View Full Version : judson vs. reagan
nevaplayedk9
11-04-2006, 09:34 AM
can judson make the playoffs or will reagan come up with another big win?
jrock210
11-04-2006, 09:48 AM
can judson make the playoffs or will reagan come up with another big win?
judson will come off of a los and reagan will follow the bye wk tradition in a way losing the wk after the bye wk
SeguinMatadors
11-04-2006, 11:36 AM
Essentially these teams are starting the playoffs one week early. That is pretty much the way it should be approached.
jrock210
11-04-2006, 11:41 AM
Essentially these teams are starting the playoffs one week early. That is pretty much the way it should be approached.
ya but if thats how itis against any team in 26 5A
nevaplayedk9
11-04-2006, 01:12 PM
Essentially these teams are starting the playoffs one week early. That is pretty much the way it should be approached.
tru dat!!! win or go home.
LoneRocket
11-04-2006, 01:21 PM
Essentially these teams are starting the playoffs one week early. That is pretty much the way it should be approached.
So we are starting three weeks later than last year.
jrock210
11-04-2006, 01:52 PM
tru dat!!! win or go home.
got to love those games but i dont like that in the playoffs
TexasRed6x
11-04-2006, 02:43 PM
Rather have Reagan go on and win this one. Judson at this point is not ready for the playoffs and it continues to show.
jrock210
11-04-2006, 04:02 PM
Rather have Reagan go on and win this one. Judson at this point is not ready for the playoffs and it continues to show.
reagan is not ready for playoffs and judson is always better in the playoffs
lonny23
11-04-2006, 04:11 PM
Judson lost to one of the 10 best teams in Texas. They'll be fine in the playoffs and will beat Reagan.
jrock210
11-04-2006, 05:34 PM
Judson lost to one of the 10 best teams in Texas. They'll be fine in the playoffs and will beat Reagan.
ya and mac will beat lee
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 12:09 AM
Judson lost to one of the 10 best teams in Texas. They'll be fine in the playoffs and will beat Reagan.
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
jroc09
11-05-2006, 12:18 AM
yupp
lonny23
11-05-2006, 12:18 AM
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
Yes. I'll give you guys credit for beating SV, but I don't think you had their complete attention. If you beat Judson, I'll give you guys all the credit in the world.
It's a different world when the pressure is on to succeed.
Gridiron Gopher
11-05-2006, 12:19 AM
Reagan will have to be able to pass and keep Judson honest or this one will get ugly for Reagan.
I like Judson 27-10
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 12:20 AM
I think this game is going to be closer than most think.
I'll be there.
lonny23
11-05-2006, 12:21 AM
Reagan will have to be able to pass and keep Judson honest or this one will get ugly for Reagan.
I like Judson 27-10
That's around right for a score.
jroc09
11-05-2006, 12:23 AM
if reagan can beat judson that will be the 2nd time a team has beaten SV and JUDSON in the same season... last year church did it and they can do it again this year agian next week
Gridiron Gopher
11-05-2006, 12:23 AM
Yes. I'll give you guys credit for beating SV, but I don't think you had their complete attention. If you beat Judson, I'll give you guys all the credit in the world.
That not getting their attention is a bunch of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe for the first series or two but not into the 2nd quarter. Then you have half time and still SV is not there. BULL!!!!!!!!!!!!! SV got beat period. Did they play their best game....no but they got beat. If I'm not mistaken.....SV took the lead in the 4ht quarter and Reagan still came back and scored to win. SV not ready......BULL, BULL, BULL. Reagan beat SV plan and simple. Stop making excusses for teams when they lose. They just get beat because they get out executed.
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 12:25 AM
That not getting their attention is a bunch of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe for the first series or two but not into the 2nd quarter. Then you have half time and still SV is not there. BULL!!!!!!!!!!!!! SV got beat period. Did they play their best game....no but they got beat. If I'm not mistaken.....SV took the lead in the 4ht quarter and Reagan still came back and scored to win. SV not ready......BULL, BULL, BULL. Reagan beat SV plan and simple. Stop making excusses for teams when they lose. They just get beat because they get out executed.
AMEN!
dwistheman
11-05-2006, 12:25 AM
Unless Reagan can pass for close to 200 yds they will lose. Marcus Wright is good, but he wont break those long runs on Judson's D.
jroc09
11-05-2006, 12:27 AM
That not getting their attention is a bunch of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe for the first series or two but not into the 2nd quarter. Then you have half time and still SV is not there. BULL!!!!!!!!!!!!! SV got beat period. Did they play their best game....no but they got beat. If I'm not mistaken.....SV took the lead in the 4ht quarter and Reagan still came back and scored to win. SV not ready......BULL, BULL, BULL. Reagan beat SV plan and simple. Stop making excusses for teams when they lose. They just get beat because they get out executed.
That WAS a pretty speach
PaulinPlano
11-05-2006, 01:06 AM
I think Converse has one more W in them for this season.:D
trbandchic
11-05-2006, 01:29 AM
LETS GO RATTLERS!!!!
Reagan-28
Judson-7
WHOOHOOO!
Rattlers go do your striking thing...:p
but seriously.. I really hope Reagan wins.. and makes it to the playoffs...:D
PaulinPlano
11-05-2006, 01:38 AM
LETS GO RATTLERS!!!!
Reagan-28
Judson-7
WHOOHOOO!
Rattlers go do your striking thing...:p
but seriously.. I really hope Reagan wins.. and makes it to the playoffs...:D
Even if Reagan is a better football team, how can you beat that Judson Mystic? They have spotted themselves 21 points just for that!:D
trbandchic
11-05-2006, 01:46 AM
Even if Reagan is a better football team, how can you beat that Judson Mystic? They have spotted themselves 21 points just for that!:D
I don't like judson...
thus...
GO RATTLERS!!!
PaulinPlano
11-05-2006, 01:51 AM
I don't like judson...
thus...
GO RATTLERS!!!
Not my favorite team either.
lonny23
11-05-2006, 03:07 AM
That not getting their attention is a bunch of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe for the first series or two but not into the 2nd quarter. Then you have half time and still SV is not there. BULL!!!!!!!!!!!!! SV got beat period. Did they play their best game....no but they got beat. If I'm not mistaken.....SV took the lead in the 4ht quarter and Reagan still came back and scored to win. SV not ready......BULL, BULL, BULL. Reagan beat SV plan and simple. Stop making excusses for teams when they lose. They just get beat because they get out executed.
I'm not talking about having their attention during the game. I'm talking about during the week leading up to the game. Sure Reagan beat them and deserves credit, but I can't help but believe that SV was trying to win a game without completely selling out during the week.
lonny23
11-05-2006, 03:21 AM
I think Converse has one more W in them for this season.:D
I'm thinking more along the lines of:
Pride- They don't want to miss the playoffs.
Anger- They're tired of hearing how good Seguin is.
Envy- 28-5A still wishes they could consistently beat 26-5A.
Gluttony- They'll get fat off of a Valley team.
Slothfulness- Churchill won't beat them like the last time.
Greed- Getting to the Semis won't be good enough.
Lust- They want another title.
At least I'm creative!:D
lonny23
11-05-2006, 03:23 AM
Even if Reagan is a better football team, how can you beat that Judson Mystic? They have spotted themselves 21 points just for that!:D
Judson doesn't need a mystic. They have pride...and a mystique...and a better football team. I might ask for the mystic later on if things are looking rough!:D
lonny23
11-05-2006, 03:38 AM
Not my favorite team either.
Why? Because we say they'll win games? I'll stop bragging on them when they stop winning big games. Until they start consistently losing big games, I'm going to think they'll keep winning. Judson will lose games during the year and they always have. When they stop having games in December, I'll stop a lot of the dominance talk. I'm not going to be quiet about them this year knowing they're coming off a State Championship game.
Nobody says a word about the other 7 teams (Trinity, SLC, LP, ACM, Westfield, Katy, and SV) that went to the Semifinals last year. All of their fans think their team is top-notch and nobody disagrees. Why should Judson be any different?
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 08:52 AM
That not getting their attention is a bunch of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe for the first series or two but not into the 2nd quarter. Then you have half time and still SV is not there. BULL!!!!!!!!!!!!! SV got beat period. Did they play their best game....no but they got beat. If I'm not mistaken.....SV took the lead in the 4ht quarter and Reagan still came back and scored to win. SV not ready......BULL, BULL, BULL. Reagan beat SV plan and simple. Stop making excusses for teams when they lose. They just get beat because they get out executed.
Amen. What a tool. Judson clearly gets man-handled by Smithson Valley and he comes in here saying "Oh, no big deal... it was clear the teams were very even" No tool. SV is superior to Judson and that is what was proved. What was proved is that if Judson doesn't play a lot better then they won't even make the palyoffs and if they do make it and come in playing the way they have, the Matadors will be pulling their cape out of those collective Judson ***** at the end of the game.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 08:55 AM
Why? Because we say they'll win games? I'll stop bragging on them when they stop winning big games. Until they start consistently losing big games, I'm going to think they'll keep winning. Judson will lose games during the year and they always have. When they stop having games in December, I'll stop a lot of the dominance talk. I'm not going to be quiet about them this year knowing they're coming off a State Championship game.
Nobody says a word about the other 7 teams (Trinity, SLC, LP, ACM, Westfield, Katy, and SV) that went to the Semifinals last year. All of their fans think their team is top-notch and nobody disagrees. Why should Judson be any different?
Because they have lost to 3 of the 5 good teams they have played?
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 11:16 AM
Amen. What a tool. Judson clearly gets man-handled by Smithson Valley and he comes in here saying "Oh, no big deal... it was clear the teams were very even" No tool. SV is superior to Judson and that is what was proved. What was proved is that if Judson doesn't play a lot better then they won't even make the palyoffs and if they do make it and come in playing the way they have, the Matadors will be pulling their cape out of those collective Judson ***** at the end of the game.
True!
It was 28-7 SV at one point, but he still believes it was "even" lol
RR
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 11:50 AM
Maybe Judson can play Victoria, the largest school in Region IV, in the playoffs. Oops. I think they are not going to qualify. They better get ready because they may have to play Judson & Wagner in 2 years.
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 11:55 AM
Maybe Judson can play Victoria, the largest school in Region IV, in the playoffs. Oops. I think they are not going to qualify. They better get ready because they may have to play Judson & Wagner in 2 years.
