Jeffery Claybon the future for Lufkin

[taco_bockley]

he looked good in the 7 on 7 and only made a few rookie mistakes checking his receivers off, but threw no picks. he has good size and looks to mabe be better than his older brother jeremy. so the claybon tradition lives on for lufkin. if jeffery catches on fast look out texas, lufkin will surely be a force to be deltn with. GO PACK 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D :D :D :D

[taco_bockley]

It appears the Lufkin Panthers are in good hands with another Claybon. Jeremy Claybon's little brother Jeffrey played big in the 7 on 7 state qualifier Saturday. Claybon led the Panthers to three wins, and a berth in the state tournament. The Panthers beat Lumberton in the semifinals 35 to 24, to advance to the final. That win automatically qualified them for state. No championship game was played. Winning three straight was not easy for the Pack, who slipped past Nacogdoches by one. Lufkin then rallied to beat South Houston 41 to 31

[big red & cujo]

It appears the Lufkin Panthers are in good hands with another Claybon. Jeremy Claybon's little brother Jeffrey played big in the 7 on 7 state qualifier Saturday. Claybon led the Panthers to three wins, and a berth in the state tournament. The Panthers beat Lumberton in the semifinals 35 to 24, to advance to the final. That win automatically qualified them for state. No championship game was played. Winning three straight was not easy for the Pack, who slipped past Nacogdoches by one. Lufkin then rallied to beat South Houston 41 to 31
well, thats good to hear.hopefully we can get him and the pathers to come to tyler in 08:) thats if outlaw& owens can agree:cool:

[PackAttack2005]

The problem with Lufkin and Tyler Lee playing anytime does not exist with Lufkin's Outlaw.

[twcpfan1]

The problem with Lufkin and Tyler Lee playing anytime does not exist with Lufkin's Outlaw.

sounds like there's some history there. why don't you fill us in.

[SLC93]

If the younger Claybon is anywhere near the man and qb his older brother is, Lufkin will not miss a beat. I expect them to be seasoned and ready to go again by playoffs.

[twcpfan1]

Does this mean that Claybon will be the starter and not Nobles? Or are both guys still being considered?

[PackAttack2005]

The only thing I can say is that Claybon has taken the majority of the snaps in the last two SQT tourneys, with Nobles on the sideline. Whether you can read anything into that, I am not sure, that is for the coaches to decide. I think both players will see ample time at OB in non-district.

The Tyler Lee thing started in 2005 when Owens decided to go to Ohio after winning the Div. I State Title in 2004. Lufkin beat Lee that year in non-district 44-27. The problem with accepting the Ohio trip was Lee already had a game with Lufkin on the 2005 schedule. Owens asked Outlaw to take one of Lee's other non-district games at Port Arthur Memorial as a replacement and then Owens could go to Ohio. Outlaw agreed, with the stipulation he would get a non-district game back from Lee for 2006 and 2007. Owens instead scheduled someone else and didn't follow through as promised, therein lies the problem.

[big red & cujo]

The only thing I can say is that Claybon has taken the majority of the snaps in the last two SQT tourneys, with Nobles on the sideline. Whether you can read anything into that, I am not sure, that is for the coaches to decide. I think both players will see ample time at OB in non-district.

The Tyler Lee thing started in 2005 when Owens decided to go to Ohio after winning the Div. I State Title in 2004. Lufkin beat Lee that year in non-district 44-27. The problem with accepting the Ohio trip was Lee already had a game with Lufkin on the 2005 schedule. Owens asked Outlaw to take one of Lee's other non-district games at Port Arthur Memorial as a replacement and then Owens could go to Ohio. Outlaw agreed, with the stipulation he would get a non-district game back from Lee for 2006 and 2007. Owens instead scheduled someone else and didn't follow through as promised, therein lies the problem.the score was 44-33. i wouldnt have said anything usually but, i judt dont like when the score gets exagerated. maybe you were just mistaking. i dont know what the prob is between owens and outlaw is. i just know that it is or was a problem. i think they will schedule again in 08. thats just old natraul differences. they will be ok.

[Favpack]

the score was 44-33. i wouldnt have said anything usually but, i judt dont like when the score gets exagerated. maybe you were just mistaking. i dont know what the prob is between owens and outlaw is. i just know that it is or was a problem. i think they will schedule again in 08. thats just od natraul differences. they will be ok.

