PDA

View Full Version : Lufkin vs. Nacogdoches game thread


wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 06:37 PM
Less than an hour.
Should be a blowout.
But I figured it deserved a thread.

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:14 PM
AT HOME AND GOT THE PRE-GAME ON CAN'T WAIT FOR THE PACK TO WIN BABY. I had duty last week so missed posting stuff on the best site in TEXAS and the NATION.
GO PANTHERS

GAME TIME IN 15 MIN.

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 07:29 PM
'sup shipmate?
You listening to the game at home this week?

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:35 PM
yep at the house in SD. man a INT on the 1st place they better come to play and let nac not hang around and think they can play with the pack.

lets go pack

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:37 PM
GOOD D 3 and out now lets see what the O is going to do now.

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 07:38 PM
I thought Hewitt was going to break that punt return.
Nice to see he actually found the bus this week.

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:43 PM
the O sounds bad this week so far they should have ran the ball some more. D should be 3 and out and we got to score and stop playing with them dragons.

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:45 PM
way to go D

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 07:46 PM
I don't like how this is sounding!

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 07:49 PM
7-0

Claybon to Thad!!!!!!

Go baby!!!!

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:50 PM
TD panthers

T. Gordon on a pass. that was set up after running the ball at the start of this drive.. the dragons are going to be looking at the pass so if we can just keep running some more then we can pass like that all night on them. but just my opinion that is why Law is the man in Lufkin and a great coach.

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 07:52 PM
Thaddius...I love that name.
You could be the dumbest guy on the planet...and if
your name is Thaddius...you sound smart...hahaha

Good job Pack.

pack98
09-16-2005, 07:56 PM
that is what the nac paper were talking about some of the players were caught drinking. That is a class act by coach harper doing what he did. i remember law did that to us when we got into a fight with tyler lee we suspended 12 people and played nac short in 97 but still won. but tyler lee did not suspend anyone for there big game against JT.

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 07:58 PM
Sounds like Quick's Crew is dealing some serious punishment!!

Gotta Love it!

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:05 PM
pack is shooting themselves in the foot so far

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:05 PM
blocked punt Dragons ball on the panthers 15 yard line and we have 2 turnover in the 1st quarter.

Mistakes beats good teams all the times got to cut them out.

that nac coach has them ready to play.

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:07 PM
I'm getting a feeling of Deja Vu from 2 years ago.

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:09 PM
INT panthers.

GREAT D

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:10 PM
Defense is doing great so far!!!!!

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:12 PM
Sounds like Claybon is having an off night so far.

Fumble!!!!!

Sounds like the offensive coaches have some more work to do!

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:12 PM
Nac has to have the worst stadium around that stadium is so small and just a bad place to play and the field is not even level with that big crown that they have.


oh NO another turnover for the panthers NAC ball on the 11 yard line come on D save us one more time

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 08:12 PM
Alright fellas...enough is enough...
These dudes actually think they can beat us.

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:13 PM
TD Dragons!!!

The Pack better come and play man this is getting scarry

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 08:14 PM
For the first time since 1992 ...Nacogdoches is in the ball game...
Radio said it...not me...
Good Lord...that's back in my day.

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:16 PM
They were in it two years ago for the first half. Coach Outlaw put a boot you know where and Lufkin came out and played the 2nd half.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:19 PM
refs are definatley from Nac

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:20 PM
Man the O better get it together!

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:21 PM
our O is playing bad that TD was not the D fault . the O has to play better.

halftime the lufkin coaches are going to be upset.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:23 PM
Looks like the defense may have to win this game

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:23 PM
I thought I would never say this during a game with Nacogdoches, but it is gut check time for the Pack!!

This isn't funny anymore!!!

Lufkin_Class_Of_08
09-16-2005, 08:26 PM
ive gone to lufkin every year except for half of 5th grade when my dad got promoted from 1 church to being in charge of 70 so we were in nacogdoches for half of my 5th grade year and mcannich was a horrible thrower...my what a difference 5 years makes...moved back to lufkin at christmas...my bro stayed at lhs and i wanted to go back to lufkin by xmas...luckily a year later we got the district to move so it went from the nac dist to the lufkin district

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:26 PM
was that a panther ejected?

