my top 10 in sa after week 0

[COOTABANG]

1. judson
2. smithson valley
3. oconnor
4. marshall
5. san marcos
6. churchill
7. roosevelt
8. warren
9. reagan
10. seguin

[Reaganrattler07]

1. judson
2. smithson valley
3. oconnor
4. marshall
5. san marcos
6. churchill
7. roosevelt
8. warren
9. reagan
10. seguin

Cootabang *tear*....your my new best friend, your like the only person outside of Reagan that actually supports us, my hat is off to you. And I'm glad you didn't list Madison up there....

[COOTABANG]

hold on im an idiot
i forgot clemens they gotta be in there in the top 3 so i guess just squeeze seguin off my first post

[Reaganrattler07]

hold on im an idiot
i forgot clemens they gotta be in there in the top 3 so i guess just squeeze seguin off my first post

Phew *wipes sweat off forehead*....You didn't bump us off....

[gibberish]

Looks good other then you forgot Clemens. They deserve at least a number three spot. I missed judson's first game to check them out, and if they get the offense rolling watch out. They are for real.

[Reaganrattler07]

He added Clemens in the TOp 3....and bumped Seguin off.

[Mad Hatter]

yea...i was like wheres clemens the buffs fans are gonna hurt you.

[RoughRiderDrummer]

I think that is a good SA top 10 list. Im not a big fan of Reagan (no offense) and I doubted them before they played, but they proved to me that they are no push-over this year. Also its nice to see alil love to TR.

[zippy]

Reagan is suppose to be a good team this year, like them or not, but I am having my doubts about Churchill. They were suppose to be behind Judson and SV, but I dont know after watching the film from last week. I dont know much about O connor. How have they done up to this point?


I think that is a good SA top 10 list. Im not a big fan of Reagan (no offense) and I doubted them before they played, but they proved to me that they are no push-over this year. Also its nice to see alil love to TR.

[Reaganrattler07]

I think that is a good SA top 10 list. Im not a big fan of Reagan (no offense) and I doubted them before they played, but they proved to me that they are no push-over this year. Also its nice to see alil love to TR.

Don't worry, a lot of people doubt us, and I can't blame them. But my hat is off to you for your comming out and praising our team - thank you. I heard the Rough Rider's are gonna have a good squad this year.

O'Connor looked pretty good, but that can be due to the team they played - I dunno. But Churchill is riding a lot of it's hopes on Churchill, and you can't blame them, kid's fast and a smart player....gets it after his ol'man i'm guessing.

[Gridiron Gopher]

1. Judson
2. SV
3. O'Conner
4. Clemens
5. Warren
6. Marshall
7. Churchill
8. San Marco
9. Seguin
10. Roosevelt

Judson's #1 until they lose. SV will get their test this week to see if they are the real deal. O'Conner looks like they've reloaded and are ready to go. Clemens up with the Churchill lose and Marshall's lose of TE Johnny Moore. They won't be able to replace him and that will hurt them offensively. Churchill IMO is better then Marshall but they will have to prove it now due to the lose. Finuzzi is the real deal and he can beat teams by himself. They won't play that bad again this year. SM moves up with the win against Madison but I'm not convinced that win is that big. Madison is on the down side and will struggle to finish .500 for the year. It's amazing what a blowout does for your rankings. Seguin and Roosevelt benefit from it and jump into the top 10.

[Reaganrattler07]

1. Judson
2. SV
3. O'Conner
4. Clemens
5. Warren
6. Marshall
7. Churchill
8. San Marco
9. Seguin
10. Roosevelt

Judson's #1 until they lose. SV will get their test this week to see if they are the real deal. O'Conner looks like they've reloaded and are ready to go. Clemens up with the Churchill lose and Marshall's lose of TE Johnny Moore. They won't be able to replace him and that will hurt them offensively. Churchill IMO is better then Marshall but they will have to prove it now due to the lose. Finuzzi is the real deal and he can beat teams by himself. They won't play that bad again this year. SM moves up with the win against Madison but I'm not convinced that win is that big. Madison is on the down side and will struggle to finish .500 for the year. It's amazing what a blowout does for your rankings. Seguin and Roosevelt benefit from it and jump into the top 10.

A part of me almost expected to see Mac up there.....

[Hdshrinker]

Ive said it b4 and I'll say it agin...Warren has no offense and is over rated....

