Funny season so far in San Antonio

[Gridiron Gopher]

I posted this on another thread but thought I should start a new one with it. How does everyone else see the season going.



Redskins88:
1st place a toss-up between SV and Churchill....Madison's got a way to go. Judson will get the playoffs. Mac should probably keep dreaming. Reagan needs some changes, but consider their season over. Roosevelt...I dunno.

You know it's been a strange start to the season. Everybody is kind of beating up on each other. It starts with Churchill losing to Marshall. Reagan starts off 2-0 with a big win over Warren. Mac does the same by beating Clark and Taft(everyone says Taft is now trash). Madison loses to San Marcos and they must be on the down slide. O'Conner comes out on fire with a win against McAllen and then gets blown out at home by Boerne. Then Boerne goes home and loses to Mac. O'Conner must really be bad now. Madison blows out Taft which means Taft is now rated with Lee. Reagan plays Jay and it can't be! Jay blows Reagan off the field. Madison goes into O'Conner land and will walk on them since Boerne beat O'Conner and Mac beat Boerne. O'Conner sucks this year. Right! Madison pulls off a win in a nail biter.
SV is rolling and gets a bye week with Churchill coming in......Opps Churchill wins???? What is that. How can that happen? SV played HORRIBLE (at least that's what everyone from SV things). Mac could be for real with the win over Boerne and will take out Reagan since Reagan couldn't beat Jay. Come on it's Jay. Nope! Reagan beats Mac who beat Boerne who beat O'Conner who barely lost to Madison. Reagan is going to kill Madison then. Nope wrong again. Madison wins 21-9??? What the heck is going on? How could I forget Warren over Marshall. No way that happens after Reagan beat Warren and then Jay beats Reagan. Warren is over rated. Bam! Warren beats Marshall. Now Warren gets the bye week in Taft. Remember Taft sucks out loud after losing to Mac and Madison. You got it. Taft upsets Warren 34-33. I guess Taft is better then Warren which in turn is better then Marshall which in turn is better then Churchill which in turn is beter then SV. Wow! Taft should be rated #2 in the city now. SV is not where we thought they were after losing to that HORRIBLE team Churchll. Their going down against Judson. Wrong again. SV 21-7.

What it comes down to is it looks like we have a lot of teams that could win on any given night. A lot depends on matchups with each teams strenghts and weaknesses. Now that we've got a few games under everyone's belt I would still say that SV and Judson are still the teams to beat but not by the margins in the past years. Both teams look to have good defenses but offensively they are not running on all cylinders and that has brought them down to the rest of the district. I would also say that teams like Churchill, Reagan and Mac have all raised their level of play. Madison looks to be as good as last year and are now leading the district. Big game tonight in Churchill/Roosevelt and then next week we get:

Judson at Roosevelt
Madison at Churchill
MacArthur at SV
Reagan at Lee

Should be a lot of fun watching how this district works out this year.

[Hdshrinker]

I posted this on another thread but thought I should start a new one with it. How does everyone else see the season going.





You know it's been a strange start to the season. Everybody is kind of beating up on each other. It starts with Churchill losing to Marshall. Reagan starts off 2-0 with a big win over Warren. Mac does the same by beating Clark and Taft(everyone says Taft is now trash). Madison loses to San Marcos and they must be on the down slide. O'Conner comes out on fire with a win against McAllen and then gets blown out at home by Boerne. Then Boerne goes home and loses to Mac. O'Conner must really be bad now. Madison blows out Taft which means Taft is now rated with Lee. Reagan plays Jay and it can't be! Jay blows Reagan off the field. Madison goes into O'Conner land and will walk on them since Boerne beat O'Conner and Mac beat Boerne. O'Conner sucks this year. Right! Madison pulls off a win in a nail biter.
SV is rolling and gets a bye week with Churchill coming in......Opps Churchill wins???? What is that. How can that happen? SV played HORRIBLE (at least that's what everyone from SV things). Mac could be for real with the win over Boerne and will take out Reagan since Reagan couldn't beat Jay. Come on it's Jay. Nope! Reagan beats Mac who beat Boerne who beat O'Conner who barely lost to Madison. Reagan is going to kill Madison then. Nope wrong again. Madison wins 21-9??? What the heck is going on? How could I forget Warren over Marshall. No way that happens after Reagan beat Warren and then Jay beats Reagan. Warren is over rated. Bam! Warren beats Marshall. Now Warren gets the bye week in Taft. Remember Taft sucks out loud after losing to Mac and Madison. You got it. Taft upsets Warren 34-33. I guess Taft is better then Warren which in turn is better then Marshall which in turn is better then Churchill which in turn is beter then SV. Wow! Taft should be rated #2 in the city now. SV is not where we thought they were after losing to that HORRIBLE team Churchll. Their going down against Judson. Wrong again. SV 21-7.