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:26 PM
i would agree this i gut check time for the panthers and we just got someone kicked out the game.

COME ON PANTHERS.

Lufkin_Class_Of_08
09-16-2005, 08:28 PM
outlaw is gonna be TICKED off at teh half...id hate to be in the lp locker room at the half

wide's BETTER half
09-16-2005, 08:31 PM
Who got ejected and why?

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:31 PM
question, is anyone elses radio online cutting out alot all the sudden? or is it my computer

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:34 PM
i am having radio issues to. hope they get it fixed NAC just punted the ball so come on O lets score would be nice to go to halftime 21-7 or 14-7.

LETS GO PACK GOT TO KNUCKLE UP AND GET YOUR BUTT IN GEAR

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:36 PM
This is unbelievable!!!

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:37 PM
I am only hearing about 3 seconds before it rebuffs, this sucks!!!!! Along with the offense so far

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 08:37 PM
Mine is cutting out too...
Damndest thing...the La Unica commercials are always crystal clear...?????
Lufkin needs to quit BSing...

sweetpea
09-16-2005, 08:37 PM
i guess they got an overload on the server. it's slow loading up

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 08:38 PM
What's the ejection count up to?
pre-game included...

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:38 PM
I am shocked that nac is playing this good. But this a good test for the pack this is how you find out what your team is made of.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:41 PM
does nac have a radio station to listen to this game on?

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:44 PM
hey pack98 are you listening to this online? And are you having any trouble hearing the game? I am having no luck, not even with commercials

pack98
09-16-2005, 08:48 PM
it is cutting in and out it is bad

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 08:49 PM
Same as last week fellas...
It's cutting out bad...
But the Ike game was clear all the way through..huh?
Maybe they can fix it at halftime..
I don't even know the dang score.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 08:50 PM
I heard coach outlaw say about 2 words and that was it,,,,,I think it is 7-7 at halftime

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:51 PM
It's half time. Tied 7-7. Coach Outlaw had some interesting comments. Said QB is just not playing well. Said they've got to get him calmed down, but the game ain't over yet!

myround0
09-16-2005, 08:54 PM
Maybe it is not Clayborn as much as it is the Dragons defense...they have played well to this point winning a few games after scoring 49 points...Hope you panthers get it together...

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 08:56 PM
When the Coach says the QB is having trouble. I tend to believe him. He has made some bad decisions on the ground and in the air.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 09:03 PM
its working better now at halftime, well maybe I spoke to soon

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:10 PM
The pack has to come out and stop them and go and score and break the dragons hope of wining this game. cant keep them in this game in the 3rd qrt.

I have faith the score will be atleast 21-7 going to the 4th. just a feeling the panther coachers will have this team ready to play.

the dragons are playing well and i cant say anything bad about them they are going to be a good team this season.

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:27 PM
good start d lets go O GOT TO PLAY

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 09:28 PM
Can 'yall hear the game fellas?
I'm crystal clear here in Waco...knock on wood..
Stopped 'em on the first drive...
Punt
Lp ball

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 09:29 PM
yea, its working good right now!!! Hope it stays like this

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 09:31 PM
Don't you hate it when they call Nacogdoches...'Doches?
It's Nac.....not 'Doches...

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:32 PM
Man what is up with the O. got to punt again lets go D. got to make some plays.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 09:32 PM
this looks like the offense that was at the scrimmage games, not the first two games. Also, not sure why they keep passing when we can,t stop the run

poppy
09-16-2005, 09:36 PM
wait till the pack plays klien forrest they will get there butts kicked
naca who.....7-7 are you people kidding me...
the pack is back...
right where they started be :p fore reggie

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 09:38 PM
Did 'yall hear them talking about Diboll's QB tranferring to Lufkin?