LMAO! I'm not even a Victoria Memorial supporter! That's not my school. And they are not the largest school in Region IV. 3600 students is not the largest. We're not discussing Victoria. We're discussing Judson.
Why do yall get so defensive when we say something that doesnt make yall look like god? No one can ever criticize your team without yall going "WELL AT LEAST WE HAVE THIS AND THAT"....I thought this forum was to discuss the good and bad of teams.
I was stating a fact...it was 28-7 at one point...but Lonny can't take off his Judson-colored glasses. He thinks Judson is even with SV. 28-7 doesnt seem even to me! I just gave my opinion that I think SV is a much better team and I get attacked for it ? LOL
What do you think DiamondJ...you seem to be more level-headed than Lonny! Do you think Judson and SV are even?
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 11:59 AM
And I hope the Judson players aren't taking Reagan lightly like so many Judson fans on here b/c they might just suprise yall. All the Judson fans are already talking about the playoffs when they have to beat Reagan first.
RR
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 12:33 PM
Rather have Reagan go on and win this one. Judson at this point is not ready for the playoffs and it continues to show.
I like how after Judson wins you support them, but after they lose they aren't ready for anything. Judson WILL be ready for the game this week, Judson WILL be ready for the playoffs, just like last year.
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 12:35 PM
Amen. What a tool. Judson clearly gets man-handled by Smithson Valley and he comes in here saying "Oh, no big deal... it was clear the teams were very even" No tool. SV is superior to Judson and that is what was proved. What was proved is that if Judson doesn't play a lot better then they won't even make the palyoffs and if they do make it and come in playing the way they have, the Matadors will be pulling their cape out of those collective Judson ***** at the end of the game.
Judson and SV were about even, Judson just made mistakes and SV capitalized on them. Yes, SV is the better team, and they won that game, but it was not a clear man handling.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 12:55 PM
Judson and SV were about even, Judson just made mistakes and SV capitalized on them. Yes, SV is the better team, and they won that game, but it was not a clear man handling.
I am sure SV didn't play a perfect game either.
The scoreboard has no agenda. It is late enough in the season that better teams are prevailing and showing their true colors... and the same with lesser teams.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 12:59 PM
I like how after Judson wins you support them, but after they lose they aren't ready for anything. Judson WILL be ready for the game this week, Judson WILL be ready for the playoffs, just like last year.
TRN I fired you a few weeks back I will make no comment to you please do the same.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 01:05 PM
What do you think DiamondJ...you seem to be more level-headed than Lonny! Do you think Judson and SV are even?[/QUOTE]
Rage, I believe Judson has equal the talent that SV has, please do not try to come here and say that. Now if that is what you are calling equal then you are wrong. Now what makes them not equal is the way they prepare, the scouting, the adjustments during the game, knowinig your players inside and out. I believe then they are not equal.
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 01:10 PM
What do you think DiamondJ...you seem to be more level-headed than Lonny! Do you think Judson and SV are even?
Rage, I believe Judson has equal the talent that SV has, please do not try to come here and say that. Now if that is what you are calling equal then you are wrong. Now what makes them not equal is the way they prepare, the scouting, the adjustments during the game, knowinig your players inside and out. I believe then they are not equal.[/QUOTE]
That's what I'm trying to say. Lonny is trying to act like everything is peachy at Judson. Like no problems exist when he has seen in person what TWO judson games all year? You on the other hand are more "tell it like it is"...You've seen more than 2 Judson games this season. You've been around a lot longer and have been a fan longer than lonny.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 01:14 PM
Rage, I believe Judson has equal the talent that SV has, please do not try to come here and say that. Now if that is what you are calling equal then you are wrong. Now what makes them not equal is the way they prepare, the scouting, the adjustments during the game, knowinig your players inside and out. I believe then they are not equal.
That's what I'm trying to say. Lonny is trying to act like everything is peachy at Judson. Like no problems exist when he has seen in person what TWO judson games all year? You on the other hand are more "tell it like it is"...You've seen more than 2 Judson games this season. You've been around a lot longer and have been a fan longer than lonny.[/QUOTE]
I get in trouble allot because I will just tell it like it is, even when we where winning I always said that the offense was aweful. I still believe that Judson has loads of talent it is the other things that they used to have that is not there any longer. You have to ask yourself, why when Gibbens got the job at Wagner that over 50% of the coaches went with him?
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 01:14 PM
That's what I'm trying to say. Lonny is trying to act like everything is peachy at Judson. Like no problems exist when he has seen in person what TWO judson games all year? You on the other hand are more "tell it like it is"...You've seen more than 2 Judson games this season. You've been around a lot longer and have been a fan longer than lonny.
That is the thing about Lonny. He comes here and acts like he is the guru of San Antonio area HS football when the fact is all of us have a better grasp for the teams in this area. You can't see potential, coaching, effort, and ethic on scorecards. You have to witness it. He really has no idea what he is talking about most of the time. He just argues what is convient to him. That is why he has little to no credability as far as a lot of us go.
Rocketman81
11-05-2006, 01:20 PM
Go Rockets
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 01:25 PM
Go Rockets
LOL
You changed what I was going to reply to! :cool:
Rocketman81
11-05-2006, 01:27 PM
Judson and SV were about even, Judson just made mistakes and SV capitalized on them. Yes, SV is the better team, and they won that game, but it was not a clear man handling.
+1
nevaplayedk9
11-05-2006, 01:33 PM
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
not all j-rock fans take that approach, i respect reagan and any other opponet we have faced this year, judson will have to be focused to win, remember...reagan will be emotionally hyped, a possible 1st playoff apperance in school history hangs in the balance, so they will be even more focused than against sv game, judson needs to respect reagan and play hard
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 01:34 PM
+1
+1?
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 01:39 PM
judson needs to respect reagan and play hard
You are like the only one that has said that.
nevaplayedk9
11-05-2006, 01:45 PM
You are like the only one that has said that.
respect your opponent..is a quality of rocket pride, but i am not sure most fans are following it. i am more than confident that rackely has his kids following it
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 01:53 PM
not all j-rock fans take that approach, i respect reagan and any other opponet we have faced this year, judson will have to be focused to win, remember...reagan will be emotionally hyped, a possible 1st playoff apperance in school history hangs in the balance, so they will be even more focused than against sv game, judson needs to respect reagan and play hard
Just like last year huh...Reagan is pumped, all they have to do is not lose by 21 and they are in the playoffs, but they couldn't pull it off.:rolleyes:
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
Judson lost a close game to Churchill, then beat MacArthur in a close game. If we go by this, Churchill is the best of the 3 and should have beaten MacArthur. Mac won by 3tds. Madison lost to SV 30-27, Judson beat Madison 31-27, according to that, Judson is the best team out of the 3. SV beat Judson 35-20. Sv has beaten everyone in the district, except Reagan (14-10) and Churchill (have not played). Churchill beat Reagan 27-7. So according to that Churchill should beat SV this week. So, if we go by what has happend so far according to who beat who and who is playing who this week:
Churchill will beat SV because they beat Reagan, who is the only team to beat SV
Reagan will beat Judson because they beat SV, who beat Judson by 15, but at the same time Reagan lost to Churchill by more points than Judson lost to Churchill and SV combined...
Madison lost by 4 to SV after beating Lee by 22, then beat Reagan by 5. So, going by that, SV should have beat Reagan because they beat Madison, that did not happen. Mac beat Reagan 35-17, so that means Mac is better than SV because SV lost to Reagan. SV won that matchup(Mac) 41-14.
I could go on and on about "team 1 beat team 2, therefore they should also beat team 3, because team 3 lost to team 2, which makes team 3 worse than team 2, and since team 2 is worse than team 1 because team 1 won the game between team 1 and team 2, team 3 is automatically worse than team 1." But by saying this is anything really being proved? Oh yeah, 1 thing is being proved...It doesn't matter who beat who last week or who beat them the week before, all that matters is the game at hand.
Basically what I am trying to say is regardless of who Reagan has beat, regardless of who Judson has lost to, both these teams know 1 thing: They win, they are in, they lose, they're not. Each team plays every other team differently. There is a different way to beat every team, there are different weaknessess to each team. All in all, I just want to say:
GO ROCKETS GO
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 01:56 PM
LMAO! I'm not even a Victoria Memorial supporter! That's not my school. And they are not the largest school in Region IV. 3600 students is not the largest. We're not discussing Victoria. We're discussing Judson.
Why do yall get so defensive when we say something that doesnt make yall look like god? No one can ever criticize your team without yall going "WELL AT LEAST WE HAVE THIS AND THAT"....I thought this forum was to discuss the good and bad of teams.
I was stating a fact...it was 28-7 at one point...but Lonny can't take off his Judson-colored glasses. He thinks Judson is even with SV. 28-7 doesnt seem even to me! I just gave my opinion that I think SV is a much better team and I get attacked for it ? LOL
What do you think DiamondJ...you seem to be more level-headed than Lonny! Do you think Judson and SV are even?
I guess you are right. your school doesn't exist anymore. My condolences.
Judson & SV equal. Not according to the score, but the score doesn't indicate how close it was either. Neither team played very good defense or both teams played great offense. Judson didn't score twice inside the 8 yard line (bad blocking, penalty, bad hands, poor play calling, good SV defense)--a little of each. Great throw by Hill, poor coverage; great run by Rios, caught Judson on a blitz. Personally, I give the edge to SV, but not by much (in what areas?, I plead the 5th or will say after I've had a 5th). Judson's poor offensive performance in the two middle quarters was the killer. Both teams need to improve--quickly because of their next games and impending playoffs. Defensive Judson posters--anybody will defend their team--some more irrationally than others (I'm guilty at times). The Magic of Judson is still present, but at what level is debatable. On to Reagan. Same song--second verse.
nevaplayedk9
11-05-2006, 01:57 PM
Just like last year huh...Reagan is pumped, all they have to do is not lose by 21 and they are in the playoffs, but they couldn't pull it off.:rolleyes:
Judson lost a close game to Churchill, then beat MacArthur in a close game. If we go by this, Churchill is the best of the 3 and should have beaten MacArthur. Mac won by 3tds. Madison lost to SV 30-27, Judson beat Madison 31-27, according to that, Judson is the best team out of the 3. SV beat Judson 35-20. Sv has beaten everyone in the district, except Reagan (14-10) and Churchill (have not played). Churchill beat Reagan 27-7. So according to that Churchill should beat SV this week. So, if we go by what has happend so far according to who beat who and who is playing who this week:
Churchill will beat SV because they beat Reagan, who is the only team to beat SV
Reagan will beat Judson because they beat SV, who beat Judson by 15, but at the same time Reagan lost to Churchill by more points than Judson lost to Churchill and SV combined...
