View Full Version : Next Weeks game Sv V Judson
Clemensfan
09-23-2005, 01:50 PM
who do yall think going to win the Sminth Valley and judson game?
bullrock
09-23-2005, 02:01 PM
SV or Judson.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 02:06 PM
I'm leaning a little towards Judson...like I said for the past few months...they're #1 until beaten. I wouldn't mind having a change, but whoever takes it, deserves it.
FootballJunkie
09-23-2005, 02:26 PM
I like Judson but I think SV may take it this year. I am taking the trip down 35 to see this one should be a good game.
lonny23
09-23-2005, 03:28 PM
I'm going with Judson at home.
bullrock
09-23-2005, 03:54 PM
I'll just hold my breath. If I pass out would somebody tell me the score when I come to?
TexasRed6x
09-23-2005, 04:33 PM
I'm going with SV by 17 points. At this time I feel the defenses are just about even, but the big edge goes to SV and the Offense and special teams. Judson, could be a whole lot better on offense by week 9 or 10, but for the time being they are struggling on offense. If they play the same way like PV, then the rangers could make this a game like Madison in 2003.
Alamo_Mojo
09-23-2005, 05:15 PM
Going with SV by 10 pts...hasn't there been quite of bit of turnover on the Judson staff? That alone could be difference?
SVite
09-23-2005, 05:22 PM
SV by 8
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 05:28 PM
Hmm...because of all the comments the SV people made about Reagan, I'll go with Judson....
clemensbuff
09-23-2005, 08:15 PM
who do yall think going to win the Sminth Valley and judson game?
This could, and should be one of the best games all year. This will be a classic battle of the heavy weights. Whoever can control the line of scrimmage will win this one. They both have very good defenses and points will be at a premium. I'm thinking it will end up 21-17 or something close to that. I wouldn't bet a dime on who will come out on top of this one. Judson's home field advantage should count for something but I don't think that it will effect SV at all playing there. SV will bring enough fans that it will equal out! One thing is for sure, whichever wins will be the 26-5a champion this year! Good luck to both, and may the best team win so there are no excuses for the team that looses.
jrp83
09-23-2005, 08:34 PM
I'm going with SV by 17 points. At this time I feel the defenses are just about even, but the big edge goes to SV and the Offense and special teams. Judson, could be a whole lot better on offense by week 9 or 10, but for the time being they are struggling on offense. If they play the same way like PV, then the rangers could make this a game like Madison in 2003.
SV needs to get past Churchill first. They're down 14-0 at the half. How about them Chargers. If Churchill pulls this out, it would be a big upset. I don't know, maybe SV got caught looking ahead to the big showdown with Judson next week.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 08:57 PM
SV needs to get past Churchill first. They're down 14-0 at the half. How about them Chargers. If Churchill pulls this out, it would be a big upset. I don't know, maybe SV got caught looking ahead to the big showdown with Judson next week.
Yeah, this would be a big upset.
And I think your right on saying that they did get caught looking ahead....they'll probably be able to make some good modifications for the second half. Whoever made the most modifications will win.
lonny23
09-23-2005, 09:02 PM
Yeah, this would be a big upset.
And I think your right on saying that they did get caught looking ahead....they'll probably be able to make some good modifications for the second half. Whoever made the most modifications will win.
Hopefully Judson makes some good ADJUSTMENTS before next week. I couldn't pass that one up! :p
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 09:04 PM
Hopefully Judson makes some good ADJUSTMENTS before next week. I couldn't pass that one up! :p
...I don't get it. And it's not 3 paragraphs, Lonny!
But seriously, some of the best teams have made a living by just barely making it past the first half and then making adjustments at halftime and then end up winning the game.
lonny23
09-23-2005, 09:57 PM
...I don't get it. And it's not 3 paragraphs, Lonny!
But seriously, some of the best teams have made a living by just barely making it past the first half and then making adjustments at halftime and then end up winning the game.
You talked about modifications in the SV game and I was making fun of your terminology. Teams make adjustments!
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 10:20 PM
You talked about modifications in the SV game and I was making fun of your terminology. Teams make adjustments!
Oh okay, I probably should have said adjusments....i've dropped off in the english department in the last few years. And I'm tired...whoever thought of Thursday night games was crazy. All of today felt like a monday and it doesnt feel like a friday night...