That's my nephew Jeremy Tamez...he transferred this week..hahaha
That is cool

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 09:39 PM
The D has got to be running out of gas here soon.

myround0
09-16-2005, 09:40 PM
Lufkin bashed Longview for beating Highly ranked Marshall a 4A team is what they called Marshall...Nac'doches is a 4A team and I don't think they are higly ranked...you all best concentrate...I think I can, I think I can

Texasfrog
09-16-2005, 09:41 PM
Did 'yall hear them talking about Diboll's QB tranferring to Lufkin?

That's my nephew Jeremy Tamez...he transferred this week..hahaha
That is cool


Wide... whats the score ??

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:42 PM
Td Panthers 98 Yard Td Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dez Bryant 98 Yards That Kid Is A Beast.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 09:42 PM
claybon to Dez Bryant 98 yard td!!! But freakin game messing up again!!!

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:43 PM
Lufkin 14- Nac 7

time to PUT THEM AWAY BABY

3 min left in the 3rd qrt.

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 09:43 PM
Man. That's what I'm talking about. A Claybon to Bryant special!

14-7!!!!!

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 09:46 PM
This are looking up...
Pack scores...
and Jeff freakin' Bagwell comes off the bench
to hit a pinch hit single to win the game...
Welcome back Baggy...

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 09:51 PM
Man!! it was working so good for awhile, but now the radio is sucking again big time!!!!

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:52 PM
man the radio is killing me. come on fix the radio man.

LETS GO PACK TIME TO STEP UP ON D BABY LETS GO

pack98
09-16-2005, 09:56 PM
4th Qtr. This Is Were Champions Are Made The Pack Has To Stop Them And Get A Score Right Here Set The Tone For The Rest Of The Game.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:02 PM
Hewitt interception!!!

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:03 PM
INT L. Hewitt on a blocked punt then the holder threw it and got the INT.

lets go O.

Lufkin ball on the Nac 8 yard line early in the 4th

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 10:06 PM
As a Lufkin graduate...even after Lp wins this game...they should
fall out of the top 10....just to prove a point...this is unacceptable...
Not Nacogdoches...you're a powerhouse....act like it.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:08 PM
If I'm not mistaking, some other top ranked teams have not played good as well, like SLC to some unranked teams, should they move down as well?

LPanther
09-16-2005, 10:08 PM
As a Lufkin graduate...even after Lp wins this game...they should
fall out of the top 10....just to prove a point...this is unacceptable...
Not Nacogdoches...you're a powerhouse....act like it.
J. Lane is obviously missed.......but LP will be OK...this is not the same Nac. team of recent years.

myround0
09-16-2005, 10:12 PM
If I'm not mistaking, some other top ranked teams have not played good as well, like SLC to some unranked teams, should they move down as well?


SLC had a bye this week

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 10:14 PM
If I'm not mistaking, some other top ranked teams have not played good as well, like SLC to some unranked teams, should they move down as well?


Maybe it's the fact that I expect more from our school...
Sorry...I just hate Nac...and this pisses me off.

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:15 PM
cant say anything bad the dragons came to play and played well.

this is a rivalry game and anything can happend when you have emotion and everything and playing at home things can happen.

but great game to the Dragons they got them a new coach and a winner and he has set the example for the dragon program in the future and they will do good this season.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:16 PM
me too. I just think it is hard for these guys to get pumped up for a team that they have lost interest in the last 10 years or so. I think they need to put a team on the schedule that can at least sit all teams fans in the stands. They even had to put there band and drill team on the opponents side

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:16 PM
i dislike NAV but I hate TYLER LEE!!

GO PANTHERS

sweetpea
09-16-2005, 10:17 PM
you know that Lp plays to teams at times. you got to realize that this team is more pass than run. The Qb is going to be the tell-tell of the games this year. If the Qb have a bad game, then you can look for some tight games.

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:17 PM
Td E.j. Shankle

Panthers 21- Nac 7

Go Pack

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 10:19 PM
Polls, Schmolls!

They mean nothing anyway!

Drop em' out of the Top 20 for all I care. Better yet, leave Lufkin unranked.

This team will be fine. The offense is young. Law has been telling us that since day 1. Give it time.

