Wasn't it 63-13?

[Slim-Rob]

I think that everyone is putting the Judson vs Nixon score wrong. Didn't Nixon go for two and miss? Thats what the coaches and players said, and thats what the scoreboard said. I was busy helping coach check an ankle, so I didn't see it, but the scoreboard did say 13. I don't know, and I don't know how big of a deal it is, but the score should be correct shouldn't it?

Please don't attack me, just tell me what you know. Thanks

[Reaganrattler07]

I think that everyone is putting the Judson vs Nixon score wrong. Didn't Nixon go for two and miss? Thats what the coaches and players said, and thats what the scoreboard said. I was busy helping coach check an ankle, so I didn't see it, but the scoreboard did say 13. I don't know, and I don't know how big of a deal it is, but the score should be correct shouldn't it?

Please don't attack me, just tell me what you know. Thanks

Yeah, it should be correct no matter what....and this sort of thing happens a lot but mostly it's only a point or so off.

[Slim-Rob]

Thanks for not attacking me. I'm not trying to brag or anything, I just don't remember now. I know the scoreboard said 63-13, but then again it also said we were in the 9 quarter while we were in the first so I don't know.

[Reaganrattler07]

Not a problem....I get attacked enough on the board :p

But yeah, I heard the scoreboard was acting all funny.....they should get a new one...and new sound system...

[DiamondJ2]

scoreboard is fine, but sound system needs some work, but they (maintanence) worked on it Friday morning. Maybe they fine tuned it too much. Bleachers need some work. Need dressing rooms at the stadium, too. But that is not in the budget.

BTW, official enrollment at Judson for this year is between 3100-3200.

[Reaganrattler07]

Oh ok....first time i was there was last year for one of the playoff games and I kinda remember the bleachers weren't the best but not the worst I had seen (that would be SV's...no offense guys).

The reason why I brought up the scoreboard was I heard some different sources saying that it was weird or something....but when I was there it was fine.

[Jrock]

Will that make Reagan the largest school in the district? I believe they were pushing 3,000 last year.

[gldneagles]

just from what i have seen posted by loonie23, i do not care for judson. and then i see a score of 63-13!!! does judson have no respect for the game? that is shameful. westfield completely dismantled judson last year when loonie23 says that was the best judson team he had seen in several years. if that was the best...judson has a long ways to go. and the score of last weeks game shows that they have a long ways to go to be a ligetimate program. when you get up on a weaker opponent, back off. but iguess judson has some kind of complex where they have to drill it in, huh?

[Reaganrattler07]

Will that make Reagan the largest school in the district? I believe they were pushing 3,000 last year.

Probably....we're pushing about 3300....roughly i believe...when I see the exact number, I'll be sure to fill ya in.

[dwistheman]

just from what i have seen posted by loonie23, i do not care for judson. and then i see a score of 63-13!!! does judson have no respect for the game? that is shameful. westfield completely dismantled judson last year when loonie23 says that was the best judson team he had seen in several years. if that was the best...judson has a long ways to go. and the score of last weeks game shows that they have a long ways to go to be a ligetimate program. when you get up on a weaker opponent, back off. but iguess judson has some kind of complex where they have to drill it in, huh?

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Someone else flame this rookie.

[Reaganrattler07]

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Someone else flame this rookie.

Nah, you take him. I'm kinda sleepy....

[gldneagles]

bring it on. no denying last year's game. westfield completely dominated. and that is with your feeder schools running your scheme.

[Reaganrattler07]

and that is with your feeder schools running your scheme.

What're you talking about?!

And I was neither at the game or know what happened so I'm not even gonna bother commentating on it.

[gldneagles]

What're you talking about?!

And I was neither at the game or know what happened so I'm not even gonna bother commentating on it.
fine. i was there. my point is 63-13. any team that does that to another is a piece of cr*p. either you need to set your expectations higher with your non-district games or you need to get a life. sad, very sad for judson. :mad:

[dwistheman]

gldeagles

Did you even see the game. There was less than 50 yds difference in total offense and Judson committed more turnovers. Westfield was a good team. But they played the game of there life and Judson effort was on of thier poorest of the season.

I guess you need more than 27 straight winning seasons, 9 title game appearances and 6 state titles to be a legitimate program.

What school do you represent. I am sure they are more storied than Judson the way you are running smack.

NEXT!

[Reaganrattler07]

Ok, you like completely changed topics of what you were talking about....from last year's game to a game played last week. The only debate was on whether the scoreboard was right or not, not if the win was justified or not. I'm sure your really complaining when your team shuts out another....

[Mad Hatter]

fine. i was there. my point is 63-13. any team that does that to another is a piece of cr*p. either you need to set your expectations higher with your non-district games or you need to get a life. sad, very sad for judson. :mad:

lol please keep talking your probably the funniest person on the board.

[Reaganrattler07]

gldeagles

Did you even see the game. There was less than 50 yds difference in total offense and Judson committed more turnovers. Westfield was a good team. But they played the game of there life and Judson effort was on of thier poorest of the season.

I guess you need more than 27 straight winning seasons, 9 title game appearances and 6 state titles to be a legitimate program.