SLCDRGN
09-23-2005, 10:24 PM
Judson!!
FootballJunkie
09-23-2005, 10:41 PM
I picked SV over Judson either Judson will win big or 26-5A is more balanced than I thought. SV losing is BIG upset!!!
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 10:45 PM
I picked SV over Judson either Judson will win big or 26-5A is more balanced than I thought. SV losing is BIG upset!!!
It's HUGE! But we'll see how good a team SV is next week....I honestly think SV can take it.
lonny23
09-23-2005, 10:59 PM
It's HUGE! But we'll see how good a team SV is next week....I honestly think SV can take it.
SV losing doesn't affect next week's game. They won't be any better or any worse going into that game. Judson wins.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 11:01 PM
SV losing doesn't affect next week's game. They won't be any better or any worse going into that game. Judson wins.
Normally when a team loses, they try and make an effort to come back and win big....Judson does it. Did it against pflugerville....Reagan did it, they didn't win big but they did make a comeback and didn't cash in.
seansvranger
09-23-2005, 11:02 PM
sv will get it in gear and fix whats wrong and come playin twice as hard next week i think it will be a good game could go either way but of course i have to go for sv
dwistheman
09-23-2005, 11:05 PM
Even though Judson won big tonight, this performance would not have beaten a good team.
Way too many penalties, another turnover and just a lack of enthusiasm. If the jersey's did not say Judson, I would have thought I was watching one of many local high school teams. Tonights effort will not get it done next week.
TexasRed6x
09-23-2005, 11:18 PM
If SV does not beat Judson next week, they will be fighting for their playoff lifes.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 11:21 PM
If SV does not beat Judson next week, they will be fighting for their playoff lifes.
If they don't make the playoffs....who will be the top 3 then?
lonny23
09-23-2005, 11:24 PM
If they don't make the playoffs....who will be the top 3 then?
If SV loses next week, they just have to hope Churchill makes the playoffs. Otherwise, they could be in trouble. I still says SV makes it, but you never want to lose an early district game in 26-5A.
lonny23
09-23-2005, 11:25 PM
Normally when a team loses, they try and make an effort to come back and win big....Judson does it. Did it against pflugerville....Reagan did it, they didn't win big but they did make a comeback and didn't cash in.
SV is too good of a team to play better just because they got beat. They keep an even keel and don't worry about ups and downs.
mad_fan
09-23-2005, 11:26 PM
If SV does not beat Judson next week, they will be fighting for their playoff lifes.
If they don't make the playoffs....who will be the top 3 then?
I wouldnt write off SV.
TexasRed6x
09-23-2005, 11:27 PM
IT could be like Clemens was a few years ago, lose the first two district games and out of the playoffs with a really good team. It is still to early to tell, and I know SV will be fired up for the game, but Judson will not go down easily.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 11:28 PM
Yeah, I wouldn't write off SV....but this just made the fight for the playoffs that much more fierce.....
DiamondJ2
09-23-2005, 11:35 PM
SV Judson game should be a good one. Judson looked sluggish in the beginning. Tried to work on their passing game against Lee, then turned it on with the running game and a multitude of running backs. The Judson "fire & enthusiasm" is one of the things I see missing not only in the players, but in most of the coaches on the sideline. I promise the fire will be there this week during practice and come Friday night.
How will SV play after the loss? They could raise it a notch and really get after it or with their backs to the wall they might be a little tentative. It depends how things go in the first quarter.
Again, Judson is still learning basically a new offense and may be better in week 10 than in the 2nd game of district.
XSVRanger
09-23-2005, 11:45 PM
I still can't believe it!!!! Did any of y'all see the celebration after the game on the Churchill side? That's all motivation right there. Expect to see SV give Judson all they can handle. They're not going to lay down and let this happen again.
Reaganrattler07
09-23-2005, 11:49 PM
I still can't believe it!!!! Did any of y'all see the celebration after the game on the Churchill side? That's all motivation right there. Expect to see SV give Judson all they can handle. They're not going to lay down and let this happen again.