Nac is a lot better than previous years. Bill Harper is no slouch as coaches go. I hope to have an even closer game next year! Good to see some improvement from our neighbors on the wet side of the river.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:27 PM
looks good now!!! Panthers just running the clock out sounds like

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:31 PM
now the internet messing up, should've known.

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 10:31 PM
I didn't mean it that way 'yall.
I'm just saying...we shouldn't struggle
like this against Nac....

sweetpea
09-16-2005, 10:32 PM
27-7 under 2:00 in the 4 qter.

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:32 PM
TD pack

27-7

great game the dragons just got tired in the end and after that 98 yard td pass i think that is what broke there backs.

GREAT GAME. Nac played well

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:33 PM
27-7, not bad if you ask me, defense has looked good as usual,,,,,offense really came around in the end

pack98
09-16-2005, 10:33 PM
see yall next week for the game time to go. have duty in the morning on the ship.

GO PANTHERS

NOW the real season starts District.

PantherStang84
09-16-2005, 10:34 PM
Yep, this one is done!

Say Good Night Gracie.

rich_pack
09-16-2005, 10:34 PM
see ya!!!

Lufkin_Class_Of_08
09-16-2005, 10:46 PM
27-14...klein forest next week...see yall then at ole abe at 730

c-lisle
09-16-2005, 10:58 PM
sounds like it was closer than what most expected...

Red Raiders
09-16-2005, 11:34 PM
i dislike NAV but I hate TYLER LEE!!

GO PANTHERS

How come you hate us? too many arrogrants and alot of money at our school is what you think? I like Lufkin but Lufkin Fans are very disrespectful in the game, seriously they are. I am not trying to make anybody mad but its true. They actually spit on away players at their home game. I have said this before but yall are like no we aren't, well... come on! I know it.

EasTex9
09-16-2005, 11:34 PM
Not really. Nac sustained most drives on LP penalties and never really threatened but once and resulted ina blocked FG. Did have a few good drives, but scored as a result of a gift (fumble on the 10yd line). I was there and LP never really seemed to get in sync until late in the 3Q. In the first half Claybon had a hard time hitting his targets, but seemed to settle down in the 2nd half. Once the LP offense found itself (lol), Nac simply could not hang

Nac has improved, but we had too many penalties, turnovers and some mental lapses. Nac will be very competitive in their district.

All in all LP did not look like they were up for the game and slept through 3Q's. :cool:

They'll be ready for the district opener where things really count! ;)

Red Raiders
09-16-2005, 11:37 PM
I think Lufkin wasn't playing very good because they should able to beat Nac pretty bad, my predictions was 42-7.

VB Pack Fan
09-16-2005, 11:49 PM
I said this game was going to be close, because Nac is vastly improved.Our offense has got to get it together or we are going to go down when a good team comes along. This offense should be better next year , but this year "I ,M NOT SO SURE "defense got us through again.Hey guys I,M just keeping it real.

wide-e-wide
09-16-2005, 11:53 PM
I said this game was going to be close, because Nac is vastly improved.Our offense has got to get it together or we are going to go down when a good team comes along. This offense should be better next year , but this year "I ,M NOT SO SURE "defense got us through again.Hey guys I,M just keeping it real.


Where?...Where did you say this game would be close?...where...
Liar....
you are just as shocked as we are...
don't act like you know something we didn't know...
show me a link where you said that....c'mon....
or shut up.

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 12:08 AM
Where?...Where did you say this game would be close?...where...
Liar....
you are just as shocked as we are...
don't act like you know something we didn't know...
show me a link where you said that....c'mon....
or shut up.


I know Nac will be up for this game this year and playing at home will fire the up even more and two weeks of putting up 49 points, huh think this game may be closer than some think.The pack had better not take these Dragons to lightly. They need to go out and put the points on them early, that will take the wind out of their sails.


This was on the first page of the Lufkin-Nacogdoches thread below

http://www.5atexasfootball.com/forum/vB/showthread.php?t=1550&page=1

I don't think he is a liar afterall. Maybe you need to calm your attitude before you get banned again.

