agree Lonny, but you have to remember they only have 7 starting seniors. Which is their QB, RB,RT, RG, DE, S, and one LB. So I would watch out for them the next 2 to 3 years. The majority of the OC team this year is soph.'s
when you have a 63 man Roster and only 20 are seniors, thats kind of scary. They have'nt dominated this year but, they are learning. So it will be interesting.
Don't they also aternate the senior QB with the Junior QB also? I definately think that OC will be a force to deal with in the very near future in SA area and beyond, just don't beleive it will be this year! :(
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:38 AM
It's no wonder I like sports because numbers have always been a part of my life. I probably have more fun studying and predicting than I do watching.
Good God Lonny, now you are scaring the crap out of me. I work with numbers all day long and really enjoy it most of the time myself! And I feel the same way about studying stats myself. Are you sure that you didn't graduate from Clemens? LOL :)
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:40 AM
Clemensbuff, You going hunting this weekend? I am going to try to thin out some more hogs.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:42 AM
I am just glad we are all getting along. It sure is a great thing. I am so happy that my new pleasant personality has had an effect on you guys. :)
What is up with you lately? Have you been going to a Dr. that makes you lay down on his couch while he speaks to you? If that's it, I'd take that Dr. over the one that is pulling on the rubber glove and tells you it's time to grab your ankles!!! :eek:
lonny23
10-13-2005, 10:43 AM
Good God Lonny, now you are scaring the crap out of me. I work with numbers all day long and really enjoy it most of the time myself! And I feel the same way about studying stats myself. Are you sure that you didn't graduate from Clemens? LOL :)
I have a love/hate relationship with Clemens. I don't really hate them and want to see them win games, but I couldn't ever force myself to live in the district because I like Judson. That's the same reason I never moved close to Madison.
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 10:46 AM
Don't they also aternate the senior QB with the Junior QB also? I definately think that OC will be a force to deal with in the very near future in SA area and beyond, just don't beleive it will be this year! :(
They did the first three games, but due to injury the Jr. qb is the alternating RB, 2 QB's on the field at once! that has some dangerous potential, good, and bad! The 03 team is alot like this years, as far as them being young, but you are right, probably not going to be a great force this year, but will turn heads just because of how well the youth is doing, With Padron as the coach though you never know, he is an amazing coach and gets his kids to produce.
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:49 AM
What is up with you lately? Have you been going to a Dr. that makes you lay down on his couch while he speaks to you? If that's it, I'd take that Dr. over the one that is pulling on the rubber glove and tells you it's time to grab your ankles!!! :eek:
No Doctor, just everyone was always getting on me for being so mean on this sight, I decided I would try to be nice. It has been hard, because there are a couple of threads that are pissing me off. But, in the end I control myself.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:50 AM
Clemensbuff, You going hunting this weekend? I am going to try to thin out some more hogs.
Not this weekend. I'm reloading bullets for our rifles every evening this week so we can go to the range this weekend. My 9 year old daughter wants to shoot her first deer this year, so I've told her that she has to go to the range the next two weekends and show that she can be consistant enough to make a good, clean kill out to 100 yards or so. I don't think she'll have a problem because with the little bit of shooting she has done with my .22 mag, she's really impressed me. I was shocked, and happy that she asked me if she could take her first deer. She went with me to the blind a whole bunch up until she was about 5 and then kinda starting doing the girly things! She actually tried to get a gobbler during the spring season but I couldn't call one close enough in for her to get a good shot with a 20 guage. I think her renewed interest has sprung up because she saw her little brother take three deer last year and four turkeys when he was only six! Anyway, I'm really glad she is going with us because that will force my wife to sit with my son while I'm with her and it will make it a total family experience. Personally I think if you keep your kids into the outdoor life, you wont have to worry as much about them putting stuff into their bodies that can ruin lives!!
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 10:53 AM
I have a love/hate relationship with Clemens. I don't really hate them and want to see them win games, but I couldn't ever force myself to live in the district because I like Judson. That's the same reason I never moved close to Madison.
I have the same feelings for CJ. I've always pulled for them except when they play Clemens and will continue to do so. When they do well it makes our area shine!
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 10:56 AM
Not this weekend. I'm reloading bullets for our rifles every evening this week so we can go to the range this weekend. My 9 year old daughter wants to shoot her first deer this year, so I've told her that she has to go to the range the next two weekends and show that she can be consistant enough to make a good, clean kill out to 100 yards or so. I don't think she'll have a problem because with the little bit of shooting she has done with my .22 mag, she's really impressed me. I was shocked, and happy that she asked me if she could take her first deer. She went with me to the blind a whole bunch up until she was about 5 and then kinda starting doing the girly things! She actually tried to get a gobbler during the spring season but I couldn't call one close enough in for her to get a good shot with a 20 guage. I think her renewed interest has sprung up because she saw her little brother take three deer last year and four turkeys when he was only six! Anyway, I'm really glad she is going with us because that will force my wife to sit with my son while I'm with her and it will make it a total family experience. Personally I think if you keep your kids into the outdoor life, you wont have to worry as much about them putting stuff into their bodies that can ruin lives!!