We'll probably see a much more dedicated SV team next week. It's better to lose early and progressively get better than get really good and lose all your games in the end and then go into the playoffs....kinda like what happened to Madison last year.
mad_fan
09-23-2005, 11:58 PM
Regardless of who wins next weeks (Judson/SV) it'll still the same as last week and the week before...five teams (Judson, SV, Churchill, Madison and Roosevelt) competing for three spots. Judson and SV will still be favorites for two of the three. JMO.
Reaganrattler07
09-24-2005, 12:09 AM
Regardless of who wins next weeks (Judson/SV) it'll still the same as last week and the week before...five teams (Judson, SV, Churchill, Madison and Roosevelt) competing for three spots. Judson and SV will still be favorites for two of the three. JMO.
If SV loses out next week, it'll be a lot harder for them to get a good run going. But it's better to lose the oens you lose in the beginning. Like Churchill did (or does) and not lose them all at the end like Madison did last year.
Slim-Rob
09-24-2005, 12:45 AM
If SV loses out next week, it'll be a lot harder for them to get a good run going. But it's better to lose the oens you lose in the beginning. Like Churchill did (or does) and not lose them all at the end like Madison did last year.
Judson went 5-2 in district in '03 and missed out on the playoffs. Tell me thats not a tough district. There are teams that make the playoffs with more losses than wins, and Judson hasn't had a losing season in over 30 years.
sendero
09-24-2005, 08:20 AM
If SV loses next week they will need some help mainly from Churchill. They can't be in a tie with Churchill for the last playoff spot. One week into 265 and already some very exciting games.
BTW- crow doesn't taste very good on an "upset" stomach.
mad_fan
09-24-2005, 08:56 AM
If SV loses out next week, it'll be a lot harder for them to get a good run going. But it's better to lose the oens you lose in the beginning. Like Churchill did (or does) and not lose them all at the end like Madison did last year.
Skins88, I wish I could agree, but what you are saying is meaningless. To stay on topic, look at Judson, 1997 lost two opening district games then lost in round 1, in 2000 they lost their last two district games and lost in round 1.
Judson went 5-2 in district in '03 and missed out on the playoffs. Tell me thats not a tough district. There are teams that make the playoffs with more losses than wins, and Judson hasn't had a losing season in over 30 years.
They also went 5-2 in 1997 and 2000 and made the playoffs. In the 265, at the top end, playoffs often come down to what your opponent do to each other. The Churchill victory goes a long way towards insuring a Judson playoff spot win or lose against SV. Their win also puts them a mile ahead of Madison and Roosevelt.
Madison and Roosevelt do not have the quality teams that will be needed to beat either Judson or SV. In fact, I would say that both are subject to losses against either Mac or Reagan on a given weekend.
Bottom line Churchill win almost certainly takes Madison and Roosevelt out of the picture, insures Judson playoff, and has little affect on SV's chances of fininsh in the #2 or #3 spot.
clemensbuff
09-24-2005, 10:32 AM
I wouldnt write off SV.
Anybody writing off SV after 1 loss would have to be completely out of their mind! If SV can beat Judson all of this talk will end really quickly. If they don't beat Judson, it could get real interesting????? But I sure can't see Madison or Reagan or anyone else going 6-1 thru district play. What I can see happening is 3 teams, possibly 4 teams finishing with 5-2 records and positive points between the teams dictating who goes in the 2nd and 3rd spots. After next weeks games, it will either be a heck of a lot clearer or it could be even more interesting to watch
One thing is for sure, this is what makes 26-5a one of the best in the state. And like I said before, even the 3rd place team has a good chance to make a whole lot of noise in the playoffs!
poppy
09-24-2005, 10:48 AM
next week judson 28 sv 10
0-2 in district for sv....
mad_fan
09-24-2005, 10:55 AM
Anybody writing off SV after 1 loss would have to be completely out of their mind! If SV can beat Judson all of this talk will end really quickly. If they don't beat Judson, it could get real interesting????? But I sure can't see Madison or Reagan or anyone else going 6-1 thru district play. What I can see happening is 3 teams, possibly 4 teams finishing with 5-2 records and positive points between the teams dictating who goes in the 2nd and 3rd spots. After next weeks games, it will either be a heck of a lot clearer or it could be even more interesting to watch
One thing is for sure, this is what makes 26-5a one of the best in the state. And like I said before, even the 3rd place team has a good chance to make a whole lot of noise in the playoffs!
Wow, what four teams do you think, at this point, could finish 5-2?
