View Full Version : The Wood Vs. Klein Collins
ilovefootball
09-18-2005, 02:52 PM
When the season began, I thought this would be an awesome game but this one could get ugly for KC. KC will have Goodson back and at full strength which will give them a shot if their defense can play well. KC's only win was last week against Magnolia which could be in the top 5 for worst 5A teams in the state. They still looked bad against 4A Klein Oak and Aldine MacArthur. KC does not have a very good quarterback either. Let me know what ya'll think about this game
kchsfan
09-18-2005, 03:31 PM
Your probably right. These are facts. Collins defense is small and inexperienced. They did hold Oak to 6 first downs and I think we are all finding out that Oak is a pretty salty football team. Call them 4A if you want but they are larger than many 5A schools now and growing fast.
Goodson did play some against Magnolia with a stiff left ankle and they moved Chris Burns (The tackle) back to right tackle after failed attempt to run him at fullback so line play was better.
This game is for third place. Neither of these teams can play with Klein Forest or Lufkin and a loss here make it hard to sneak into a playoff spot.
The Woodlands will suit up their 98 players and probably outman the 37 KC squad unless a group of them wrap their cars around a pole this week.
See you Thursday.
heckyesforfootball
09-18-2005, 03:35 PM
unless a group of them wrap their cars around a pole this week.
call me crazy, but I believe that comment was a tad bit unnecessary...
bubbacoach
09-18-2005, 08:28 PM
Saw the Klein Collins vs. Magnolia game on Friday was not impressed with either team. The Goodson kid who I have heard so much about did not impress me. He made a couple of good long runs, if he could beat Magnolia to the sidelines. He is not North and South enough for me. If the Woodlands have any speed on defense they will be able to stretch him to the sidelines. We will see.
kchsfan
09-18-2005, 09:05 PM
Goodson was basically running with a cast on his left ankle and got something like 160 yrds on 11 carries. What was impressive was his blocking on several plays.
Anyone who has seen a healthy Goodson won't question his ability. I hope he gets well and you can see him at his best.
WoodlandsHigh
09-18-2005, 09:51 PM
The Woodlands North Shore experience will have us ready for Klein Collins. Put another victory in TWHS win column.
TWHPA
09-18-2005, 09:59 PM
I think The Woodlands will win this game but I assure you we learned our leason last year with Klein when we thought we had a walk in the park and they made us eat our words. Klein Collins may be having some experience problems but you never know when they might get it together...simular to our offense problem.....See you Thursday expecting a good game.
PurpleNation
09-18-2005, 11:37 PM
He was healthy against Lufkin last year and he looked like a child getting hit by men. like 15 carries 37 yards.
eastside football
09-19-2005, 07:40 AM
The Woodlands North Shore experience will have us ready for Klein Collins. Put another victory in TWHS win column.
POLL: What is the biggest win in The Woodlands History?
A. Triple overtime win against Tyler Lee in 2003
B. One point loss to North Shore in 2005 :confused:
kchsfan
09-19-2005, 07:44 AM
No question, a Woodlands loss would be a major upset.
In the other point, The KC/Lufkin game last year was a great game. Lufkin pulled away in last quarter after KC led with 10 minutes left. The pressure that defense puts on an offense is tough and I don't think anyone will put up 100+ yards rushing against them.
Sportsfan24
09-19-2005, 12:09 PM
I think TWHS will win in a low scoring game. KC is missing to much from last years backfield even if Goodson is 100%. I think TWHS coaching staff will figure a way to score. KC problem will be finding a way to get Goodson 1 on 1 with a defender to have a chance.
WoodlandsHigh
09-19-2005, 12:35 PM
Woodlands is great against the run. Back-to-back performance (North Shore & Humble) indicates Klein Collins will have a rough time. North Shore had a pretty good offensive line. The Woodlands have a pretty good defensive line (or front seven). TWHS safeties are probably the best 1/2 punch.