Madison lost by 4 to SV after beating Lee by 22, then beat Reagan by 5. So, going by that, SV should have beat Reagan because they beat Madison, that did not happen. Mac beat Reagan 35-17, so that means Mac is better than SV because SV lost to Reagan. SV won that matchup(Mac) 41-14.
I could go on and on about "team 1 beat team 2, therefore they should also beat team 3, because team 3 lost to team 2, which makes team 3 worse than team 2, and since team 2 is worse than team 1 because team 1 won the game between team 1 and team 2, team 3 is automatically worse than team 1." But by saying this is anything really being proved? Oh yeah, 1 thing is being proved...It doesn't matter who beat who last week or who beat them the week before, all that matters is the game at hand.
Basically what I am trying to say is regardless of who Reagan has beat, regardless of who Judson has lost to, both these teams know 1 thing: They win, they are in, they lose, they're not. Each team plays every other team differently. There is a different way to beat every team, there are different weaknessess to each team. All in all, I just want to say:
GO ROCKETS GO
all teams matchup differently against eachother, nobody is disputing that.....regardless of the matchup though, we still need to respect our oppenent, there is an old saying "don't mistake my kindness for weakness" with that being said, judson to me FEARS NONE, RESPECTS ALL, thats all i am trying to say
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 01:59 PM
respect your opponent..is a quality of rocket pride, but i am not sure most fans are following it. i am more than confident that rackely has his kids following it
They are. The only team it seems that the team took lightly was Lee. Well, they took Wagner lightly in the first half.
I respect Reagan. They could have given up hope on the playoffs, but they didn't and now here they are knocking on the spot that Judson "clinched" after beating Madison.
Crazy 26-5A...They should make a dang movie or documentary out of this district. Watch all 4 26-5a teams lose in the first round...that would NOT be hilarious.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 02:22 PM
The fact that nearly all Judson fans are all but announcing theirselves in the playoffs is and should be taken as a sign of disrespect by the Reagan football team. That team should play with a chip on their shoulders.
dwistheman
11-05-2006, 02:32 PM
The fact that nearly all Judson fans are all but announcing theirselves in the playoffs is and should be taken as a sign of disrespect by the Reagan football team. That team should play with a chip on their shoulders.
If Reagan players need fodder from a message board to get motivated about a playoff birth they have big problems.
I dont think anything said on this board will have any bearing on the game.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 02:42 PM
If Reagan players need fodder from a message board to get motivated about a playoff birth they have big problems.
I dont think anything said on this board will have any bearing on the game.
Posting stuff like this for the players can read is more common than you would think. I am not saying that the players aren't motivated... because they are. The fact is, being disrespceted brings out another level of pride in any athlete and that pride can take you to the next level. There just isn't anything like being disrepected for a player to want to prove the world wrong or coaches wouldn't bother.... sometimes they even fabricate stuff.
dwistheman
11-05-2006, 02:50 PM
Ok. Let try this.
Judson you dont have a chance next week vs. Reagan. They are going to take you to the woodshed. Wagner is open, your talent is gone, and you will fold like a cheap tent next Friday.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 03:17 PM
Ok. Let try this.
Judson you dont have a chance next week vs. Reagan. They are going to take you to the woodshed. Wagner is open, your talent is gone, and you will fold like a cheap tent next Friday.
Um, pretty ********. Thinking you can win is not disrectful. Believing you are already in the playoffs is. That is like a team announcing theirself in the state title game when they still have the semi's to go.
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 03:26 PM
Um, pretty ********. Thinking you can win is not disrectful. Believing you are already in the playoffs is. That is like a team announcing theirself in the state title game when they still have the semi's to go.
Didn't somebody back in August make a statement that Seguin was going to be State Champions and undefeated this year?
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 03:32 PM
Didn't somebody back in August make a statement that Seguin was going to be State Champions and undefeated this year?
Probably. Did somebody lose their sense of humor in August?;)
dwistheman
11-05-2006, 03:32 PM
Didn't somebody back in August make a statement that Seguin was going to be State Champions and undefeated this year?
Hello.....Hello.....
Can you hear me now?
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 03:33 PM
Hello.....Hello.....
Can you hear me know?
I am quite sure you meant now.
Mac Is Back
11-05-2006, 03:34 PM
Is that a decline in the integrity of this thread that I feel in the wind?
dwistheman
11-05-2006, 03:38 PM
I am quite sure you meant now.
Sorry, It that Judson education.
Slim-Rob
11-05-2006, 04:23 PM
Sorry, It that Judson education.
I'm from Judson and i'm pretty edjumacated...
LoneRocket
11-05-2006, 04:28 PM
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
Your point?
PaulinPlano
11-05-2006, 04:31 PM
Your point?
The point may be is that you can't just hand this game to Converse. I think they will win but it is NOT a lock.
LoneRocket
11-05-2006, 04:35 PM
The point may be is that you can't just hand this game to Converse. I think they will win but it is NOT a lock.
I think it is going to be a fight and the team that has heart will win. We will find out who has heart.
catman
11-05-2006, 04:35 PM
I think I may have to drive down for this one. I think it is going to be a genuine slobberknocker. And much, much closer than last year.
jrock210
11-05-2006, 04:47 PM
Ok. Let try this.
Judson you dont have a chance next week vs. Reagan. They are going to take you to the woodshed. Wagner is open, your talent is gone, and you will fold like a cheap tent next Friday.
ya not going to happen...we ploayed good and (in my opinion) should only have one district loss
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 05:05 PM
Reagan remembers last year; Judson remembers last week. Rattlers will be defanged by 2+ TD's. Reagan will get too tight and not be able to handle the pressure; bye week; Saturday afternoon game (playoff atmospehere which judson is used to); Judson ready to play.
jrock210
11-05-2006, 05:10 PM
Reagan remembers last year; Judson remembers last week. Rattlers will be defanged by 2+ TD's. Reagan will get too tight and not be able to handle the pressure; bye week; Saturday afternoon game (playoff atmospehere which judson is used to); Judson ready to play.
at rutledge stadium and during in 26 5a game (yes even wagner vs lee) its a playoff atmophere
zippy
11-05-2006, 05:16 PM
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
Reaganrattler, I have watched this game 3-4 times (SV vs. Reagan). I promise you, Reagan got a ton of breaks, and SV did not play SV ball. I think frustration set in, and it was the game after the bye week (they do not ever play great afterward). I have also seen Judson play a few times now. Judson is going to beat Reagan. Reagan is not that good this year. They were lucky to get by SV. I have a feeling they will be getting prepared for B-Ball after next week.
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 05:25 PM
I was expecting Reagan to vie for the district title with 40+ seniors on the team and a lot of starters returning. I believe they made their season when they defeated SV. Kind of like the "Miracle on the Brazos".
zippy
11-05-2006, 05:29 PM
I was expecting Reagan to vie for the district title with 40+ seniors on the team and a lot of starters returning. I believe they made their season when they defeated SV. Kind of like the "Miracle on the Brazos".
You would think they won the damn state championship after that game. Stuff like that happens, but good teams can look past it and move on to make a good playoff run. Honestly, I hope Judson wins and Reagan is out. I would rather have Judson represent 26-5.
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 05:39 PM
Reaganrattler, I have watched this game 3-4 times (SV vs. Reagan). I promise you, Reagan got a ton of breaks, and SV did not play SV ball. I think frustration set in, and it was the game after the bye week (they do not ever play great afterward). I have also seen Judson play a few times now. Judson is going to beat Reagan. Reagan is not that good this year. They were lucky to get by SV. I have a feeling they will be getting prepared for B-Ball after next week.
Zippy, from talking and listening to you these past few years, its like you have a sanctuary for Hill in your home or something and worship it before you go to sleep.
I hate to break it to you, but I'm pretty sure SV gets as many breaks as any other team, probably even more. Is it our fault SV didn't play their style of football?
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 05:39 PM
You would think they won the damn state championship after that game. Stuff like that happens, but good teams can look past it and move on to make a good playoff run. Honestly, I hope Judson wins and Reagan is out. I would rather have Judson represent 26-5.
Did we hit a nerve in you somewhere Zippy? You weren't that one coach that was telling off all the Reagan students, were you?
Reagan has allot of defensive players back who remember that 38-13 loss they also have conifdence. If big bad Judson is this cocky going into the game they will lose
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 05:40 PM
I was expecting Reagan to vie for the district title with 40+ seniors on the team and a lot of starters returning. I believe they made their season when they defeated SV. Kind of like the "Miracle on the Brazos".
Lol, Diamond, all you've ever said about Reagan was "oh, well they should be doing it anyways".
zippy
11-05-2006, 05:46 PM
Did we hit a nerve in you somewhere Zippy? You weren't that one coach that was telling off all the Reagan students, were you?
Lol, where did you hear this BS? If its true at least give a name, or description. Dont just make this up. I highly doubt they said anything to anyone. Even if they wanted to kick them in the face. You guys have some smart *** players out there that think they are the ****. However, I doubt any SV staff would go that low. They could keep something like that inside. Sorry, I just do not like the lack of class that Reagan shows. You, I, and anyone that has seen that game knows that even with SV playing bad, Reagan got lucky.
SvFootball
11-05-2006, 05:46 PM
I have played both teams. we beat judson and lost to Reagan. People who don't really follow our district would not believe this but Judson compared to reagan, played with the most class i have ever seen. not saying judson doesn't usually play with class but reagan played disgustingly. Reagan can argue this because the reffs didn't throw a flag on them all night but if you watch the game on demand you will see personal foul after personal foul, mostly on 43 Ben stonestreet, MLB. the way both teams played us strengths against strengths. weaknesses against weaknesses i say Judson pulls out BIG against Reagan.