Reaganrattler07
09-24-2005, 11:19 AM
Skins88, I wish I could agree, but what you are saying is meaningless. To stay on topic, look at Judson, 1997 lost two opening district games then lost in round 1, in 2000 they lost their last two district games and lost in round 1.
Last year - look at at Madison....lost three straight games and went to the second round and lost like what 38-7? Their first round opponent wasn't too good. And besides, Judson's a lot different than any other team.
SVite
09-24-2005, 11:23 AM
If Brian Hill doesnt pass the ball any better,SV wont make the play-offs.And if he doesnt stop fumbling the ball from center,and if the center cant calm down and stop trying to snap the ball over the Qb`s head in shotgun formation.The defense did show that they could finally stop Qb` right ,and Qb left,in the 2nd half.So the rest of 26 5 will get film on that.He killed us in the 1st half.If Judson cant pass the ball,it will be interesting.
mad_fan
09-24-2005, 11:25 AM
Last year - look at at Madison....lost three straight games and went to the second round and lost like what 38-7? Their first round opponent wasn't too good. And besides, Judson's a lot different than any other team.
I thought we were talking about getting into the playoffs , not what happened after. The point was they made the playoffs, losing first two in one year and last two in another year. I should have just said that.
Reaganrattler07
09-24-2005, 11:47 AM
I thought we were talking about getting into the playoffs , not what happened after. The point was they made the playoffs, losing first two in one year and last two in another year. I should have just said that.
I was talking about getting to the playoffs....I just said it's better to lsoe first and then progressively get better....not win and then lose all your last games...maybe I didn't clearly, sorry.
clemensbuff
09-24-2005, 11:55 AM
Wow, what four teams do you think, at this point, could finish 5-2?
SV, Madison, Churchill, and Roosevelt. Not saying it's going to happen, but it could!
mad_fan
09-24-2005, 12:12 PM
SV, Madison, Churchill, and Roosevelt. Not saying it's going to happen, but it could!
I dont see any way that Roosevelt only loses one more district game...they lose atleast two more (out of Judson, SV and Churchill) and probably three.
Madison loses atleast 3 (out of Judson, SV, Churchill and yes Mac (it's a rivalry thing)).
Again I base this on the teams, not their performances this weekend. I'll stay with Judson, SV and Churchill (until Madison beats one of them).
Reaganrattler07
09-24-2005, 12:58 PM
I dont see any way that Roosevelt only loses one more district game...they lose atleast two more (out of Judson, SV and Churchill) and probably three.
Madison loses atleast 3 (out of Judson, SV, Churchill and yes Mac (it's a rivalry thing)).
Again I base this on the teams, not their performances this weekend. I'll stay with Judson, SV and Churchill (until Madison beats one of them).
How is Madison with the loss of Amadeus(?) Waters? I don't think Caflisch or Green are the same without him, i could be wrong. Reagan and Madison may be a good game next week.
Bucky
09-24-2005, 01:09 PM
SV can beat Judson. Will they is another quetion. If Judson loses to SV it will be their own fault. If they get in the shot gun and try to beat them that way it could very well be SV winning it. If they come out in 2 TE's and give the ball to Mendoza, McD, and Dubose..Judson will win by as much as 2 TD's. As for SV not making the playoffs..I doubt that will happen. Churchill will probably lose 2 or 3 district games. What will help Sv is if Judson runs the table as well as SV would have to win out!! That will probably happen. This district is so competative that anything can happen. Im just guessing on all this stuff. I was impressed by Judson's defense against Lee..but thats Lee. But I know that Coach Rackley will have his team ready to go and so will Coach Hill. May the best TEAM win and hopefully both of them will have a long run in the playoffs... PSST..Coach Mangold...RUN the ball and speed it up would ya!!!!
lonny23
09-24-2005, 01:33 PM
Depth is a killer when you lose a district game early in the year. You hope somebody runs the table when you lose early. When Clemens was in the district, the loser of the Judson-Clemens game every year had 1 foot in the grave and you saw that the loser always missed the playoffs. Roosevelt will lose other games and this district is wide open when you add in Mac and Reagan. SV might miss the playoffs if they lose to Judson, because Churchill could still lose some games and help the other teams out.