KC's defense is weaker than the past. Our offense should kick in this week. If not, then we really have a problem.
Klein Forest will be a challenge.
Git R Done
09-19-2005, 12:56 PM
An analysis of the Woodlands shows real problems with the "O" in general......there is no clear choice at QB as both Hutson and Parsons have had very mixed results from bad to worse......the RB's are ok but don't run North/South with real authority and act timid.....the "O" line is a work in progress and is not gelling ....and without Drabek the only receiver to show any moxy is the tall TE ......play calling and scheme are very questionable, especially in pressure situations. Very lucky to get the win in Humble......and the "O" had great field position all night long in that game.
As for the "D" they are playing well as a unit for the moment, and tackling better. They were fortunate that Humble could not catch and throw well or they get smoked several times......in the last series they went man in an obvious desperate passing situation with no one deep to play safety.......very lucky one of those passes wasn't on target. I do give props to the "D" for keeping TWHS in the game and doing some of the scoring......they were the diff in this one or else Humble takes the "W". Some of the calls to blitz and then not cover leave one thinking though.......historically TWHS has not played the option well so this game with KCHS could be a barnburner if adjustments aren't made and Goodson has his "A" game going.
Special teams are atrocious.....but getting better in that the first extra point of the year was made by the kicker....a new one I believe....punts were better.....punt return sucked as did K.O. returns.
I like TWHS in this one but there need to be serious improvements or this will be a 5-5 maybe 6-4 team........the schedule does favor TWHS as they play KF and LP later in the year.......hopefully KCHS etc will be a stepping stone to those matchups...........Thoughts?
kchsfan
09-19-2005, 01:10 PM
All three are right on. Too many injuries besides Goodson's will make for tough games against quality opponents. I say this winner grabs the third spot when all the smoke clears. KF is really good this year and Lufkin is Lufkin.
unbiasedobserver
09-19-2005, 01:20 PM
I agree this game should be for the final playoff spot. However, I do not think that either team can afford any kind of let down against Klein or Conroe, or both could end up missing the playoffs. I am interested to see how KC responds. They lost to what is obviiously a pretty good Oak team and then McArthur without Goodson. The Woodz would be 0-3 if the Humble Dbacks had hands. At least three for cetain INTs bounced off the Dbacks hands last week. On the other side, the Woodz D is getting better. The secondary is talented but inexperienced. They should improve as the season goes along. I think the O will be mediocre at best, even at the end of the year. That being said, I think the D will key a win over Collins this week.
TWHPA
09-19-2005, 01:45 PM
Need to be careful about the Ofense predictions. Woods has a LA transfer due to Katrina that becomes available to play this week or next (not sure on which). From what I here, he holds LA state record in 100 meter (not confirmed). From observation (JV), he can shoot through an opening as quick if not quicker than anyone I have seen in a while.
If not this week, next week with Drabek??
forest99
09-19-2005, 02:05 PM
"the" woodlands may upend a weaker klein collins team, but beware because 14-5A is the best district in the state, 3 teams in the top 20 in state. not 2 mention undefeated conroe and a klein team who beat them last year. "the" woodlands is finally on their spiral downward. kinda hard not 2 be good with 5,000 kids at your school!!!
Git R Done
09-19-2005, 02:09 PM
Still gotta block for the QB and git the ball to him/them (receivers). Both TWHS QB's have serious accuracy, touch, and decision making problems. What good is that new LA speed if the ball sails over the receivers head or nose dives into the ground? Lotta if's and maybe's with this TWHS squad.....they have the tools......but can they make something out of them?
Conroe and Klein could make noise but who have they played? Exactly... no one!
This weeks edge to TWHS.......Go Highlanders!
forest99
09-19-2005, 02:24 PM
Still gotta block for the QB and git the ball to him/them (receivers). Both TWHS QB's have serious accuracy, touch, and decision making problems. What good is that new LA speed if the ball sails over the receivers head or nose dives into the ground? Lotta if's and maybe's with this TWHS squad.....they have the tools......but can they make something out of them?