RR

pack0808
09-17-2005, 12:28 AM
Look, i was in shock!! This is the first time in many many years that this game was not over by mid way through the third and usually by half. Lufkin usually wins by 35-40 points when they play Nac but am telling you this team has improved. They are well coached now and i was impressed. Never thought i would say that about a Nac team. They can make some serious noise in 174a i kid you not. Yes Lufkin played very sloppy with many turnovers yes Lufkin doubled their total yards about 434 to 220 and about 75 yards of the Nac's offense came on a play with 1 minute left on the 2nd string defense to make it 27-14. 2nd string or not that is still not an excuse to not be off your man and giving some cushion when you are up by 20 with 1 minute left and they have the ball at their own 28 or so. Lufkin's defense looked great but the offense was very inconsistent tonight. Either way hat off to the dragons i never in my wildest dreams thought this game would have been close going in the 4th quarter. :eek Harper has something there i believe?? we will see??


The Lufkin defense is easily one of the best if not the best in the state but you never know with this offense. Klein Forest has a good ball club but i think Lufkin wins big at home. They are almost unbeatable at abe.

pack0808
09-17-2005, 12:29 AM
This was on the first page of the Lufkin-Nacogdoches thread below

http://www.5atexasfootball.com/forum/vB/showthread.php?t=1550&page=1

I don't think he is a liar afterall. Maybe you need to calm your attitude before you get banned again.

RR


Banned again for questioning if he was telling the truth. Lord?? :rolleyes: Anal is an understatement.

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 12:34 AM
Banned again for questioning if he was telling the truth. Lord?? :rolleyes: Anal is an understatement.

Nah, thats only the BEGINNING of his attitude (telling people to shut up & calling them a Liar when he is the one that was wrong).....next thing you know he is cussing people out....and getting banned AGAIN. There is a difference between questioning someone in a CIVIL manner instead of calling them a LIAR and telling them to SHUT UP.

I am far from anal. I never cause drama on this site. I'm just calling it like I see it. I don't think it'll be long before he is cussing someone out again and getting banned again.

RR

pack0808
09-17-2005, 12:44 AM
Well i disagree and considering i have known him since we were little kids i think i have a little better idea about him then you do. He will be fine!!

wide-e-wide
09-17-2005, 12:52 AM
(whistle)....hmmm....hmmm ...hmmmm
so somebody predicted that Lufkin would struggle with Nac...?
RR...don't hate the player...hate the game...
Why are you tryin' to get me banned?....
for what?...speakin' the truth baby?
prove me wrong...or shut up....
Nobody ....I REPEAT....nobody....predicted that Lufkin would
struggle with Nac...

PM me patna....maybe we should talk 'bout it.

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:01 AM
The game was sloppy and dirty...I wasn't very impressed at all

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:03 AM
(whistle)....hmmm....hmmm ...hmmmm
so somebody predicted that Lufkin would struggle with Nac...?
RR...don't hate the player...hate the game...
Why are you tryin' to get me banned?....
for what?...speakin' the truth baby?
prove me wrong...or shut up....
Nobody ....I REPEAT....nobody....predicted that Lufkin would
struggle with Nac...

PM me patna....maybe we should talk 'bout it.

I am not trying to get you banned. You do a pretty good job of that yourself.

Oh, and I'm not your baby! LOL


RR

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 01:08 AM
I am not trying to get you banned. You do a pretty good job of that yourself.

Oh, and I'm not your baby! LOL


RR

No, I am!

Good Lord, so he was wrong and hadn't seen the guys earlier post. So he over reacted maybe...we're working on that but guys like you aren't helping! Wide, do you see now where the earlier post was made. Now boys, can't we all just play nice!!! Give me a break.

wide-e-wide
09-17-2005, 01:09 AM
Listen dawg...VB did predict it..after further review...he said the game would be close...I called him out...and I am man enough to say I was wrong...
Sorry VB...I was just a little emotional about the game...I truly aplogize for calling you a liar...


But as for you ...sideline....cheerleader....