Marshall has a QB and has lost their D1 Tight end Johnny Moore for the year......

Good luck on those top ten

[Reaganrattler07]

Ive said it b4 and I'll say it agin...Warren has no offense and is over rated....

Marshall has a QB and has lost their D1 Tight end Johnny Moore for the year......

Good luck on those top ten

So who's your prediction with the Reagan-Warren game?

[sendero]

Other than SV test there will be several good tests this week:

Clemens vs. Roosevelt
Judson vs. Copperas Cove
Reagan vs. Warren?
Macarthur vs. Taft

[Gridiron Gopher]

Mac still has to prove they belong. A win against Taft will back up the win against Clark. Warren and Reagan should be a good game.

[Reaganrattler07]

Other than SV test there will be several good tests this week:

Clemens vs. Roosevelt
Judson vs. Copperas Cove
Reagan vs. Warren?
Macarthur vs. Taft

The way Reagan played on Saturday, they MAY challenge Warren...so it may turn out to be a good game. Mac might've had it easy with Clark as they couldn't hold on to the ball very well but Taft will be a different story. Only advantage Mac may have is it's Taft's first game....course it can be a disadvantage as well because first games are normally played very well.

[Reaganrattler07]

Mac still has to prove they belong. A win against Taft will back up the win against Clark. Warren and Reagan should be a good game.

I agree with that. Clark might've been a fluke with all the turnovers, Taft should be a good test. Just like Warren will be a good test for Reagan.

[raidercheerdad]

How many of these teams will be alive after week 11?

[RoughRiderDrummer]

Well this week will be proving grounds for several teams to see if a win this last week was a fluke or if they are the real deal.

[Reaganrattler07]

How many of these teams will be alive after week 11?

Good question - that's what we're trying to figure out :D

At least one of those teams missed the playoffs by 1 game.

[Reaganrattler07]

Well this week will be proving grounds for several teams to see if a win this last week was a fluke or if they are the real deal.

Yeah, we'll see who's for real or not. Should be a good week of football.

[RoughRiderDrummer]

How many of these teams will be alive after week 11?

Right now that is something nobody knows and really shouldn't be thinking about with only week 0 just behind us. Teams will have injuries, possible staff changes, and also will have lots of room for improvement over the next several weeks.

[sendero]

My guess would be 4 left after week 11 at this point but a lot of football to play between now and then to see if they even make it to week 11 :)

[Gridiron Gopher]

I actually like Mac's chances against Taft. Taft lost a good core of the offensive power. Those players were replaced with JV and any Freshman that were worthy of moving up. Mac's JV and Freshman teams destroyed Taft last year. Those same players with the Seniors from both teams will now go at it. Should be another good game.

[Reaganrattler07]

If Taft returns a sizeable portion, the same sizable portion that beat them like 40-20 (correct me if i'm wrong there) then Taft should win. But I don't think we should count them out just like that however.

[Gridiron Gopher]

I could be wrong, but they lost their QB, half their O-line and their #1 WR. That's a big hit. Mac has improved at O-line and RB. The D is much better then last years team.
Heck who knows what is going to happen, but we get them on our field and IMO Mac as more talent this year.

[Reaganrattler07]

I could be wrong, but they lost their QB, half their O-line and their #1 WR. That's a big hit. Mac has improved at O-line and RB. The D is much better then last years team.
Heck who knows what is going to happen, but we get them on our field and IMO Mac as more talent this year.

That may be pushing it a bit saying they have more talent BUT there a new teams getting new QB's that are turnign out to be even better.....Reagan's QB is far better than either one we had last year.

[lonny23]

1. judson
2. smithson valley
3. oconnor
4. marshall
5. san marcos
6. churchill
7. roosevelt
8. warren
9. reagan
10. seguin
I'll save my answers for one post. At least one of these teams misses the playoffs and because of the districts, 6 of them will probably play in Week 12.

Judson should be #1 until they lose to a SA team, not just lose a game.

[mad_fan]

Oh, week ZERO down and the season is over. Will Madison be ranked somewhere around 240 in the state by the end of the season?

[Reaganrattler07]

I'll save my answers for one post. At least one of these teams misses the playoffs and because of the districts, 6 of them will probably play in Week 12.

Judson should be #1 until they lose to a SA team, not just lose a game.