Amen, I take my son and wife hunting every chance I get. My daughter is only three and has shown no interest. But the second she shows interest, she is in.
Gridiron Gopher
10-13-2005, 10:57 AM
O'Conner is rebuilding this year. They have a young team and their having to learn the speed of game at this level. They will get better has they go along but I'm not sure they'll get to last years level. I've been to 2 of their games(Boerne,Madison) and the defense was struggling with the run. Both Boerne and Madison ran all over them. On offense their was no consistentcy. The starting QB was ave at best and yes they did play the backup QB some. This weeks game against Clark should be a good one but if O'Conner can't stop Clark's running game, it won't be close. O'Conner will start to cheat up front and Clark will kill them overer the top with passes just like Boerne and Madison did. Clark IMO is a very much like Boerne. They rely on the run and they do it well. It's not like the running attack of Madison or Reagan where it could go the distance on any play. They like to pound you and control the clock. Once you crowd the line they go over the top with the pass. They don't do anything fancy, they just do well. This attacks O'Conners weakness.
Clarks defense is just like their offense, nothing special but they do what their suppose to. If they have a weakness on defense it is probably against the pass. This is not O'Conner's strength and that's why I think Clark wins this game. Probably by 14 or more. I think the two best teams in their district played last week (Clark/Jay).
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 11:02 AM
. I think the two best teams in their district played last week (Clark/Jay).
Did you see the game? One of the greatest catches I have ever seen was made in that game. It was by the OHR (spelling) kid from Clark. If he does not make that catch Jay wins that game.
Bucky
10-13-2005, 11:04 AM
What is up with you lately? Have you been going to a Dr. that makes you lay down on his couch while he speaks to you? If that's it, I'd take that Dr. over the one that is pulling on the rubber glove and tells you it's time to grab your ankles!!! :eek:
Hey Buff..Do you spend a lot of time at the Dr. telling you to grap your ankles :D :D :D Just make sure he doenst have both hands on your shoulders..lol :cool: I knew there was something about you a little different!! lol Im sorry..I just cant quit making wise cracks...Is his name Dr. Jellyfinger? Does he have fingers that look like cucumbers? Ill be he is a former NFL defensive lineman..ok ok Im sorry thats enough bubba is on something...
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 11:06 AM
Hey Buff..Do you spend a lot of time at the Dr. telling you to grap your ankles :D :D :D Just make sure he doenst have both hands on your shoulders..lol :cool: I knew there was something about you a little different!! lol Im sorry..I just cant quit making wise cracks...Is his name Dr. Jellyfinger? Does he have fingers that look like cucumbers? Ill be he is a former NFL defensive lineman..ok ok Im sorry thats enough bubba is on something...
Bubba is on nothing. He just loves the intellectual conversations we have here.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 11:09 AM
Hey Buff..Do you spend a lot of time at the Dr. telling you to grap your ankles :D :D :D Just make sure he doenst have both hands on your shoulders..lol :cool: I knew there was something about you a little different!! lol Im sorry..I just cant quit making wise cracks...Is his name Dr. Jellyfinger? Does he have fingers that look like cucumbers? Ill be he is a former NFL defensive lineman..ok ok Im sorry thats enough bubba is on something...
Nope, never had it done to me yet, but I'm sure at 37 it's not far away. I'm not looking forward to that day one bit. Mine is exit only!!! Hell, it hurts me if I don't eat enough fiber!
By the way though, it really sounds like by your descriptions up above you've had quite of bit of personal experience on these matters! LOL :)
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 11:13 AM
I have to agree with mad fan the parity amongst the top teams in San Antonio is probably the greatest it has been in a number of years. This is due, to the top teams being down a bit. Injuries, youth, missing that one key cog, court dates, etc. has kept many of these teams from truly shining.
Right now if there is one team that shines just a little bit, it would be Clemens. They beat Waco and Roosevelt, both team are down, but both teams have athletes on their teams that most teams only dream of having. Hopefully next year everyone will be able to get their respective programs on line again and we can start talking about truly exceptional teams. Peace and Love. Can't we all get along.
I post so much it was bound to happen... :)
Gridiron Gopher
10-13-2005, 11:13 AM
Did you see the game? One of the greatest catches I have ever seen was made in that game. It was by the OHR (spelling) kid from Clark. If he does not make that catch Jay wins that game.
No I had to miss that one. I'm trying to go to as many O'Conner games as I can because I have cousins that go there. In the Clark/Churchill game, Clark made some outstanding catches in that game too. They seem to make those key passing plays when they need them.
This week I'll try to make the SV/Reagan game as well as the Mac/Roosevelt game. Next week I'll be at Mac/Churchil on Thursday, then Judson/Madison and Roosevelt/Reagan.