bubbacoach
09-24-2005, 01:42 PM
I do not think that 26-5A is that competitive this year because the number of teams that are playing well, but visa versa. This is not the same talent level overall that this district has had over the last 4 or 5 years. I think that Judson has the most talent on the field in this district. After the upeset last night who is behind them is anybody's guess. Judson just needs to get out of that new and improved shotgun offense that is scoring on average about 18 points a game against varsity competition and go back to the one that averaged about 38 points a game against all competition. (I did not include Laredo or Lee when looking at this years offensive production.) I agree with Bucky give Mendoza, McDaniels, and Dubose the ball, throw in a few play actions and get out of the way. Really if they want to put the ball in the air on offense then run the toss. Rackley needs to realize that the arms of his quarterbacks will not carry this team, the legs of his running backs and that massive offensive line will be the difference. I do like to see a couple of deep balls to the Williams kid every now and then, because he is for real. That kid will make an impact next year on Saturdays. Well all hail the rockets and let's hope the caliber of football in San Antonio next year is better.
)
mad_fan
09-24-2005, 01:55 PM
How is Madison with the loss of Amadeus(?) Waters?
it's like... well...reagan. :D
dwistheman
09-24-2005, 02:17 PM
I agree with Bubba. The district as a whole is not at the same level it has been in the last few years.
Sv and Judson would have 2 losses at this point had Pflugerville held on to the ball. Maybe both teams will be better at the end of the season, but right now neither one is playing championship caliber ball.
Lots of room for improvement!
lonny23
09-24-2005, 02:18 PM
I do not think that 26-5A is that competitive this year because the number of teams that are playing well, but visa versa. This is not the same talent level overall that this district has had over the last 4 or 5 years. I think that Judson has the most talent on the field in this district. After the upeset last night who is behind them is anybody's guess. Judson just needs to get out of that new and improved shotgun offense that is scoring on average about 18 points a game against varsity competition and go back to the one that averaged about 38 points a game against all competition. (I did not include Laredo or Lee when looking at this years offensive production.) I agree with Bucky give Mendoza, McDaniels, and Dubose the ball, throw in a few play actions and get out of the way. Really if they want to put the ball in the air on offense then run the toss. Rackley needs to realize that the arms of his quarterbacks will not carry this team, the legs of his running backs and that massive offensive line will be the difference. I do like to see a couple of deep balls to the Williams kid every now and then, because he is for real. That kid will make an impact next year on Saturdays. Well all hail the rockets and let's hope the caliber of football in San Antonio next year is better.
)
I'm all for 26-5A playing good football, but what I really care about is...
JUDSON PLAYING GOOD FOOTBALL. They're not doing that well enough yet. They need to figure it out between now and Week 14. They've got 10 weeks to get their act together.
dwistheman
09-24-2005, 02:23 PM
I'm all for 26-5A playing good football, but what I really care about is...
JUDSON PLAYING GOOD FOOTBALL. They're not doing that well enough yet. They need to figure it out between now and Week 14. They've got 10 weeks to get their act together.
I guess you are right Lonny. Judson is good enough defensively at this point to make it to the semi's. That being said, it is very frustrating to see our offense perform the way it is and on top of that the penalties (2 or 3 delay of game) last night. I wanted to pull out what little is left of my hair. At this point it may take 10 weeks to iron out the kinks offensively.
J-ROCKSTUD79
09-24-2005, 02:25 PM
I'm going with SV by 17 points. At this time I feel the defenses are just about even, but the big edge goes to SV and the Offense and special teams. Judson, could be a whole lot better on offense by week 9 or 10, but for the time being they are struggling on offense. If they play the same way like PV, then the rangers could make this a game like Madison in 2003.
WOW WHAT ARE YOU SMOKIN???? :confused:
J-ROCKSTUD79
09-24-2005, 02:38 PM
I still can't believe it!!!! Did any of y'all see the celebration after the game on the Churchill side? That's all motivation right there. Expect to see SV give Judson all they can handle. They're not going to lay down and let this happen again.
I hope they bring all the got.I have been waiting for this game all year.SV better be ready cause the 2005 JUDSON ROCKETS are gonna defend our district title with everything we got.
J-ROCKSTUD79
09-24-2005, 02:55 PM
I'm all for 26-5A playing good football, but what I really care about is...