Don't worry about what ol' wide-e-wide does...okay...mind your business.
and if I wanted you to be my baby....I could make that happen too ...punk

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:10 AM
No, I am!

Good Lord, so he was wrong and hadn't seen the guys earlier post. So he over reacted maybe...we're working on that but guys like you aren't helping! Wide, do you see now where the earlier post was made. Now boys, can't we all just play nice!!! Give me a break.

Well, I am glad you are working on his temper, Wide's BETTER half (love the name btw). Good Luck with the temper. It sounds like you have your hands full. :p :D

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:11 AM
Listen dawg...VB did predict it..after further review...he said the game would be close...I called him out...and I am man enough to say I was wrong...
Sorry VB...I was just a little emotional about the game...I truly aplogize for calling you a liar...


But as for you ...sideline....cheerleader....

Don't worry about what ol' wide-e-wide does...okay...mind your business.
and if I wanted you to be my baby....I could make that happen too ...punk

Side line cheerleader? LOL

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 01:12 AM
Well, I am glad you are working on his temper, Wide's BETTER half (love the name btw). Good Luck with the temper. It sounds like you have your hands full. :p :D


You're probably right there. But pushing buttons doesn't make it any easier.


Thank you honey, I mean Wide (you coulda left the last part out). :D

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:16 AM
Don't worry about what ol' wide-e-wide does...okay...mind your business.
and if I wanted you to be my baby....I could make that happen too ...punk

You better watch your baby daddy(LOL) Wide's BETTER half...sounds like he may be a little curious to switching teams LOL.....And I'm not talking about going from a Lufkin fan to Longview either hahahaha

RR

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 01:18 AM
First of all, he's not my baby daddy! (well he is but he's not) Those words aren't in my vocabulary. Second of all, do you not know when to stop? Come on man...leave well enough alone.

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:19 AM
Ok this is suppose to be about LUFKIN and nac......not yalls little argument....use the private messages for that please...not tryin to be rude but dang....

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 01:22 AM
You're right but when someone calls another out publicly then I belive there must be somewhat of a public resolution. Agree?

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:22 AM
First of all, he's not my baby daddy! (well he is but he's not) Those words aren't in my vocabulary. Second of all, do you not know when to stop? Come on man...leave well enough alone.

Alright, I'll leave you alone since you're a lady :)

I only used "baby daddy" because I thought he would understand it since he calls me "Dawg." ect. But I don't use those words daily either.

*raises peace flag*

RR

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 01:24 AM
:D

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:25 AM
i guess so...but I'm just tryin to read about the game...but hey if you all feel like yall need to solve this openly then so be it...it has nothin to do with me...i would just rather read about the game instead stuff that really isnt my business :o

RedRage00
09-17-2005, 01:28 AM
i guess so...but I'm just tryin to read about the game...but hey if you all feel like yall need to solve this openly then so be it...it has nothin to do with me...i would just rather read about the game instead stuff that really isnt my business :o

Simma down ladypack simma down!

So why did you think the game was UGLY?

RR

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:31 AM
Naw I'm good..I was just sayin

The game was ugly because...I mean basically on every punt return Nac gained like 15-20 yards...the O Line didn't give Jeremy (Claybon) much time to really do anything...and Nac played harder than Lufkin...and really dirty...nuthin was really goin for Lufkin on either side of the ball

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:32 AM
It was ugly to pack fans because Lufkin usually beats Nac 57-3. They have not beat Lufkin since 92 and have lost 19 of 20 to the pack. Hey, this team is much much better though i am not going to lie. Lufkin dominated the stats but committed too many turnovers to blow them out. Sometimes you have to win ugly on the road.