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 11:14 AM
O'Conner is rebuilding this year. They have a young team and their having to learn the speed of game at this level. They will get better has they go along but I'm not sure they'll get to last years level. I've been to 2 of their games(Boerne,Madison) and the defense was struggling with the run. Both Boerne and Madison ran all over them. On offense their was no consistentcy. The starting QB was ave at best and yes they did play the backup QB some. This weeks game against Clark should be a good one but if O'Conner can't stop Clark's running game, it won't be close. O'Conner will start to cheat up front and Clark will kill them overer the top with passes just like Boerne and Madison did. Clark IMO is a very much like Boerne. They rely on the run and they do it well. It's not like the running attack of Madison or Reagan where it could go the distance on any play. They like to pound you and control the clock. Once you crowd the line they go over the top with the pass. They don't do anything fancy, they just do well. This attacks O'Conners weakness.
Clarks defense is just like their offense, nothing special but they do what their suppose to. If they have a weakness on defense it is probably against the pass. This is not O'Conner's strength and that's why I think Clark wins this game. Probably by 14 or more. I think the two best teams in their district played last week (Clark/Jay).
Of course you would see the crappiest games that O'Connor has played, and of course they got slaughtered, it was most of the teams first time to play GOOD teams, they learned and have adjusted. Apparently you didn't see the end of the MAdison game when OC drove the ball down the field and found the PAdron type of offense, unfortunatlley a mistake cost the game. The defensive midle is soft, but they have learned to close the holes quicker, and I don't think Clark wins by 14 or more, if clark wins its by 7 or less. The secondary is no pushover either, they have solid players in those positions, They have multiple INT's too. It will be a solid game and probably the best game this year. If OC wins I say it is thanks to the defense being able to get turnovers, and get pressure in the backfield. I still se OC winning by a FG.
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 11:15 AM
I post so much it was bound to happen... :)
I am not disagreeing with anyone anymore. I felt bad for making so many people upset and sad, that I decided to be nice far as long as I can.
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 11:26 AM
I am not disagreeing with anyone anymore. I felt bad for making so many people upset and sad, that I decided to be nice far as long as I can.
and I'm not gonna post so much... :)
Gridiron Gopher
10-13-2005, 11:40 AM
Of course you would see the crappiest games that O'Connor has played, and of course they got slaughtered, it was most of the teams first time to play GOOD teams, they learned and have adjusted. Apparently you didn't see the end of the MAdison game when OC drove the ball down the field and found the PAdron type of offense, unfortunatlley a mistake cost the game. The defensive midle is soft, but they have learned to close the holes quicker, and I don't think Clark wins by 14 or more, if clark wins its by 7 or less. The secondary is no pushover either, they have solid players in those positions, They have multiple INT's too. It will be a solid game and probably the best game this year. If OC wins I say it is thanks to the defense being able to get turnovers, and get pressure in the backfield. I still se OC winning by a FG.
I hope you're right. Like I said I have family that goes to O'Conner. Yes, I did see O'Conner drive down the field to "almost" get the win against Madison but they didn't execute and that's what I have seen them do in 2 games. They are not consistant on offense and they don't play the run well against good running teams. Clark runs the ball well and they do it in the same way Boerne does. They pound you over and over and I think their O-line and D-line will control this game. O'Conner will start to crowd the line because they don't have a choice and the good teams will attack that through the air. Clark will be no different.
If O'Conner has improved over the last 3 games that's great but I would look at who they played. Holmes, Marshall and Del Rio. None of those teams are top level. Not even Marshall now with all their injuries. I think that O'Conner will play them tough but will get worn out by games end and Clark wins 28-14.
I would love to see O'Conner get this win but I don't see it that way. That's all.
lonny23
10-13-2005, 11:45 AM
I post so much it was bound to happen... :)
I love how people used to say, "I can't believe I agree with Lonny..." :D
lonny23
10-13-2005, 11:47 AM
and I'm not gonna post so much... :)
No such promises from me!
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 11:49 AM
I love how people used to say, "I can't believe I agree with Lonny..." :D
I never had that problem. :p
lonny23
10-13-2005, 11:55 AM
I never had that problem. :p
I guess I antagonized them so much that it was a foreign concept that I was right. They knew I was right about a bunch of stuff all along, but the bad outweighed the good. It was almost like the board was in a bad marriage with me! :D
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 12:44 PM
I hope you're right. Like I said I have family that goes to O'Conner. Yes, I did see O'Conner drive down the field to "almost" get the win against Madison but they didn't execute and that's what I have seen them do in 2 games. They are not consistant on offense and they don't play the run well against good running teams. Clark runs the ball well and they do it in the same way Boerne does. They pound you over and over and I think their O-line and D-line will control this game. O'Conner will start to crowd the line because they don't have a choice and the good teams will attack that through the air. Clark will be no different.
If O'Conner has improved over the last 3 games that's great but I would look at who they played. Holmes, Marshall and Del Rio. None of those teams are top level. Not even Marshall now with all their injuries. I think that O'Conner will play them tough but will get worn out by games end and Clark wins 28-14.
