PDA

View Full Version : 40 Yard Dash Times Exposed (Article link)


ktchamp97
04-22-2005, 11:08 AM
We've talked, before, about how we have to take 40 times with a grain of salt. We often hear of high schoolers running in the high 4.2's or low 4.3's etc. It's not just high school though; you hear the same stuff about college players too.

I've always maintained that you could never take 40 times at face value, because the times will be different for every different person taking the time and for every time that person times another 40. There's just way too much uncertainty in the measurements to derive any conclusions from the times themselves. The only time you really know if one dude is faster than another is if he outruns him on the field. We all get caught up in stuff like, "Well, he only runs a 4.53, but this guy, he runs a 4.44." Grab a stopwatch and try to stop it before it hits 0.09, seriously. I think we all put too much emphasis on the 40...it's certainly no way to differentiate between really good players.

This article really puts it all in perspective...it's a must read:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050418/news_1s18forty.html


San Diego Union-Tribune
By Mark Zeigler
STAFF WRITER

There is no official world record for 40 yards.
The shortest distance that the IAAF, track and field's international governing body, recognizes for world-record purposes is an indoor 50 meters, or about 54 yards. It is 5.56 seconds and it was set by Canadian sprinter Donovan Bailey in 1996. There is also a world record for 60 meters – 6.39 seconds by American Maurice Greene in 1998.

But it is another Canadian, Ben Johnson, who is believed to have run 40 yards faster than any human in history. Johnson is best known for injecting copious amounts of steroids and winning the 100 meters at the 1988 Olympics in Seoul in 9.79 seconds, only to have his gold medal and world record stripped after failing a post-race drug test.


Timing officials have since broken down that famed race into 10-meter increments, and Johnson was so preposterously fast that he went through 50 meters in 5.52 seconds and 60 meters in 6.37 – both under the current world records at those distances. He went through 40 yards that day in 4.38 seconds.

He was running in spikes . . . on a warm afternoon perfectly suited for sprinting . . . with a slight tailwind . . . with years of training from arguably track's top coach, Charlie Francis . . . with Carl Lewis and six others of the fastest men on the planet chasing him . . . with 69,000 people roaring at Seoul's Olympic Stadium . . . with hundreds of millions of people watching on TV . . . with the ultimate prize in sports, an Olympic gold medal, at stake.

And, as we learned later, with muscles built with the assistance of the anabolic steroid stanazolol.

Four-point-three-eight seconds.

Then again, maybe Ben Johnson isn't the fastest 40-yard man in the world.

Maybe half the NFL is faster.



It can be the most important few hours of a football player's career. It is the day NFL scouts come to campus to determine whether prospects have what it takes to play at the next level.

Players are measured to the quarter-inch. They're weighed to the half-pound. They do a vertical jump and a standing broad jump. They see how many times they can bench-press 225 pounds. They do a 20-yard shuttle drill and something called a three-cone drill. They are put through a short workout specific to their position.

But it is something else that commands everyone's attention, something else that interrupts the businesslike atmosphere of players shuffling from one station to the next. Something else that causes scouts and spectators to snap to attention.

The 40-yard dash.

It is the day's shortest event, and the most critical. No other statistic carries more influence for an NFL prospect, no single number has more impact on his draft fortunes. It's not called Pro Scouting Day or Pro Prospect Day or Pro Workout Day. The sign taped to the weight-room door at San Diego State on March 19 says: "Pro Timing Day."

Or as local football agent David Caravantes puts it: "There's football speed and there's 40 speed, and the scouts will all tell you they understand that and game film is the most important thing. But how many defensive backs who ran a 4.6 are left on the draft board ahead of guys who ran 4.3?

"I'll give you another example. There's this DB who was originally projected as a first-rounder. But he didn't run the 40 that fast – something like 4.6 instead of in the 4.4s – and now they're talking about him slipping to the second round. Well, he's looking at a minimum $4 million signing bonus if he goes in the first round and only about $1.6 million if he goes in the middle of the second round.

"You do the math."