Conroe and Klein could make noise but who have they played? Exactly... no one!
This weeks edge to TWHS.......Go Highlanders!
the LA player cant play till next game, if even then, defensively its too easy for teh opponents, cover dj smalls coming out of backfield, pressure qb into turnovers and mistakes, prevent deep passes to wr's. without drabek "the" woodlands is in trouble offensively. and it does matter who you are playing, but just remember, winning is winning and losing is losing.
Git R Done
09-19-2005, 03:37 PM
Profound statement here by Conroe 05 - "but just remember, winning is winning and losing is losing." I agree that it is much better to have a "W" than an L.......but we'll see where Conroe is at the end of district play......those 3 non district wins against weak opponents doesn't go for much in the post season.
TWHS has played TOP TEN COMPETITION and fared well in all but 2 quarters (second half Katy).......No game should be a push over in 14-5A....any given day
unbiasedobserver
09-19-2005, 03:43 PM
Actually, I think 14-5a is pretty weak this year. Only two quality teams are Lufkin and KF. The Woodlands and or KC and or Conroe and or Klien won't get past the 2nd round at best. But as far as the Woodz in a downward spiral...I wouldn't count on that just yet. The Junior class looks pretty talented, and is getting a lot of playing time this year. If the oline can be fixed the Woods should be a force next year.
pack0808
09-19-2005, 03:45 PM
I would not say The Woodlands is not a quality team. If they had 3 cupcakes on their schedule like many of our teams had they would be 3-0 also. They played some very tough teams and played them very tough. The only time they got manhandled was by Katy late in the 2nd half. Other then that they have been right there vs tough comp. If the offense can show improvement this team will be tough to beat.
Mean Green Machine
09-19-2005, 06:13 PM
Pack0808
You got it! Who has KF played. The Pack is going to put it on them this week 35 to 7. The O will play better than last week. And the D will do its thing by getting 2 or 3 turnovers.
The Highlanders will be there for the show down Friday, Night Oct. 28th. The Nation will be there...and so will the Pack
ktCarl
09-19-2005, 09:01 PM
Do you Woodlanders feel that after 3 tough opponents there might be a letdown against a weaker opponent? There is always that possibility.
homeboy281
09-19-2005, 09:05 PM
im sry green machine ive been scouting both of these teams. i think KF will win 24-17. Both teams are good but special teams will make the difference in this game! Also ball control will be a major factor.
twhsfan#2
09-19-2005, 10:35 PM
An analysis of the Woodlands shows real problems with the "O" in general......there is no clear choice at QB as both Hutson and Parsons have had very mixed results from bad to worse......the RB's are ok but don't run North/South with real authority and act timid.....the "O" line is a work in progress and is not gelling ....and without Drabek the only receiver to show any moxy is the tall TE ......play calling and scheme are very questionable, especially in pressure situations. Very lucky to get the win in Humble......and the "O" had great field position all night long in that game.
As for the "D" they are playing well as a unit for the moment, and tackling better. They were fortunate that Humble could not catch and throw well or they get smoked several times......in the last series they went man in an obvious desperate passing situation with no one deep to play safety.......very lucky one of those passes wasn't on target. I do give props to the "D" for keeping TWHS in the game and doing some of the scoring......they were the diff in this one or else Humble takes the "W". Some of the calls to blitz and then not cover leave one thinking though.......historically TWHS has not played the option well so this game with KCHS could be a barnburner if adjustments aren't made and Goodson has his "A" game going.
Special teams are atrocious.....but getting better in that the first extra point of the year was made by the kicker....a new one I believe....punts were better.....punt return sucked as did K.O. returns.