What school do you represent. I am sure they are more storied than Judson the way you are running smack.

NEXT!

Looks like we both got him, haha

[gldneagles]

gldeagles

Did you even see the game. There was less than 50 yds difference in total offense and Judson committed more turnovers. Westfield was a good team. But they played the game of there life and Judson effort was on of thier poorest of the season.

I guess you need more than 27 straight winning seasons, 9 title game appearances and 6 state titles to be a legitimate program.

What school do you represent. I am sure they are more storied than Judson the way you are running smack.

NEXT!
no smack. i expect more from a storied program like judson. 63-13, that is sad. does judson hve no respect for the game? justify that. please.

[Reaganrattler07]

no smack. i expect more from a storied program like judson. 63-13, that is sad. does judson hve no respect for the game? justify that. please.

If they didnt have respect for a game, then why do you think they play it with such tenacity and tradition?

And I'm afraid to say, that is smack. And besides, everyone enjoys a good blowout every now and then.

[Mad Hatter]

Judson was runnign th ball to try and run out the clock....but when nixon cannot tackle and mcdaniels gets loose do u not expect him to run for a touchdown ?

[Reaganrattler07]

Judson was runnign th ball to try and run out the clock....but when nixon cannot tackle and mcdaniels gets loose do u not expect him to run for a touchdown ?

That happened to us on Saturday....we got two touchdowns by just trying to run for a first down so we could run out the clock.

[gldneagles]

gldeagles

Did you even see the game. There was less than 50 yds difference in total offense and Judson committed more turnovers. Westfield was a good team. But they played the game of there life and Judson effort was on of thier poorest of the season.

I guess you need more than 27 straight winning seasons, 9 title game appearances and 6 state titles to be a legitimate program.

What school do you represent. I am sure they are more storied than Judson the way you are running smack.

NEXT!
sorry, another idea. your past sucess justifies running a score up to 63-13?

[DiamondJ2]

I doubt if he will say what team he cheers for. Of course, he was at the Judson game last week, because he knows all about the 2 interceptions run back for TD's, the 2 long TD runs by McDaniels, the stats, and how much of the game was played by 2nd & 3rd teamers. He has all of the facts, & yet he won't declare his team. So who is it big fella!!

[dwistheman]

sorry, another idea. your past sucess justifies running a score up to 63-13?

I brought up the past success because you questioned the legitimacy of Judson's program, but dont let the facts get in the way of a good argument.

Third string players played the second half and Judson only scored 2 tds after halftime. What are they supposed to do? Just punt on first down? Take a shot at someone who deserves to be a target. Judson's program has always been a class act.

[DiamondJ2]

Now, tell me gldeagle,your school, Midland Lee NEVER beat sombody that bad in their storied football career? Or are you still upset about 1983?

[gldneagles]

If they didnt have respect for a game, then why do you think they play it with such tenacity and tradition?

And I'm afraid to say, that is smack. And besides, everyone enjoys a good blowout every now and then.
sorry. i have a problem with 63-13. that's all.

[DiamondJ2]

So I guess 57-3, 56-0, 59-6 are okay scores? Because those are scores from the districts of schools that cy fair has competed in over the last 8 years. Shame on The Woodland, Spring, etc for doing that.

[dwistheman]

gldneagles

You back peddle faster than Deion Sanders. :cool:

[gldneagles]

gldneagles

You back peddle faster than Deion Sanders. :cool:
no back peddling from me. i am one way all the time. my team is cyfalls. not a dynasty....YET. i personnaly have a problem with 63-13 and braging about it.

[DiamondJ2]

where on this thread was anybody bragging about the score?

[gldneagles]

where on this thread was anybody bragging about the score?
the entire thread.

[bullrock]

Tssk, Tssk, another wannabe who's tired of being on the wrong end of those kind of scores. Don't give up eagle. Someday your ship will come in.

[gibberish]

I wasn’t at Judson’s game (watching Clemens) but on the radio they said the Judson coaches were going to ask the Laredo coaches, if they wanted to run the clock non stop in the second half. So they could finish it in less than 25 minutes. :eek: Maybe someone at the game can confirm if they did that. I turned the radio off after halftime. Which that doesn't sound like a team trying to run the score up to me.

[dragonsdaddy]

there was a question earlier about who would be the largest school in the district. that question was settled in october of 03 when they took the official census counts at every school in the state. nothing that occurs, student population -wise matters, until this oct when the next round of counts for the 06 and 07 seasons is done. the d-1 rep is determined based on the official count almost 2 years ago.

[DiamondJ2]

well stated bullrock.

[Reaganrattler07]

the entire thread.

How is it bragging? They wanna get a score right, that's not bragging. That's getting historical facts right.

And lets put you in a scenario, your running the ball to run out the clock, you find an open route, you take, it turns out its so open, you run for a touchdown. Or another one, you intercept the ball, and a clear route to the endzone, do you take it or ruin what could be your one touchdown of the season and take a knee? They were playing a game - a game that involves scoring more points than the other, and doing whatever way possible to do it.