I would love to see O'Conner get this win but I don't see it that way. That's all.
I don't think their O-line and D-line control this game, I think OC's O-line dominates Clarks D-line, Unless Clarks D-line are great at the rip or spin move I doubt they control anything, and if they do get in the back field itsw on the O-lines left side. I would just say the line backers will be the problem for OC but if the run gets to the LB's thats 4 yards, just like Padron likes it. The defense for OC will have clark running to whatever side #40 is not on but then they still have the LB #44 to deal with. Besides Clark has played Taft, Jay- solid team this year from what I can tell, and Holmes - Everybody is getting excited because they put up those great numbers on this inexpirienced team. BUT I don't believe who they've played and haven't played is a good way to decide. I may be biased because I graduated for OC and my brother plays there, but after looking at the whole picture I have to back OC, now if we were talking SV (nobody get mad because I didn't say one of your top 5 teams, its just an example and SV leads OC 6-0 in that series all time) and OC I'd totally be agreeing with you.
But I can't on this one. and I just like talking about OC so I like this argument.
Are you going to be going to the OC-Clark game?
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 12:49 PM
I guess I antagonized them so much that it was a foreign concept that I was right. They knew I was right about a bunch of stuff all along, but the bad outweighed the good. It was almost like the board was in a bad marriage with me! :D
You antagonize me, but I like it! :eek: :p
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 01:14 PM
O'Connor will only continue to get better as long as Danny Padron is the Head Coach. After all a Team is a reflection of their coach. And he is pure quality. :)
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 01:17 PM
O'Connor will only continue to get better as long as Danny Padron is the Head Coach. After all a Team is a reflection of their coach. And he is pure quality. :)
I totally agree!
bubbacoach
10-13-2005, 01:24 PM
Does anyone know what happened to Mavs D End? Did he talk his way off this sight? :confused:
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 01:35 PM
Does anyone know what happened to Mavs D End? Did he talk his way off this sight? :confused:
twice!
lonny23
10-13-2005, 01:42 PM
You antagonize me, but I like it! :eek: :p
I could probably pull the same stuff this year without a problem.
svtakestate
10-13-2005, 02:34 PM
Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
1. Clemens- If you don't like them being number #1 then beat them. Playing with a stout defense that has allowed the offense to sputter at times. Could reach semi-finals in DIV 1 if they can get past the Rockets in Round 1.
2. Smithson Valley- One of the premier programs in the State of Texas. Stumbled against Churchill, do not see it happening again. You can expect them to get better each week under Larry Hill. Will make a strong push in in DIV 2. Probably will not get past semi-finals.
3. San Marcos- Tied for first in district 25-5A. Will probably finish second to Clemens. With the ground game that San Marcos has and their ability to control the clock, they will be in any game. Could match up with Smithson Valley early in the play-offs and have an early exit.
4. Madison- Sitting all alone the top of 26-5A. This is due to the fact that they have not played Smithson Valley or Judson. Madison could beat one of the two but not both. Should finish in top three and make playoffs. If they can get past San Marcos or Seguin they might have a rematch with Smithson Valley late in playoffs.
5. Judson- The name speaks for itself. Although struggling offensively, you can never count the Rockets out with their stifling defense. If the Rockets can get their offense on a roll, look out. Will be a great match-up week one in DVI 1 against Clemens.
6. Clark- Clark is tied at the top of 27-5A. Clark although undersized on the line seems to get it done offensively. Underrated defense that works exceptionally hard keeps them in ball games. Have improved each week.
7. O'Connor- Tied with Clark atop of 27-5A. Should be a good game between two good friends when Clark and O'Connor match up. Any team that is coached by Danny Padron will be well prepared, disciplined, and give you total effort.
8. Jay- Good defensive team that seemed to struggle late in the game against Clark. Defense as fast as any defense I have seen in San Antonio this year. Will be a playoff representative for 27-5A in the playoffs and will do fine as long as the games are not tight.
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
10. Marshall- Injuries have slowed down the Rams. An early injury to their tight end has hampered the Rams offense. Marshall will have to have a little help and a lot of luck to make a push for the play-offs.
Take what you want from this. Laugh at this. Cry because of this. Disagree with this. It is just one man's opinion. Give me your opinion, San Antonio Football fans!!! :)
I dont think Clemens should be no. 1 ... look at their scedual.... the havent played any good teams yet... if they played judson,Sv, or someone good. they would lose.
clemensbuff
10-13-2005, 04:16 PM
I dont think Clemens should be no. 1 ... look at their scedual.... the havent played any good teams yet... if they played judson,Sv, or someone good. they would lose.