No SA team beat them last year so they're #1 in SA until they are beaten. Other teams are lower until they beat them. Other than that, there's some good teams on that list.

[mad_fan]

hold on im an idiot
i forgot clemens they gotta be in there in the top 3 so i guess just squeeze seguin off my first post


I don't know you, but I doubt you are an idiot. PS You forgot Madison.

Predictions:
Mad over Taft
Mad over O
Mad over Roo
Mad over Ray(gun)
Mad over Chuch
Mad over Lee
Mad over CJ
Mad over SV
Mac over Mad

Lastly, San Marcos sweeps the 255.

[Reaganrattler07]

I don't know you, but I doubt you are an idiot. PS You forgot Madison.

Predictions:
Mad over Taft
Mad over O
Mad over Roo
Mad over Ray(gun)
Mad over Chuch
Mad over Lee
Mad over CJ
Mad over SV
Mac over Mad

Lastly, San Marcos sweeps the 255.

.....man, what're you drinkin'?!

[mad_fan]

.....man, what're you drinkin'?!

that new bud select! keep an open mind and try something different.

judson=rome
sv=a flash in the pan

[Reaganrattler07]

that new bud select! keep an open mind and try something different.

judson=rome
sv=a flash in the pan

Haha, word of advice - don't be so denouncing about SV....haha, they like to be top ranked.

Madison proved at the end of last year and the beginning of this year that they may not be as good as people think they are. And Green and Caflisch are not that good without Mr. Amadeous (spelling) Waters....

[mad_fan]

[QUOTE=Redskins88]Haha, word of advice - don't be so denouncing about SV....haha, they like to be top ranked.

like dallas people! right?

[Reaganrattler07]

[QUOTE=Redskins88]Haha, word of advice - don't be so denouncing about SV....haha, they like to be top ranked.

like dallas people! right?

haha, sort of....yeah, I guess SV and Dallas people are about the same :p

Now don't burn me too bad, people! :D

[mad_fan]

Haha, word of advice - don't be so denouncing about SV....haha, they like to be top ranked.

Madison proved at the end of last year and the beginning of this year that they may not be as good as people think they are. And Green and Caflisch are not that good without Mr. Amadeous (spelling) Waters....


Hey Skins, just don't want this thread to disappear before the end of week one. :rolleyes: Im all alone on my bandwagon.

[clemensbuff]

I don't know you, but I doubt you are an idiot. PS You forgot Madison.

Predictions:
Mad over Taft
Mad over O
Mad over Roo
Mad over Ray(gun)
Mad over Chuch
Mad over Lee
Mad over CJ
Mad over SV
Mac over Mad

Lastly, San Marcos sweeps the 255.

What are you smoking? You really think that the Mavs are going to sweep the rest of the way and SM is going to sweep 25-5a?

[clemensbuff]

1. Judson
2. SV
3. O'Conner
4. Clemens
5. Warren
6. Marshall
7. Churchill
8. San Marco
9. Seguin
10. Roosevelt

Judson's #1 until they lose. SV will get their test this week to see if they are the real deal. O'Conner looks like they've reloaded and are ready to go. Clemens up with the Churchill lose and Marshall's lose of TE Johnny Moore. They won't be able to replace him and that will hurt them offensively. Churchill IMO is better then Marshall but they will have to prove it now due to the lose. Finuzzi is the real deal and he can beat teams by himself. They won't play that bad again this year. SM moves up with the win against Madison but I'm not convinced that win is that big. Madison is on the down side and will struggle to finish .500 for the year. It's amazing what a blowout does for your rankings. Seguin and Roosevelt benefit from it and jump into the top 10.

O'Conner ranked above Clemens? Don't they actually need to win one game against Judson, SV, or Clemens before they deserve that much praise? I am not knocking them one bit because they are one heck of a team for as young of a school that they are. But, come on, they need to earn top 3 respect on the field. One last thing, I guess after last night you can drop the Chargers down a little more, huh?

[rattlerbacker]

How does the list look today? 4 out of the 10 lost last night.

[mad_fan]

... One last thing, I guess after last night you can drop the Chargers down a little more, huh?

ya, somewhere between madison and lee... :rolleyes:

[mad_fan]

How does the list look today? 4 out of the 10 lost last night.

i just noticed that too. and the of the express-news san antonio top 10 five LOST...judson,warren,seguin,roos,and taft...and one has a bye (o'conner).