Judson Wins 3+ Touchdowns
zippy
11-05-2006, 05:50 PM
I have played both teams. we beat judson and lost to Reagan. People who don't really follow our district would not believe this but Judson compared to reagan, played with the most class i have ever seen. not saying judson doesn't usually play with class but reagan played disgustingly. Reagan can argue this because the reffs didn't throw a flag on them all night but if you watch the game on demand you will see personal foul after personal foul, mostly on 43 Ben stonestreet, MLB. the way both teams played us strengths against strengths. weaknesses against weaknesses i say Judson pulls out BIG against Reagan.
Judson Wins 3+ Touchdowns
Judson is miles ahead of Reagan when it comes to class. I agree Judson will spank Reagan too. The SV win will be the highlight of their season.
I have watched it and you are right. There was a late hit which the strped shirts didnt call but they did call one on a qb wedge where Hill was still moving his feet and his knee hadnt touched.
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 06:14 PM
Lol, where did you hear this BS? If its true at least give a name, or description. Dont just make this up. I highly doubt they said anything to anyone. Even if they wanted to kick them in the face. You guys have some smart *** players out there that think they are the ****. However, I doubt any SV staff would go that low. They could keep something like that inside. Sorry, I just do not like the lack of class that Reagan shows. You, I, and anyone that has seen that game knows that even with SV playing bad, Reagan got lucky.
Had black hair, moustache, that's about all I can remember. Believe me, he was there and he was doin' it.
There are a few players who play with loads of emotion. I wouldn't call them dirty or classless. I like the way our fans are, there hasn't been enough incidents in which I'd call them classless or low.
But anyways, we'll see how "lucky", "classless", and "bad" Reagan is on Saturday.
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 06:15 PM
I have watched it and you are right. There was a late hit which the strped shirts didnt call but they did call one on a qb wedge where Hill was still moving his feet and his knee hadnt touched.
The loser will always see things that they want to see.
I believe all of us can attest to that.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 06:30 PM
Yay, another Reagan fan to banter with before our playoff game if you guys advance to play us.
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 06:37 PM
Yay, another Reagan fan to banter with before our playoff game if you guys advance to play us.
Is he a Reagan fan?
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 07:12 PM
Is he a Reagan fan?
looks like it... RonaldReagan08.
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 07:14 PM
looks like it... RonaldReagan08.
Or ReaganRattler
But it would be like Roosevelt Rider or Rough Rider or something....we'll see.
SeguinMatadors
11-05-2006, 07:15 PM
Or ReaganRattler
But it would be like Roosevelt Rider or Rough Rider or something....we'll see.
I am assuming Reagan because he chimed in about them.
zippy
11-05-2006, 07:16 PM
I have watched it and you are right. There was a late hit which the strped shirts didnt call but they did call one on a qb wedge where Hill was still moving his feet and his knee hadnt touched.
Do I even bring up the fumble that was given to Reagan, or the constant holding from the O-Line (SV was called, Reagan was not all night), or the false personal foul and facemask giving Reagan 30 extra much needed yards on 3rd and long? Or how about when Chris was trown to the ground long after the play was over? I honestly never want to hear that SV gets games called in their favor anymore. Its funny this happened 1 week after someone complained about it in the express???
Reaganrattler07
11-05-2006, 07:25 PM
Do I even bring up the fumble that was given to Reagan, or the constant holding from the O-Line (SV was called, Reagan was not all night), or the false personal foul and facemask giving Reagan 30 extra much needed yards on 3rd and long? Or how about when Chris was trown to the ground long after the play was over? I honestly never want to hear that SV gets games called in their favor anymore. Its funny this happened 1 week after someone complained about it in the express???
I'm pretty sure there was at least a hold cause I remember saying to the person beside me "we really need to cut those holding penalties out".
There were a lot of people who saw the 15yd face mask as well as the personal foul that occured out of bounds right after it and if there wasn't contact, maybe that SV player needs to "learn to play with a passion but keep his mouth shut while doing so."
zippy
11-05-2006, 07:35 PM
I'm pretty sure there was at least a hold cause I remember saying to the person beside me "we really need to cut those holding penalties out".
There were a lot of people who saw the 15yd face mask as well as the personal foul that occured out of bounds right after it and if there wasn't contact, maybe that SV player needs to "learn to play with a passion but keep his mouth shut while doing so."
lol, yea, I guess he does because that is the only reason they could have thrown a flag. Also, it was not out of bounds. It was right on the number on the field. If they called personal fouls for words like they should, #8 would have had one every play. You can watch it again, there was no facemask. SV lost, Reagan won. SV will be in the playoffs, Reagan will not. Its all good and its over with.
jrock210
11-05-2006, 07:39 PM
what cable network has on demand for hs games i want to know
svrangerfan
11-05-2006, 07:43 PM
I picked Reagan with my heart. Yes they will still have the playoffs without Judson. SV needs to schedule an intrasquad game during their bye week.
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 07:44 PM
Lol, Diamond, all you've ever said about Reagan was "oh, well they should be doing it anyways".
And they should be. Look at the type of players they have and everything that is at their disposal at school and outside of school. What makes them different than Churchill, Clark, or SV? Most of the other sports at Reagan are doing very well, why not football?!! I am just curious on the reason(s). I've felt over the last 3-4 years, that Reagan has the talent, but not the drive to sustain them through a season. I've also said that the Rattlers will be a power to be dealt with----but when?!!
jrock210
11-05-2006, 07:46 PM
the ppl choosding reagan r looking at whats better for them and not whats better for the district....if ur choosing a team ook at who can go further and not lose to seguin in the first rd
DiamondJ2
11-05-2006, 07:51 PM
the ppl choosding reagan r looking at whats better for them and not whats better for the district....if ur choosing a team ook at who can go further and not lose to seguin in the first rd
Not entirely true. Some just want somebody else, anybody else to be in the playoffs than Judson.
JRocketMan
11-05-2006, 09:15 PM
JROC takes this game. It will probably be closer than most people think but JROC will be in control of this game. Reagan won the game they really wanted to because their was no pressure on them. They caught SV coming off a bye week and all the other top teams got caught with an L coming off their bye week in this district also. Reagan coming off a bye week, Judson coming off a loss to SV, Reagan under pressure to beat JROC by 19= Judson vs Seguin first round. Now that will be a classic. Seguin see ya soon.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 09:26 PM
JROC takes this game. It will probably be closer than most people think but JROC will be in control of this game. Reagan won the game they really wanted to because their was no pressure on them. They caught SV coming off a bye week and all the other top teams got caught with an L coming off their bye week in this district also. Reagan coming off a bye week, Judson coming off a loss to SV, Reagan under pressure to beat JROC by 19= Judson vs Seguin first round. Now that will be a classic. Seguin see ya soon.
Let's take it game by game.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 09:49 PM
Reagan has allot of defensive players back who remember that 38-13 loss they also have conifdence. If big bad Judson is this cocky going into the game they will lose
Bub what is their to be cocky about they got their ***** handed to them last week, please wake up.
I was more talking about the posters on this board. Youd think Judson has already won. Both teams are going to have to play there best to get a W. This isnt going to be automatic for Judson.
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 09:54 PM
I was more talking about the posters on this board. Youd think Judson has already won. Both teams are going to have to play there best to get a W. This isnt going to be automatic for Judson.
I have not said that Judson would win, I do not like the chances, I thnk that Judson has allot more talent then you but coaching kills. will we be dead?
Mac Is Back
11-05-2006, 09:55 PM
I'll give Reagan their credit when they knock off J-Rock. However, the Rattlers haven't proven to me they can truly contend for the playoffs yet.
They narrowly lost to a Madison team that proved to be overrated in the end, and then beat a Smithson Valley team that got hammered with penalties and was completely out of their rhythm. Now, I'm not taking away from that win, but Reagan still has a lot to prove before I give them the edge over Judson.
Both of you had valid points. I think its going to be a hard fought game but in the end Reagan will pull out a W, well in my opinon I could be a homer:D
TexasRed6x
11-05-2006, 10:00 PM
Both of you had valid points. I think its going to be a hard fought game but in the end Reagan will pull out a W, well in my opinon I could be a homer:D
You should always pull for your team win, lose or draw.
Mr_Lucci
11-05-2006, 10:00 PM
I have played both teams. we beat judson and lost to Reagan. People who don't really follow our district would not believe this but Judson compared to reagan, played with the most class i have ever seen. not saying judson doesn't usually play with class but reagan played disgustingly. Reagan can argue this because the reffs didn't throw a flag on them all night but if you watch the game on demand you will see personal foul after personal foul, mostly on 43 Ben stonestreet, MLB. the way both teams played us strengths against strengths. weaknesses against weaknesses i say Judson pulls out BIG against Reagan.Judson Wins 3+ Touchdowns
Good lookin out svfootball. Sv players also showed alot of class vs Judson. I am glad to see that the SV players are nothing like some of their fans that post on here. Good luck to sv during their deep playoff run.
Mac Is Back
11-05-2006, 10:01 PM
Both of you had valid points. I think its going to be a hard fought game but in the end Reagan will pull out a W, well in my opinon I could be a homer:D
I know what you mean. I picked Mac to beat SV and Judson merely because that's my school. Reagan can certainly win, but Judson is not going to be a pushover.
zippy
11-05-2006, 10:08 PM
Good lookin out svfootball. Sv players also showed alot of class vs Judson. I am glad to see that the SV players are nothing like some of their fans that post on here. Good luck to sv during their deep playoff run.
Many of their fans that post on here are past players. However, they are all good people here and on the field. Maybe they do not always agree with you, but that does not make them bad people does it?
RedRage00
11-05-2006, 10:10 PM
Many of their fans that post on here are past players. However, they are all good people here and on the field. Maybe they do not always agree with you, but that does not make them bad people does it?
He's one to talk. You should see some of the stuff he posts on here :rolleyes:
I ve taken some time and Im ready to make a long post. Last year Reagan and Judson were in the same position vying for the last playoff spot. Reagan was experinceing our first taste of sucsess while Judson was hampered by an offense that wasnt clicking and a rash of injuries. Going into the game Reagan was 6-3 and Judson was 5-4. All Reagan had to do was not lose by 21 and we failed to do so. J-rocks offense clicked and they were healthy. Reagan imploded on itself while Judson beat us 38-13. This year will be different. Reagan has 7 definsive starters back whom remember that game. Reagan knows they belong on the same feild as Judson. We have our own pride.