So, who should be ranked #1? How can you be so sure that we would lose to either team? Judson's offense is still struggling at times and SV lost to a decent Churchill team. It's not like you lost to Katy or SLC or another top-ranked team. I'll give credit where credit is due and say that SV played a great game the following week against Judson. But, if you are so worried about Clemens being ranked #1 and that is obvious that since you beat Judson, you think SV should deserve that ranking, you should have taken care of business against Churchill! An SV supporter or player should know by now that rankings don't mean squat anyway! It just gives everyone something to talk about and argue about! :p
Gridiron Gopher
10-13-2005, 04:25 PM
I don't think their O-line and D-line control this game, I think OC's O-line dominates Clarks D-line, Unless Clarks D-line are great at the rip or spin move I doubt they control anything, and if they do get in the back field itsw on the O-lines left side. I would just say the line backers will be the problem for OC but if the run gets to the LB's thats 4 yards, just like Padron likes it. The defense for OC will have clark running to whatever side #40 is not on but then they still have the LB #44 to deal with. Besides Clark has played Taft, Jay- solid team this year from what I can tell, and Holmes - Everybody is getting excited because they put up those great numbers on this inexpirienced team. BUT I don't believe who they've played and haven't played is a good way to decide. I may be biased because I graduated for OC and my brother plays there, but after looking at the whole picture I have to back OC, now if we were talking SV (nobody get mad because I didn't say one of your top 5 teams, its just an example and SV leads OC 6-0 in that series all time) and OC I'd totally be agreeing with you.
But I can't on this one. and I just like talking about OC so I like this argument.
Are you going to be going to the OC-Clark game?
I like to look at teams strengths and weaknesses. Clark's strength is at running and run blocking. I match that up against what I think is an average D-line at best with O'Conner. I think Clark will control this part of the game. If that happens, then the passing will open up and that's where Clark as done well against other opponents and O'Conner has not (again my only 2 games have been Boerne and Madison). On defense Clark has shown that they are a very solid team but not outstanding(say like a Judson/SV or Clemens). If you can pass on them you have a chance to hurt them.
Now look at O'Conner (my only 2 games again). Very inconsistant on both sides of the ball. Running game doesn't have anyone who can take over a game and the passing game is below average at best. The starting QB is glued into his first option and if it's not there he runs. There have been open WR's but he doesn't see them. The other thing that stands out with O'Conners offense is the amount of QB/Center exchange problems I've seen in those 2 games and the amount of times they have put the ball on the ground. Hopefully that as stopped.
What makes me like Clark is that I think they will control the line of scrimmage on both sides. Sooner or later O'Conner will start bringing more defenders up to help on run and Clark will take advantage of it. I also don't see anyone on O'Conner that will give them that instant TD that they will need to get back in the game late.
It's just my opinion of what I've seen of both teams. Should be a good game but I still like Clark to win.
mad_fan
10-13-2005, 04:29 PM
I could probably pull the same stuff this year without a problem.
I'm holding back 'til next week. :p
PantherFan70
10-13-2005, 04:31 PM
I like to look at teams strengths and weaknesses. Clark's strength is at running and run blocking. I match that up against what I think is an average D-line at best with O'Conner. I think Clark will control this part of the game. If that happens, then the passing will open up and that's where Clark as done well against other opponents and O'Conner has not (again my only 2 games have been Boerne and Madison). On defense Clark has shown that they are a very solid team but not outstanding(say like a Judson/SV or Clemens). If you can pass on them you have a chance to hurt them.
Now look at O'Conner (my only 2 games again). Very inconsistant on both sides of the ball. Running game doesn't have anyone who can take over a game and the passing game is below average at best. The starting QB is glued into his first option and if it's not there he runs. There have been open WR's but he doesn't see them. The other thing that stands out with O'Conners offense is the amount of QB/Center exchange problems I've seen in those 2 games and the amount of times they have put the ball on the ground. Hopefully that as stopped.
What makes me like Clark is that I think they will control the line of scrimmage on both sides. Sooner or later O'Conner will start bringing more defenders up to help on run and Clark will take advantage of it. I also don't see anyone on O'Conner that will give them that instant TD that they will need to get back in the game late.
It's just my opinion of what I've seen of both teams. Should be a good game but I still like Clark to win.
Well we will have to see tomm night, and see what happens
Mac Is Back
10-13-2005, 09:36 PM
Hey mad fan...I got something we can add to our sigs:
"Mac won't last long either...wait, when did they last?"
Cute.
And no, I don't find it beneficial to me to decrease the size of my sig. I WANT YOU TO SEE IT.
So Mac has been dry in the 21st century. But, the point of my sig is that someone told me they would be as horrible as last year. And all it takes is 3 wins and you've put that one to bed.
Reaganrattler07
10-13-2005, 09:42 PM
Cute.
And no, I don't find it beneficial to me to decrease the size of my sig. I WANT YOU TO SEE IT.
So Mac has been dry in the 21st century. But, the point of my sig is that someone told me they would be as horrible as last year. And all it takes is 3 wins and you've put that one to bed.
I thought it was cute.
Only thing I need to see is this
20-22
Mac Is Back
10-13-2005, 09:44 PM
I thought it was cute.
Only thing I need to see is this
20-22
It's funny really. Mac, for the first time since 2000 I suppose, was the favorite to beat Reagan. And they STILL didn't do it.