The players are inside the SDSU weight room being measured and weighed. In the hallway outside are their agents, pacing. Nervously. Occasionally they'll walk outside, look up at the sky and stick out an upturned hand to feel the raindrops.

This is not good. The plan, according to the schedule on the weight-room door, has the players lifting and jumping inside and running the 40 outside on SDSU's synthetic-turf practice field. The course marked with cones has them running on a spongy, soggy, uneven turf into a chilly wind with a dark sky spitting rain.

That's not good for 40 times, and that's not good for business.

The players leave the weight room and begin to warm up in the wind and rain. The agents squirm even more. They huddle with players, and soon the players are marching back into the weight room, demanding that they run inside on a strip of rubberized track laid between the various lifting machines.

The fastest of the players at SDSU's Pro Timing Day, which also includes a half-dozen prospects from small West Coast schools, is Aztecs safety Marviel Underwood. Players each run the 40 twice, and Underwood is clocked in a hand-timed 4.38 both times.

Other prospects run their 40s at the annual NFL Scouting Combine in February inside Indianapolis' RCA Dome, where this year Arkansas quarterback Matt Jones went 4.37. Jones is 6 feet 6, 242 pounds.

It's also where Jerome Mathis, a wide receiver from tiny Hampton College in Virginia, sent his stock soaring with a reported 4.32. Some scouts apparently caught him sub-4.30. Dallas Cowboys coach Bill Parcels told people his stopwatch showed 4.25.

Never mind that Mathis was running on the RCA Dome's notoriously slow artificial turf, or that he was running alone without the aid of fellow competitors pushing him. Or that his left hamstring was wrapped because of a slight muscle strain.

Ben who?


There are the legends about the 4.17 Deion Sanders ran in high tops when he was at Florida State, or the 4.15 by a cornerback from West Virginia, or the 4.0-something a high school kid ran down in Texas.

Hogwash, all of it.

Track coaches go to Pro Timing Days, and they see scouts starting their stopwatches with their thumb, which has a slower reaction time than the index finger. They see them crowding the finish line and anticipating – guessing, basically – when someone will cross it. They see running surfaces that weren't professionally measured or leveled. They see no starter's gun, no automatic timing device, no wind gauge.

Grizzled track coaches love to say that the "clock doesn't lie." Well, it does in football.

Say someone clocks a hand-timed 4.35 in an NFL workout.

The accepted standard to convert a hand-timed event to its automatically timed equivalent is to round up to the nearest tenth of a second – in this case 4.4 – and add .24 seconds. Now you're at 4.64.

Most football 40s don't go on a starter's pistol but on an athlete's motion.The average reaction time among elite sprinters (from the gun to the moment they exert pressure on the starting block's electronic pads) is about .15 seconds; for a football player with little track experience it probably would be closer to .2. Add that in, and you have 4.84.

Now say it's a breezy day and you're running with a tailwind. Say it's 10 mph. Accepted track tables say that would provide a .07-second advantage over 40 yards. Add it in, and your 4.35 is suddenly a 4.91.

There's no shame in running a 4.9-second 40, of course. World-class sprinters get a bad start or get a cold day, and they go through 40 yards in the high 4s, too.

But NFL scouts aren't comparing their times to Ben Johnson in Seoul in 1988. They're comparing them to other players at a particular position, and that might be an even more dubious endeavor.

The hope was that the top 300 or so prospects invited to the NFL Combine in Indianapolis would all run indoors under the same conditions with an automatic timing device. A great idea, in theory. But players are controlled by their agents, and why run on a slow surface with automatic timing in Indy six weeks after the college bowl season when you can run at your home campus on a lightning-fast track with the leniency of the stopwatch while having another month to train under an expert sprint coach?

Two years ago, 32 running backs were invited to Indianapolis. Thirteen ran the 40 there.

Enter the Pro Timing Day. There were more than 150 this year, most jammed into a three-week period in March, most held in a dizzying blend of conditions and surfaces.