I like TWHS in this one but there need to be serious improvements or this will be a 5-5 maybe 6-4 team........the schedule does favor TWHS as they play KF and LP later in the year.......hopefully KCHS etc will be a stepping stone to those matchups...........Thoughts?
I agree with most of what Git R Done has to say and he has made some good :) :) observations with a few exceptions... to say that the only receiver with moxy is the tall TE is totally incorrect. TWHS has several quality WR's. Look at the catches that Bova has made the past 2 games - all for critical first downs and two of them were very difficult catches (Northshore and Humble). To think that TWHS cannot have a quality passing game without Drabek is a fallacy. Yes he is extremely athetic but, it matters not if the QB does not have time to throw the ball downfield or makes the wrong read!!! We have had several opportunities where Bova, Grote or Dennis have been wide open downfield but the line did not hold their blocks or the QB did not make the right read. Don't underestimate the WR's we have and keep your eyes on Bova .. he is a player with sure hands and good size and strength. McKee, Grote and Dennis will also light things up once we get the entire "O" working on all cylinders. Have faith my friends :)
Git R Done
09-19-2005, 11:37 PM
The receivers you refer to are possession receivers and no breakaway threat. Frankly I thought they heard a lot of footsteps dropping many easy catches. Yes, they did catch some balls, but dropped many an easy one as did the Bumblin' Humblin' receivers..... If any other receiver other than Drabek makes the catch in the Katy game TWHS ends up with a goose egg on the scoreboard......or maybe a field goal.....yeah right. Drabek or the new LA move in are the receiving corps to Git R Done and give the Woodz any chance to stretch the field vertically. It is a concept rarely used much in any games from my observations.....that could be due to arm strength, blocking issues, or a failure to make the call. Either way having those two ready could help the "O" find itself!
Mean Green Machine
09-19-2005, 11:43 PM
KTcarl,
I think the Highlanders will be battle tested and will get better as the season goes on.
The bottom line in this game will be Goodson againsted one of the best defenses that TWHS has ever produced, a least since 2000. The team that shut down C.Benson in a playoff game with less than 100 yards.
Here are the facts, rushing Katy 44-122, NS 44-173, Humble 35-102 for a 3.28 avg.
Goodson is going to get his yards. But this is not Magnolia. Bigger, faster D line, faster LB, DB's fast, stronger and love to lay the wood.
Look at the film!
On the otherside of the ball KC gave up 52-262 to Magnolia, and 46-287 againsted MacArthur.
The O is going to get better. It has too much talent and deepth. I know the QB's can hand the ball off. They'll pass against KC too. KC is not Katy (Sr leadership, W.Thompson), NS (D1 CB's and D), Humble D isn't chop liver.
KC is going to have a long night. Goodson will have a breakaway. But the TWHS D hasn't given it up yet. Dean, King, Sims, Ganious, Johnson and (42). Goodsen?
The real match up will be the Purple People Eaters on Oct 28th at old Abe.
twhsfan#2
09-20-2005, 06:32 AM
The receivers you refer to are possession receivers and no breakaway threat. Frankly I thought they heard a lot of footsteps dropping many easy catches. Yes, they did catch some balls, but dropped many an easy one as did the Bumblin' Humblin' receivers..... If any other receiver other than Drabek makes the catch in the Katy game TWHS ends up with a goose egg on the scoreboard......or maybe a field goal.....yeah right. Drabek or the new LA move in are the receiving corps to Git R Done and give the Woodz any chance to stretch the field vertically. It is a concept rarely used much in any games from my observations.....that could be due to arm strength, blocking issues, or a failure to make the call. Either way having those two ready could help the "O" find itself!