What it comes down to is it looks like we have a lot of teams that could win on any given night. A lot depends on matchups with each teams strenghts and weaknesses. Now that we've got a few games under everyone's belt I would still say that SV and Judson are still the teams to beat but not by the margins in the past years. Both teams look to have good defenses but offensively they are not running on all cylinders and that has brought them down to the rest of the district. I would also say that teams like Churchill, Reagan and Mac have all raised their level of play. Madison looks to be as good as last year and are now leading the district. Big game tonight in Churchill/Roosevelt and then next week we get:

Judson at Roosevelt
Madison at Churchill
MacArthur at SV
Reagan at Lee

Should be a lot of fun watching how this district works out this year.



HS football...you gotta love it!!

[mad_fan]

I agree that the big game is tonight Churchill/Roosevelt.
As for next week only one big one...Madison at Churchill

Easy picks:
Judson at Roosevelt------>Judson
MacArthur at SV--------->SV

Who cares:
Reagan at Lee

jmo :)

[Gridiron Gopher]

It will be interesting on how things work out. As far as easy games....they should be but that hasn't been how it's worked out so far.

[sendero]

I don't know if there are any gimmes this season. Could Churchill, Judson, & SV win out making it a 3 way co-champs :eek: Can Madison go undefeated???

I don't think so but you never know.

[mad_fan]

I don't know if there are any gimmes this season. Could Churchill, Judson, & SV win out making it a 3 way co-champs :eek: Can Madison go undefeated???
I don't think so but you never know.

NO

[Hdshrinker]

It will be interesting on how things work out. As far as easy games....they should be but that hasn't been how it's worked out so far.


Tonight Jav vs Clark two undefeateds..... Marshall vs OC

[BuffFan2005]

everyone is talking about SV judson and churchill in San Antonio. What about Schertz Clemens they are the #1 team they already beat some power programs this yr. such as roosevelt and waco. Offense looked better last night, even though it was jefferson lol they were 7 of 9 passing for 119 yds not much but alot for the clemens passing game. look out for the buffaloes this yr san antonio!

[mad_fan]

everyone is talking about SV judson and churchill in San Antonio. What about Schertz Clemens they are the #1 team they already beat some power programs this yr. such as roosevelt and waco. Offense looked better last night, even though it was jefferson lol they were 7 of 9 passing for 119 yds not much but alot for the clemens passing game. look out for the buffaloes this yr san antonio!


WHO? :confused:

[rangerfan101]

i would hardly call roosevelt or waco "power progams" but they both are respectable opponents. i'll give them that.

[CLFalcon2006]

I posted this on another thread but thought I should start a new one with it. How does everyone else see the season going.





You know it's been a strange start to the season. Everybody is kind of beating up on each other. It starts with Churchill losing to Marshall. Reagan starts off 2-0 with a big win over Warren. Mac does the same by beating Clark and Taft(everyone says Taft is now trash). Madison loses to San Marcos and they must be on the down slide. O'Conner comes out on fire with a win against McAllen and then gets blown out at home by Boerne. Then Boerne goes home and loses to Mac. O'Conner must really be bad now. Madison blows out Taft which means Taft is now rated with Lee. Reagan plays Jay and it can't be! Jay blows Reagan off the field. Madison goes into O'Conner land and will walk on them since Boerne beat O'Conner and Mac beat Boerne. O'Conner sucks this year. Right! Madison pulls off a win in a nail biter.
SV is rolling and gets a bye week with Churchill coming in......Opps Churchill wins???? What is that. How can that happen? SV played HORRIBLE (at least that's what everyone from SV things). Mac could be for real with the win over Boerne and will take out Reagan since Reagan couldn't beat Jay. Come on it's Jay. Nope! Reagan beats Mac who beat Boerne who beat O'Conner who barely lost to Madison. Reagan is going to kill Madison then. Nope wrong again. Madison wins 21-9??? What the heck is going on? How could I forget Warren over Marshall. No way that happens after Reagan beat Warren and then Jay beats Reagan. Warren is over rated. Bam! Warren beats Marshall. Now Warren gets the bye week in Taft. Remember Taft sucks out loud after losing to Mac and Madison. You got it. Taft upsets Warren 34-33. I guess Taft is better then Warren which in turn is better then Marshall which in turn is better then Churchill which in turn is beter then SV. Wow! Taft should be rated #2 in the city now. SV is not where we thought they were after losing to that HORRIBLE team Churchll. Their going down against Judson. Wrong again. SV 21-7.