Eh. It was quite a game. Could Mac have faced any higher odds on that 4th and 15 from the Reagan 23 with about 2 mins to go? Ah, how exciting that finish turned out to be. Quality football.
However, if Mac and Reagan faced each other again, I wouldn't count on Reagan winning it again.
Reaganrattler07
10-13-2005, 09:47 PM
It's funny really. Mac, for the first time since 2000 I suppose, was the favorite to beat Reagan. And they STILL didn't do it.
Eh. It was quite a game. Could Mac have faced any higher odds on that 4th and 15 from the Reagan 23 with about 2 mins to go? Ah, how exciting that finish turned out to be. Quality football.
However, if Mac and Reagan faced each other again, I wouldn't count on Reagan winning it again.
Perhaps, kinda like in basketball.....second time you know whats comming. Difference is....in basketball, you all knew what was comming...still couldn't stop it, heck, couldn't even stop it the third time....
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 07:37 AM
Basketball, Basketball, we talkin about Basketball.
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 09:42 AM
Basketball, Basketball, we talkin about Basketball.
Couldn't resist.....hey bubbacoach, your Top Ten is known.....
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 09:45 AM
lol... we're talking about basketball
psssh forget basketball man!
Bubba your top ten is lacking more of Madison, you got to give Madison more credit then Mac, just because Mac looked good in the beginning doesn't mean they are good now in the playoffs. Mac is overhyped.
Also, I think that Judson needs some more love too.
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 09:48 AM
lol... we're talking about basketball
psssh forget basketball man!
Bubba your top ten is lacking more of Madison, you got to give Madison more credit then Mac, just because Mac looked good in the beginning doesn't mean they are good now in the playoffs. Mac is overhyped.
Also, I think that Judson needs some more love too.
In my top ten Mac is not even ranked. Madison is Number 4 behind Clemens, San Marcos, and Smithson Valley, I feel that is plenty of Love right now. Judson needs to get their offense rolling if they want to be loved by me. :)
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 09:58 AM
In my top ten Mac is not even ranked. Madison is Number 4 behind Clemens, San Marcos, and Smithson Valley, I feel that is plenty of Love right now. Judson needs to get their offense rolling if they want to be loved by me. :)
Haha, I gotta agree with that....Mac loses to Reagan and Mac makes the playoffs....gee whiz. Madison's gonna straighten out Macarthur in the final game though....tie up the loose ends from last year.
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 09:59 AM
oops my apoligies Bubba
i read someone else's post where they put Mac in front of Madison
Redskins88's quote--agreed x2
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:02 AM
I just love the reasoning people use though.....gee, Reagan beats Mac....but Mac comes up and makes the playoffs! To be honest, I think people are too used to Reagan being consistently bad at football and some people are getting surprised, but let me tell you this - Reagan's team this year is far different than any other team we've had.
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:03 AM
Haha, I gotta agree with that....Mac loses to Reagan and Mac makes the playoffs....gee whiz. Madison's gonna straighten out Macarthur in the final game though....tie up the loose ends from last year.
If I am not mistaken Mac still has Judson and Madison on their schedule. It could happen, but I don't see them beating either team and that would eliminate them from play-off contention. The top three teams in 26-5A, in my opinion, will be 1st Smithson Valley 2nd Judson, 3rd Madison.
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:04 AM
If I am not mistaken Mac still has Judson and Madison on their schedule. It could happen, but I don't see them beating either team and that would eliminate them from play-off contention. The top three teams in 26-5A, in my opinion, will be 1st Smithson Valley 2nd Judson, 3rd Madison.
One Smithson Valley team is losing to Reagan this weekend.....I wouldn't mind both :D
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 10:06 AM
lol, Reagan is a changed team, I remember the time when Madison blew out Reagan like 60-7 or something. Crazy game, i was on Reagan's side too because I was invited by a friend at Reagan. LOl, too bad i couldn't scream when Madison scored. But yeah, the Rattlers are mucho better now
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:13 AM
lol, Reagan is a changed team, I remember the time when Madison blew out Reagan like 60-7 or something. Crazy game, i was on Reagan's side too because I was invited by a friend at Reagan. LOl, too bad i couldn't scream when Madison scored. But yeah, the Rattlers are mucho better now
Remember that time when Madison was ranked #1 in the STATE.....Reagan went into double-overtime and won 59-53. Reagan missed the pat, but stopped the mavericks.
But it's not talent thats changed.....it's the determination and heart that they've shown. That first game vs. Harlingen, when the game was over the players had their helmets off and we're lookin in the crowd, and you could look into their faces and see that they were different....they felt they could finally win.
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:15 AM
Reagan has given Madison fits over the last couple of years. I would not count Reagan out of the 3rd spot.
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:17 AM
Reagan has given Madison fits over the last couple of years. I would not count Reagan out of the 3rd spot.
Even if they don't get the playoffs....they'll give every team as much hell as possible.