They are possession receivers only because we are not able to throw downfield most of the time OR the coaches are choosing not to go long and instead going to RB's or short routes. Have a look at the games and you will see that they ARE open downfield. Each of the receivers that I mentioned are as fast as Drabek, and Grote has already scored on a 36 yd. TD. With regard to footsteps... I disagee. Bova dropped only 1 catch all year.. and yes it was an easy one. As for the others, yes a few drops were made but, Drabek missed an easy ball vs Katy. Point is ... everybody drops balls - Chris Riser, Humblin bumbles, Drabek etc.... I agree that we need to go vertical to also open up the run and we have not done much of that. Not sure what the reasons are but lets test our current WR's downfield first before making such conclusions.
kchsfan
09-20-2005, 07:53 AM
What is the status of Drabek? Goodson played last week but at 3/4 strength and ankle was still sore but didn't look like he re-injured it.
TWHPA
09-20-2005, 08:15 AM
My understanding is Drabek is out this week too.
TheDuke
09-20-2005, 10:27 AM
We NEED A QB!!!!!
unbiasedobserver
09-20-2005, 11:01 AM
Duke, I think the D will have to carry the load til Parsons can get more experience or Hutson's arm heals. Hutson is more mobile which helps him avoid the rush. I still think most of the problems begin and end with the oline. It would be interesting to see how these QBs fare with time to read progressions and plant thier feet and make throws.
kchsfan
09-20-2005, 11:06 AM
Does anyone know how they are doing the Woodlands freshman teams. I noticed our freshman are playing College Park, not the Woodlands or are they the same thing?
unbiasedobserver
09-20-2005, 11:11 AM
No, the College Park freshman team is completely separate from the Woodlands H.S. freshman teams. The Woodz has three freshman teams. I think one or two lost to Humble last week.
Git R Done
09-20-2005, 11:26 AM
Duke, I think the D will have to carry the load til Parsons can get more experience or Hutson's arm heals. Hutson is more mobile which helps him avoid the rush. I still think most of the problems begin and end with the oline. It would be interesting to see how these QBs fare with time to read progressions and plant thier feet and make throws.
Poor old line gets blamed again! Both QB's make too many mental mistakes that are costly.....if opposing teams DB's could catch there would be more interceptions registered than receptions by the pair.....bottom line is put 8 in the box and you stop TWHS "O".
Git R Done
09-20-2005, 11:33 AM
They are possession receivers only because we are not able to throw downfield most of the time OR the coaches are choosing not to go long and instead going to RB's or short routes. Have a look at the games and you will see that they ARE open downfield. Each of the receivers that I mentioned are as fast as Drabek, and Grote has already scored on a 36 yd. TD. With regard to footsteps... I disagee. Bova dropped only 1 catch all year.. and yes it was an easy one. As for the others, yes a few drops were made but, Drabek missed an easy ball vs Katy. Point is ... everybody drops balls - Chris Riser, Humblin bumbles, Drabek etc.... I agree that we need to go vertical to also open up the run and we have not done much of that. Not sure what the reasons are but lets test our current WR's downfield first before making such conclusions.,
If indeed as you say that the other receivers are as fast as Drabek, which I seriously doubt, then the coaches must not have the confidence in them to chance any deep throws. I think the RB Smalls leads TWHS in catches? Use the others as decoys and throw to the athlete seems to be TWHS coaching stategy.
Git R Done
09-20-2005, 11:39 AM
KTcarl,
I think the Highlanders will be battle tested and will get better as the season goes on.
The bottom line in this game will be Goodson againsted one of the best defenses that TWHS has ever produced, a least since 2000. The team that shut down C.Benson in a playoff game with less than 100 yards.
Here are the facts, rushing Katy 44-122, NS 44-173, Humble 35-102 for a 3.28 avg.
Goodson is going to get his yards. But this is not Magnolia. Bigger, faster D line, faster LB, DB's fast, stronger and love to lay the wood.
Look at the film!
On the otherside of the ball KC gave up 52-262 to Magnolia, and 46-287 againsted MacArthur.
The O is going to get better. It has too much talent and deepth. I know the QB's can hand the ball off. They'll pass against KC too. KC is not Katy (Sr leadership, W.Thompson), NS (D1 CB's and D), Humble D isn't chop liver.