I feel confident they can get together and iron out differences. I sincerely wish it wasn't Lufkin that Lee had to turn down to go to Ohio, I wish it had been someone else. I'd be curious to know the last time they spoke to each other. This is a game that needs to be played annually.

[AG8411]

for the uninformed, where did the older brother end up?

[Favpack]

for the uninformed, where did the older brother end up?

SFASU - go Jacks.

[AG8411]

playing QB , or was he moved?

[big red & cujo]

I feel confident they can get together and iron out differences. I sincerely wish it wasn't Lufkin that Lee had to turn down to go to Ohio, I wish it had been someone else. I'd be curious to know the last time they spoke to each other. This is a game that needs to be played annually.
in an interview he had doing the spring. when he was questioned about that new proposal the uil is trying to pass. he sounded like, if that does go down that he would schedule lufkin, longview, and obviously jt in the non- schedule anually.he said non-district would be easier for lee to schedule games if they are sent to a dallas district. so i guess schedling lufkin isnt really a problem.

[Favpack]

playing QB , or was he moved?

qb as far as I know. I think he could be a good one. His broken wrist made him become a better passer - he's still got some rawness - but I think he could play at the 1aa level.

[slorch]

the score was 44-33. i wouldnt have said anything usually but, i judt dont like when the score gets exagerated. maybe you were just mistaking. i dont know what the prob is between owens and outlaw is. i just know that it is or was a problem. i think they will schedule again in 08. thats just old natraul differences. they will be ok.

the point was the scheduling, not the score of the game, and it's not as if he said LP laid 75 on 'em- he missed it by a TD.

[Big_Maar]

the point was the scheduling, not the score of the game, and it's not as if he said LP laid 75 on 'em- he missed it by a TD.

Don't even whisper anything bad about Tyler Lee, in error or on purpose because big red & cujo will take it personal.:rolleyes:

[PackAttack2005]

That was my error, I was off by 6 points, please forgive me. The point was we beat Lee, 44-33 the year they won the 2004 State Title and the game wasn't that close.

Owens did not keep his word on his deal with Outlaw. If Lufkin plays Lee again:confused: , Outlaw will make his rebuttal crystal clear to Owens and Jeffery Claybon will probably play big part in sending that message.

[big red & cujo]

the point was the scheduling, not the score of the game, and it's not as if he said LP laid 75 on 'em- he missed it by a TD.
MAN, SHUT UP I WASNT TALKIN TO YOU !!!

[big red & cujo]

Don't even whisper anything bad about Tyler Lee, in error or on purpose because big red & cujo will take it personal.:rolleyes:
JUST LIKE 69 SOUTH DOES !!!:rolleyes:

[big red & cujo]

That was my error, I was off by 6 points, please forgive me. The point was we beat Lee, 44-33 the year they won the 2004 State Title and the game wasn't that close.

Owens did not keep his word on his deal with Outlaw. If Lufkin plays Lee again:confused: , Outlaw will make his rebuttal crystal clear to Owens and Jeffery Claybon will probably play big part in sending that message.
YOU ARE A LIE SAYING THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE. 27- 27 AT THE END OF THE 3RD. INTHE 4TH THE SCORES WAS 34-27, 34-33,37-33 THEN 44-33. THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE, MAN if you believe that YOU ARE AN IDIOT. plus i was just correcting you on the damn score. i wasnt making a big deal out of it. but if you want to we can. we can argue all night bra. i can always prove yo lies wrong.come on wit it.you played against our second string defense anyway. as for owens. what difference does it make. that is stupid. i bet yall wish yall would have played us that year because we were sorry. yes, all yall like doing is playing sorry teams.

[Big_Maar]

YOU ARE A LIE SAYING THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE. 27- 27 AT THE END OF THE 3RD. INTHE 4TH THE SCORES WAS 34-27, 34-33,37-33 THEN 44-33. THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE, MAN if you believe that YOU ARE AN IDIOT. plus i was just correcting you on the damn score. i wasnt making a big deal out of it. but if you want to we can. we can argue all night bra. i can always prove yo lies wrong.come on wit it.you played against our second string defense anyway. as for owens. what difference does it make. that is stupid. i bet yall wish yall would have played us that year because we were sorry. yes, all yall like doing is playing sorry teams.