Reagan O V Judson D
This is Judosns strongest point a D that relies on speed and tenacity to get to the ball. Some Reagans offense will play right into J-rocks defense disregarding what many precive to be a rather medicore pass offense. This will surprise some pepole
Reagan D V Judson O
I am excited about this Judson has been plagued by inconsistency while Reagan held SV to only 10 2 weeks ago. Oh did I mention Reagan has 7 starters back from that loss.
Special teams
Sufice to say I know little of Judson Poweress in this area, however this has been Reagan strong point all year. We have the best K/P in the state and tenacious cover and block teams.
Intangibles
Judson pride musnt be overlooked but they also mustnt come in thinking that Diamond J is going to win it for them. Reagan has to be reminded there season didnt end with SV.
Score
Reagan 35 Judson 7.....ok:D Reagan 17 Judson 13
jrock210
11-06-2006, 05:41 PM
does anyone know that reagan has never beat judson....even last yr when judson was expected to lose by 3 pts we ended up wining by 24 (i think)
Reagan had never beaten SV ethier.
trbandchic
11-06-2006, 05:48 PM
can reagan lose by like 3 and still make it to the play offs?.. is it a point thing this year,or is it just a W or L?
jrock210
11-06-2006, 05:49 PM
reagan has to win as far as im concerned
jrock210
11-06-2006, 05:50 PM
if they lose they will be out of the picture (seeing how it is the last game of the yr)
TrojanFan4Life
11-06-2006, 05:51 PM
ReaganRattler08:D
Good luck this week - my sister-in-law teaches at Reagan - so gotta go with the family loyalty thing and root for the Rattlers! :D
jrock210
11-06-2006, 05:53 PM
Good luck this week - my sister-in-law teaches at Reagan - so gotta go with the family loyalty thing and root for the Rattlers! :D
rattlers suck they got lucky against sv and they know it
rattlers suck they got lucky against sv and they know it
Jrock thinks like this they will lose
SV2005
11-06-2006, 06:01 PM
rattlers suck they got lucky against sv and they know it
I believe Reagan did get lucky as well, but reguardless they played SV on the right night to pull away with the win. If Reagan were to play them again the score would not be the same but of course that wont happen. Everyone just needs to move on and get ready for playoffs. I predict Judson 28-10. Make the best man win.
TrojanFan4Life
11-06-2006, 06:23 PM
rattlers suck they got lucky against sv and they know it
Never said they were the future state champs - just saying good luck - you know luck is a powerful thing - it can definitely change the future and not just in football - a little luck is needed in life- besides it is an accomplishment they have garnered that you haven't this year - and it is still a W and there is no side note saying, "Reagan sucks and just got lucky against us" :)
Mean DT
11-06-2006, 06:37 PM
can judson make the playoffs or will reagan come up with another big win?I think J-Rocks got enough in the tank to pull
this one off.:D
Gridiron Gopher
11-06-2006, 06:58 PM
That WAS a pretty speach
LOL!
SeguinMatadors
11-06-2006, 07:02 PM
rattlers suck they got lucky against sv and they know it
You suck. Your post have no substance.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 07:34 PM
I have watched it and you are right. There was a late hit which the strped shirts didnt call but they did call one on a qb wedge where Hill was still moving his feet and his knee hadnt touched.
it's ok that he moves his legs but when the whistle blows you can't throw the QB 4 seconds later. he can move all he wants when the whistle blows a play dead you can't hit anyone whether his knee touches or not.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 07:38 PM
I ve taken some time and Im ready to make a long post. Last year Reagan and Judson were in the same position vying for the last playoff spot. Reagan was experinceing our first taste of sucsess while Judson was hampered by an offense that wasnt clicking and a rash of injuries. Going into the game Reagan was 6-3 and Judson was 5-4. All Reagan had to do was not lose by 21 and we failed to do so. J-rocks offense clicked and they were healthy. Reagan imploded on itself while Judson beat us 38-13. This year will be different. Reagan has 7 definsive starters back whom remember that game. Reagan knows they belong on the same feild as Judson. We have our own pride.
Reagan O V Judson D
This is Judosns strongest point a D that relies on speed and tenacity to get to the ball. Some Reagans offense will play right into J-rocks defense disregarding what many precive to be a rather medicore pass offense. This will surprise some pepole
Reagan D V Judson O
I am excited about this Judson has been plagued by inconsistency while Reagan held SV to only 10 2 weeks ago. Oh did I mention Reagan has 7 starters back from that loss.
Special teams
Sufice to say I know little of Judson Poweress in this area, however this has been Reagan strong point all year. We have the best K/P in the state and tenacious cover and block teams.
Intangibles
Judson pride musnt be overlooked but they also mustnt come in thinking that Diamond J is going to win it for them. Reagan has to be reminded there season didnt end with SV.
Score
Reagan 35 Judson 7.....ok:D Reagan 17 Judson 13
sv definatley had the drives to score more then 10. penalties and one turnover that was obviously a bad call turnover gave reagans D the Big Breaks it took to hold SV to 10. judson wins this with smart hard play. Wetzel just doesn't have it in him.
nevaplayedk9
11-06-2006, 07:56 PM
I think J-Rocks got enough in the tank to pull
this one off.:D
where u been Mean DT ? good to see ya on the board:D
jrock210
11-06-2006, 08:05 PM
You suck. Your post have no substance.
no right now im just speeking what i think im an opiniative person...SO WHAT?!?!? is that a crime and whats with the personal attacks dude
Mac Is Back
11-06-2006, 08:38 PM
Lol...internet fighting is idiotic. Let's come to a peaceful conclusion now before our dignity goes into the drink alongside Madison's season. :D
sv definatley had the drives to score more then 10. penalties and one turnover that was obviously a bad call turnover gave reagans D the Big Breaks it took to hold SV to 10. judson wins this with smart hard play. Wetzel just doesn't have it in him.
wetzel has it in him
bullrock
11-06-2006, 09:00 PM
Judson, hard SMARTplay?:confused: :eek:
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:06 PM
wetzel has it in him
If he did Reagan would be a powerhouse in San Antonio. reagan has all the atheletes a team needs to be great. all the facilities and all the support a team coud possibly ask for. i personally went to many games for reagan this year. my girlfriend goes there. ive seen game tape after game tape. the players needed are there. when they feel they have the advantage they play like they have the advantage but wetzel doesn't push as hard as he should, poor play calling is what losses reagan most of their losing games. with someone who pushes reagan wins district in 26-5
Wetzel in the 2 years he has been here has completly turned around the program. (The 1st year doesnt count he had no off season or summer. I remember thinking I was going to play for Kincaid 2 weeks before school started) No one cared about Reagan football it was put on the back burner the school didnt care the students thought we were a bunch of rich jocks and they were right. Then Wetzel comes in and we go 6-4 our best record in history and narrowly miss the playoffs. and here we sit at 5-4 with a darned good chance to make them if we play Rattler football.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:19 PM
Wetzel in the 2 years he has been here has completly turned around the program. (The 1st year doesnt count he had no off season or summer. I remember thinking I was going to play for Kincaid 2 weeks before school started) No one cared about Reagan football it was put on the back burner the school didnt care the students thought we were a bunch of rich jocks and they were right. Then Wetzel comes in and we go 6-4 our best record in history and narrowly miss the playoffs. and here we sit at 5-4 with a darned good chance to make them if we play Rattler football.
define rattler football for me. i hope anyone could have turned reagan football around look at the difference in size speed and number of players for the year before wetzel, but he losses key games after key games. i give him and the rattlers as much credit as i can for beating us they played a great game, but i think it was a player thing not so much a coach thing. you only win the games everyone in the distict wins, lee wagner and roos. you win with us to keep false hopes alive. you will not beat judson and it won't even be close. Thats all i can say. you'll see what i mean on friday.
Well I think you are wrong. I think Reagan is going to shock the world.
Mac Is Back
11-06-2006, 09:25 PM
Well I think you are wrong. I think Reagan is going to shock the world.
Well, the Texas High School Football world, anyway.
as if there were any other:D
Mac Is Back
11-06-2006, 09:30 PM
as if there were any other:D
Indeed.
Other states think they know high school football. Psh.
Football is Texas' baby.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:32 PM
as if there were any other:D
what do you know about texas football outside of san antonio arent you suiting up for basketball every year in november. while we are making runs into december?
what do you know about texas football outside of san antonio arent you suiting up for basketball every year in november. while we are making runs into december?
Someone is a bit grumpy today.
DiamondJ2
11-06-2006, 09:40 PM
If he did Reagan would be a powerhouse in San Antonio. reagan has all the atheletes a team needs to be great. all the facilities and all the support a team coud possibly ask for. i personally went to many games for reagan this year. my girlfriend goes there. ive seen game tape after game tape. the players needed are there. when they feel they have the advantage they play like they have the advantage but wetzel doesn't push as hard as he should, poor play calling is what losses reagan most of their losing games. with someone who pushes reagan wins district in 26-5
See ReaganRattler, I'm not the only one who believes that Reagan should have been in the playoffs by now. Promise you, there are many others who feel the same way. wetzel is doing a good job, a whole lot better than kincaid.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:47 PM
See ReaganRattler, I'm not the only one who believes that Reagan should have been in the playoffs by now. Promise you, there are many others who feel the same way. wetzel is doing a good job, a whole lot better than kincaid.
i don't think kincaid has any buisness coaching. i do believe reagan has chance to do good in the future and i guess it's easy to judge someone when you have a coach like larry hill but i don't think wetzel should be the head coach at reagan.
jrock210
11-06-2006, 09:48 PM
as if there were any other:D
LOL ACTUALLY THE POLLS FOR THIS ONE ARE CLOSER THAN I THOUGHT:eek: reagan (from what im hearing) might come in with a close loss
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:52 PM
LOL ACTUALLY THE POLLS FOR THIS ONE ARE CLOSER THAN I THOUGHT:eek: reagan (from what im hearing) might come in with a close loss
i say it again it won't be close. Judson on top big.
i don't know is judson like us? we have not lost back to back since 1995 whens the last time judson lost back to back?
DiamondJ2
11-06-2006, 09:56 PM
i say it again it won't be close. Judson on top big.
i don't know is judson like us? we have not lost back to back since 1995 whens the last time judson lost back to back?
Lat year: Churchill & Madison.
SvFootball
11-06-2006, 09:57 PM
Lat year: Churchill & Madison.
oh ok. you think it would happen this year?