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:36 AM
Naw I'm good..I was just sayin

The game was ugly because...I mean basically on every punt return Nac gained like 15-20 yards...the O Line didn't give Jeremy (Claybon) much time to really do anything...and Nac played harder than Lufkin...and really dirty...nuthin was really goin for Lufkin on either side of the ball


I do not remember any punt return for Nac going 20 yards?? Usually it bounced and Lufkin downed it?? The offense is what was ugly tonight. Yes they had well over 400 yards of offense but they just did not look right. Too many 3 and outs and too many turnovers. J Turner and Shankle need to run the ball more and i hope coach outlaw realizes this. Kibble is a hard runner and a good kid and he has a very hard worker and outlaw is rewarding him but i think Turner and Shankle are 3 times the backs then he is. Not knocking Kibble because he is not a bad runner but that is just a fact. I am not saying do not give Kibble the ball at all i am just saying give the ball to J Turner and Shankle more. I know shankle is a wr but they still have running plays for him while at wr by using options and reverses.

wide-e-wide
09-17-2005, 01:37 AM
You left out the part where....you sound like aggy...
stop making excuses...they won...leave it at that...
You know I love you bro...but don't do that...
you sound like aggy....

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:39 AM
Kibble isn't bad though...he can play

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:40 AM
They won dude come on!! It only sounds like aggy as you call it if you lose?? I was just stating the obvious and the facts. If they lost to Nac you would have never heard me making sorry *** excuses i promise. I would simply say we absolutely suck this year. LOL

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:42 AM
Kibble isn't bad though...he can play


No he is not bad at all. He is a solid runner!! The o-line was not getting a great push up front when rushing so it was not entirely his fault tonight. He did his best!! Turner and Shankle looked great when they had a few chances to run the ball. Shankle now has 2 carries for 60 yards and 2 td's for the season.

wide-e-wide
09-17-2005, 01:44 AM
But when you say...on the road....and not prepared....and unexpected.....you sound like aggy....stop that!!! You're a Hawkeye fan for God's sake...act like it...stop making excuses...our alma mater...grabbed their ankles against Nacogdoches tonight...show me a little hatred...show me some heart...this was supposed to be a blow-out...

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:45 AM
yeah....the line WILL be ready here VERY soon....

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:49 AM
But when you say...on the road....and not prepared....and unexpected.....you sound like aggy....stop that!!! You're a Hawkeye fan for God's sake...act like it...stop making excuses...our alma mater...grabbed their ankles against Nacogdoches tonight...show me a little hatred...show me some heart...this was supposed to be a blow-out...


LOL ok we stunk it up for on offense for 3 quarters. LOL I am sorry but the defense looked great i cannot say anything bad about them. It is only excuses if you lose the last time i checked. ;) I was embarrassed and nauseated for 3 quarters and there is no excuse for that no doubt. I was thinking this is Nac man what the hell??

pack0808
09-17-2005, 01:50 AM
I have to go to bed yall be good!! :cool:

Ladypack34
09-17-2005, 01:54 AM
Yeah I'm out too...i have open gym in the morning..man 9 sounds so early!

wide-e-wide
09-17-2005, 01:56 AM
See you menana...mi amigo..

VB Pack Fan
09-17-2005, 07:57 AM
Well I guess everyone got Wide to look back at what I said. Don,t worry wide I been called worse names than that :D .I,ve read lots of you comments, and I don,t know you peronally, but I got you figured out dude.I laugh at lot of your statements. It,s a good idea to think before you speak :eek: .I have been to all the games and LP will stuggle if we don,t get that offense in gear soon.The D can,t keep us in really tough games week in and week out.Man we got to put some points on those teams or all the talk about seeing SLC again won,t happen.................GO PACK

Favpack
09-17-2005, 09:07 AM
Well, once again - I'm up and my fellow Packsters are probably still snoozing - here's my previous post/prediction on the score-
_________________
But, I don't think the game is that close. I'd take Lufkin about 38-17 or so. I honestly hope for a good game. If LP goes up there with a lousy attitude as they have been known to do in years past - it will be an ugly game. _________________________

I think that score was probably one of few that weren't 55-3. This was clearly more a game of Nac. making a 180 degree turnaround as a program than Lufkin playing poorly. Nac. could very well be in the playoff hunt if they stay healthy. They won't beat Kilgore, but they could sneak in. Coach Harper has done what he was hired to do - find the talent, and coach them. Follow the wins trail - he did it at Marshall and he will do it at Nac.