Ughhhh, WHAT?

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j309/big_maar/279847484_cc7751cfdb.jpg

[PackAttack2005]

Man, cool your horse down and don't get personal with me. Your the one acting like a jerk on the board and you have proved it by your comments.

The Panthers are playing the people who will sign on to play them in non-district and frankly we haven't had many takers. As for District 15-5a, we are not in control of where the U.I.L. assigns us. That district admittedly has some overall strength issues.

I guess I am at fault for taking the subject off topic because we were talking about Jeffery Claybon. My point was Owens made a deal with Lufkin to switch games in order to go to Ohio and reneged on his promise to Outlaw the following year in the 2006 realignment, to re-establish a non-district contract.

:) Hey, I just remembered the reason you mentioned 2nd string, Jorvorskie Lane knocked two of Lee's starting linebackers out in that game and your other LB was already out because he had been hurt the week before against Trinity. Anyway, it was a good game and maybe closer than I remember, but it doesn't mean you need to resort to name calling over such petty stuff and I am not a "bra", lets get that straight right now.

As far as I am concerned, this is as "wit it" as I will get on this subject.

[slorch]

MAN, SHUT UP I WASNT TALKIN TO YOU PUNK !!!

first time I've ever considered asking the admins to deal with someone. That was completely uncalled for. After pausing for a second, I realized I should just be thankful that you exposed yourself for what you are, and the board sees it too.

Thanks, man.

[big red & cujo]

Man, cool your horse down and don't get personal with me. Your the one acting like a jerk on the board and you have proved it by your comments.

The Panthers are playing the people who will sign on to play them in non-district and frankly we haven't had many takers. As for District 15-5a, we are not in control of where the U.I.L. assigns us. That district admittedly has some overall strength issues.

I guess I am at fault for taking the subject off topic because we were talking about Jeffery Claybon. My point was Owens made a deal with Lufkin to switch games in order to go to Ohio and reneged on his promise to Outlaw the following year in the 2006 realignment, to re-establish a non-district contract.

:) Hey, I just remembered the reason you mentioned 2nd string, Jorvorskie Lane knocked two of Lee's starting linebackers out in that game and your other LB was already out because he had been hurt the week before against Trinity. Anyway, it was a good game and maybe closer than I remember, but it doesn't mean you need to resort to name calling over such petty stuff and I am not a "bra", lets get that straight right now.

As far as I am concerned, this is as "wit it" as I will get on this subject.
thats a damn good thing you not to.i should of known you was not a bra. because you couldnt get wit it if you pushed the easy button. now is that straight enough for you ? please excuse me for calling you the idiot. i am the idiot for mistaking you as one of the bra's. i take my compliment back

[big red & cujo]

first time I've ever considered asking the admins to deal with someone. That was completely uncalled for. After pausing for a second, I realized I should just be thankful that you exposed yourself for what you are, and the board sees it too.

Thanks, man.
you are very much welcome. when ever you need me to do it again. you know where to find me.:cool: :rolleyes: mind ya buisiness and i want send you crying to the administrator. loosin up yo diapers.

[slorch]

the absence of this kind of post is what makes this site so great. Keep it up.

If you wanted me to " mind ya business," then post your opinion in a PM. You called somebody out over a difference in a score to a game that was trivial. The point of the post was why there may be a rift between the coach of LP and REL, and you want to gripe about a difference of 7 points. Makes sense to me.

Telling someone to "Shut up" and calling them a "punk" just because they redirected your post is out of line, whether you recognize that or not.

[c-lisle]

so the little CLaybon is 6'3'' but what is his weight and speed? If he doesnt have any speed that is not good in Lufkin's system. I cant imagine him not haveing speed though and I bet he weighs about 180.

[SLC93]

YOU ARE A LIE SAYING THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE. 27- 27 AT THE END OF THE 3RD. INTHE 4TH THE SCORES WAS 34-27, 34-33,37-33 THEN 44-33. THE GAME WASNT THAT CLOSE, MAN if you believe that YOU ARE AN IDIOT. plus i was just correcting you on the damn score. i wasnt making a big deal out of it. but if you want to we can. we can argue all night bra. i can always prove yo lies wrong.come on wit it.you played against our second string defense anyway. as for owens. what difference does it make. that is stupid. i bet yall wish yall would have played us that year because we were sorry. yes, all yall like doing is playing sorry teams.