[Reaganrattler07]

Tssk, Tssk, another wannabe who's tired of being on the wrong end of those kind of scores. Don't give up eagle. Someday your ship will come in.

Hahahaha, that is very well stated....

[lonny23]

I was the first person to ask why we gave up 13. Last year, they took Kyle Fox out after 1 quarter. Judson runs a plain offense when the game is in hand. They don't run it up and put backups in.

As far as Westfield goes, they played a great game and beat Judson. Since Judson is the best 5A team ever, they don't really have to hope to improve a lot. They just need to maintain their level since 1982.

[DiamondJ2]

dd, I know that the enrollment is locked in stone for this season. Just letting people know what the current enrollment of Judson is this school year.

[Slim-Rob]

just from what i have seen posted by loonie23, i do not care for judson. and then i see a score of 63-13!!! does judson have no respect for the game? that is shameful. westfield completely dismantled judson last year when loonie23 says that was the best judson team he had seen in several years. if that was the best...judson has a long ways to go. and the score of last weeks game shows that they have a long ways to go to be a ligetimate program. when you get up on a weaker opponent, back off. but iguess judson has some kind of complex where they have to drill it in, huh?

To start off, lets explain the score of 63-13. 14 points were defensive points, Alfred McDaniels had 3 td's on 7 carries for 190 something yards. Thers 35 points accounted for. I think Kevin Taylor had a touchdown or 2, and there were a couple of passes for touchdowns.

YOU ARE AN IDIOT
Westfield didn't Dismantle Judson last year. You are a complete idiot if you think 14-28 is dismantled. You say Judson has a long ways to go and that we are not a legitimate team. Well, I don't think you know what your talking about, because had we not backed off, the score would have been much higher. If we had not backed off, you could be looking at 100-0 right now. The score 63-0 and then they scored 13. I am not sure, but I think the score was around 49-0 at halftime. Last season, Kyle Fox had 3 or 4 touchdowns in the first quarter, and they took him out. Judson is one of the best programs in the state when your talking about sportsmanship, and we don't just beat people bad for fun. We wouldn't be playing Laredo Nixon if we hadn't needed a 10th game last year.

Before you post something this ignorant again, do some research.

[Reaganrattler07]

I think Rackley is a very classy coach....after the Judson SV game when they were interviewing him, he could do nothing but praise the SV team.

I think it was 42 at the half? Cause it was 21-21-21-0....but some of the scores were just because the player had found open routes....

[Slim-Rob]

no back peddling from me. i am one way all the time. my team is cyfalls. not a dynasty....YET. i personnaly have a problem with 63-13 and braging about it.

I guess you can't read good because if you read the first post, I was asking if the score was 63-13 or 63-14. I was busy helping somebody, so I missed what happend after Nixon scored the 2nd TD. The score board said 63-13, all the coaches were telling me 63-13, the players were saying 63-13 because Nixon went for 2 and didn't get it. HOW IS THAT BRAGGING? I was confused because I thought 63-13 and it said 63-14 on this site.


Thanks for not attacking me.I'm not trying to brag or anything , I just don't remember now. I know the scoreboard said 63-13, but then again it also said we were in the 9 quarter while we were in the first so I don't know.

My second post on this topic^^^

[Reaganrattler07]

I love facts....

[SmilinTiger]

I think that everyone is putting the Judson vs Nixon score wrong. Didn't Nixon go for two and miss? Thats what the coaches and players said, and thats what the scoreboard said. I was busy helping coach check an ankle, so I didn't see it, but the scoreboard did say 13. I don't know, and I don't know how big of a deal it is, but the score should be correct shouldn't it?

Please don't attack me, just tell me what you know. Thanks


'88??????????? Needs an asterisk*

Know it wasn't Judson's fault. But a loss is a loss.

[Reaganrattler07]

'88??????????? Needs an asterisk*

??????????? :confused:

[DiamondJ2]

Judst Katy did a few years back, huh, smilintiger.

[Slim-Rob]

i believe he is referring to my signature. If this is the case, '88 doesn't need an asterick. My signature is showing what years Judson holds a State Title, not WHAT YEARS THEY WON.

[DragonFan]

Sometimes scores just get out of hand. When one team is executing well and the other team is having problems then the score gets lopsided. I do not think any coach would willfully run up a score to embarish another school. On any given year a great team could become a bad team depending on the circumstances of coaching, and graduation. The only thing that can be said was on that night one team was better than the other!

I live in Southlake and I have seen the Dragons put up tons of points. They have routinely beat teams by 30 or more points. It is not a matter of trying to humiliate an opponent it is just the style of offense or inablitily of the other team of stopping the winning teams scheme. Last year SLC beat Coppell by a huge margin and it was only becase the Dragons scored on 11 of 12 drives they had in the game and the last drive was stopped because time ran out. The starters were not in after the 2nd quarter it was just that coppell did not have an answer to what SLC was doing. All of the 2nd and 3rd stringers wanted to do well when they got a chance to play. You cannot ask a kid who does not get to play much to slow down or dog it when they do have a chance to play.

Judson has been a very good team for a long time and sometimes scores just happen.

Good luck to all who play the game!