Take March 23, when there were pro days at 11 campuses. North Carolina State ran its 40s indoors in the weight room on a rubber floor. USC ran outdoors on a state-of-the-art track with a crosswind. Southern Illinois ran outdoors on FieldTurf in breezy, 42-degree weather. Southern Mississippi ran outdoors on FieldTurf but in still, 65-degree conditions.

Virginia ran outdoors on a Tartan track, Northern Colorado outdoors on artificial turf, Northern Iowa in a dome, Georgia Southern and Bowling Green outdoors on grass, Boston College indoors on rubber. Lambuth, an NAIA school in Jackson, Miss., had its offensive line prospect run on a cracked tennis court.

A couple weeks earlier, Louisiana-Monroe held pro day in a basketball gym.

NFL teams have their own formulas for adjusting times based on the conditions, subtracting a tenth here, adding .12 there. But really, how exact a science can it be?

"Nowadays, perception is reality," says Paul Turner, a University City High alum who played a season at receiver for the Buffalo Bills and trains college players for their pro days. "If they say it's a 4.29 and they have it written down, well, it must be a 4.29."


Pro Football Weekly's 2005 Draft Preview is a 200-page analysis of the top prospects in painstaking detail. Below each player's name and position are three numbers: his height, weight and 40-yard dash time.

Why 40 yards? Why not 20? Why not 60?

The short answer is, no one knows. Draft historians will tell you the NFL stole the idea from colleges and that it came from an era when races were run in yards and not meters. The reasons the NFL went from 50 yards, its former measuring stick of speed, to 40 yards are more ambiguous.

Some say 40 yards represents the distance between where players are aligned – from the running back to the free safety. Some say it is the longest distance a receiver can realistically cover before the quarterback is sacked. Some say it's the point when most people begin losing their form and slowing down, making it a better judge of a person's raw speed.

The counter argument, of course, is that players rarely run 40 yards in an unimpeded straight line during a game. That there is a difference between pure speed and playing speed. That about three inches separate a player who runs 4.49 and a 4.50.

That Blair Thomas ran a 4.4 and the New York Jets took him with the second pick in 1990, and Emmitt Smith ran a 4.7 and slipped to 17th.

All of which is true.

Veteran La Jolla-based agent Jack Bechta says Ron Wolf, the former general manager for the Green Bay Packers, explained it best to him once.

"He told me that there are guys who are fast but play slow, and that there are guys who are slow but play fast," Bechta says. "He told me that, sure, there are exceptions, but you can't have a team full of exceptions. Their thinking is, you can't take a good football player and make him fast, but you can take a great athlete and make him a good football player.

"You need a baseline, a common denominator, and that's what 40 times are. They are like minimum qualifying standards."

So college players finish their senior seasons and have their agent hire a speed coach like Turner, or enroll them in one of several speed schools (at upward of $10,000) for the sole purpose of lowering their 40 time by two-tenths of a second. They learn how to start. They learn how to run with their feet higher off the ground, which goes against accepted football practice of low, quick feet necessary for rapid changes of direction.

Some, no doubt, succumb to the temptation of anabolic steroids considering they are no longer under the auspices of the NCAA's testing program and don't yet quality for the NFL's.

Even then, experts say, there is little you can do to make you appreciably faster. The major component in speed is the ratio of fast-twitch to slow-twitch muscles a person is born with. Rahn Sheffield, SDSU's longtime track coach, acknowledges that "only 17 to 19 percent" of speed can be developed.