KC is going to have a long night. Goodson will have a breakaway. But the TWHS D hasn't given it up yet. Dean, King, Sims, Ganious, Johnson and (42). Goodsen?
The real match up will be the Purple People Eaters on Oct 28th at old Abe.
Perhaps you better focus playing one game at a time and layoff stirring up LP....granted that may be a great matchup like last years game was.....but TWHS cannot overlook ANYONE.....REMEMBER KLEIN LAST YEAR????? Keep your focus on the opponent of the week.......TWHS needs to improve weekly and use each weeks opponent as a stepping stone to that matchup! KF vs LP, if played this week, will give TWHS who the top contenders are....hopefully TWHS will be in there too! FOCUS
Mean Green Machine
09-20-2005, 12:47 PM
KtCarl
Your absoultly right. Remember Klein!
twhsfan#2
09-20-2005, 01:07 PM
,
If indeed as you say that the other receivers are as fast as Drabek, which I seriously doubt, then the coaches must not have the confidence in them to chance any deep throws. I think the RB Smalls leads TWHS in catches? Use the others as decoys and throw to the athlete seems to be TWHS coaching stategy.
I am not sure where you are going with this and this will be my last response to your comments because it is pointless to argue. Feel free to check their 40-yd times if you do not believe me about the speed ... then again, who cares if you believe it or not? Yes, Smalls leads TWHS in catches - so what. How many uncatchable balls were thrown downfield to receivers - do you know? The percentae of drops vs uncatchable balls is very low - get your facts straight. The highest percentage pass is always to the RB's. I agree that the coaches may not have confidence in going downfield at the moment but, the problems go well beyond our WR's. Could it be that the coaches do not have confidence in the entire offense, including the O-line and QB's and that is why they are choosing not to go deep? Could it be they want to give Parsons some confidence with short passes first? Jerry Rice could be on the field and if the line does not do its job and the QB doesn't make the throw and read, it matters not.
Unbiasedobserver has valid points about the offense and you poo-poo'd his observations. What exactly are you trying to say and hope to achieve by marginalizing our WR's?? There are multiple problems at the moment with our offense but, these kids are young and inexperienced. You miss the big picture. TWHS has enough depth and athletes to be successful and it will come around. Using our WR's as decoys and throwing to our RB's is an absurd solution .... like that will increase our chances of winning! Trust me my friend, football is a TEAM sport. Where did you learn that coaching strategy?
TheDuke
09-20-2005, 01:23 PM
I know that our O-Line needs some help, however, I still have NOT seen ONE spiral thrown by either QB yet!!!! That is the TRUTH!! Not Joking! Not ONE spiral has been thrown in the game!! That is a SAD SAD thing and hate to say it, but is BAD coaching in my opinion! Drabek was on the sideline last game throwing and catching with Parsons and Drabek was throwing the ball MUCH better then Parsons. I have watched Parsons, and with his size he should be WAY better then he is. We just don't produce good QB's at The Woodlands! Since the 70's we have only had 4 or so that made a difference:
Jordan Dotson
Chance Mock
Scott Atcheson
Stacy Arambete
Are there any more?
TWHPA
09-20-2005, 01:54 PM
Duke...you coming to the tailgate on Thursday at Klein?
TheDuke
09-20-2005, 02:04 PM
Not sure if I can make it in time for that since I will be coming from work but I will be at the game for sure. So Drabek still not playing?
Mean Green Machine
09-20-2005, 02:52 PM
Duke,
It's reps. Mock and Dotson played youth football and by the time they were Jrs they had more understanding and control of their game. Dotson had a 50% pass compeletion-his Jr season didn't he.
Parsons definitely needs to improve his fundmentals. He's big strong kid that needs reps. He is a competitor. It may not be pretty. He'll get it done. He's progressed every week. Stay the course Parsons is going to come through.