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 10:18 AM
yeah, I remember that time, Madison's powerhouse days are somewhat now of a star. So far away, yet so beautiful lol
Too bad, Madison doesn't play like they used too
I went to a recent freshman game of Madison, they played Churchill. Both teams lost, but the A team fumbled so much! To my suprise it wasn't even the HB, it was mostly the Center and QB! They have a HB on A team thats fast on certain plays, and looks big. On B team, they have a small RB thats very quick and can juke lots of people out. I saw him juke two guys at the same time and he scored in the endzone...crazy! But yeah, Madison has a future
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:19 AM
[QUOTE=bubbacoach]Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
I think in the near future with four teams going to the play-offs Reagan will make an appearance
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:20 AM
yeah, I remember that time, Madison's powerhouse days are somewhat now of a star. So far away, yet so beautiful lol
Too bad, Madison doesn't play like they used too
I went to a recent freshman game of Madison, they played Churchill. Both teams lost, but the A team fumbled so much! To my suprise it wasn't even the HB, it was mostly the Center and QB! They have a HB on A team thats fast on certain plays, and looks big. On B team, they have a small RB thats very quick and can juke lots of people out. I saw him juke two guys at the same time and he scored in the endzone...crazy! But yeah, Madison has a future
Don't you have to score in the endzone?
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:20 AM
[QUOTE=bubbacoach]Bubbacoach's San Antonio Top Ten
9. Reagan- Best team Reagan has had in it's history. Probably not ready to make playoffs in 26-5A, but it is about to happen. Will not make play-offs, but congradulations on your season.
I think in the near future with four teams going to the play-offs Reagan will make an appearance
Bubbacoach.....those rankings were talked about greatly this morning :D but none of my posts were mentioned :(
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 10:21 AM
Don't you have to score in the endzone?
lol shutup, he scored but he juked 2 people at the same time doing it, probably a 60 yard run too!
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:21 AM
yeah, I remember that time, Madison's powerhouse days are somewhat now of a star. So far away, yet so beautiful lol
Too bad, Madison doesn't play like they used too
I went to a recent freshman game of Madison, they played Churchill. Both teams lost, but the A team fumbled so much! To my suprise it wasn't even the HB, it was mostly the Center and QB! They have a HB on A team thats fast on certain plays, and looks big. On B team, they have a small RB thats very quick and can juke lots of people out. I saw him juke two guys at the same time and he scored in the endzone...crazy! But yeah, Madison has a future
Reagan's freshman is pretty good...JV's decent so I look forward to Reagan to get better.....I think the year after I graduated, they'll be good....that'll be lets see....2008?
Its In The Bag
10-14-2005, 10:22 AM
Reagan's freshman is pretty good...JV's decent so I look forward to Reagan to get better.....I think the year after I graduated, they'll be good....that'll be lets see....2008?
Hmm, maybe Reagan and Madison in the top 2 for 26-5A in 3 years??? lol maybe....
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:23 AM
lol shutup, he scored but he juked 2 people at the same time doing it, probably a 60 yard run too!
Just messing with you. Don't get mad I am still trying to be a very nice person on this board. I don't want to go back to my alter ego on anyone.LOL :D
Bucky
10-14-2005, 10:36 AM
I am not disagreeing with anyone anymore. I felt bad for making so many people upset and sad, that I decided to be nice far as long as I can.
Yes you will!!!
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:38 AM
Yes you will!!!
Don't instigate me, you little.. oops caught myself. Believe what you will I am changed.
mad_fan
10-14-2005, 10:50 AM
yeah, I remember that time, Madison's powerhouse days are somewhat now of a star. So far away, yet so beautiful lol
Too bad, Madison doesn't play like they used too
I went to a recent freshman game of Madison, they played Churchill. Both teams lost, but the A team fumbled so much! To my suprise it wasn't even the HB, it was mostly the Center and QB! They have a HB on A team thats fast on certain plays, and looks big. On B team, they have a small RB thats very quick and can juke lots of people out. I saw him juke two guys at the same time and he scored in the endzone...crazy! But yeah, Madison has a future
You talking about the early '80s? We were good back them! :D
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:55 AM
Every team has its peaks and valleys as far as talent goes. Good programs are still able to be successful through them all.
Bucky
10-14-2005, 10:56 AM
Don't instigate me, you little.. oops caught myself. Believe what you will I am changed.
Im sure you have changed..but you will disagree with someone sometime..and it will be soon. Ill bet you are bustin at the seams. :cool:
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 10:59 AM
Im sure you have changed..but you will disagree with someone sometime..and it will be soon. Ill bet you are bustin at the seams. :cool:
Disagreeing with someone because I have a different opinion I might do. But I will not be calling people any names. It was not nice to call someone a numbskull, buttsniffing, moron. And I am bigger that that now. :cool:
bubbacoach
10-14-2005, 03:16 PM
Does anyone have an opinion on the Brackenridge vs. Sam Houston game? LOL It should be a classic match-up, in 25-5A. Clemens will be watching in anticipation of the outcome.