DiamondJ2
11-06-2006, 10:25 PM
No. Emphatically no.
Carson73
11-06-2006, 10:25 PM
So let me get this straight. Judson gets whooped on by a Top Ten team. That same top ten team lost in their forest fotress to Reagan.....and now Reagan's gonna lose to Judson?:confused:
fluke...refs....looking past you for Judosn....bad luck for SV...stars aligned right for Reagan....Reagan's superbowl....another game for SV...SV worries about playoffs.... Reagan worries about SV....put your gear up Reagan and get ready for hoop.
Well I think you are wrong. I think Reagan is going to shock the world.
Its going to take more than the diamond J to win the game.
SeguinMatadors
11-06-2006, 10:36 PM
Its going to take more than the diamond J to win the game.
Don't fight with these guys. Isn't worth your time. All that hype about Judson and you guys are sitting in the same seat as them. That is fact.
Mac Is Back
11-06-2006, 10:53 PM
Don't fight with these guys. Isn't worth your time. All that hype about Judson and you guys are sitting in the same seat as them. That is fact.
I have a sneaking suspicion that this game is HIGHLY overrated.
Or maybe it's just that I grow weary of hearing how Judson is either slipping or on the prowl again.
And for good measure, Seguin would win the Judson-Seguin playoff matchup.
DiamondJ2
11-06-2006, 11:02 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that this game is HIGHLY overrated.
Or maybe it's just that I grow weary of hearing how Judson is either slipping or on the prowl again.
And for good measure, Seguin would win the Judson-Seguin playoff matchup.
yeah, it has no implications, nah, none whatsoever.
I think what Mac is Back is trying to say is whoever wins will lose to Seguin. That however is for another time:D
zippy
11-06-2006, 11:06 PM
One thing I have learned about Judson is that you can NEVER count them out. Last year I was kind of pissed that they lucked out and made the playoffs. YES they got VERY lucky to get in. However, they went all the way to the finals and gave Trinity a decent fight. They have a coach over there that is one hell of a leader. He fights until the very end. If I were going to go to battle, and I got to pick my co-fighters, his short *** would be my first pick. He will get his troops playing their best next week, and in the playoffs, if they make it. I do not know if their best will be good enough, but I didnt think so last year either and I was wrong.
Reagan is going to be just as ready and just as commited, its going to be a damned good game mark my words.
DiamondJ2
11-06-2006, 11:44 PM
I think what Mac is Back is trying to say is whoever wins will lose to Seguin. That however is for another time:D
Never can tell. Mac not get by Austin. Assuming they win their final game.
jrock210
11-07-2006, 06:13 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that this game is HIGHLY overrated.
Or maybe it's just that I grow weary of hearing how Judson is either slipping or on the prowl again.
And for good measure, Seguin would win the Judson-Seguin playoff matchup.
like before the judson mac game i thought the game was way too underrated
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 06:51 PM
Honestly this game is a little overrated. I mean it does put Judson in the playoffs with a Win and even a loss if its not more than 19 points. Nobody this year or last has beat Judson by 19+ and believe me it wont happen against Reagan. Whats funny is how people are down on a Judson team who lost to SV, last time I checked SV was still ranked as one of the top 10 teams in the state.
jrock210
11-07-2006, 06:53 PM
Honestly this game is a little overrated. I mean it does put Judson in the playoffs with a Win and even a loss if its not more than 19 points. Nobody this year or last has beat Judson by 19+ and believe me it wont happen against Reagan. Whats funny is how people are down on a Judson team who lost to SV, last time I checked SV was still ranked as one of the top 10 teams in the state.
are u serious i didnt know that...what r they 9 or 10???
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 06:54 PM
are u serious i didnt know that...what r they 9 or 10???
I think they are 9, I think theyve been pretty much idle in that spot, they didnt move even with the loss to Reagan, everyone pretty much knows it was a fluke.
jrock210
11-07-2006, 06:55 PM
I think they are 9, I think theyve been pretty much idle in that spot
they were 6 and after the loss 13 and now i guess 9 not a bad season
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 06:58 PM
they were 6 and after the loss 13 and now i guess 9 not a bad season
Not at all and theyll do great in the D2 playoffs
LoneRocket
11-07-2006, 07:01 PM
Reagan is going to be just as ready and just as commited, its going to be a damned good game mark my words.
We would not want it any other way.
LoneRocket
11-07-2006, 07:03 PM
Honestly this game is a little overrated. I mean it does put Judson in the playoffs with a Win and even a loss if its not more than 19 points. Nobody this year or last has beat Judson by 19+ and believe me it wont happen against Reagan. Whats funny is how people are down on a Judson team who lost to SV, last time I checked SV was still ranked as one of the top 10 teams in the state.
We just need to win it would be a shame if we did not qualify for our own invitational.
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 07:12 PM
We just need to win it would be a shame if we did not qualify for our own invitational.
We'll win without a doubt and get ready for a nice playoff run. This puts JROC to the test, first Reagan to get some revenge and then Seguin to get some revenge too.
Reaganrattler07
11-07-2006, 07:15 PM
Honestly this game is a little overrated. I mean it does put Judson in the playoffs with a Win and even a loss if its not more than 19 points. Nobody this year or last has beat Judson by 19+ and believe me it wont happen against Reagan. Whats funny is how people are down on a Judson team who lost to SV, last time I checked SV was still ranked as one of the top 10 teams in the state.
First time I've heard that. Are you saying that if Mac somehow loses?
Mac Is Back
11-07-2006, 07:21 PM
I think what Mac is Back is trying to say is whoever wins will lose to Seguin. That however is for another time:D
Mostly. I picked Seguin to be the only team to beat 26-5A in the first round.
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 07:22 PM
First time I've heard that. Are you saying that if Mac somehow loses?
Im not concerned about the Mac game. What havent you heard of.
Reaganrattler07
11-07-2006, 07:23 PM
Im concerned about the Mac game. What havent you heard of.
Reagan having to win by positive points.
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 07:28 PM
Reagan having to win by positive points.
Its just like last year but reversed. Last year we had to win by 21 against you guys to get in. Mac will beat Lee, I dont have a doubt about that, right now JROC has 2 losses in district and I think you have 3 losses and Mac has 2 or 3 losses. So if we lose to you, that gives us both 3 losses and points will determine who goes on. Remember we beat Mac and you lost to Mac
Reaganrattler07
11-07-2006, 07:49 PM
Its just like last year but reversed. Last year we had to win by 21 against you guys to get in. Mac will beat Lee, I dont have a doubt about that, right now JROC has 2 losses in district and I think you have 3 losses and Mac has 2 or 3 losses. So if we lose to you, that gives us both 3 losses and points will determine who goes on. Remember we beat Mac and you lost to Mac
Pretty sure there won't be positive points. It will be head-to-head matchups. If Reagan wins both will be tied at 5-3 and with the head to head, Reagan will advance. Positive points, I don't believe will be that much. Depending on which game it will be based on.
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 07:51 PM
Pretty sure there won't be positive points. It will be head-to-head matchups. If Reagan wins both will be tied at 5-3 and with the head to head, Reagan will advance. Positive points, I don't believe will be that much. Depending on which game it will be based on.
It will be probably based on your loss to Mac by 18 since SV and Church are already in.
LoneRocket
11-07-2006, 07:53 PM
It will be probably based on your loss to Mac by 18 since SV and Church are already in.
Positive points was one of the reasons that I wanted Judson to keep trying to score last week.
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 08:05 PM
Positive points was one of the reasons that I wanted Judson to keep trying to score last week.
Does anyone know for sure, this is what Ive heard so far..Can someone confirm, how pos points will work in this weeks game.
nevaplayedk9
11-07-2006, 08:37 PM
the winner goes on, plain and simple, mac has 2 losses(sv and judson)
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:24 PM
judson is gonna beat reagan for numbers of reason....they r better, more speed, reagan jsut came off of a bye week, judson just suffered a loss to sv and wants to come back strong, judson has more clutch experience, and reagan doesnt deserve playoffs.... plain and simple
judson is gonna beat reagan for numbers of reason....they r better, more speed, reagan jsut came off of a bye week, judson just suffered a loss to sv and wants to come back strong, judson has more clutch experience, and reagan doesnt deserve playoffs.... plain and simple
Reagan deserves it if we win as does Judson. I also think a certian tailback quarterback combo would take issue with your speed comment...
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 09:31 PM
Reagan deserves it if we win as does Judson. I also think a certian tailback quarterback combo would take issue with your speed comment...
We invite the run..Welcome
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:32 PM
judson has them beat with skill and speed their speed on defense can match or better than tailback/qb for reagan.... judson d is much better than reagan and will hold reagan to less than 10
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 09:33 PM
3 and out
judson has them beat with skill and speed their speed on defense can match or better than tailback/qb for reagan.... judson d is much better than reagan and will hold reagan to less than 10
This would be the same D that gave 35 up to SV right? A team that Reagan only held to 10 right? I may just be arguing to argue but hey Im all giddy:D
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 09:37 PM
What the problem here is, Reagan seems to have a swollen head from that fluke of an SV win. But what you dont notice is the mystery of the bye week. Look at all the top teams that have lost after a bye week and the same will hold true come Saturday. SV, Church, Judson have all lost coming off a bye week. Im not sure about Mac though. Judson wins 28-13
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:38 PM
sv has a good offense they judson stopped the run which is all reagan has which will be enough for judson to kill reagan....also reagn has the coach that previously coached for sv so he knew what was coming every play and was screaming it to the defense and yall still couldnt stop sv's basic plays....the refs determined that game and u say they only missed 1 or 2 calls on reagn no more like 10
What the problem here is, Reagan seems to have a swollen head from that fluke of an SV win. But what you dont notice is the mystery of the bye week. Look at all the top teams that have lost after a bye week and the same will hold true come Saturday. SV, Church, Judson have all lost coming off a bye week. Im not sure about Mac though. Judson wins 28-13
Ha swollen head no sir. Reagan remembers last year. We know we need our minds right. Judson deserves our upmost respect. Reagan 17-Jrock 13
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 09:42 PM
This would be the same D that gave 35 up to SV right? A team that Reagan only held to 10 right? I may just be arguing to argue but hey Im all giddy:D
That happens when good teams play each other. As I can tell SV was way off that night by only putting 10 pts on the board and you guys were just so stellar to put up 14. Congrats on the win and we can go back and forth about points, but what about the teams youve have lost too and we beat. Mac being one. Your D got shredded for something like 38 and we gave up 7. Like I said we can go back and forth all night, but I love the attitude, I hope your squad has the same one.