Stop Goodson.
Git R Done
09-20-2005, 03:16 PM
I am not sure where you are going with this and this will be my last response to your comments because it is pointless to argue. Feel free to check their 40-yd times if you do not believe me about the speed ... then again, who cares if you believe it or not? Yes, Smalls leads TWHS in catches - so what. How many uncatchable balls were thrown downfield to receivers - do you know? The percentae of drops vs uncatchable balls is very low - get your facts straight. The highest percentage pass is always to the RB's. I agree that the coaches may not have confidence in going downfield at the moment but, the problems go well beyond our WR's. Could it be that the coaches do not have confidence in the entire offense, including the O-line and QB's and that is why they are choosing not to go deep? Could it be they want to give Parsons some confidence with short passes first? Jerry Rice could be on the field and if the line does not do its job and the QB doesn't make the throw and read, it matters not.
Unbiasedobserver has valid points about the offense and you poo-poo'd his observations. What exactly are you trying to say and hope to achieve by marginalizing our WR's?? There are multiple problems at the moment with our offense but, these kids are young and inexperienced. You miss the big picture. TWHS has enough depth and athletes to be successful and it will come around. Using our WR's as decoys and throwing to our RB's is an absurd solution .... like that will increase our chances of winning! Trust me my friend, football is a TEAM sport. Where did you learn that coaching strategy?
Must have touched a nerve.........many of your points are accurate and there is no attempt to marginalize other receivers so chill.......Football is a team game...but in 5A football you need not only hands, but speed and the will power to catch in a crowd. Having observed TWHS I can't say that I saw any of those traits by the other receiving corps.....true there were a lot of missed passes, but there were a lot of easy drops too which has been uncharacteristic of previous TWHS teams. The state team had Amendola as the go to guy and this years, like last years squad, is supposed to have Drabek....along with others in a supporting role. I'm sure you are correct that they are just young and they just need to grow up.
As far as reference to coaching stategy, I might suggest you watch your game film if you have access.....only TWHS coaches know the answer to that one and they haven't been impressive to date with their strategies.
TheDuke
09-20-2005, 06:12 PM
Must have touched a nerve.........many of your points are accurate and there is no attempt to marginalize other receivers so chill.......Football is a team game...but in 5A football you need not only hands, but speed and the will power to catch in a crowd. Having observed TWHS I can't say that I saw any of those traits by the other receiving corps.....true there were a lot of missed passes, but there were a lot of easy drops too which has been uncharacteristic of previous TWHS teams. The state team had Amendola as the go to guy and this years, like last years squad, is supposed to have Drabek....along with others in a supporting role. I'm sure you are correct that they are just young and they just need to grow up.
As far as reference to coaching stategy, I might suggest you watch your game film if you have access.....only TWHS coaches know the answer to that one and they haven't been impressive to date with their strategies.
No they haven't! As far as I am concerned those coaches need to step it up!! I watched a practice before the season and was NOT impressed by the coaching!
twhfan#1
09-20-2005, 09:25 PM
I know that our O-Line needs some help, however, I still have NOT seen ONE spiral thrown by either QB yet!!!! That is the TRUTH!! Not Joking! Not ONE spiral has been thrown in the game!! That is a SAD SAD thing and hate to say it, but is BAD coaching in my opinion! Drabek was on the sideline last game throwing and catching with Parsons and Drabek was throwing the ball MUCH better then Parsons. I have watched Parsons, and with his size he should be WAY better then he is. We just don't produce good QB's at The Woodlands! Since the 70's we have only had 4 or so that made a difference:
Jordan Dotson
Chance Mock
Scott Atcheson
Stacy Arambete
Are there any more?