"Every coach and athlete is fascinated with one thing, and that's raw speed," says Sheffield, who trains about a dozen pro prospects for their 40s each year. "That's the one thing that every athlete doesn't have, the one thing that's unattainable for some people. Speed is the one thing they can't coach. "They talk about genetics and genetic codes. Well, this is their way of gauging that."

wide-e-wide
04-22-2005, 11:14 AM
I agree. It is the stat that immediately follows height/weight
which by the way are always exaggerated as well. We put waaaaay
too much stock into 40 times. It's to the point where, when I see them
they mean nothing.

pack0808
04-22-2005, 11:24 AM
i agree they are over used but it is a way to keep up with who is the fastest but you are right that is not a clear way to tell. some run 100's faster then 40's and some are quicker on the field. i know 40 times are exaggerated a lot! lufkin has one of the fastest teams in the state and i believe the only one that been officially clocked under a 4.4 has been ej shankle. so i really laugh when some post in here how they have 4 or 5 guys running 40's at 4.2 and 4.1 on their hs team. that is just not realistic!! nfl teams do not have that. i think the last football player i heard that was really clocked at 4.1 was rocket when he played at nd.

wide-e-wide
04-22-2005, 11:35 AM
"PrimeTime" ran an un-official 4.1 at FSU.
These people are freaks though...If a coach
has 4-5 guys doing that...he needs to play the
lotto because he's got incredible luck.

Kind of related---The Astros Willy Taveras ran from the
batter's box to third base in 9.38 a few nights ago...that
is pretty dang quick. But he doesn't block and his hands are
suspect...hahaha

ktchamp97
04-22-2005, 11:49 AM
"PrimeTime" ran an un-official 4.1 at FSU.
These people are freaks though...If a coach
has 4-5 guys doing that...he needs to play the
lotto because he's got incredible luck.

Kind of related---The Astros Willy Taveras ran from the
batter's box to third base in 9.38 a few nights ago...that
is pretty dang quick. But he doesn't block and his hands are
suspect...hahaha

If a coach had 4-5 guys doing that, they wouldn't be humans...

You guys really should read the article. I've pasted it above for y'all...

RGVBadBoy
04-22-2005, 01:53 PM
i dont agree with some of the times posted, especially for HS kids, when i was in HS, i timed a 4.54 in the 40 and i wasnt the fastest guy on my team, i was 3rd, i later timed 4.47 at college tryouts and again i was not even near the top, i think Howard Jackson RB Utep ran 4.28 right next to me, i have seen guys supposedly run 4.3s, YEAH RIGHT!!!! if BenJohnson couldnt do it, and he was the most powerful sprinter i have ever seen out of the blocks, then i really doubt any HS or college kid could, i have read alot about the SLC Dragons and their talented WRs, i read that McKay Jacobson ran a 4.4 yet he only runs low 11s in the 100m, i also know that a RB down here in the RGV from LaJoya runs a supposed 4.6 yet he ran the 100m in 10.6 sec....is there somthing wrong here or are the SLC WRs times inflated??? this is not a knock against anyone, just a question as to the inflation of numbers....

Big Daddy Cool
04-22-2005, 02:14 PM
One thing you have to take into consideration when dealing with times like this is there is track speed and then there is football speed. Take a guy like Carl Lewis. He was one of the fastest men to ever step on the track. Though when he tried to play football he found it wasn't enough just to be fast. And as was said most all stats be it 40 times or a players height and weight are almost always exaggerated n matter what level your talking.

dragonsdaddy
04-22-2005, 02:55 PM
mckay's pr is 10.7 which he ran last year as a soph. his speed though improving is still a step away from where it was before his injury.

Favpack
04-22-2005, 02:59 PM
Let's all remember KT's posted article next fall when people start popping off about 40 times.

pack0808
04-22-2005, 05:05 PM
just because somebody wrote an article on something does not make it concrete. this goes with anything. i have heard all of these theories and everybody has a different take on it so i do not know what to believe?? i will still list 40's so people will know who is faster then who. i understand they might not be 100 percent scientific but my god what is?? if some kid is clocked at a 4.3 by his coach using a time clock and the others are 4.6 you will still know that the 1 kid is 3 tenths of a second faster then the others. that is the point!! i realize that 40's are not completely accurate but how on earth are we supposed to monitor that??

KT2000
04-22-2005, 06:12 PM
Very well written and presented article.

With all of the 40s we put on this site for the Super List and things like that...I usually take them with a grain of salt, and I measure speed in a game situation.