[Reaganrattler07]

Hehe, Warren lost :D

My throat still hurts...

[mad_fan]

Hehe, Warren lost :D

My throat still hurts...


congrats to reagan

[Reaganrattler07]

congrats to reagan

Thanks...I just remembered in the Regional Finals in basketball Warren missed a three pointer that would've tied it...kinda odd, isn't it?

[Reaganrattler07]

Hey, who do you all think should be in the Top 10 after Week 1?

[mad_fan]

Hey, who do you all think should be in the Top 10 after Week 1?


depends....how did lee do saturday? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[Reaganrattler07]

Haha, 31-12 Lee....

[mad_fan]

Haha, 31-12 Lee....

??????Why HaHa?????? They beat Southwest????

Anyway, I found the score elsewhere. This place bites. 40+ views after I asked and no response. Why? Nothing to do with longview lufkin slc, that's why. I've lerked here for a longgggggg time and it's always the same old smack about my dad can beat up your dad.....

So with week one down and some teams having playeed twice as many game as others heres San Antonio (in no particular order)

You have to include the 2-0 teams

SV
Clemens
San Marcos
Mac
Marshall
Reagan

You might include these (see below)

Judson
Warren

That leaves two spots. Based on the way things work here at 5a.com I cant include any team that hasnt won a game. Madison, out. Churchill, out. Highlands, Jefferson, Holmes, Jay, Taft. Out, out, out, out, out.

Given the weighting of a loss here at 5a.com, no team with a loss should be included, which would silly. Which for this place would be appropriate. The top 10 in SA has only 6 teams.

So, because I'm using this list elsewhere, I'll violate 5a.com etiquitte and include some LOSERS. Judson and Warren are include because 1) Judson has one lose to a state rated team and 2) Warren has one lose to an undeafeted SA team (this Warren rule will be used to fill the other spots).

Roosevelt is included under the Warren Rule. Lost to undefeated Clemens.
Clark is in under the same rule. Lost to undefeated Mac.


So to this point we have 10.

SV
Clemens
San Marcos
Mac
Marshall
Reagan
Judson
Warren
Roosevelt
Clark

We could leave it at that, but we would offend some people whose teams are not addressed above. Further analysis is required. 5a.com style.

If you include teams with a lose, you have to include all undefeated teams. OConnor, Del Rio and Lee are in. I repeat, Del Rio and Lee are in, Madison and Churchill are OUT.

Seguin lost to a 4A team. OUT. This is 5A.com!!!!!!!!!
Southwest lost to Lee and forced there inclusion above. OUT.
East Central beat Holmes and lost to Roosevelt and still no one cares about either one. East Central, out. Holmes, out.

So our revised top 6, no 10, is now 13. And I feel, I am getting the hang of this rating stuff, 5a style.

SV
Clemens
San Marcos
Mac
Marshall
Reagan
Judson
Warren
Roosevelt
Clark
O'Connor
Del Rio
Lee

Now, we cant have a top 10 in San Antonio with 13 teams on it. More analysis is required.

Del Rio aint that close to SA. Out they go.
San Marcos is a ways away too. OUT.
Lee on the list is just stupid. OUT.

Then there were 10....But, with Lee no longer included, Southwest is IN with a 1-1 record (see reason for initial exclusion above). Madison is in because their one loss was to San Marcos. All 0-1 teams must now be reexamined.

Highlands lost to Harlendale. NO WAY.
Jefferson lost to Medina Valley. NOPE
Jay lost to Kerrville. Holmes lost to East Central. NO. NO.

Taft lost to Mac. IN.

SV
Clemens
Mac
Marshall
Reagan
Judson
Warren
Roosevelt
Clark
O'Connor
Southwest
Madison
Taft

Darn, back to 13. Time for the final cut. Deep thought and insightful analysis, 5a.com style is really needed here, so follow me.

Given: The 265 rules SA.
Given: Reagan has about as much chance of a playoff berth as Madison does.
Given: I went to Madison.
Conclusion: Reagan is OUT.

Given: Have Southwest on the list is abbbout as dumb as putting Lee on it.
Conclusion: Southwest is out.

11 left, I cant stand the excitement, who will it be?

Given: I told you where I went to school.
Conclusion: I'm at 5a.com, so I will NEVER remove my school from the list. I went through a lot to get them on there.