1986-87- Arthur Baird
just FYI --of the 4 you listed
Jordon Dotson --playing baseball at Rice U.( started LF as freshman )
Chance Mock -- UT of course ( mistake on his part )
Scott Atchinson --pitching for Seatle Mariners ( DL this year though )
Stacy Arambee --played QB for Sam Houston U.
so the 4 you named were athletes for sure
TXFootballFan
09-21-2005, 12:14 PM
Duke, what's your problem? Your son sitting the bench? You definitely sound bitter.
TXFootballFan
09-21-2005, 12:46 PM
Duke, you are so close to revealing yourself. From reading your posts, your son plays defense for TWHS and is not getting enough playing time. (Or so you think). Your mad at the coaches, (more so at Coach Parsons) so you feel better by bashing his son. Your son probably doesn't deserve to play, if his character is anything like your's.
TheDuke
09-22-2005, 10:06 PM
Duke, you are so close to revealing yourself. From reading your posts, your son plays defense for TWHS and is not getting enough playing time. (Or so you think). Your mad at the coaches, (more so at Coach Parsons) so you feel better by bashing his son. Your son probably doesn't deserve to play, if his character is anything like your's.
Don't have a son or any kids! Your WAY OFF!! Just think we have offensive problems! When I HAVE A SON he won't be on the bench though so don't worry about it!
poppy
09-23-2005, 06:59 PM
Originally Posted by TXFootballFan
Duke, you are so close to revealing yourself. From reading your posts, your son plays defense for TWHS and is not getting enough playing time. (Or so you think). Your mad at the coaches, (more so at Coach Parsons) so you feel better by bashing his son. Your son probably doesn't deserve to play, if his character is anything like your's.
that was cold...
TheDuke
09-26-2005, 09:34 AM
that was cold...
It was? How? Not even true! Makes me laugh!!
When has this game been resheduled??
TWHPA
09-26-2005, 10:55 AM
Duke,
I heard they are having meetings today to decide when to replay all games. Should be out this afternoon or early tomorrow.
TheDuke
09-27-2005, 10:29 AM
Duke,
I heard they are having meetings today to decide when to replay all games. Should be out this afternoon or early tomorrow.
Any news on this game?
TWHPA
09-27-2005, 11:01 AM
The Woodlands is playing Klein on Friday as per the schedule (homecoming). One of the coaches told me yesterday that they are trying to maintain the current schedule and will work in the cancelled games later in the season. I bet they may do it at the end of season if it affects district standings. That's just my opinion.
kchsfan
09-27-2005, 01:27 PM
They have got to get by homecoming before they do the 3 games in 11 days thing because Friday night just doesn't work in this formula. Collins' homecoming is next weekend.
heckyesforfootball
09-27-2005, 06:48 PM
The Woodlands is playing Klein on Friday as per the schedule (homecoming). One of the coaches told me yesterday that they are trying to maintain the current schedule and will work in the cancelled games later in the season. I bet they may do it at the end of season if it affects district standings. That's just my opinion.
stupid question, sorry. if the klein game is moved to friday, I'm guessing the game that was originally set for friday will be rescheduled some time the next week?
once again, sorry for the stupid question.. I'm just confused!
TWHPA
09-28-2005, 07:59 AM
Klein wasn't moved to Friday, it was origanally scheduled for that day. The Klein Collins came that was scheduled for last Thursday is the game that hasn't been rescheduled as of yet. Hope that helps.
TheDuke
09-28-2005, 10:40 AM
Is Drabek playing?
TWHPA
09-28-2005, 11:06 AM
I do not think so...he was not in uniform at practice yesterday. It appears to be his knee which was still wrapped.
heckyesforfootball
09-28-2005, 11:46 PM
Klein wasn't moved to Friday, it was origanally scheduled for that day. The Klein Collins came that was scheduled for last Thursday is the game that hasn't been rescheduled as of yet. Hope that helps.
ah, I feel stupid. too many kleins.. I was thinking that you were talking about the klein collins game being played friday instead of the klein game.. haha sorry I was confused, but that cleared it up! thanks!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.