Hardly anyone runs 40 yards unimpeded in football as the guy pointed out. A fast 40 time doesn't guarantee you anything in football except for the ability to pull away from a few people if you should be lucky enough to get into the open field.

Obviously, there is so much more that goes into being a good football player than how fast he can cover 40 yards so it always makes me scratch my head when an NFL prospect's stock can drop a round or two just because of a poor timing.

Michael Clayton (6'4 197), former LSU receiver, was a perfect example of that last year. He was touted as a sure-fire top 10 pick after the Tigers won the National Championship. Clayton was a two way star at WR and DB on occassion. Clayton timed a 4.65 or 4.7 on Pro Day and dropped to the Buccaneers at 15. Many of the experts considered that a gamble despite his pre-combine hype all because of the 40 he ran. Clayton ended up catching 80 passes as a rookie, and was arguably the best offensive rookie in the league.

The best example of football speed I've ever seen is former Waco and University of Texas star Derrick Johnson.

wide-e-wide
04-22-2005, 06:13 PM
The easiest way is...hand him a football...tell him to run...if nobody catches him
then he is the fastest guy. Not very scientific...but very easy to
determine who is the fastest.

drgnbkr
04-22-2005, 09:04 PM
Very well written and presented article.



The best example of football speed I've ever seen is former Waco and University of Texas star Derrick Johnson.

Yeah, Lufkin always has a bunch of guys with "football speed".... ;) or maybe it's just flat out speed...

KT2000
04-22-2005, 09:40 PM
By football speed... I'm talking about these factors combined...start/stop ability, change of direction, explosion (impact/non-impact), instincts..etc.

drgnbkr
04-22-2005, 10:23 PM
I know..I was just praising the athletes that are Lufkin....they are by far, consistently the most athletic bunch the Dragons have faced...IMO. I would say they offer a variety of speed types, football, pure, track, closing...well, you know what I mean...

JC73
04-22-2005, 10:49 PM
I think football quikness is the key, not forty times. Just ask teams like Smithson Valley and Southlake Carroll. How many of their players are sub 4.6?

LarryFine
04-23-2005, 08:42 AM
Bogus article. You can't say someone ran this in the 100M so it is impossible to run this 40 yards. It is impossible to do because there are a lot more to it than just that. You can't do it w/ the 50M, 55M, or 60M either.

I used to run distance for fun a lot and ran a few marathons. I used to stop my stop watch on my track work better than the suggestion frequently. Then how do you explain the electronic timing?

Then you just factor in the relative nature of it. If all 40 times are somehow "faster", then it still shows who is faster than who.

Of course I take 40 times w/ a grain of salt and it is just a relative tool, but it is effective. There is a reason Tom Landry started using it and there is a reason people still live and die with it.

The issue is 40 times are taken in shorts in a workout rather than pads in game situations. Wes Welker was always slow in timed 40, but he is tough to catch when he breaks in the open, in the NFL as well as NCAA. Some guys are able to keep their speed in full pads, while others can't.

The 40 yards dash is a tool to measure players. It isn't the only tool or a perfect tool, but it is a useful tool. If it wasn't, it would have been dropped years ago. Like it or not, the 40 yard dash is an effective tool.

ktchamp97
04-23-2005, 12:45 PM
That's just it though LarryFine, you can't take hand-timed 40's and say this guy is faster than that guy solely based on the time. There's too much uncertainty in a hand-timed 40 to use that as a true representation of speed. If you believe they are, you're basically saying that whoever is working the stopwatch starts the clock at the exact same instant each guy starts off the line and he stops the watch at the exact same instant each guy crosses the finish line. When you're trying to differentiate between guys with comparable speed, the uncertainty in the measurements is certainly greater than the difference in speed between the athletes.

Now, if you use electronic timing, as the Nike combines are going to this year, you get much more consistency in the measurements because the system uses lasers fixed at the starting and finish lines to stop the clock in the same spot for each and every guy who runs. Now you have a more reliable basis for comparison. I've read where these laser-timed 40's add close to .2 seconds to a hand timed 40 and, because of the measurement techniques, they're a more accurate representation...and they support some of what was written in the article above.