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:45 PM
well put rocket man i like ur style haha judson did play a nice clean game agaisnt sv just as every team knows in 26-5a that sv feeeeeds off of mistakes by their opponent....judson THAT night had more than they needed but great game....
JRocketMan
11-07-2006, 09:48 PM
Ha swollen head no sir. Reagan remembers last year. We know we need our minds right. Judson deserves our upmost respect. Reagan 17-Jrock 13
Judson remembers last year as well and knowing they need to come out with a win, but better yet the scoreboard starts at 0-0 this time. JROC is fired up and wont be held to only 13. The only team that came close and still lost was Mac and that was 14-7.
On all points you are right but something people fail to realize is Reagan has had 2 seasons. The 2nd started with a W over Roosi since then we have gone 4-1 (the loss being agianst Madison 48-43) I would also tell you that if the Mac Reagan game doesnt get cancelled due to lightning Reagan wins but that of course doesnt matter now. Ive got all night do you?:D
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:51 PM
ive got all night to keep saying that judson has reagan beat no matter what u say about reagan reasons stated in previous post.... so after u lose u can come apologize.... haha:)
DiamondJ2
11-07-2006, 09:53 PM
This would be the same D that gave 35 up to SV right? A team that Reagan only held to 10 right? I may just be arguing to argue but hey Im all giddy:D
And Regan gave up 35 to Mac; 48 to Madison and 30 to Lee with the latter two being predominately running teams.
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 09:57 PM
reagan cant stop the run and judson can.....both teams run first and run second thats thier offense so judson wins....
We are going around in circles...does this mean I win?
#1texasgreat
11-07-2006, 10:06 PM
this means that u lose on the argument and that reagan loses period and for the i dont know how many years in a row that yall dont make playoffs.....
this means that u lose on the argument and that reagan loses period and for the i dont know how many years in a row that yall dont make playoffs.....
Im pretty sure other teams have had longer runs. Im pretty sure teams have been put in eaiser districts and Im pretty sure youre wrong.
SvFootball
11-07-2006, 11:04 PM
Im pretty sure other teams have had longer runs. Im pretty sure teams have been put in eaiser districts and Im pretty sure youre wrong.
I'm pretty sure this isn't going to be your year sry pack up, play basketball, give it another shot next year.
lets agree to disagree and wait till Saturday at 2
lonny23
11-08-2006, 12:56 AM
i say it again it won't be close. Judson on top big.
i don't know is judson like us? we have not lost back to back since 1995 whens the last time judson lost back to back?
Last year. Churchill and Madison. They lost 3 in a row in 2000. Beyond that, you might have to go back to the 70's to find 2 in a row.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 12:59 AM
One thing I have learned about Judson is that you can NEVER count them out. Last year I was kind of pissed that they lucked out and made the playoffs. YES they got VERY lucky to get in. However, they went all the way to the finals and gave Trinity a decent fight. They have a coach over there that is one hell of a leader. He fights until the very end. If I were going to go to battle, and I got to pick my co-fighters, his short *** would be my first pick. He will get his troops playing their best next week, and in the playoffs, if they make it. I do not know if their best will be good enough, but I didnt think so last year either and I was wrong.
I'd go to war for that man, too. My sneaky suspicion is that 26-5A is better than people realize and will unleash a load of hurt in the playoffs.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 01:06 AM
It will be probably based on your loss to Mac by 18 since SV and Church are already in.
Positive points only come into play if:
Reagan beats Judson
AND
Lee beat Mac
Judson +7 over Mac
Mac +18 over Reagan
Reagan-Judson?
Reagan gets 3rd if they beat Judson by 19 or more and Judson would get 4th. Reagan-Westlake, Judson-Seguin, SV-Churchill winner vs. San Marcos, SV-Churchill loser vs. Austin High.
Mac gets 3rd if Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 and Reagan would be 4th. Mac-Austin, SV-San Marcos, Reagan-Seguin, and Churchill-Westlake.
Judson gets 3rd if they beat Reagan and Mac would be 4th. Judson-Seguin, Churchill-Westlake, SV-San Marcos, Mac-Austin.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 01:10 AM
Reagan deserves it if we win as does Judson. I also think a certian tailback quarterback combo would take issue with your speed comment...
I agree Reagan deserves it if they win.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 01:14 AM
Im pretty sure other teams have had longer runs. Im pretty sure teams have been put in eaiser districts and Im pretty sure youre wrong.
Yeah, like Lubbock since 1975!:D
svhorns
11-08-2006, 01:23 AM
nm... my bad...
Mac Is Back
11-08-2006, 08:00 AM
On all points you are right but something people fail to realize is Reagan has had 2 seasons. The 2nd started with a W over Roosi since then we have gone 4-1 (the loss being agianst Madison 48-43) I would also tell you that if the Mac Reagan game doesnt get cancelled due to lightning Reagan wins but that of course doesnt matter now. Ive got all night do you?:D
I beg to differ, my good sir.
Mac Is Back
11-08-2006, 08:03 AM
It will be probably based on your loss to Mac by 18 since SV and Church are already in.
If Mac loses to Lee, then Reagan must beat Judson by 19 or more for BOTH Reagan and Judson to get in and eliminate Mac - because Mac beat Reagan by 18 points.
But if (and when :D ) Mac beats Lee, then all Reagan has to do is beat Judson to get in behind Mac.
LoneRocket
11-08-2006, 10:00 AM
If Mac loses to Lee, then Reagan must beat Judson by 19 or more for BOTH Reagan and Judson to get in and eliminate Mac - because Mac beat Reagan by 18 points.
But if (and when :D ) Mac beats Lee, then all Reagan has to do is beat Judson to get in behind Mac.
I think Mac needs to start their 3rd string team and rest their starters to give them a chance to heal up. :rolleyes:
J-Rock Mom
11-08-2006, 10:11 AM
I think Mac needs to start their 3rd string team and rest their starters to give them a chance to heal up. :rolleyes:
I have a feeling that Mac will have not problem with Lee but just remember this is 26-5a you really can't take any team lightly, look what happened to SV vs Reagan.
Go Brahamas Go!!
Best of luck in the Playoffs
LoneRocket
11-08-2006, 10:13 AM
I have a feeling that Mac will have not problem with Lee but just remember this is 26-5a you really can't take any team lightly, look what happened to SV vs Reagan.
Go Brahamas Go!!
Best of luck in the Playoffs
I think they need to look ahead to next week and put their starters in street clothes.:D
bullrock
11-08-2006, 10:26 AM
Let me get this straight. If Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 points, Judson misses the playoffs? That's what I'm reading in Lonnys assessment. If they beat Judson by more than 19 points then we are in? If that's the case, and I question it is, then we also need to put our third string in and rest our starters.:confused:
JRocketMan
11-08-2006, 11:18 AM
Let me get this straight. If Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 points, Judson misses the playoffs? That's what I'm reading in Lonnys assessment. If they beat Judson by more than 19 points then we are in? If that's the case, and I question it is, then we also need to put our third string in and rest our starters.:confused:
Sounds crazy doent it. But per someone at Judson, they dont care about the points and are ready to play smashmouth football with Reagan and Win, so theirs no head to head. Im glad Judson can control their own fate and I know they will handle biz against Reagan. That bye week could be a killer, so far it has been for a majority of teams, JROC, Church and SV
Let me get this straight. If Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 points, Judson misses the playoffs? That's what I'm reading in Lonnys assessment. If they beat Judson by more than 19 points then we are in? If that's the case, and I question it is, then we also need to put our third string in and rest our starters.:confused:
Do you really think Rackley would really take a dive to back into the playoffs? This would be a disgrace to the past 26 years of the Judson dynasty. He already has a state title. I think he would rather lose straight up to Reagan and miss the playoffs, than to "weasel" his way into the playoffs. He and Judson are above that.
Any Judson fans think Rackley would or should take a dive (assuming Mac loses to 1-6 Lee)?
J-Rock Mom
11-08-2006, 11:50 AM
Do you really think Rackley would really take a dive to back into the playoffs? This would be a disgrace to the past 26 years of the Judson dynasty. He already has a state title. I think he would rather lose straight up to Reagan and miss the playoffs, than to "weasel" his way into the playoffs. He and Judson are above that.
Any Judson fans think Rackley would or should take a dive (assuming Mac loses to 1-6 Lee)?
Not just NO but H$!! NO!!!!!!!
zippy
11-08-2006, 12:34 PM
I have a feeling that Mac will have not problem with Lee but just remember this is 26-5a you really can't take any team lightly, look what happened to SV vs Reagan.
Go Brahamas Go!!
Best of luck in the Playoffs
SV/Reagan really can't be compared to Mac/Lee. At least not in this point for Mac. SV should have beat Reagan, and if they had faced them the week after or prior, I am sure they would have. Mac should handle Lee with ease. Even if Mac played their freshman on defense, I still think Mac could outscore them for the win. It should be 50-14, I would be very surprised if it was 35-20, I cant imagine a Lee win.
J-Rock Mom
11-08-2006, 12:46 PM
SV/Reagan really can't be compared to Mac/Lee. At least not in this point for Mac. SV should have beat Reagan, and if they had faced them the week after or prior, I am sure they would have. Mac should handle Lee with ease. Even if Mac played their freshman on defense, I still think Mac could outscore them for the win. It should be 50-14, I would be very surprised if it was 35-20, I cant imagine a Lee win.
I cant imagine Lee winning either, but no team should take another team lightly becuz once this happens they will get slapped.
If Mac loses to Lee, then Reagan must beat Judson by 19 or more for BOTH Reagan and Judson to get in and eliminate Mac - because Mac beat Reagan by 18 points.
But if (and when :D ) Mac beats Lee, then all Reagan has to do is beat Judson to get in behind Mac.
well im rooting for yall now. I do find it funny that SV berates theb Judson fans for complaining about there loss to SV when they do the same with there loss to Reagan:rolleyes:
atwelljroc
11-08-2006, 05:34 PM
SV/Reagan really can't be compared to Mac/Lee. At least not in this point for Mac. SV should have beat Reagan, and if they had faced them the week after or prior, I am sure they would have. Mac should handle Lee with ease. Even if Mac played their freshman on defense, I still think Mac could outscore them for the win. It should be 50-14, I would be very surprised if it was 35-20, I cant imagine a Lee win.