JUDSON PLAYING GOOD FOOTBALL. They're not doing that well enough yet. They need to figure it out between now and Week 14. They've got 10 weeks to get their act together.
yes sir your right.we just have to keep getting better and work on the little things.
clemensbuff
09-24-2005, 03:26 PM
I dont see any way that Roosevelt only loses one more district game...they lose atleast two more (out of Judson, SV and Churchill) and probably three.
Madison loses atleast 3 (out of Judson, SV, Churchill and yes Mac (it's a rivalry thing)).
Again I base this on the teams, not their performances this weekend. I'll stay with Judson, SV and Churchill (until Madison beats one of them).
You are probably correct on the losses for Madison and Roosevelt. But it is 26-5a and anything can happen.
If I was betting on it, I'd probably take the trifecta that you picked, Judson, SV, and Churchill.
clemensbuff
09-24-2005, 03:29 PM
I agree with Bubba. The district as a whole is not at the same level it has been in the last few years.
Sv and Judson would have 2 losses at this point had Pflugerville held on to the ball. Maybe both teams will be better at the end of the season, but right now neither one is playing championship caliber ball.
Lots of room for improvement!
You are probably correct in your assesment with the Pflugervile games and that both SV and Judson will be much improved by the end of the regular season. That is what both teams are known for, getting better each week (this is the mark of great coaching)! If I had either one of them on the schedule, I'd much rather face them in week 1 than in the state semi-finals!!!
TexasRed6x
09-24-2005, 03:49 PM
WOW WHAT ARE YOU SMOKIN???? :confused:
79 - Marcus lets face it your offense is not that good and one of the resaons is the O-Line. This line is good at the run, but you guys are not able to keep the pass rush from your QB and that is just the facts. The offense had better get going and going fast, because the only real thing that is working is the defense, and you should realize this.
Reaganrattler07
09-24-2005, 04:05 PM
it's like... well...reagan. :D
Must be pretty good then :D Haha, but really, he was one of their best players last year and he moved....has there been any difference?
JudsonStud19
09-24-2005, 04:33 PM
Alright Fellas... This is how I see it... Judson wins... IF and only IF... They get their butts in gear... If you want to beat SV... I agree with everyone that has said it... RUN RUN RUN... Judson never could go wrong with that mentality... Like was said... Judson hasnt had a losing season in 30 years... Well what the heck were we doing... RUN RUN RUN... I love the fact that we r using out assests wisely... We have big recivers and a Alright O-LINE... But the pass protection jus isnt there... I jus think Judson needs to get fired up and have more of a enthusiasm about them when they step onto the field... Be it the game feild... but mostly the practice feild... Judson will win this one but look for it to be the toughest game all year anywhere in 5A... I may be wrong but that is how i forsee it becoming....
Slim-Rob
09-24-2005, 05:08 PM
I do not think that 26-5A is that competitive this year because the number of teams that are playing well, but visa versa. This is not the same talent level overall that this district has had over the last 4 or 5 years. I think that Judson has the most talent on the field in this district. After the upeset last night who is behind them is anybody's guess. Judson just needs to get out of that new and improved shotgun offense that is scoring on average about 18 points a game against varsity competition and go back to the one that averaged about 38 points a game against all competition. (I did not include Laredo or Lee when looking at this years offensive production.) I agree with Bucky give Mendoza, McDaniels, and Dubose the ball, throw in a few play actions and get out of the way. Really if they want to put the ball in the air on offense then run the toss. Rackley needs to realize that the arms of his quarterbacks will not carry this team, the legs of his running backs and that massive offensive line will be the difference. I do like to see a couple of deep balls to the Williams kid every now and then, because he is for real. That kid will make an impact next year on Saturdays. Well all hail the rockets and let's hope the caliber of football in San Antonio next year is better.
)
Rackley is not the Offensive Coordinator.
Besides that, you are all right in saying that Judson has not been playing to their potential this year. Look for them to step it up against SV.
Judson 30 SV 14
bubbacoach
09-24-2005, 09:52 PM
Rackley is not the Offensive Coordinator.
Besides that, you are all right in saying that Judson has not been playing to their potential this year. Look for them to step it up against SV.
Judson 30 SV 14
Rackley is not the offensive coordinator, but he is the offensive coordinators boss and could try to get him straight. After all this is Rackley's Team.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.