Here's yet another article about the issue. It involves the electronic timing being used at the Nike camps: http://rivals100.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=406231

wide-e-wide
04-23-2005, 02:15 PM
The laser times are the accurate times... and all of these
magical 4.1 and 4.2 mysteriously disappear...funny how that
happens.

MojoRaiderPower
04-23-2005, 03:01 PM
Who cares about 40 times being a tad off, the point of them is to measure speed, and it doesn’t need to be an exact time!!! This guy doesn’t have anything to do other than this with his job? Dude write about something that people actually care about!!! :confused:

NewSherriffInTown
04-24-2005, 11:32 AM
I can't wait until people get these 40 times through their head.


Nobody runs 4.1s and 4.2s. It just doesn't happen. Nobody in HS is running less than a high 4.3 and you can count those guys on your fingers.

Maurice Clarett ran a 4.8!! So you are telling me that there are 100s of football players in high school who are FOUR tenths faster than him. Heck no. I've only seen 3 players run lower than a 4.50 in NY. NY may stink for football, but speed is speed. The fastest player in the country last year was Mike Ray Garvin from Don Bosco in NJ. He ran a 4.37.

wide-e-wide
04-24-2005, 12:24 PM
A lot of fans just have it etched in their skulls and
can't get rid of it. The people who come on the site and
rattle off 3-4 guys on a team with 4.2 speed are full of it.
It just doesn't happen. Fabian and PacMan were the fastest
guys picked in the NFL draft yesterday...They both ran high 4.2's
and you want me to believe there is a high school anywhere that
has 3 or 4 guys like that? You just make yourself look stupid.

pack0808
04-25-2005, 09:12 AM
maybe he should change his name to packman considering he has all that speed. lol

PackAttack2005
04-25-2005, 09:34 AM
They reported on the local sports news where Reggie McNeal ran had 4.26 and a 4.28 40 times at a NFL scouting evaluation held last week.

Favpack
04-25-2005, 09:48 AM
I saw that as well PA - certainly eye-popping numbers. Well, I've been one to take the 40 times with a grain of salt - but honestly, Reggie has ALWAYS been the guy I've compared other HS athletes to - and probably will be the same for the next 20 years. Reggie was simply the fastest HS football player I ever saw - period. Reggie was so fast he made fast D's like John Tyler look silly.

Classic case in points on 40 times. We heard all week long just how lightning fast the Pflugerville backs were - 4.2 and change 40's etc. etc. In our playoff game with them - both the qb and tb were caught from behind by two different db's of Lufkin's - with bad angles. No way those guys were that fast. Don't get me wrong - they were excellent rb's - just not in the same league as Reggie in terms of sick fast.

Another point - nobody here ever mentioned Vondrell McGee's 40 time. But in LP's playoff game - he was PULLING AWAY from our same db's on his 55 yard TD run. He is scary fast.

pack0808
04-25-2005, 09:52 AM
hewitt was not playing in that game though. ;)

Mr. Buddy Garrity
04-25-2005, 10:23 AM
They reported on the local sports news where Reggie McNeal ran had 4.26 and a 4.28 40 times at a NFL scouting evaluation held last week.
That might be accurate. I said before on the last board I went to their practice before they played Longview and he ran below a 4.3. Reggie is right up there with Jamaal Charles and Quentin Holman as for fastest players i've ever seen play.

wide-e-wide
04-25-2005, 11:30 AM
They reported on the local sports news where Reggie McNeal ran had 4.26 and a 4.28 40 times at a NFL scouting evaluation held last week.


Now, if he could only out-run that pesky Longhorn defense.
Sorry Reggie, your from my hometown, but your stiill aggy...

Xfballphenome05
04-25-2005, 08:15 PM
wow...that is extremly fast..i herd that deagelo hall (corner for atlanta falcons) runs a 4.21.these guys r so fast its unbelievable..no one is faster than those 2 guys in football..and nobody runs a 4.1.unless they get a headstart.