Everyone knows, that if SVand Reagan met 10 more times, SV would win all 10. They had a bad game and got beat, simple as that. Mistakes cost games, example Judson/SV this year. With that said, if Judson does not make mistakes they will win this game for sure. If they make some, then it is up for grabs. WE all want to believe that our team is the greatest there is, but reality has a way of slapping us in the face. It will all be decided on the field between the white lines, nuf said........
jrock210
11-08-2006, 05:54 PM
Everyone knows, that if SVand Reagan met 10 more times, SV would win all 10. They had a bad game and got beat, simple as that. Mistakes cost games, example Judson/SV this year. With that said, if Judson does not make mistakes they will win this game for sure. If they make some, then it is up for grabs. WE all want to believe that our team is the greatest there is, but reality has a way of slapping us in the face. It will all be decided on the field between the white lines, nuf said........
and if they dont make mistakes it will be close i think a blow out but of course like most judson fans i havent seen reagan play this yr
and if they dont make mistakes it will be close i think a blow out but of course like most judson fans i havent seen reagan play this yr
So you really cant be sure of anything. The SV game awoke a sleeping giant:D
jrock210
11-08-2006, 06:04 PM
So you really cant be sure of anything. The SV game awoke a sleeping giant:D
lol well 2 be honest u cant be suire of anything in 26 5A its dangerous ground u know
Gridiron Gopher
11-08-2006, 07:01 PM
Positive points only come into play if:
Reagan beats Judson
AND
Lee beat Mac
Judson +7 over Mac
Mac +18 over Reagan
Reagan-Judson?
Reagan gets 3rd if they beat Judson by 19 or more and Judson would get 4th. Reagan-Westlake, Judson-Seguin, SV-Churchill winner vs. San Marcos, SV-Churchill loser vs. Austin High.
[B]Mac gets 3rd if Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 and Reagan would be 4th. Mac-Austin, SV-San Marcos, Reagan-Seguin, and Churchill-Westlake.
Judson gets 3rd if they beat Reagan and Mac would be 4th. Judson-Seguin, Churchill-Westlake, SV-San Marcos, Mac-Austin.
Actually none of this is totally correct. If Mac and Judson win and Churchill were to lose to SV then Mac would finish 2nd with the points difference in a 3-way tie. If Mac and Reagan win and Churchill loses...again Mac would finish 2nd with the H2H win over Churchill.
#1texasgreat
11-08-2006, 09:06 PM
Im pretty sure other teams have had longer runs. Im pretty sure teams have been put in eaiser districts and Im pretty sure youre wrong.
im not talking about other teams im talking about reagan, im not talking about distrcits im talking about 26-5a that one that should matter to u, pretty sure im right judson can stop the run reagan cant sorry buddy u lose, game over,
we will see. I have faith
realREAGANrattler
11-08-2006, 09:10 PM
GO REAGAN!!!!
WOOO!!!!!
jrock210
11-08-2006, 09:20 PM
NO REAGAN!!!!
WOOO!!!!!
GO JUDSON!!!!!
WOOOO!!!!!
LETS WIN THIS GAME!!!!
HEY! HEY!
#1texasgreat
11-08-2006, 09:20 PM
Go Judson Beat Em Down!
catman
11-08-2006, 09:47 PM
Will Reagan's band be at the game and will they perform their UIL routine?
jrock210
11-08-2006, 09:56 PM
Will Reagan's band be at the game and will they perform their UIL routine?
i hope reagans band is awesome but i like judsons show better than reagans this yr
catman
11-08-2006, 10:28 PM
i hope reagans band is awesome but i like judsons show better than reagans this yr
Yeah, I think I saw Judson's band when the Rockets played MacArthur. I have never seen Reagan before.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 10:32 PM
Let me get this straight. If Reagan beats Judson by less than 19 points, Judson misses the playoffs? That's what I'm reading in Lonnys assessment. If they beat Judson by more than 19 points then we are in? If that's the case, and I question it is, then we also need to put our third string in and rest our starters.:confused:
The points scenario is true and this got me to thinking a few days ago. I really don't think Judson would tank to make sure they lost by 19. I think they'll keep playing hard to win and let the chips fall where they may. Losing to make the playoffs is unethical in my books and won't get you ahead in the long run.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 10:34 PM
Sounds crazy doent it. But per someone at Judson, they dont care about the points and are ready to play smashmouth football with Reagan and Win, so theirs no head to head. Im glad Judson can control their own fate and I know they will handle biz against Reagan. That bye week could be a killer, so far it has been for a majority of teams, JROC, Church and SV
Yep, that's exactly what I expected them to do. They want to come in there and punish Reagan.
jrock210
11-08-2006, 10:34 PM
The points scenario is true and this got me to thinking a few days ago. I really don't think Judson would tank to make sure they lost by 19. I think they'll keep playing hard to win and let the chips fall where they may. Losing to make the playoffs is unethical in my books and won't get you ahead in the long run.
judson...lose on purpose....never going to happen
lonny23
11-08-2006, 10:37 PM
Do you really think Rackley would really take a dive to back into the playoffs? This would be a disgrace to the past 26 years of the Judson dynasty. He already has a state title. I think he would rather lose straight up to Reagan and miss the playoffs, than to "weasel" his way into the playoffs. He and Judson are above that.
Any Judson fans think Rackley would or should take a dive (assuming Mac loses to 1-6 Lee)?
I'd be mad if he took a dive to make the playoffs. I'd rather miss the playoffs than take a dive. Don't get me wrong about this. If Judson did lose by 19 and made the playoffs and we can feel certain that they didn't take a dive, I wouldn't feel good about the playoffs, but I'd take it considering that meant Mac lost to Lee. It's not like they deserved it any more than Judson did.
lonny23
11-08-2006, 10:39 PM
well im rooting for yall now. I do find it funny that SV berates theb Judson fans for complaining about there loss to SV when they do the same with there loss to Reagan:rolleyes:
Judson fans made excuses for SV's loss and none of us even made fun of them for losing. How soon they forget (again and again).
lonny23
11-08-2006, 10:42 PM
Actually none of this is totally correct. If Mac and Judson win and Churchill were to lose to SV then Mac would finish 2nd with the points difference in a 3-way tie. If Mac and Reagan win and Churchill loses...again Mac would finish 2nd with the H2H win over Churchill.
That's true. I forgot about Churchill and 2nd Place.
jrock210
11-08-2006, 11:05 PM
That's true. I forgot about Churchill and 2nd Place.
ya chucrhill played pretty hard this yr but i dont think they should have a district championship
lonny23
11-09-2006, 12:20 AM
ya chucrhill played pretty hard this yr but i dont think they should have a district championship
If they beat SV, they deserve it. Whoever is better will be decided come playoff time and you have to beat the teams you face.
Mac Is Back
11-09-2006, 07:57 AM
judson...lose on purpose....never going to happen
If Judson loses on purpose, they're out - there's no way Judson would ever do that anyway, but their season is on the line.
RedRage00
11-09-2006, 08:25 AM
Go Judson Beat Em Down!
Someone has a lot of hatred towards Reagan LOL
RR
Reaganrattler07
11-09-2006, 09:32 AM
we will see. I have faith
As do we all.
jrock210
11-09-2006, 09:35 AM
As do we all.
we have a tradition do u have that also?
According to the Express-news, If Mac loses to Lee, Reagan must beat Judson by 7 or more points to make the playoffs. If Reagan wins by 6 or less, Mac and Judson advance.
nevaplayedk9
11-09-2006, 10:46 AM
we have a tradition do u have that also?
taking cheap shots does not show good sportsmanship or respect. c'mon guys rocket pride is about respect, discipline and class, let us as fans show that as well!!!!!
we have a tradition do u have that also?
Id like to start one this week
atwelljroc
11-09-2006, 05:24 PM
Id like to start one this week
There is no doubt that we as fans would like to see our own team come out ahead, but reality is all we can do is give our best wishes and watch them play. As a parent, I pray no one gets hurt and that they play to the best of their God given talent. I would agree that Reagan is on their way to being a playoff team, just not this year. Judson's defense, once again, will be the difference in the game, so good luck to Reagan and hope that we see a good game.J-Roc for life!!!
jrock210
11-09-2006, 05:27 PM
There is no doubt that we as fans would like to see our own team come out ahead, but reality is all we can do is give our best wishes and watch them play. As a parent, I pray no one gets hurt and that they play to the best of their God given talent. I would agree that Reagan is on their way to being a playoff team, just not this year. Judson's defense, once again, will be the difference in the game, so good luck to Reagan and hope that we see a good game.J-Roc for life!!!
ya i know that ppl have had career ending hits and everything but to me this arguing on here is just pay time not serious...i wasnt taking a cheap shot i was just stating a point that we have a tradition that is aways on our side....i do believe that the sporting world would be better with no injuries but u cant have a perfect world
There is no doubt that we as fans would like to see our own team come out ahead, but reality is all we can do is give our best wishes and watch them play. As a parent, I pray no one gets hurt and that they play to the best of their God given talent. I would agree that Reagan is on their way to being a playoff team, just not this year. Judson's defense, once again, will be the difference in the game, so good luck to Reagan and hope that we see a good game.
Thats all Agreeable
GO BIG GREEN SILVER AND BLACK
atwelljroc
11-09-2006, 05:34 PM
ya i know that ppl have had career ending hits and everything but to me this arguing on here is just pay time not serious...i wasnt taking a cheap shot i was just stating a point that we have a tradition that is aways on our side....i do believe that the sporting world would be better with no injuries but u cant have a perfect world
I know that no cheap shot was meant, we as Judson fans do not even consider doing something like that, it is just like the ones saying Judson would lose on purpose, it is not in our character. We unlike some other schools (no names) Reagan, have nothing but hard working lower income people trying to support our kids to something that we as kids never were. Oh I played, and thought I was pretty good, but these kids at Judson, its not just being good, it is a feeling, an almost unspoken code.....Give your best all the time. So, cheap shot.......no way. Reagan, I again hope one day your school and your kids have the kind of tradition that Judson has, but you have many years to go and really need to work on it.........J-Roc for life!!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.