Did you really just freak out about a six point differential in the score of a game from three years ago? Get a grip on you life kid.

[PackAttack2005]

c-lisle, Jeffery is not quite 6'3" but getting close, he is only going to be a junior next season so he could put on another couple of inches by his senior year. He weighs about 180-185 right now and has decent speed, don't know any 40 times for him, but I will go out on a limb and put him in the 4.7 range.

The difference is he probably won't need to run that much this year with the RB's we have on board for 2007. Like I said in another post, senior Jeremy Nobles is still competing for the starting job with Claybon, so nothing is a given at this point. However, IMO Claybon looks to be the front runner to start for the Panthers

[c-lisle]

Did you really just freak out about a six point differential in the score of a game from three years ago? Get a grip on you life kid.

big red is the definition of a homer. noone can beat lee and if they have it wasn't fair.

[pack0808]

big red is the definition of a homer. noone can beat lee and if they have it wasn't fair.


Yeah bigred is a trip and homer is a understatement. I love the part about the Lufkin 44-33 win was against Lee's 2nd string defense in 04. :) That is great stuff. Lane took out 2 of their LB's during that game and the other lb was hurt before the LP game. So they started the game with 10 starters of the 11 on defense and ended up with 8 starters because they got injured during the game. But according to bigred that was their 2nd string D? Forget the fact that Lufkin had a couple of starters out for that game also. It is called football and injuries happen all the time durrrrhh. Oh bigred you never can just accept a loss can you? Even a loss almost 3 years ago. :eek: Get over it bra!

[KT2000]

you are very much welcome. when ever you need me to do it again. you know where to find me.:cool: :rolleyes: mind ya buisiness and i want send you crying to the administrator. loosin up yo diapers.

You've got a week on the shelf to cool down for your posts in this thread. No need to let things get personal on here.

[SLC93]

And now back to our regularly scheduled programming.:D

[Lp78]

And now back to our regularly scheduled programming.:D

LOL

44-33 & Lufkin had I know at least 1 TD called back. Lane physically wore Lee out. 21-21 at halftime.

[c-lisle]

c-lisle, Jeffery is not quite 6'3" but getting close, he is only going to be a junior next season so he could put on another couple of inches by his senior year. He weighs about 180-185 right now and has decent speed, don't know any 40 times for him, but I will go out on a limb and put him in the 4.7 range.

The difference is he probably won't need to run that much this year with the RB's we have on board for 2007. Like I said in another post, senior Jeremy Nobles is still competing for the starting job with Claybon, so nothing is a given at this point. However, IMO Claybon looks to be the front runner to start for the Panthers

no doubt he will get bigger.....it amazes me what just a summers time does to some of these kids they gain 15-20 lbs and grow 2-3 inches lol.

[LPNATION67]

i was at the 7 on 7 here in lufkin and claybon did look good but IMO nobles looked sharper more accurate and looser under pressure. i take into consideration the 7 on 7 as well as practices i attended. really i dont think lufkin would do bad with either one behind center. they both have good attributes. so we will see what goes down as the season progresses.as far as the REL and LP hook up is concerned, i believe owens reneged on his oral commitment to lufkin. it was done and until both outlaw and owens patch things up i guess these teams wont play. i would love to have SLC and some other teams appear on our non district schedule. there seems to be a problem with lufkin being able to get the elite teams in texas to play in non district. it has been said by friends of mine here that travel costs concerns are a big issue. i agree partly but i feel we are not that far away from the dallas area and either closer to the houston area where lufkin is placed district wise. so whatz the problem? i can only speculate. i do know that lufkin needs to be pushed and challenged no disrespect to any current or past non district opponents but lufkin needs to play teams like euless slc as well as others sorry i got off the topic but i wanted to get what i thought out in the open. SLC as far as i can see is a respectful well disciplined bunch of young men and to the people of the southlake community on this board and just in general i commend you i would like to see some of you and get your opinion about a LP-SLC rivalry developing. im donev you guys have a very blessed day

[c-lisle]

i was at the 7 on 7 here in lufkin and claybon did look good but IMO nobles looked sharper more accurate and looser under pressure. i take into consideration the 7 on 7 as well as practices i attended. really i dont think lufkin would do bad with either one behind center.

so what is the hieght/size/weight of Nobles? Also, will he be a JR next season?