Great second half excitement - horrendous officiating - the Nac. announcer and scoreboard dude make you want to get a gun, but a fun game nonetheless.

Lufkin has got some work to do to be ready for district. The O-line had their worst outing, but give Nac. credit. Coach Green is going to have to realize that 15 dive plays a game won't cut it without the big man at rb anymore.

Take away the blocked punt and LP's fumble on it's on 10 and I think LP would have won more like 35-7. BUT - this team cannot just show up - and everybody knows it.

Hat's off to Nac. - they have this program finally moving forward. Lufkin showed grit on a tough, humid night -and came home with a win, ugly, but win nonetheless.

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 09:51 AM
But didn't I hear that 3 of Lufkin's starters weren't allowed to play (by the coach) due to some trouble a few days before the game? And wasn't there at least another one (starter? not sure) that was ejected? Not sure...heard it from Wide and don't know if his sourse was reliable either...he's asleep, I can say that now. So do you guys think that made a difference in how they played? That if they had had their full team that it would have been different? Just wondering.

Favpack
09-17-2005, 10:11 AM
If Lufkin had 3 starters not playing - I didn't see it - certainly no high profile players. Yep - Lufkin had another player ejected - I think it was a second team db - but I honestly never saw it - nothing overtly flagrant at all.

These issues had no bearing on the game at all - nice to meet Mrs. Wide.

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 10:16 AM
If Lufkin had 3 starters not playing - I didn't see it - certainly no high profile players. Yep - Lufkin had another player ejected - I think it was a second team db - but I honestly never saw it - nothing overtly flagrant at all.

These issues had no bearing on the game at all - nice to meet Mrs. Wide.

:) Thank You! and thanks for the info. Hmmm...I'll have to get more info. I believe Wide heard that on the radio last night but it could have been here.??? And I could have completely misunderstood, too. I'll have to ask him when he gets up. I was kinda wondering since no one brought it up. In a way, maybe wishful thinking on my part to help explain some of the struggles. Thanks Again!

Favpack
09-17-2005, 10:21 AM
Leave it to the crack Lufkin radio crew to not mention a peep about two starters missing last week's game including Leonard Hewitt - and then talk about 3 starters missing this game when either a) they were wrong or b) the starters were offensive lineman who inter-change regularly anyway.

I will say, however, if that was the case on the O-line - it might have had a bearing -they did look pretty poor for much of the game. No line push and limited protection for Jeremy in the first half.

The player ejected was something ticky-tack - nobody saw anything on my side. I think it was a second team cornerback - but just not sure.

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 10:31 AM
OK Well, like I said I'll ask Wide later.

You guys know more about it than I do but maybe this shook 'em up a little and they'll be back to what they should be next week, esp being a home game. Maybe they were a little too relaxed playing Nac and thought they had it won before they got there. ??? Who would have expected Nac to put up such a fight and actually give Lufkin a run for their money at any point in the game. I know what everybody's saying about KF in the other thread but I don't see Lufkin losing (or even coming too close to losing) at home.

rich_pack
09-17-2005, 11:56 AM
I thought the radio said it was Nac's main runningback and a couple of their players that got in trouble at a party and could not play, and not Lufkin

wide's BETTER half
09-17-2005, 05:14 PM
Very well could have been. Wide said he heard it second hand so that could easily be the case.

pack0808
09-17-2005, 09:38 PM
A few starters were injured but most teams have those by now. R Murphy on dl and M Raines could not play at wr. He really is not a starter anyways because the LP wr core goes 5 deep. Lufkin had no excuses with personell last night that is for sure. Nac came to play!!

pack68
09-17-2005, 10:06 PM
Read in Nacogdoches Sports Section that the starting quarterback did not play due to off field problems. Starting running back hurt his ankle in practice during the week and couldn't play. Said both replacements were sophomores. looks like they have a goodd future.

pack0808
09-17-2005, 10:10 PM
The starting rb story is true but not the starting qb. Both qb's have split it up and both were just as successful for Nac in their first 2 games. They have been using a 2 qb system. I hear both are very equal.