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 05:02 PM
Don't instigate me, you little.. oops caught myself. Believe what you will I am changed.
(SONG) Puff, the magic dragon! Out by the sea!
clemensbuff
10-14-2005, 06:21 PM
Does anyone have an opinion on the Brackenridge vs. Sam Houston game? LOL It should be a classic match-up, in 25-5A. Clemens will be watching in anticipation of the outcome.
bubbacoach, the last time that I looked these two teams were not in 25-5a! Although, if they were, I don't think the power rating of our district would rise any! LOL
mad_fan
10-14-2005, 09:39 PM
1. Churchill :confused:
clemensbuff
10-14-2005, 09:56 PM
1. Churchill :confused:
I was at the game and can honestly say that Churchill totally dominated Judson. They are definately deserving of a top 10 ranking in the SA area. Churchill's defense played one hell of a game.
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:29 PM
I was at the game and can honestly say that Churchill totally dominated Judson. They are definately deserving of a top 10 ranking in the SA area. Churchill's defense played one hell of a game.
Think Judson may be packing their bags and for the first time in a long time....will not be in the Top 10....
RedRage00
10-14-2005, 10:32 PM
It's all WAGNERS fault....
Lonny, are you jumping ship? ;)
.....to WAGNER :D
Reaganrattler07
10-14-2005, 10:34 PM
It's all WAGNERS fault....
Lonny, are you jumping ship? ;)
.....to WAGNER :D
There's room at Reagan, lonny :D
The best 5A school in San Antonio will always accept ya!
Go Buffs
10-15-2005, 12:46 AM
Right now, Madison is better than San Marcos and SV and Judson are better than Clemens. It has nothing to do with wins and losses.
lonny....hello lonny
How about now? Still better and nothing to do with wins and losses?
Just kidding lonny. Couldn't resist. Had to find out where we stand with you now, or are you still waiting till after the San Marcos game?
sendero
10-15-2005, 12:56 AM
Clemens stock goes even higher as the Waco team that supposedly was very weak takes the mighty Copperas Cove to 3OT :eek:
lonny23
10-16-2005, 05:51 PM
1. Churchill :confused:
That's probably what the paper will say next week! :D
lonny23
10-16-2005, 05:52 PM
It's all WAGNERS fault....
Lonny, are you jumping ship? ;)
.....to WAGNER :D
Nope.
lonny23
10-16-2005, 05:53 PM
There's room at Reagan, lonny :D
The best 5A school in San Antonio will always accept ya!
You won't see me going to Reagan, either.
lonny23
10-16-2005, 05:54 PM
lonny....hello lonny
How about now? Still better and nothing to do with wins and losses?
Just kidding lonny. Couldn't resist. Had to find out where we stand with you now, or are you still waiting till after the San Marcos game?
Right now, Clemens is better than Judson.
HAPPY? :D
purple_thunder
10-16-2005, 06:27 PM
al#1.San Marcos#2.Sv#3.Shertz#4Madison#5Judson#6Reagan#7Mar shall#8O'conner#9Clark#10Jay The reason San Marcos is gonna finish first is because there ability to control the clock.There defense is to be rekoned with which helped them beat madison which beat judson and some pretty good teams also you'll see because they play clemens friday night which will probabley decide the district 25-5A championship ;)
Mac Is Back
10-16-2005, 07:35 PM
I just love the reasoning people use though.....gee, Reagan beats Mac....but Mac comes up and makes the playoffs! To be honest, I think people are too used to Reagan being consistently bad at football and some people are getting surprised, but let me tell you this - Reagan's team this year is far different than any other team we've had.
If I totally fall in love with Reagan, does that make me popular in your world?
Because after reading this...hmm. I felt like this basically conveyed a statement that, in short, says, "If Reagan beats Mac, then the Brahmas are no longer in contention for the playoffs. Clearly, right? That one loss is tremendous." Because Reagan must be better than everyone.
I'm sorry. I don't mean to be bitter. But that IS what it looked like.
purple_thunder
10-16-2005, 09:22 PM
Why do you'll people put Madison above SAN MARCOS beat them :D
Mac Is Back
10-16-2005, 09:26 PM
Why do you'll people put Madison above SAN MARCOS beat them :D
This is what gets me. People say they're going to make a top ten list based on overall talent and strength, right? And then people groan about Reagan not being listed above MacArthur or Madison over SM. IT WAS ONE GAME, PEOPLE. And last time I checked, one game between two teams doesn't say anything of overall talent unless both teams play consistently at that particular level. Let's all look at the big picture, ladies and gents.
Attempt # IV
10-16-2005, 11:53 PM
yall are all dumb...
1. SV
2. Holmes
3. Lee
4-10. all the rest
:D
lonny23
10-17-2005, 01:24 AM
yall are all dumb...
1. SV
2. Holmes
3. Lee
4-10. all the rest
:D
You might want to go back for Attempt # V! :p
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.