What it comes down to is it looks like we have a lot of teams that could win on any given night. A lot depends on matchups with each teams strenghts and weaknesses. Now that we've got a few games under everyone's belt I would still say that SV and Judson are still the teams to beat but not by the margins in the past years. Both teams look to have good defenses but offensively they are not running on all cylinders and that has brought them down to the rest of the district. I would also say that teams like Churchill, Reagan and Mac have all raised their level of play. Madison looks to be as good as last year and are now leading the district. Big game tonight in Churchill/Roosevelt and then next week we get:

Judson at Roosevelt
Madison at Churchill
MacArthur at SV
Reagan at Lee

Should be a lot of fun watching how this district works out this year.

Holy crap and I thought Lake was inconsistent

[rattlerbacker]

6 out of the EN top 10 lost this week, it will be interesting to see what their list looks like this week.

[mad_fan]

6 out of the EN top 10 lost this week, it will be interesting to see what their list looks like this week.


THREE OF THEM HAD TO LOSE...they were playing other teams in the top 10.

I said previously the #9Churchill v. Roosevelt game was a tossup. Church was move BACK into the Expense-News top 10 based on last weeks victory over SV. This week back out.

As for the other two losers from the Expense-News top 10 (#4 Warren and #5 Jay) they come from 27-5. What were they doing up there in the first place? :eek:

[rattlerbacker]

THREE OF THEM HAD TO LOSE...they were playing other teams in the top 10.

True but the 4 and 5 teams lost to non-top 10 teams. I agree with you that Churchill drops out, Reagan and maybe Seguin as well, but what about the others? Judson will still be top 10, but what about Warren and Jay? Roosevelt should move in but who else?

BTW, cute sig line, how long will you be using it? :D

[mad_fan]

True but the 4 and 5 teams lost to non-top 10 teams. I agree with you that Churchill drops out, Reagan and maybe Seguin as well, but what about the others? Judson will still be top 10, but what about Warren and Jay? Roosevelt should move in but who else?

BTW, cute sig line, how long will you be using it? :D

Six days, I can always change in to TIED...(so cool to have orange letters).

[lonny23]

i would hardly call roosevelt or waco "power progams" but they both are respectable opponents. i'll give them that.
NOT THIS YEAR! I'll give you that Clemens has played good and real good at times, but don't make it out to be more than it is.

[lonny23]

True but the 4 and 5 teams lost to non-top 10 teams. I agree with you that Churchill drops out, Reagan and maybe Seguin as well, but what about the others? Judson will still be top 10, but what about Warren and Jay? Roosevelt should move in but who else?

BTW, cute sig line, how long will you be using it? :D
Until Judson beats it out of him!

[mad_fan]

I say they won't put Roosevelt in.

It's hard guessing what the E-N will do, probably swap SV and Judson at #2 and #3. Move Madison and San Marcos up#4 and #5. They'll leave Churchill in at #10 because of win over SV (change of mind-this is the E-N) and pack #6-#9 with 27-5 teams...my guess...Jay, O'Connor, Clark and Warren. Just my guess what the E-N will do.

The problem the E-N has is that Warren was in there at all (okay maybe #10, but # freakin' 4, no way). Let's see, Warren wins: Alamo Heights, Southwest, Marshall. Warren loses: Reagan and Taft.

[rattlerbacker]

Until Judson beats it out of him!

I'm sure you realize the irony of a team that lost to a 25 team sitting atop the 26 standings? :eek:

[mad_fan]

I'm sure you realize the irony of a team that lost to a 25 team sitting atop the 26 standings? :eek:

Rattler a couple of points:
1) I think Lonny now's full well that I'm bragging for the one or two weeks I can.
2) Your win was a win, not a blow out and I dont think it would happen again if we played this week.

[rattlerbacker]

Rattler a couple of points:
1) I think Lonny now's full well that I'm bragging for the one or two weeks I can.
2) Your win was a win, not a blow out and I dont think it would happen again if we played this week.


I'm well aware there is probably a time limit on the bragging rights but while it lasts San Marcos is just entitled to it as Madison, don't you think?

As for whether y'all would win right now in a rematch thats just speculation either way but San Marcos is playing much better now as well. I don't happen to agree with your opinion but we can agree to disagree.

[mad_fan]

I'm well aware there is probably a time limit on the bragging rights but while it lasts San Marcos is just entitled to it as Madison, don't you think?

As for whether y'all would win right now in a rematch thats just speculation either way but San Marcos is playing much better now as well. I don't happen to agree with your opinion but we can agree to disagree.

Agree to disagree on the second point, but on the first point, I didnt know San Marcos was alone at the top 25-5A like Madison is in the 265. Okay, I kind of think maybe I can follow your thought here, but Madison is atop the 265 through the misfortune of others, not because anything they have done. I dont think there's anything to brag about there. jmo.