Given: I hate Mac.
Conclusion: Surprise!!!!! Not being a true 5a.com'er I'm leaving them on the list.

Given: I'm getting bored with this, so Roosevelt is out.
Conclusion:

SV
Clemens
Mac
Marshall
Judson
Warren
Clark
O'Connor
Madison
Taft

Did I forget to mention anybody????

[Reaganrattler07]

Did I forget to mention anybody????

Yes, Reagan. They beat Warren and are undefeated.

[rattlerbacker]

This place bites.

If thats the way you feel you should just stay away. Your top ten list bites.

[Go Buffs]

mad fan, I'm giving you a standing ovation for that post. I can't believe I read the whole thing, but I'm glad I did. That was absolutely hilarious! Your analysis, re-analysis, and over-analysis were dripping with tongue in cheek and sarcasm. Funny stuff.

Any chance you could take a crack at a state top ten? Just make sure you let SLC and Lufkin fans know you're kidding beforehand. Otherwise you'll get more responses than you ever wanted. :D

[mad_fan]

mad fan, I'm giving you a standing ovation for that post. I can't believe I read the whole thing, but I'm glad I did. That was absolutely hilarious! Your analysis, re-analysis, and over-analysis were dripping with tongue in cheek and sarcasm. Funny stuff.

Any chance you could take a crack at a state top ten? Just make sure you let SLC and Lufkin fans know you're kidding beforehand. Otherwise you'll get more responses than you ever wanted. :D


Im working on two project 1)State poll and 2) a way to get churchill back in the sa top ten. neither task will be easy.

[Go Buffs]

What the heck is wrong with Churchill anyway? They were so hyped coming into this season and then...thud! Just a bad start or sign of things to come? :confused:

[mad_fan]

If thats the way you feel you should just stay away. Your top ten list bites.

Sorry. I knew I would offend someone, I can get SM back on the list if you like.

[Reaganrattler07]

Sorry. I knew I would offend someone, I can get SM back on the list if you like.

How the heck was reagan bumped off the list to begin with?

[Go Buffs]

Sorry. I knew I would offend someone, I can get SM back on the list if you like.
I've got you figured out now. You're Greg Simmons aren't you? The absolute worst excuse ever for a sports broadcaster. His lists are a joke. His reporting is horrible. But, most of all, he's the biggest homer anywhere.

Those of us here in the SA area keep track of sports seasons by the wardrobe Greg wears. Black and silver cheerleader outfit means NBA. Blue and silver skirt and pom poms means NFL. The next time this guys asks a tough question during an interview will be the first time. But I guess KSAT enjoys having a joke of a sports department.

[mad_fan]

What the heck is wrong with Churchill anyway? They were so hyped coming into this season and then...thud! Just a bad start or sign of things to come? :confused:

I cant tell you, but unlike some here i have not written then off. The guys I feel for are at Lee. They probably haave one of the toughest schedules in the state (in terms of getting to the playoffs).

PS Im glad Schertz was close enough to stay on my list.

[mad_fan]

How the heck was reagan bumped off the list to begin with?

No playoff probability in the 265!

[mad_fan]

I've got you figured out now. You're Greg Simmons aren't you? The absolute worst excuse ever for a sports broadcaster. His lists are a joke. His reporting is horrible. But, most of all, he's the biggest homer anywhere.

Those of us here in the SA area keep track of sports seasons by the wardrobe Greg wears. Black and silver cheerleader outfit means NBA. Blue and silver skirt and pom poms means NFL. The next time this guys asks a tough question during an interview will be the first time. But I guess KSAT enjoys having a joke of a sports department.

Man, now Im offended (and after trying so hard not to offend). I used to watch him growing up in SA. I am an NO Greg Simmons.

[Reaganrattler07]

No playoff probability in the 265!

Dude, whatever your smokin'....slow down before you hurt yourself.

[mad_fan]

Cootabang *tear*....your my new best friend, your like the only person outside of Reagan that actually supports us, my hat is off to you. And I'm glad you didn't list Madison up there....

Oh, what have we here? I have gone out of my way not to exclude anybodys team or offend anybody. Why so uptight about Madison?

[Reaganrattler07]

Because they lost, meaning they are winless. Also meaning they shouldn't be in a Top 10. Unless that Top 10 involves being in the Top Losing Ten.