[Favpack]

so what is the hieght/size/weight of Nobles? Also, will he be a JR next season?

Jeremy will be a senior - I believe he's 6', 180. Good arm and speed, good vision and pocket awareness - made a few careless errors in mop-up duties last year that caused some coaches to chew on him a bit.

[DragonFan0316]

Jeremy will be a senior - I believe he's 6', 180. Good arm and speed, good vision and pocket awareness - made a few careless errors in mop-up duties last year that caused some coaches to chew on him a bit.

I just got done talking to a Dad of some Lufkin players. I was shocked to hear what he said. It was racial in nature. Says the kids don't get along particularly when it comes to black/white. Says the coaches don't stop it and that it is eating the program alive. Now I have had a lot of respect for Lufkin and their fans over the last 5 years. I would like another opinion about whether this is true or not though. I hope not.:confused:

[PackAttack2005]

Don't see that as a widespread issue at Lufkin, because I see the players talking and interacting with each other all the time. Plus I am sure the coaches would not tolerate this, if it did exsist. Your always going to have isolated incidents wherever you go today.

[DragonFan0316]

Don't see that as a widespread issue at Lufkin, because I see the players talking and interacting with each other all the time. Plus I am sure the coaches would not tolerate this, if it did exsist. Your always going to have isolated incidents wherever you go today.

I was looking forward to another classic last year. Good luck to you guys and we will see you in December.:D

[Favpack]

I just got done talking to a Dad of some Lufkin players. I was shocked to hear what he said. It was racial in nature. Says the kids don't get along particularly when it comes to black/white. Says the coaches don't stop it and that it is eating the program alive. Now I have had a lot of respect for Lufkin and their fans over the last 5 years. I would like another opinion about whether this is true or not though. I hope not.:confused:

You're asking someone to give an opinion on something they can't possibly know the "entire story" on - unless you're the coach. The dad only knows his son's perspective. Do I think there is a problem that is "eating the program alive"? No I don't. Do programs such as Lufkin, Longvew and a host of others that have widely diverse racial and socio-economic backgrounds in it's team that coaches must deal with daily, if not hourly? Yes they do. It's called the real world, and, sorry, but many of the elite programs in Texas such as Highland Park, are folks not living in the real world.

[Texasfrog]

You're asking someone to give an opinion on something they can't possibly know the "entire story" on - unless you're the coach. The dad only knows his son's perspective. Do I think there is a problem that is "eating the program alive"? No I don't. Do programs such as Lufkin, Longvew and a host of others that have widely diverse racial and socio-economic backgrounds in it's team that coaches must deal with daily, if not hourly? Yes they do. It's called the real world, and, sorry, but many of the elite programs in Texas such as Highland Park, are folks not living in the real world. Trust me Favpack, I hear stupid stuff almost daily from a guy on here that has his location as Highland Park. I agree with that comment for at least that "ONE GUY.":D :eek: ;)

[taco_bockley]

nobles is a senior and i have inside info from a coach at lufkin that claybon is our man. also i saw nobles at the 7 on 7 he only played one series had 1 completion and looked shakey at best. claybon is our guy

[LPNATION67]

i agree if jeffrey gets the nod over nobles. like i said i dont think lufkin can go wrong with either guy being the field general. IMO nobles is more accurate and his throwing mechanics are more technically sound. no knock against claybon. nobles has more zip on the ball imo bottom line lufki looks good at qb position. as far as the issue with racial divides between blacks n whites is concerned i think the whole thing is horse manure. if one kid comers out and says such and such well its to me an isolated slanted view on things. rumors are like are like peanut butter everybody spreads em so lets just get this season boiling and see who ends up where come december

[Bootsdaddy]

You're asking someone to give an opinion on something they can't possibly know the "entire story" on - unless you're the coach. The dad only knows his son's perspective. Do I think there is a problem that is "eating the program alive"? No I don't. Do programs such as Lufkin, Longvew and a host of others that have widely diverse racial and socio-economic backgrounds in it's team that coaches must deal with daily, if not hourly? Yes they do. It's called the real world, and, sorry, but many of the elite programs in Texas such as Highland Park, are folks not living in the real world.

Eating the program alive where they are only winning about 95% of their games the last decade. Im sure there may be some tension but IMO today's kids see color less and less. I could be wrong since Im old.