[lonny23]

We bash 25-5A because all but 3 teams are on life support. It's not because of Seguin, Clemens, or San Marcos.

[rattlerbacker]

Actually I just said "irony" except in reply to your post about "bragging rights." Madison may be alone in their position through the "misfortune" of others but you are in that spot to begin with by winning. Just keep it up!

[rattlerbacker]

We bash 25-5A because all but 3 teams are on life support.


I can't and won't argue that point at all. Its a big disappointment that the district isn't more competitive overall.

[mad_fan]

Actually I just said "irony" except in reply to your post about "bragging rights." Madison may be alone in their position through the "misfortune" of others but you are in that spot to begin with by winning. Just keep it up!

Okay, just a little thread confusion, I think.

Websters: IRONY - incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity.

I agree there is some degree of irony there, but I implied from your statement that you got bragging rights out of that. If not, my bad, because that would be like Churchill having bragging rights over Judson. My bragging rights come from a fact, 2-0 in district.

[Reaganrattler07]

Okay, what "wall" did Jones run into? He got 80 yards....he wasn't to blame for the loss either...the whole team was. They failed to produce in the redzone.

[clemensbuff]

I don't know if there are any gimmes this season. Could Churchill, Judson, & SV win out making it a 3 way co-champs :eek: Can Madison go undefeated???

I don't think so but you never know.

How could Churchill and CJ both win out when they still have to play one another???? Madison go undefeated, what? There is no way that Madison will beat both SV and CJ!! NO WAY!!!!

[clemensbuff]

Rattler a couple of points:
1) I think Lonny now's full well that I'm bragging for the one or two weeks I can.
2) Your win was a win, not a blow out and I dont think it would happen again if we played this week.

Your right, it wouldn't happen the same way again if you played SM this week. They'd beat you by more than they did the first time!!!!!

[RoughRiderDrummer]

I would have to agree with this. SM is playing better and on a second note yall only beat us by 3 after we lost 8 starters like the day before the game or something.

[mad_fan]

Your right, it wouldn't happen the same way again if you played SM this week. They'd beat you by more than they did the first time!!!!!

yet another san marcos fan speaks up in defense of the middling 25-5 :p

[clemensbuff]

yet san marcos fan speaks upin defense of the middling 25-5 :p

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, please translate!

[Mavs D End]

listen we all know that madison cant beat both SV or CJ, but they will win one i know it. Now, to the person that said "theyre at #1 cuz of others misfortune" is completely wrong. Madison could have lost to Reagan like madison or lose to Roosevelt like Churchill but no THEY WON, madison is at #1 due to SV and CJ losing but they taking advantage of this and WINNING THEIR GAMES

[lonny23]

listen we all know that madison cant beat both SV or CJ, but they will win one i know it. Now, to the person that said "theyre at #1 cuz of others misfortune" is completely wrong. Madison could have lost to Reagan like madison or lose to Roosevelt like Churchill but no THEY WON, madison is at #1 due to SV and CJ losing but they taking advantage of this and WINNING THEIR GAMES
I say Madison gets the double whammy again. Judson gets you one week and SV the next week.

[mad_fan]

I say Madison gets the double whammy again. Judson gets you one week and SV the next week.

I say triple whammy, what are we betting?

[mad_fan]

listen we all know that madison cant beat both SV or CJ, but they will win one i know it. Now, to the person that said "theyre at #1 cuz of others misfortune" is completely wrong. Madison could have lost to Reagan like madison or lose to Roosevelt like Churchill but no THEY WON, madison is at #1 due to SV and CJ losing but they taking advantage of this and WINNING THEIR GAMES

Fact is freshman, that the easiest part of Madison's schedule is at the start of the year. Others have shown over the past 20+ years that they improve their games as the year goes on; Madison has failed to do that consistently. Madison would be far better off playing Judson and/or SV far earier in the year, but that's not the way it is know.

[mad_fan]

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, please translate!

edited...I've got to quit working during football season.

[bubbacoach]

Mad Fan is it lonely at the top?

[lonny23]

I say triple whammy, what are we betting?
Oh, MacArthur again? Or do they lose the week before Judson?

[mad_fan]

Oh, MacArthur again? Or do they lose the week before Judson?

Now wouldnt that be a hoot; Lee's gonna beat somebody in the district.

[lonny23]

Fact is freshman, that the easiest part of Madison's schedule is at the start of the year. Others have shown over the past 20+ years that they improve their games as the year goes on; Madison has failed to do that consistently. Madison would be far better off playing Judson and/or SV far earier in the year, but that's not the way it is know.
You got that one right. That's why Madison has never won a title.

[mad_fan]

Mad Fan is it lonely at the top?

"Not for long"...mad replayed in big orange letters...